Volume 12, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



The paper explores non-native children’s peer socialization to norms of literacy and appropriate language use in the classroom. Drawing on ethnographic research in a primary school in northern Italy, this study adopts a CA-informed approach to analyze an Italian L2 class attended by children aged 8 to 10. The study focuses on children’s enacting of correction sequences following peers’ problematic conduct. As the analysis illustrates, children creatively re-produce teachers’ ways of speaking to enforce normative uses of language. Through these practices, non-native children socialize their classmates into expected ways of speaking, reading, and writing, and negotiate the social hierarchy of the peer group. Risks and opportunities of such practices are considered in relation to children’s social inclusion and exclusion.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Atkinson, Dwight
    (ed.) 2011Alternative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203830932
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203830932 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bazzanella, Carla
    2011 “Redundancy, Repetition, and Intensity in Discourse.” Language Sciences33: 243–254. 10.1016/j.langsci.2010.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2010.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  3. Benoit-Barné, Chantal and François Cooren
    2009 “The Accomplishment of Authority Through Presentification: How Authority Is Distributed Among and Negotiated by Organizational Members.” Management Communication Quarterly23(1): 5–31. 10.1177/0893318909335414
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318909335414 [Google Scholar]
  4. Burdelski, Matthew
    2010 “Socializing Politeness Routines: Action, Other-orientation, and Embodiment in a Japanese Preschool.” Journal of Pragmatics42: 1606–1621. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.11.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2020 “‘Say Can I Borrow it’: Teachers and Children Managing Peer Conflict in a Japanese Preschool.” Linguistics and Education59: pages n.a.. 10.1016/j.linged.2019.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.04.002 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cekaite, Asta and Polly Björk-Willén
    2012 “Peer Group Interactions in Multilingual Educational Settings: Co-constructing Social Order and Norms for Language Use”, International Journal of Bilingualism17 (2SI): 174–188. 10.1177/1367006912441417
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006912441417 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cekaite, Asta and Ann-Carita Evaldsson
    2008 “Staging Linguistic Identities and Negotiating Monolingual Norms in Multiethnic School Settings.” International Journal of Multilingualism5 (3): 177–196. 10.1080/14790710802387588
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710802387588 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2017 “Language Policies in Play: Learning Ecologies in Multilingual Preschool Interactions among Peers and Teachers” Multilingua36 (4): 451–475. 10.1515/multi‑2016‑0020
    https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2016-0020 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cekaite, Asta, Shoshana Blum-Kulka, Vibeke Grøver and Eva Teubal
    2014 “Children’s Peer Talk and Learning: Uniting Discursive, Social, and Cultural Facets of Peer Interactions: Editor’s Introduction.” InChildren’s Peer Talk: Learning from Each Other, ed. byAsta Cekaite, Shoshana Blum-Kulka, Vibeke Grøver, and Eva Teubal, 3–23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139084536.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084536.003 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cobb-Moore, Charlotte, Susan Danby and Ann Farrell
    2009 “Young children as rule makers.” Journal of Pragmatics41: 1477–1492. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.04.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.04.013 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cooren, François
    2006 “The Organizational World as a Plenum of Agencies.” InCommunication as Organizing, ed. byFrançois Cooren, James Taylor, and Elizabeth Van Every, 81–100. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 2010Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Incarnation and Ventriloquism. Amsterdam: John Benjamin. 10.1075/ds.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.6 [Google Scholar]
  13. Corsaro, William A.
    1985Friendship and Peer Culture in the Early Years. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 1992 “Interpretive Reproduction in Children’s Peer Cultures.” Social Psychology Quarterly55 (2): 160–177. 10.2307/2786944
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2786944 [Google Scholar]
  15. Danby, Susan
    2002 “The Communicative Competence of Young Children.” Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 27 (3): 25–30. 10.1177/183693910202700306
    https://doi.org/10.1177/183693910202700306 [Google Scholar]
  16. Drew, Paul
    1998 “Complaints about Transgressions and Misconduct.” Research on Language and Social Interaction31: 295–325. 10.1080/08351813.1998.9683595
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.1998.9683595 [Google Scholar]
  17. Duff, Patricia
    2000 “Repetition in Foreign Language Classroom Interaction.” InThe Development of Second and Foreign Language Learning through Classroom Interaction, ed. byJoan K. Hall and Lorrie S. Verplaetse, 109–138. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Duranti, Alessandro
    1997Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511810190
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810190 [Google Scholar]
