Volume 13, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127



The current state of the art in Dialogue Analysis represents a multitude of diverse models of dialogue, communication, pragmatics, discourse, interaction, organization, and management, which claim to be science or philosophy. Can we indeed expose science and philosophy to arbitrary decisions on issues and methodology? As soon as our object becomes ‘dialogue in the stream of life’, science faces the issue of complexity. The challenge is to develop a new type of science which is capable of grasping the complex whole and deriving the components from it. New Science as also demonstrates how science and philosophy can be united by description and explanation in science and evaluation and recommendation in philosophy.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.

Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Agazzi, Evandro and Luisa Montecucco
    (eds) 2002Complexity and Emergence. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the International Academy of the Philosophy of Science. New Jersey, London: World Scientific Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bisang, Walter
    2007 “Some General Thoughts about Linguistic Typology and Dialogue Linguistics.” InDialogue and Culture, ed. byMarion Grein and Edda Weigand, 53–72. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.1.06bis
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.1.06bis [Google Scholar]
  3. Chomsky, Noam
    1965Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: The M.I.T. Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cooren, François
    2015aOrganizational Discourse: Communication and Constitution. Cambridge, UK/ Malden, MA: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 2015b “In the Name of Law: Ventriloquism and Juridical Matters.” InLatour and the Passage of Law, ed. byKyle McGee, 235–272. Edinburgh/UK: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748697922‑010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748697922-010 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2020 “Reconciling Dialogue and Propagation: A Ventriloquial Inquiry.” Language and Dialogue10 (1): 9–28. 10.1075/ld.00057.coo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00057.coo [Google Scholar]
  7. Cooren, François, Matthieu Balay, and Frédéric Dion
    2023 “From Adjacency Pairs to Interactional Triad: The Organization of Dialogue and the Emergence of Organized Forms.” InPractices of Dialogue, Dialogues in Practice – with their Problems. Special issue ofLanguage and Dialogue20231: 2, ed. byAlain Létourneau, Nicolas Bencherki, and Geneviève Boivin.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Damasio, Antonio
    2000The Feeling of What Happens. Body, Emotion and the Making of Consciousness. London: Vintage.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Feynman, Richard P.
    1998The Meaning of It All. Thoughts of a Citizen-Scientist. Reading, Mass.: Perseus Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 2000The Pleasure of Finding Things Out. London: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gauch Jr., Hugh G.
    2012Scientific Method in Brief. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139095082
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139095082 [Google Scholar]
  12. Greimas, Algirdas Julien
    1987On Meaning: Selected Writings in Semiotic Theory, transl. byPaul J. Perron and Frank H. Collins. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Grice, H. Paul
    1975 “Logic and Conversation.” InSyntax and Semantics, vol.31: Speech Acts, ed. byPeter Cole and Jerry Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hacker, P. M. S.
    2021The Moral Powers: A Study of Human Nature. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781119657828
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119657828 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hundsnurscher, Franz
    1980 “Konversationsanalyse versus Dialoggrammatik.” InAkten des VI. Internationalen Germanisten-Kongresses, Basel 1980, Teil21, ed. byHeinz Rupp and Hans-Gert Roloff, 89–95. Bern/Frankfurt: Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Iacoboni, Marco
    2017 “The Sociobiology of Language: What Mirror Neurons Can Tell Us.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. byEdda Weigand, 264–274. New York/London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jaszczolt, Kasia
    2018 “Pragmatics and Philosophy: In Search of a Paradigm.” Intercultural Pragmatics15 (2): 131–159. 10.1515/ip‑2018‑0002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2018-0002 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kecskes, Istvan
    2017 “From Pragmatics to Dialogue.” InRoutledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. byEdda Weigand, 78–92. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Koike, Dale A.
    2017 “Theory and Practice.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. byEdda Weigand, 251–263. New York/London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kuhn, Thomas S.
    2012 (4th ed.). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. With an Introductory Essay by Jan Hacking. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press, 1st ed. 1962.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Latour, Bruno
    2007Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lumsden, Charles J. and Edward O. Wilson
    2005Genes, Mind, and Culture: The Coevolutionary Process. New Jersey: World Scientific. 10.1142/5786
    https://doi.org/10.1142/5786 [Google Scholar]
  23. Marchand, Trevor H. J.
    2010 “Making knowledge: Explorations of the indissoluble relation between minds, bodies, and environment.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.) 16 (s1): S1–S21. 10.1111/j.1467‑9655.2010.01607.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01607.x [Google Scholar]
  24. Mehan, Hugh
    1985 “The Structure of Classroom Discourse.” InHandbook of Discourse Analysis, vol.III1, ed. byTeun A. van Dijk, 120–131. London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mitchell, Melanie
    2009Complexity. A Guided Tour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Nurse, Paul
    2020What Is Life? Understand Biology in Five Steps. Oxford: David Fickling Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Okasha, Samir
    2016Philosophy of Science. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/actrade/9780198745587.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198745587.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  28. Peletier, Mark A., Rutger A. van Santen, and Erik Steur
    (eds) 2019Complexity Science: An Introduction. New Jersey, London: World Scientific Publishing Company. 10.1142/10973
    https://doi.org/10.1142/10973 [Google Scholar]
  29. Perelman, Chaïm and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
    1958La nouvelle rhetorique. Traité de l’argumentation. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Popper, Karl R.
