1887
Volume 12, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

As an Introduction to the present issue, this article explores the workings of discourse and dialogue in communicating and through language in vast social and cultural contexts. In what follows, discourse analysis is presented as a dialogue-oriented field that arose at the crossroads of linguistics and social sciences to overcome the limitations of traditional, autonomous linguistics. The dialogic profile of discourse analysis is demonstrated along three exploratory vectors that recognise dialogism as an inseparable criterion in the study of discourse. Accordingly, it will be shown that dialogicity is what lies at the core of discourse organization, discourse practice and discourse worlds. The discussion of the dialogic provenance and orientation of discourse (analysis) is closed by the volume presentation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00121.int
2022-08-08
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bakhtin, Mikhail
    1986Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 1990The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bazerman, Charles
    2012 “Genre as Social Action.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. byJames P. Gee and Michael Handford, 226–238. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhatia, Vijay
    1993Analysing Genre. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Biber, Douglas
    1988Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2012 “Register and Discourse Analysis.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. byJames P. Gee and Michael Handford, 191–208. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bondi, Marina
    2017 “Corpus Linguistics.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. byEdda Weigand, 46–61. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Boylan, Alexis L.
    2020Visual Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/12220.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12220.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown, Gillian and George Yule
    1983Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511805226
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805226 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bublitz, Wolfram, Uta Lenk and Eija Ventola
    (eds.) 1999Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.63
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.63 [Google Scholar]
  11. Campbell, Charles P.
    1998 “Rhetorical Ethos: A Bridge between High-Context and Low-Context Cultures?” InThe Cultural Context in Business Communication, ed. bySusanne Niemeier, Charles P. Campbell and René Dirven, 31–47. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.87.04cam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.87.04cam [Google Scholar]
  12. Cap, Piotr
    2013Proximization. The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.232
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.232 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cap, Piotr and Urszula Okulska
    (eds.) 2013Analysing Genres in Political Communication. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.50
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.50 [Google Scholar]
  14. Chafe, Wallace
    1982 “Integration and Involvement in Speaking, Writing, and Oral Literature.” InSpoken and Written Language, ed. byDeborah Tannen, 35–55. Norwood: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 1994Discourse, Consciousness and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 2015 “Constraining and Guiding the Flow of Discourse.” InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Volume 1 (2nd edition), ed. byDeborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton and Deborah Schiffrin, 391–405. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118584194.ch18
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch18 [Google Scholar]
  17. Cheng, Winnie and Phoenix Lam
    2012 “Prosody in Discourse.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. byJames P. Gee and Michael Handford, 271–284. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Chilton, Paul
    2004Analysing Political Discourse. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203561218
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218 [Google Scholar]
  19. Cook, Guy
    1989Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Cotter, Colleen
    2015 “Discourse and Media.” InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Volume 2 (2nd edition), ed. byDeborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton and Deborah Schiffrin, 795–821. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118584194.ch37
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch37 [Google Scholar]
  21. Coulthard, Malcolm
    1985An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
    2015 “Intonation and Discourse.” InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Volume1 (2nd edition), ed. byDeborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton and Deborah Schiffrin, 82–104. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Margaret Selting
    (eds.) 1996Prosody in Conversation: Interactional Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511597862
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597862 [Google Scholar]
  24. Cumming, Susanna and Tsuyoshi Ono
    1997 “Discourse and Grammar.” InDiscourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Volume1. Discourse as Structure and Process, ed. byTeun A. van Dijk, 112–137. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446221884.n4
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221884.n4 [Google Scholar]
  25. Daneš, František
    (ed.) 1974Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective. The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783111676524
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111676524 [Google Scholar]
  26. De Fina, Anna and Barbara Johnstone
    2015 “Discourse Analysis and Narrative.” InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Volume 1 (2nd edition), ed. byDeborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton and Deborah Schiffrin, 152–167. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118584194.ch7
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch7 [Google Scholar]
  27. Dijk, Teun A. van
    1980Macrostructures. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 1985 “Introduction: Discourse Analysis as a New Cross-Discipline.” InHandbook of Discourse Analysis. Volume1. Disciplines of Discourse, ed. byTeun A. van Dijk, 1–10. London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 1988News as Discourse. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 1997a “The Study of Discourse.” InDiscourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Volume1. Discourse as Structure and Process, ed. byTeun A. van Dijk, 1–34. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446221884.n1
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221884.n1 [Google Scholar]
  31. 1997b “Discourse as Interaction in Society.” InDiscourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Volume2. Discourse as Social Interaction, ed. byTeun A. van Dijk, 1–37. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446221884
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221884 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2008Discourse and Context. A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511481499
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481499 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2009Society and Discourse. How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511575273
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575273 [Google Scholar]
  34. Dijk, Teun A. van and Walter Kintsch
    1983Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Downing, Angela
    2001 “Thematic Progression as a Functional Resource in Analysing Texts.” Circle of Linguistics Applied to Communication5. Available at: https://webs.ucm.es/info/circulo/no5/downing.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Du Bois, John W.
