1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Language and Dialogue
  4. Volume 12, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 12, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This essay demarcates between and among schools of dialogue, differentiating relational points of meaning origins. Contrasting dialogic roots constitute distinctions in social meaning and signification. Schools of dialogue embrace the relational interplay of address and response, with exchanges consisting of multiple simultaneous conversations. Their co-presence announces dialogic hypertextuality, which acknowledges and affirms multiple simultaneous conversations and meanings within a given encounter. No single interpreter or meaning captures dialogic existence; meanings push the boundaries of any exchange, before, during, and after. Dialogic exchanges embody multiple discourses that call forth distinctive dimensions of meaning. As one speaks, multiple conversations, inclusive of previous and anticipatory dialogues, shape us. Conversation between and among persons dwells within an existential reality of dialogic hypertextuality.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00122.arn
2022-08-08
2024-12-10

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ld.00122.arn
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, Rob, Leslie A. Baxter, and Kenneth N. Cissna
    2004 “Texts and Contexts of Dialogue.” InDialogue: Theorizing Difference in Communication Studies, ed. byRob Anderson, Leslie A. Baxter, and Kenneth N. Cissna, 1–17. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. 10.4135/9781483328683.n1
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483328683.n1 [Google Scholar]
  2. Arendt, Hannah
    (1929) 1996 Love and Saint Augustine. Edited byJoanna V. Scott and Judith C. Stark. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. 1951 The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Schocken Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. (1958) 1998 The Human Condition. 2nd ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. 1963 Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. New York: Viking Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. 1968 Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought. New York: Viking.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. (1982) 1992 Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy. Edited byRonald Beiner. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226231785.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226231785.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  8. Aristotle
    Aristotle 1994 Nicomachean Ethics. Translated byHarris Rackham. Cambridge, MA: Loeb Classical Library.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Arnett, Ronald C.
    1986 Communication and Community: Implications of Martin Buber’s Dialogue. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. 2002 “Paulo Freire’s Revolutionary Pedagogy: From a Story-Centered to a Narrative-Centered Communication Ethic.” InMoral Engagement in Public Life: Theorists for Contemporary Ethics, ed. bySharon L. Bracci and Clifford G. Christians, 150–170. New York: Peter Lang. 10.1177/10778004008004006
     https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004008004006 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2004 “A Dialogic Ethic.” InDialogue: Theorizing Difference in Communication Studies, ed. byRob Anderson, Leslie A. Baxter, and Kenneth N. Cissna, 1–17. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. 2005 Dialogic Confession: Bonhoeffer’s Rhetoric of Responsibility. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. 2006 “Through a Glass, Darkly.” Journal of Communication and Religion29: 1–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. 2012 Communication Ethics in Dark Times: Hannah Arendt’s Rhetoric of Warning and Hope. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. 2014 “Arendt and Saint Augustine: Identity Otherwise Than Convention.” InAugustine for the Philosophers: The Rhetor of Hippo, the Confessions, and the Continentals, ed. byCalvin L. Troup, 39–57. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. 2015 “Communicative Meeting: From Pangloss to Tenacious Hope.” InA Century of Communication Studies: A Thematic History of the Discipline, ed. byPat J. Gehrke and William M. Keith, 261–285. New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. 2016 “Dialogue Theory.” InThe International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy. Vol.1, ed. byKlaus Bruhn Jensen and Robert T. Craig, 531–543. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect008
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect008 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2017 Levinas’s Rhetorical Demand: The Unending Obligation of Communication Ethics. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. 2022 Communication Ethics and Tenacious Hope: Contemporary Implications of the Scottish Enlightenment. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Arnett, Ronald C. and Pat Arneson
    1999 Dialogic Civility in a Cynical Age: Community, Hope, and Interpersonal Relationships. Albany: State University of New York Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
    1981 The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Baxter, Leslie A. and Barbara M. Montgomery
    1996 Relating: Dialogues and Dialectics. New York: Guilford Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Bellah, Robert N., William M. Sullivan, Richard Madsen, Ann Swidler, and Steven M. Tipton
    1985 Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Bondanella, Peter
    1997 Umberto Eco and the Open Text. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511581755
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581755 [Google Scholar]
  25. Buber, Martin
    (1923) 2004 I and Thou. Translated byRonald Gregor Smith. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. (1947) 1965 Between Man and Man (3rd ed.). Translated byRonald Gregor Smith. New York: Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. 1965 The Knowledge of Man: A Philosophy of the Interhuman. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. 1966 The Way of Response. Edited byNahum N. Glatzer. New York: Schocken Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Camus, Albert
    (1942) 2012 The Myth of Sisyphus and Other Essays. Translated byJustin O’Brien. New York: Vintage International.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Carbaugh, Donal
    2013 “On Dialogue Studies.” Journal of Dialogue Studies1 (1): 9–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Cissna, Kenneth N. and Rob Anderson
    1994 “Communication and the Ground of Dialogue.” InThe Reach of Dialogue: Confirmation, Voice, and Community, ed. byRob Anderson, Kenneth N. Cissna, and Ronald C. Arnett, 9–30. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Cooren, François
    2010 Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Incarnation and Ventriloquism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.6
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.6 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2020 “A Communicative Constitutive Perspective on Corporate Social Responsibility: Ventriloquism, Undecidability, and Surprisability.” Business & Society59 (1): 175–197. 10.1177/0007650318791780
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650318791780 [Google Scholar]
  34. Craig, Robert T. and Karen Tracy
    2020 Grounded Practical Theory: Investigating Communication Problems. San Diego: Cognella Academic Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Dahl, Robert A.