  19. Dyson, Anne H.
    2001 “Coach Bombay’s Kids Learn to Write: Children’s Appropriation of Media Material for School Literacy.” InLiteracy: A Critical Sourcebook, ed. byEllen Cushman, Eugene Kintgen, Barry Kroll, and Mike Rose, 325–357. Boston, MA: Bedford/St- Martin’s.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Enfield, Nick J. and Jack Sidnell
    2019 “The Normative Nature of Language.” InThe Normative Animal? On the Anthropological Significance of Social, Moral, and Linguistic Norms, ed. byNeil Roughley and Kurt Bayertz, 265–278. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190846466.003.0013
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190846466.003.0013 [Google Scholar]
  21. Ervin-Tripp, Susan and Claudia Mitchell-Kernan
    (eds.) 1977Child Discourse. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Evaldsson, Ann-Carita and Asta Cekaite
    2010 “‘Schwedis’ He Can’t Even Say Swedish” – Subverting and Reproducing Institutionalized Norms for Language Use in Multilingual Peer Groups.” Pragmatics20 (4): 587–604.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Feldman, Robert, Linda Devin-Sheehan, and Vernon Allen
    1976 “Children Tutoring Children: A Critical Review of Research.” InChildren as Teachers: Theory and Research on Tutoring, ed. byVernon Allen, 355–385. New York: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑052640‑6.50024‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-052640-6.50024-8 [Google Scholar]
  24. Figueroa, Ariana M. and Patricia Baquedano-Lòpez
    2017 “Language Socialization and Schooling.” InLanguage Socialization: Encyclopedia of Language and Education, ed. byPatricia Duff, and Stephen May, 141–154. Berlin, Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑02255‑0_11
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02255-0_11 [Google Scholar]
  25. Firth, Alan and Johannes Wagner
    2007 “Second/Foreign Language Learning as a Social Accomplishment: Elaborations on a Reconceptualized SLA.” The Modern Language Journal91 (Focus Issue): 800–819. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2007.00670.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00670.x [Google Scholar]
  26. Galeano, Giorgia and Alessandra Fasulo
    2009 “Sequenze direttive tra genitori e figli. [Directive sequences between parents and children].” InCulture familiari tra pratiche quotidiane e rappresentazioni. Etnografia e ricerca qualitativa, ed. bySabina Giorgi and Clotilde Pontecorvo, 261–278. Bologna: Il Mulino.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Gardner, Rod
    2019 “Classroom Interaction Research: The State of the Art.” Research on Language and Social Interaction52 (3): 212–226. 10.1080/08351813.2019.1631037
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1631037 [Google Scholar]
  28. Glenn, Philip
    2003Laughter in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511519888
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519888 [Google Scholar]
  29. Goffman, Erving
    1981Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Goodwin, Charles and Marjorie H. Goodwin
    2004 “Participation.” InA Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, ed. byAlessandro Duranti, 222–244. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Goodwin, Marjorie H.
    1983 “Aggravated Corrections and Disagreements in Children’s Conversations.” Journal of Pragmatics7: 657–677. 10.1016/0378‑2166(83)90089‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(83)90089-9 [Google Scholar]
  32. 1990He-Said-She-Said. Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Goodwin, Marjorie H. and Charles Goodwin
    1986 “Gesture and Co-participation in the Activity of Searching for a Word.” Semiotica62: 51–75.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Hall, Joan K.
    2018 “From L2 Interactional Competence to L2 Interactional Repertoires: Reconceptualising the Objects of L2 Learning.” Classroom Discourse9 (1): 25–39. 10.1080/19463014.2018.1433050
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2018.1433050 [Google Scholar]
  35. Heritage, John
    2012 “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction45 (1): 30–52. 10.1080/08351813.2012.646685
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646685 [Google Scholar]
  36. Heritage, John and Steven Clayman
    2010Talk in Action. Interaction, identities, and institutions. Malden, MA: Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444318135
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444318135 [Google Scholar]
  37. Hymes, Dell
    1974 “Ways of Speaking.” InExplorations in the Ethnography of Speaking, ed. byRichard Bauman and Joel Sherzer, 433–452. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Jefferson, Gail
    2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” InConversation Analysis. Studies from the First Generation, ed. byGene Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