    2014 “Towards a Dialogic Syntax.” Cognitive Linguistics25: 359–410. 10.1515/cog‑2014‑0024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0024 [Google Scholar]
  37. Duszak, Anna
    2004 “Globalisation and Interdiscursivity: On the Spread of Global Intertexts.” InSpeaking from the Margin. Global English from a European Perspective, ed. byAnna Duszak and Urszula Okulska, 117–132. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 2010 “Re-reading the Communist Past in Poland: The Dynamics of Us and Them.” InGlobalization, Discourse, Media. In a Critical Perspective, ed. byAnna Duszak, Juliane House and Łukasz Kumięga, 191–210. Warsaw: Warsaw University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. (ed.) 1997Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110821048
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110821048 [Google Scholar]
  40. Duszak, Anna and Grzegorz Kowalski
    (eds.) 2013Systemowo-funkcjonalna analiza dyskursu [Systemic-Functional Discourse Analysis]. Kraków: Universitas.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. (eds.) 2015Academic (Inter)Genres: Between Texts, Contexts and Identities. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑03984‑9
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-03984-9 [Google Scholar]
  42. Duszak, Anna and Urszula Okulska
    (eds.) 2004Speaking from the Margin. Global English from a European Perspective. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Duszak, Anna, Juliane House and Łukasz Kumięga
    (eds.) 2010Globalization, Discourse, Media. In a Critical Perspective. Warsaw: Warsaw University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Eemeren, Frans H. van, Rob Grootendorst, Sally Jackson and Scott Jacobs
    1997 “Argumentation.” InDiscourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Volume 1. Discourse as Structure and Process, ed. byTeun A. van Dijk, 208–229. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446221884.n8
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221884.n8 [Google Scholar]
  45. Eggins, Susan and James Martin
    1997 “Genres and Registers of Discourse.” InDiscourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Volume1. Discourse as Structure and Process, ed. byTeun A. van Dijk, 230–256. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446221884.n9
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221884.n9 [Google Scholar]
  46. Eggins, Susan and Diana Slade
    1997Analysing Causal Conversation. London: Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Fairclough, Norman
    1992Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 2001Language and Power. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. 2003Analysing Discourse. Textual Analysis for Social Research. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203697078
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078 [Google Scholar]
  50. Firbas, Jan
    1992Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511597817
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597817 [Google Scholar]
  51. Galtung, Johan
    1981 “Structure, Culture, and Intellectual style: An Essay Comparing Saxonic, Teutonic, Gallic and Nipponic Approaches.” Social Science Information20/6: 817–856. 10.1177/053901848102000601
    https://doi.org/10.1177/053901848102000601 [Google Scholar]