    1959The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Unwin Hyman.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Prigogine, Ilya
    1997The End of Certainty. Time, Chaos, and the New Laws of Nature. New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Russell, Bertrand
    1948Human Knowledge. Its Scope and Limits. London: Allen & Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
    1978 “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation.” InStudies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed. byJim Schenkein, 7–55. New York: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50008‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50008-2 [Google Scholar]
  34. Saussure, Ferdinand de
    1916Cours de linguistique générale, ed. byCharles Balley and Albert Sechehaye. Lausanne/Paris: Payot. Transl.Grundfragen der allgemeinen Sprachwissenchaft. Berlin: de Gruyter 1967, 2nd ed.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Sbisà, Marina
    2018 “Philosophical Pragmatics.” InMethods in Pragmatics, ed. byAndreas Jucker, Klaus P. Schneider and Wolfram Bublitz, 133–154. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110424928‑005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110424928-005 [Google Scholar]
  36. Searle, John R.
    1969Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. London: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
  37. Simon, Herbert A.
    1962 “The Architecture of Complexity: Hierarchic Systems.” Proceeding of the American Philosophical Society1061: 467–482.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Sinclair, John and Malcolm Coulthard
    1975Towards an Analysis of Discourse. The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Sokal, Alan and Jean Bricmont
    1998Fashionable Nonsense. Postmodern Intellectuals’ Abuse of Science. New York: Picador.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Souriau, Étienne
    1943/2015The Different Modes of Existence. Transl. byErik Beranek and Tim Howles. Minneapolis/MN: Univocal Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Tomasello, Michael and Henrike Moll
    2010 “The gap is social: Human shared intentionality and culture.” InMind the Gap. Tracing the Origins of Human Universals, ed. byPeter M. Kappeler and Joan B. Silk, 331–349. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑02725‑3_16
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02725-3_16 [Google Scholar]
  42. Tsohatzidis, Savas L.
    (ed.) 1994Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives. London/New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Valera, Gabriella
    2021Diritto di dialogo. Forum Mondiale dei Giovani. Trieste.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Weigand, Edda
    1989Sprache als Dialog. Sprechakttaxonomie und kommunikative Grammatik. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111357799
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111357799 [Google Scholar]
  45. 1991 “The dialogical principle revisited: Speech acts and mental states.” InDialoganalyse III. Referate der 3. Arbeitstagung, Bologna 1990, ed. bySorin Stati, Edda Weigand and Franz Hundsnurscher, vol.11, 75–104. Tübingen: Niemeyer. – Reprinted inEdda Weigand (ed. bySebastian Feller) 2009a Language as Dialogue, 21–44. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. – Reprinted inInterdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society, ed. byAlessandro Capone and Jacob L. Mey, 209–232. Cham: Springer 2016 10.1515/9783111678504‑008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111678504-008 [Google Scholar]
  46. 1996 “The state of the art in speech act theory: Review article on: Tsohatzidis, Savas L. (ed.). 1994. Foundations of Speech Act Theory.” Pragmatics and Cognition41. 367–405. 10.1075/pc.4.2.10wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.4.2.10wei [Google Scholar]
  47. 2002 “Constitutive features of human dialogic interaction: Mirror neurons and what they us about human abilities.” InMirror Neurons and the Evolution of Brain and Language, ed. byMaxim Stamenov and Vittorio Gallese, 229–248. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aicr.42.18wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aicr.42.18wei [Google Scholar]
  48. 2004 “Emotions: The Simple and the Complex.” InEmotion in Dialogic Interaction, ed. byEdda Weigand, 3–22. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.248.03wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.248.03wei [Google Scholar]
  49. 2006 “Teaching a foreign language: A tentative enterprise.” Studies in Communication Sciences6 (1). 93–116. – Reprinted inLanguage Teaching. Integrational Linguistic Approaches, ed. byMichael Toolan (2009), 120–140. New York/London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. 2007 “The Sociobiology of Language.” InDialogue and Culture, ed. byMarion Grein and Edda Weigand, 27–49. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.1.04wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.1.04wei [Google Scholar]
  51. 2008 “Rhetoric in the Mixed Game.” InDialogue and Rhetoric, ed. byEdda Weigand, 3–22. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.2.03wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.2.03wei [Google Scholar]
  52. 2009aLanguage as Dialogue. From Rules to Principles of Probability, ed. bySebastian Feller. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.5 [Google Scholar]
  53. 2009b “Words and their Role in Language Use.” InLanguage as Dialogue. From Rules to Principles of Probability, byEdda Weigand (ed. bySebastian Feller), 95–112. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.5 [Google Scholar]
  54. 2010Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]
  55. 2014 “Rationality of Performance.” Philosophia Scientiae181. 247–268. 10.4000/philosophiascientiae.1023
    https://doi.org/10.4000/philosophiascientiae.1023 [Google Scholar]
  56. 2015 “Dialogue in the Stream of Life.” Language and Dialogue5 (2): 197–223. 10.1075/ld.5.2.01wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.5.2.01wei [Google Scholar]
  57. 2021a “Language and Dialogue in Science and Philosophy.” Intercultural Pragmatics18 (4): 533–561. 10.1515/ip‑2021‑4005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2021-4005 [Google Scholar]
  58. 2021b “Dialogue: The Complex Whole.” Language and Dialogue11 (3): 457–486. 10.1075/ld.00106.wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00106.wei [Google Scholar]
  59. 2022 “Thinking about the Future of the Humanities.” InBeyond Babel: Learned Societies and the Global Renewal of the Humanities, ed. byTom Clark, 149–168. Amsterdam/Philadelpia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/fillm.18.09wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fillm.18.09wei [Google Scholar]
  60. Weigand, Edda and Istvan Kecskes
    (eds) 2018From Pragmatics to Dialogue. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.31
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.31 [Google Scholar]
  61. Wilson, Edward O.
    1999Consilience. The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Vintage Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. 2003The Future of Life. London: Abacus.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. 2004On Human Nature. With a New Preface. Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Wittgenstein, Ludwig
    1981[1967]Zettel. 2nd ed.Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Zimring, James C.
    2019What Science Is and How It Really Works. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108569149
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108569149 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error