  39. Johnson, Sarah J.
    2017 “Multimodality and Footing in Peer Correction in Reading Picture Books.” Linguistics and Education41: 20–34. 10.1016/j.linged.2017.07.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2017.07.004 [Google Scholar]
  40. Keenan Ochs, Elinor
    1977 “Making It Last: Repetition in Children’s Discourse.” InChild Discourse, ed. bySusan Ervin-Tripp and Claudia Mitchell-Kernan, 125–138. New York: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑241950‑8.50013‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-241950-8.50013-7 [Google Scholar]
  41. Kendon, Adam
    1990Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Koshik, Irene
    2002 “Designedly Incomplete Utterances: A Pedagogical Practice for Eliciting Knowledge Displays in Error Correction Sequences.” Research on Language & Social Interaction35 (3): 277–309. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_2 [Google Scholar]
  43. Kyratzis, Amy
    2004 “Talk and Interaction among Children and the Co-construction of Peer Groups and Peer Culture.” Annual Review of Anthropology33: 625–649. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.144008
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.144008 [Google Scholar]
  44. Kyratzis, Amy, and Marjorie H. Goodwin
    2017 “Language Socialization in Children’s Peer and Sibling-Kin Group Interactions.” InLanguage Socialization, ed. byPatricia Duff and Stephen May, 123–138. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑02255‑0_10
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02255-0_10 [Google Scholar]
  45. Kyratzis, Amy and Jiansheng Guo
    1996 “Separate Worlds for Girls and Boys? Views from U.S. and Chinese Mixed-sex Friendship Groups.” InSocial Interaction, Social Context, and Language: Essays in Honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp, ed. byDan Slobin, Julie Gerhardt, Amy Kyratzis, and Jiansheng Guo, 555–578. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Kyratzis, Amy and Sarah J. Johnson
    2017 “Multimodal and Multilingual Resources in Children’s Framing of Situated Learning Activities.” Linguistics and Education41 (Special Issue): 1–6. 10.1016/j.linged.2017.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2017.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  47. Kyratzis, Amy, Jennifer Reynolds, and Ann-Carita Evaldsson
    2010 “Introduction: Heteroglossia and Language Ideologies in Children’s Peer Play Interactions.” Pragmatics20 (4): 457–466.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Lave, Jean and Etienne Wenger
    1991Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355 [Google Scholar]
  49. Macbeth, Douglas
    2004 “The Relevance of Repair for Classroom Correction.” Language in Society33 (5): 703–736. 10.1017/S0047404504045038
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404504045038 [Google Scholar]
  50. Margutti, Piera
    2011 “Teacher’s Reproaches and Managing Discipline in the Classroom: When Teachers Tell Students What They Do ‘Wrong’.” Linguistics and Education22: 310–329. 10.1016/j.linged.2011.02.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2011.02.015 [Google Scholar]
  51. Maynard, Douglas
    1985 “On the Functions of Social Conflict among Children.” American Sociological Review50 (2): 207–223. 10.2307/2095410
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2095410 [Google Scholar]
  52. 2006 “Ethnography and Conversation Analysis: What is the Context of an Utterance?” InEmergent Methods in Social Research, ed. bySharlene Hesse-Biber and Patricia Leavy, 55–94. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 10.4135/9781412984034.n4
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984034.n4 [Google Scholar]
  53. Melander, Helen
    2012 “Transformations of Knowledge within a Peer Group. Knowing and Learning in Interaction.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction1: 232–248. 10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  54. Mökkönen, Alicia C.
    2012 “Social Organization through Teacher-talk: Subteaching, Socialization and the Normative Use of Language in a Multilingual Primary Class.” Linguistics and Education23: 310–322. 10.1016/j.linged.2012.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2012.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  55. Møller, Janus S. and Jens N. Jørgensen
    2011 “Linguistic Norms and Adult Roles in Play and Serious Frames.” Linguistics and Education22: 68–78. 10.1016/j.linged.2010.11.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2010.11.009 [Google Scholar]
  56. Mondada, Lorenza
    2019 “Contemporary Issues in Conversation Analysis: Embodiment and Materiality, Multimodality and Multisensoriality in Social Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics145: 47–62. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.016 [Google Scholar]
  57. Moore, Ekaterina
    2017 “Managing Classroom Transgression: Use of Directives in a Reading Practice.” Linguistics and Education41: 35–46. 10.1016/j.linged.2017.07.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2017.07.006 [Google Scholar]
  58. Nasi, Nicola
    2020 “Socializzarsi all’uso appropriato dell’Italiano L2: norme linguistiche e pragmatiche nell’interazione tra pari [Peer socialization to norms of appropriate language use: a conversation analysis in the Italian L2 classroom].” Italiano LinguaDue, 12 (1): 493–515.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Ochs, Elinor
    1986 “Introduction.” InLanguage Socialization across Cultures, ed. byBambi B. Schieffelin and Elinor Ochs, 1–13. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Ochs, Elinor and Bambi B. Schieffelin
    2012 “The Theory of Language Socialization.” InThe Handbook of Language Socialization, ed. byAlessandro Duranti, Elinor Ochs, and Bambi B. Schieffelin, 1–22. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Pomerantz, Anita
    1984 “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” InStructures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. byJ. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Poole, Deborah