  52. Gee, James P.
    2017 “Discourse Analysis.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. byEdda Weigand, 62–77. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Gee, James P. and Michael Handford
    2012 “Introduction.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. byJames P. Gee and Michael Handford, 1–6. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Giles, Howard, Justine Coupland and Nicholas Coupland
    1991Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511663673
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663673 [Google Scholar]
  55. Goffman, Erving
    1990The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Graf, Eva-Maria, Marlene Sator and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy
    (eds.) 2014Discourses of Helping Professions. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Gumperz, John
    1982Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611834
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834 [Google Scholar]
  58. Gundel, Jeanette K. and Thorstein Fretheim
    2005 “Information Structure.” InHandbook of Pragmatics Online, ed. byJef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert and Chris Bulcaen. John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1987 “Language and the Order of Nature.” InThe Linguistics of Writing. Arguments between Language and Literature, ed. byNigel Fabb, Derek Attridge, Alan Durant and Colin MacCabe, 135–154. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Halliday, M. A. K. and Ruqaiya Hasan
    1989Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Halliday, M. A. K. and James Martin
    (eds.) 1993Writing Science. Literacy and Discursive Power. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Harré, Rom and Luk van Langenhove
    (eds.) 1999Positioning Theory. Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Hart, Christopher
    2014Discourse, Grammar and Ideology. Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Hodges, Adam
    2015 “Intertextuality in Discourse.” InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Volume1 (2nd edition), ed. byDeborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton and Deborah Schiffrin, 42–60. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Jewitt, Carey
    (ed.) 2014The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Kecskes, Istvan
    2017 “From Pragmatics to Dialogue.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. byEdda Weigand, 78–92. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Kress, Gunther
    2012 “Multimodal Discourse Analysis.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. byJames P. Gee and Michael Handford, 35–50. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Leeuwen, Theo van
    2008Discourse and Practice. New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  69. 2015 “Multimodality.” InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Volume 1 (2nd edition), ed. byDeborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton and Deborah Schiffrin, 447–465. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118584194.ch21
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch21 [Google Scholar]
  70. Linell, Per
    2017 “Intersubjectivity in Dialogue.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. byEdda Weigand, 109–126. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Lorda, Clara-Ubaldina and Patrick Zabalbeascoa
    (eds.) 2012Spaces of Polyphony. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.15
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.15 [Google Scholar]
  72. Martin, James
    2008 “Intermodal Reconciliation.” InNew Literacies and the English Curriculum: Multimodal Perspectives, ed. byLen Unsworth, 112–148. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. 2015 “Cohesion and Texture.” InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Volume1 (2nd edition), ed. byDeborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton and Deborah Schiffrin, 61–81. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Martin, James and Maree Stenglin
    2006 “Materializing Reconciliation: Negotiating Difference in a Transcolonial Exhibition.” InNew Directions in the Analysis of Multimodal Discourse, ed. byTerry D. Royce and Wendy Bowcher, 215–238. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Maschler, Yael and Deborah Schiffrin
    2015 “Discourse Markers: Language, Meaning, and Context.” InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Volume1 (2nd edition), ed. byDeborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton and Deborah Schiffrin, 189–221. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Mauranen, Anna
    1993Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric: A Textlinguistic Study. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. McCarthy, Michael and Ronald Carter
    1994Language as Discourse: Perspectives for Language Teaching. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Mondada, Lorenza
    2017 “Conversation Analysis.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. byEdda Weigand, 26–45. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Ochs, Elinor
    1997 “Narrative.” InDiscourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Volume 1. Discourse as Structure and Process, ed. byTeun A. van Dijk, 185–207. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446221884.n7
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221884.n7 [Google Scholar]
  80. O’Connell, Daniel and Sabine Kowal
    2005 “Transcription systems for spoken discourse.” InHandbook of Pragmatics Online, ed. byJef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert and Chris Bulcaen. John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Okulska, Urszula
    2004 “Globalisation on the Polish Radio. The Case of Political Interviews.” InSpeaking from the Margin. Global English from a European Perspective, ed. byAnna Duszak and Urszula Okulska, 239–259. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. 2006 “English Borrowings in the Polish Media. Assimilation Processes and Gender.” Kwartalnik Neofilologiczny53/3: 208–231.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. 2016 “Science and Ethics in the Knowledge Society: A Rhetorical Perspective.” InRhetoric, Discourse and Knowledge, ed. byMaria Załęska and Urszula Okulska, 71–100. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Okulska, Urszula and Piotr Cap
    (eds.) 2010Perspectives in Politics and Discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.36
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.36 [Google Scholar]
  85. Ong, Walter J.
    1982Orality and Literacy. The Technologizing of the Word. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203328064
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203328064 [Google Scholar]
  86. Östman, Jan-Ola and Tuija Virtanen
    2006 “Discourse Analysis.” InHandbook of Pragmatics Online, ed. byJef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert and Chris Bulcaen. John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Philips, Susan
    2015 “Language Ideologies.” InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Volume 2 (2nd edition), ed. byDeborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton and Deborah Schiffrin, 557–575. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118584194.ch26
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch26 [Google Scholar]
  88. Prigogine, Ilya and Isabelle Stengers
    1985Order out of Chaos. Man’s New Dialogue with Nature. London: Fontana.
