1887
Volume 13, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00144.let
2023-08-01
2024-06-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, Rob, and Kenneth N. Cissna
    2008 “Fresh Perspectives in Dialogue Theory.” Communication Theory18 (1): 1–4. 10.1111/j.1468‑2885.2007.00310.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00310.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnett, Ronald C.
    2015 “The Dialogic Necessity: Acknowledging and Engaging Monologue.” Ohio Communication Journal531 (October): 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 2016 “Dialogue Theory.” InThe International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy, edited byKlaus Bruhn Jensen, Eric W. Rothenbuhler, Jefferson D. Pooley, and Robert T. Craig, 1–13. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect008
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect008 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bakhtin, Mikhail
    1981The Dialogic Imagination. Edited byMichael Holdquist. Austin, TX: Texas University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bencherki, Nicolas, and Coline Sénac
    2023 “Instrumental Dialogue and the Ethics of Expressing Solicitude for Each Other’s Existence,” February. 10.1075/ld.00138.ben
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00138.ben [Google Scholar]
  6. Bourgoin, Alaric, François Marchessaux, and Nicolas Bencherki
    2018 “We Need to Talk about Strategy: How to Conduct Effective Strategic Dialogue.” Business Horizons61 (4): 587–97. 10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.008 [Google Scholar]
  7. Buber, Martin
    1958I and Thou. New York: Scribner.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cate, Balder ten
    2004 “The Dynamics of Information Exchange Dialogues.” Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, Proceedings of the joint meeting of the 6th Conference on Formal Grammar and the 7th Conference on Mathematics of Language, 531 (April): 322–33. 10.1016/S1571‑0661(05)82592‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1571-0661(05)82592-7 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cooren, François
    2010Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Ventriloquism and Incarnation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.6 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cooren, François, and Sergeiy Sandler
    2014 “Polyphony, Ventriloquism, and Constitution: In Dialogue with Bakhtin.” Communication Theory24 (3): 225–44. 10.1111/comt.12041
    https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12041 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dornhof, Sarah
    2012 “Rationalities of Dialogue.” Current Sociology60 (3): 382–98. 10.1177/0011392111426190
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392111426190 [Google Scholar]
  12. Douyère, David
    2012 “On the Representation of a Dialogue with God.” In(Re) Presentations and Dialogue, edited byAlain Létourneau and François Cooren, 161:161–76. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.16.09dou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.16.09dou [Google Scholar]
  13. Dutilh Novaes, Catarina
    2021The Dialogical Roots of Deduction: Historical, Cognitive, and Philosophical Perspectives on Reasoning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fisher, Robert
    2009Creative Dialogue: Talk for Thinking in the Classroom. London ; New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Garfinkel, Harold
    1967Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gilbert, Michael A.
    2014Arguing with People. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hallgren, Lars, Hanna Bergeå, Emily Montgomerie, and Lotten Westberg
    . this issue. “‘I Don’t Know If We Should Have That Discussion Now’: Negotiating Procedural Frames in Collaborative Governance of Natural Resources.” Language and Dialogue.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Isaacs, William
    1999Dialogue and the Art of Thinking Together: A Pioneering Approach to Communicating in Business and in Life. 1st ed.New York: Currency.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Johannesen, Richard L.
    1971 “The Emerging Concept of Communication as Dialogue.” Quarterly Journal of Speech57 (4): 373–82. 10.1080/00335637109383082
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637109383082 [Google Scholar]
  20. Koschmann, Matthew A.
    2016 “The Communicative Accomplishment of Collaboration Failure.” Journal of Communication66 (3): 409–32. 10.1111/jcom.12233
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12233 [Google Scholar]
  21. Krippendorff, Klaus
    1989 “On the Ethics of Constructing Communication.” InRethinking Communication: Paradigm Issues, edited byB. Dervin, Lawrence Grossberg, B. J. O’Keefe, and E. Wartella, 11:66–96. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1284&context=asc_papers
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kuhn, Timothy
    2021 “(Re)Moving Blinders: Communication-as-Constitutive Theorizing as Provocation to Practice-Based Organization Scholarship.” Management Learning52 (1): 109–21. 10.1177/1350507620931508
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507620931508 [Google Scholar]
  23. Létourneau, Alain
    2012 “Towards an Inclusive Notion of Dialogue for Ethical and Moral Purposes.” In(Re)Presentations and Dialogue, edited byFrançois Cooren and Alain Létourneau, 17–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.16.02let
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.16.02let [Google Scholar]
  24. 2014 “An example of the plurality of levels of communication ethics analysis in a newspaper article.” InPhilosophy of Communication Ethics: Alterity and the Other, edited byRonald C. Arnett and Pat Arneson, 233–252. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2021 “Some Challenges of Interdisciplinarity. Working with Different Experts in Adaptation to Climate Change Stakeholders’ Teams.” Language and Dialogue11 (1): 107–24. 10.1075/ld.00086.let