    1982 Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Diderot, Denis
    (1805) 2016 Le Neveu de Rameau [Rameau’s nephew]. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Frankl, Viktor E.
    1967 Psychotherapy and Existentialism: Selected Papers on Logotherapy. Simon & Schuster.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. (1959) 1974 Man’s Search for Meaning: An Introduction to Logotherapy. Translated byIlse Lasch. New York: Pocket Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Freire, Paulo
    (1970) 2018 Pedagogy of the Oppressed (50th anniversary edition). New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Gadamer, Hans-Georg
    (1960) 1986 Truth and Method. Translated byGarrett Barden and John Cumming. New York: Crossroad.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Husserl, Edmund
    (1900) 2001 Logical Investigations. Vol.2. Edited byDermot Moran. Translated byJohn N. Findlay. 2nd ed.London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. (1936) 1970 The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Edited and translated byDavid Carr. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Kant, Immanuel
    (1781) 1998 Critique of Pure Reason. Edited and translated byPaul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. (1790) 2005 Critique of Judgement. Translated byJohn H. Bernard. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Lasch, Christopher
    1979 The Culture of Narcissism: American Life in an Age of Diminishing Expectations. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. 1985 The Minimal Self: Psychic Survival in Troubled Times. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Létourneau, Alain
    2017 “The Bakhtin Case: An Apparent Tension between Two Traditions in Dialogue Studies.” Language and Dialogue7 (2): 236–252. 10.1075/ld.7.2.05let
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.7.2.05let [Google Scholar]
  48. Levinas, Emmanuel
    (1961) 1969 Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Translated byAlphonso Lingis. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. (1968) 1998 Otherwise Than Being. Translated byAlphonso Lingis. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. (1982) 1985 Ethics and Infinity: Conversations with Philippe Nemo. Translated byRichard A. Cohen. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. (1992) 2000 God, Death, and Time. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. (1995) 1999 Alterity and Transcendence. Translated byMichael B. Smith. New York: Columbia University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. MacIntyre, Alasdair
    (1981) 1984 After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. 2nd ed.Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. 1988 Whose Justice? Which Rationality?Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Medina, Jennifer, Katie Benner, and Kate Taylor
    2019 “Actresses, Business Leaders and Other Wealthy Parents Charged in U.S. College Entry Fraud.” The New York Times, March 12, 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/12/us/college-admissions-cheating-scandal.html
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Nietzsche, Friedrich
    (1889) 1997 Twilight of the Idols. Translated byRichard Polt. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Peirce, Charles. S.
    1998 The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings. Vols.1–2. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Pitkin, Hanna F.
    1998 The Attack of the Blob: Hannah Arendt’s Concept of the Social. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226817248.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226817248.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  59. Ricoeur, Paul
    1992 Oneself as Another. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Rieff, Philip
    (1966) 1987 The Triumph of the Therapeutic: Uses of Faith after Freud. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Ritzer, George
    2014 The McDonaldization of Society. 8th ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Rogers, Carl
    (1951) 2003 Client-Centered Therapy: Its Current Practice, Implications and Theory. London: Constable.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Stewart, John
    1985 “Martin Buber’s Central Insight: Implications for His Philosophy of Dialogue.” InDialogue: An Interdisciplinary Approach, ed. byMarcelo Dascal and Hubert Cuyckens, 321–338. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbcs.1.30ste
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbcs.1.30ste [Google Scholar]
  64. 1988 “Meet a Theorist of Meeting: Two of Hans-Georg Gadamer’s Contributions to Speech Communication.” InProceedings of the 15th Annual Student Conference in Communication, 1–9. Fresno: California State University.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Taylor, Charles
    1989 Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Tolkien, J. R. R.
    1954 The Two Towers: Being the Second Part of The Lord of the Rings. New York: Ballantine Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Watt, Ian
    1996 Myths of Modern Individualism: Faust, Don Quixote, Don Juan, Robinson Crusoe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511549236
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511549236 [Google Scholar]
  68. Weigand, Edda
    2009 Language as Dialogue: From Rules to Principles of Probability. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.5
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.5 [Google Scholar]
  69. 2015 “Identity as a Dialogic Concept.” Language and Dialogue5 (1): 7–22. 10.1075/ld.5.1.01wei
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.5.1.01wei [Google Scholar]
  70. 2016 “How to Verify a Theory of Dialogue.” Language and Dialogue6 (3): 349–369. 10.1075/ld.6.3.01wei
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.6.3.01wei [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00122.arn
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): co-present meanings; dialogue; hypertextuality; modernity’s disdain; monologue; multiplicity

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error