    2008 “The Messiness of Language Socialization in Reading Groups: Participation in and Resistance to the Values of Essayist Literacy.” Linguistics and Education19: 378–403. 10.1016/j.linged.2008.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2008.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  63. Rampton, Ben
    2006Language in Late Modernity. Interaction in an Urban School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486722
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486722 [Google Scholar]
  64. Rauniomaa, Mirka
    2017 “Assigning Roles and Responsibilities. Finnish Imperatively Formatted Directive Actions in a Mobile Instructional Setting.” InImperative Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action, ed. byMarja-Leena Sorjonen, Liisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 325–355. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.30.11rau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.30.11rau [Google Scholar]
  65. Sacks, Harvey
    1987 “On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation.” InTalk and Social Organisation, ed. byGraham Button and John Lee, 54–69. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2007Sequence Organization in Interaction: 1. A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  67. Seedhouse, Paul
    2004The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom: A Conversation Analysis Perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Sidnell, Jack
    2010Conversation Analysis: An introduction. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Sieber, R. Timothy
    1979 “Classmates as Workmates: Informal Peer Activity in the Elementary School.” Anthropology and Educational Quarterly10: 207–235. 10.1525/aeq.1979.10.4.05x1385g
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.1979.10.4.05x1385g [Google Scholar]
  70. Silverstein, Michael
    1993 “Metapragmatic Discourse and Metapragmatic Function.” InReflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, ed. byJohn Lucy, 33–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621031.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621031.004 [Google Scholar]
  71. Steinberg, Zina D. and Courtney Cazden
    1979 “Children as Teachers of Peers and Ourselves.” Theory into Practice18: 258–266. 10.1080/00405847909542843
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00405847909542843 [Google Scholar]
  72. Steffensen, Sune V. and Claire Kramsch
    2017 “The Ecology of Second Language Acquisition and Socialization.” InLanguage Socialization, ed. byPatricia Duff and Stephen May, 17–32. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑02255‑0_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02255-0_2 [Google Scholar]
  73. Sterponi, Laura
    2007 Clandestine Interactional Reading: Intertextuality and Double-voicing under the Desk.” Linguistics and Education18: 1–23. 10.1016/j.linged.2007.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2007.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  74. 2012 “Literacy Socialization.” InThe Handbook of Language Socialization, ed. byAlessandro Duranti, Elinor Ochs, and Bambi B. Schieffelin, 227–246. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Stevanovic, Melisa and Anssi Peräkylä
    2014 “Three Orders in the Organization of Human Action: on the Interface between Knowledge, Power, and Emotion in Interaction and Social Relations.” Language in Society43 (2): 185–207. 10.1017/S0047404514000037
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404514000037 [Google Scholar]
  76. Stivers, Tanja and Jeffrey Robinson
    2006 “A Preference for Progressivity in Interaction.” Language in Society35 (3): 367–392. 10.1017/S0047404506060179
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060179 [Google Scholar]
  77. Stivers, Tanja and Federico Rossano
    2010 “Mobilizing Response.” Research on Language and Social Interaction43 (1): 3–31. 10.1080/08351810903471258
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810903471258 [Google Scholar]
  78. Tannen, Deborah
    2007Talking Voices. Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618987
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618987 [Google Scholar]
  79. Tarım, Şeyda D. and Amy Kyratzis
    2012 “Challenging and Orienting to Monolingual School Norms in Turkish American Children’s Peer Disputes and Classroom Negotiations at a U.S. Turkish Saturday School.” InDisputes in Everyday Life: Social and Moral Orders of Children and Young People, Sociological Studies of Children and Youth, ed. bySusan Danby and Marianne, Theobald M., 193–220. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Tholander, Michael and Karin Aronsson
    2003 “Doing Subteaching in School Group Work: Positionings, Resistance and Participation Frameworks.” Language and Education17: 208–234. 10.1080/09500780308666849
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780308666849 [Google Scholar]
  81. Vygotskij, Lev S.
    [1934] 1992Pensiero e linguaggio: Ricerche psicologiche [Thought and Language]. Bari-Roma: Laterza.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Walsh, Steve
    2011Exploring Classroom Discourse: Language in Action. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203827826
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203827826 [Google Scholar]
  83. Weigand, Edda
    2010Dialogue. The Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]
  84. 2018 “Dialogue: The key to pragmatics.” InFrom Pragmatics to Dialogue, ed. byIstvan Kecskes and Edda Weigand, 5–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.31.02wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.31.02wei [Google Scholar]
  85. Wootton, Anthony J.
    1997Interaction and the Development of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511519895
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519895 [Google Scholar]
  86. Zemel, Alan and Timothy Koschmann
    2011 “Pursuing a Question: Reinitiating IRE Sequences as a Method of Instruction.” Journal of Pragmatics43: 475–488. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.08.022
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.08.022 [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error