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00086.let [Google Scholar]
  26. Levinas, Emmanuel
    1987Time and the Other. Translated byRichard A. Cohen. Revised ed. edition. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Mallon, Colleen Mary
    2008 “Dialogue and Its Discontents: Theological and Anthropological Reflections.” Missiology36 (4): 491–503. 10.1177/009182960803600407
    https://doi.org/10.1177/009182960803600407 [Google Scholar]
  28. Martine, Thomas, and François Cooren
    2023 “The Voice of the Work to Be Made: Abductive Communication and Creativity.” Discourse & Communication17 (1): 23–39. 10.1177/17504813221123847
    https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813221123847 [Google Scholar]
  29. McNamee, Sheila, and John Shotter
    2004 “Dialogue, Creativity, and Change.” InDialogue: Theorizing Difference in Communication Studies, byRob Anderson, Leslie Baxter, and Kenneth Cissna, 91–104. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. 10.4135/9781483328683.n6
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483328683.n6 [Google Scholar]
  30. Mosès, Stéphane
    2001 “Émile Benveniste and the Linguistics of Dialogue.” Revue de metaphysique et de morale32 (4): 509–25. 10.3917/rmm.014.0509
    https://doi.org/10.3917/rmm.014.0509 [Google Scholar]
  31. Müller-Wood, Anja
    2022 “Introduction: When Dialogue Fails (and Why).” Language and Dialogue12 (1): 1–11. 10.1075/ld.00108.int
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00108.int [Google Scholar]
  32. Pauly, Marc
    2022 “Beyond the Political Principle: Applying Martin Buber’s Philosophy to Societal Polarization.” Philosophy & Social Criticism48 (3): 437–56. 10.1177/01914537211017571
    https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537211017571 [Google Scholar]
  33. Poulos, Christopher N.
    2008 “Accidental Dialogue.” Communication Theory18 (1): 117–38. 10.1111/j.1468‑2885.2007.00316.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00316.x [Google Scholar]
  34. Ritella, Giuseppe, and M Beatrice Ligorio
    2016 “Investigating Chronotopes to Advance a Dialogical Theory of Collaborative Sensemaking.” Culture & Psychology22 (2): 216–31. 10.1177/1354067X15621475
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X15621475 [Google Scholar]
  35. Sanders, Robert E.
    2012 “Strategy and Creativity in Dialogue.” InSpaces of Polyphony, edited byClara-Ubaldina Lorda and Patrick Zabalbeascoa, 11–24. Amsterdam ; New York, NY: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.15.03ch1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.15.03ch1 [Google Scholar]
  36. Schatzki, Theodore R., K. Knorr-Cetina, and Eike von Savigny
    eds. 2001The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Schwandt, Thomas A.
    2001 “Understanding Dialogue as Practice.” Evaluation7 (2): 228–37. 10.1177/13563890122209658
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890122209658 [Google Scholar]
  38. Simpson, B.
    2010 “Pragmatism, Mead and the Practice Turn.” Organization Studies30 (12): 1329–47. 10.1177/0170840609349861
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609349861 [Google Scholar]
  39. Smithberger, Leanna
    . this issue. “Constituting Climate Change in Dialogic Practice: The Moral Universe of Climate Actors.” Language and Dialogue.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Stam, Henderikus J.
    2010 “Self and Dialogue: Introduction.” Theory & Psychology20 (3): 299–304. 10.1177/0959354310366751
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354310366751 [Google Scholar]
  41. Stewart, John, and Karen Zediker
    2000 “Dialogue as Tensional, Ethical Practice.” Southern Communication Journal65 (2–3): 224–42. 10.1080/10417940009373169
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10417940009373169 [Google Scholar]
  42. Stückelberger, Christoph
    2009 “Dialogue Ethics: Ethical Criteria and Conditions for a Successful Dialogue Between Companies and Societal Actors.” Journal of Business Ethics84 (3): 329. 10.1007/s10551‑009‑0201‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0201-2 [Google Scholar]
  43. Sunstein, Cass R.
    2005Why Societies Need Dissent. 1. Harvard Univ. Press paperback ed. Oliver Wendell Holmes Lectures 2003. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Taylor, Charles
    1996 “Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory: Toward a Constructive Analysis of Scientific Rhetorics.” Communication Theory6 (4): 374–87. 10.1111/j.1468‑2885.1996.tb00137.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00137.x [Google Scholar]
  45. Tsoukas, Haridimos
    2009 “A Dialogical Approach to the Creation of New Knowledge in Organizations.” Organization Science20 (6): 941–57. 10.1287/orsc.1090.0435
    https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0435 [Google Scholar]
  46. Weigand, Edda, and István Kecskés
    eds. 2018From Pragmatics to Dialogue. Dialogue Studies (DS), volume311. Amsterdam ; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/ds.31
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.31 [Google Scholar]
  47. Wertsch, James V.
    1980 “The Significance of Dialogue in Vygotsky’s Account of Social, Egocentric, and Inner Speech.” Contemporary Educational Psychology51: 150–62. 10.1016/0361‑476X(80)90036‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(80)90036-3 [Google Scholar]
  48. Wright, Sarah
    2018 “When Dialogue Means Refusal.” Dialogues in Human Geography8 (2): 128–32. 10.1177/2043820618780570
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820618780570 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00144.let
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error