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Reisigl, Martin
    2007 “Discrimination in Discourses.” InHandbook of Intercultural Communication, ed. byHelga Kotthoff and Helen Spencer-Oatey, 365–394. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198584.4.365
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198584.4.365 [Google Scholar]
  90. Reisigl, Martin and Ruth Wodak
    2001Discourse and Discrimination. Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Rose, David
    2012 “Genre in the Sydney School.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. byJames P. Gee and Michael Handford, 209–225. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Sandig, Barbara and Margaret Selting
    1997 “Discourse Styles.” InDiscourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Volume1. Discourse as Structure and Process, ed. byTeun A. van Dijk, 138–155. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446221884.n5
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221884.n5 [Google Scholar]
  93. Schleppegrell, Mary J.
    2012 “Systemic Functional Linguistics.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. byJames P. Gee and Michael Handford, 21–34. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Scollon, Ron
    1998Mediated Discourse as Social Interaction. A Study of News Discourse. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Scollon, Ron and Suzanne Wong Scollon
    2001Intercultural Communication. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Swales, John
    1990Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Tabakowska, Elżbieta
    2005 “Iconicity.” InHandbook of Pragmatics Online, ed. byJef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert and Chris Bulcaen. John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Tannen, Deborah
    1998The Argument Culture. Moving from Debate to Dialogue. New York: Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Thornborrow, Joanna
    2012 “Narrative Analysis.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. byJames P. Gee and Michael Handford, 51–65. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Trosborg, Anna
    1997 “Text Typology: Register, Genre and Text Type.” InText Typology and Translation, ed. byAnna Trosborg, 3–23. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.26.03tro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.26.03tro [Google Scholar]
  101. Vater, Heinz
    2006 “Autonomy and Interdisciplinarity in Different Areas of Linguistics.” InBridges and Barriers in Metalinguistic Discourse, ed. byAnna Duszak and Urszula Okulska, 23–41. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Wårvik, Brita
    1990 “On the History of Grounding Markers in English Narrative: Style or Typology?” InHistorical Linguistics 1987, ed. byHenning Andersen and Konrad Koerner, 531–542. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.66.36war
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.66.36war [Google Scholar]
  103. Weigand, Edda
    2009Language as Dialogue. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.5 [Google Scholar]
  104. 2010Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]
  105. 2017a “The State of the Art.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. byEdda Weigand, 1–7. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  106. 2017b “The Mixed Game Model: A Holistic Theory.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. byEdda Weigand, 174–194. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  107. 2017c “The Concept of Language in an Utterance Grammar.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. byEdda Weigand, 214–233. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  108. 2021 “Language and dialogue in philosophy and science.” Intercultural Pragmatics18/4: 533–561. 10.1515/ip‑2021‑4005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2021-4005 [Google Scholar]
  109. (ed.) 2017The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  110. Wodak, Ruth
    2003 “Populist Discourses. The Rhetoric of Exclusion in Written Genres.” Document Design4/2, 132–148. 10.1075/dd.4.2.04wod
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dd.4.2.04wod [Google Scholar]
  111. Wodak, Ruth and Paul Chilton
    (eds.) 2005A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.13
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.13 [Google Scholar]
  112. Wong-Scollon, Susie and Ingrid de Saint-Georges
    2012 “Mediated Discourse Analysis.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. byJames P. Gee and Michael Handford, 66–78. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  113. Załęska, Maria and Urszula Okulska
    (eds.) 2016Rhetoric, Discourse and Knowledge. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑05993‑9
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-05993-9 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00121.int
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
Keyword(s): action; context; dialogue analysis; discourse analysis; diversity; language use; meaning; unity
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error