Embodied action in remote online interaction

References

1. Auer, Peter
   2014 “There’s no harm in glossing (but a need for a better understanding of the status of transcripts.” Research on Language and Social Interaction47(1): 17–22. 10.1080/08351813.2014.871795
   https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2014.871795 [Google Scholar]
2. Ayaß, Ruth
   2015 “Doing data: The status of transcripts in conversation analysis.” Discourse Studies17(5): 508–528. 10.1177/1461445615590717
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445615590717 [Google Scholar]
3. Barnes, Rebecca
   2007 “Formulations and the facilitation of common agreement in meetings talk.” Text & Talk27(3): 273–296. 10.1515/TEXT.2007.011
   https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2007.011 [Google Scholar]
4. Birlik, Seval and Jagdish Kaur
   2020 “BELF expert users: Making understanding visible in internal BELF meetings through the use of nonverbal communication strategies.” English for Specific Purposes581(2020): 1–14. 10.1016/j.esp.2019.10.002
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2019.10.002 [Google Scholar]
5. Bush, Robert A. Baruch and Joseph P. Folger
   2005 The Promise of Mediation: The Transformative Approach to Conflict. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bush, Robert A. Baruch and Joseph P. Folger
   2012 “Mediation and social justice: Risks and opportunities.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution27(1): 1–52.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bush, Robert A. Baruch and Sally Ganong Pope
   2002 “Changing the quality of conflict interaction: The principles and practice of transformative mediation.” Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal31: 67–96.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Button, Graham
   1987 “Moving out of closings.” In: Talk and Social Organisation, ed. byGraham Button, and J. R. E. Lee, 101–151. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781800418226‑007
   https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800418226-007 [Google Scholar]
9. Cibulka, Paul
   2015 “When the hands do not go home: A micro-study of the role of gesture phases in sequence suspension and closure.” Discourse Studies17(1): 3–24. 10.1177/1461445614557756
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445614557756 [Google Scholar]
10. Drew, Paul and John Heritage
    (eds) 1992 Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Ford, Cecilia E. and Trina Stickle
    2012 “Securing recipiency in workplace meetings: Multimodal practices.” Discourse Studies14(1): 11–30. 10.1177/1461445611427213
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611427213 [Google Scholar]
12. Gan, Yumei, Christian Greiffenhagen, and Christian Licoppe
    2020 “Orchestrated openings in video calls: Getting young left-behind children to greet their migrant parents.” Journal of Pragmatics1701(2020): 364–80. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.022
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.022 [Google Scholar]
13. Garcia, Angela Cora and Erik Cleven
    . n.d. “How reflection works in transformative dialogue/mediation: A preliminary investigation.” (unpublished paper, under review)
    [Google Scholar]
14. Garcia, Angela Cora, and Jennifer Baker Jacobs
    1998 “The interactional organization of computer mediated communication in the college classroom.” Qualitative Sociology21(3): 299–317. 10.1023/A:1022146620473
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022146620473 [Google Scholar]
15. Garcia, Angela Cora and Jennifer Baker Jacobs
    1999 “Eyes of the beholder: Understanding the turn-taking system in quasi-synchronous computer-mediated communication.” Research on Language and Social Interaction32(4): 337–369. 10.1207/S15327973rls3204_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973rls3204_2 [Google Scholar]
16. Garcia, Angela Cora
    2023 An Introduction to Interaction: Understanding Talk in the Workplace and Everyday Life. London: Bloomsbury Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Garfinkel, Harold
    1967 Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Goodwin, Charles
    1984 “Notes on story structure and the organization of participation.” In: Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. byJ. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 225–246. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Heath, Christian and Paul Luff
    1992 “Media space and communicative asymmetries: Preliminary observations of video-mediated interaction.” Human-Computer Interaction7(3): 315–346. 10.1207/s15327051hci0703_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0703_3 [Google Scholar]
20. Heath, Christian, Paul Luff, and Marcus Sanchez Svensson
    2007 “Video and qualitative research: Analysing medical practice and interaction.” Medical Education41(1): 109–116. 10.1111/j.1365‑2929.2006.02641.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02641.x [Google Scholar]
21. Heath, Christian and Lorenza Mondada
    2019 “Transparency and embodied action: Turn organization and fairness in complex institutional environments.” Social Psychology Quarterly82(3): 274–302. 10.1177/0190272519843303
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272519843303 [Google Scholar]
22. Jefferson, Gail
    1984 “Notes on a systematic deployment of the acknowledgment tokens ‘yeah’ and ‘mmhm’.” Papers in Linguistics17(2): 197–206. 10.1080/08351818409389201
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818409389201 [Google Scholar]
23. Jefferson, Gail
    2004 “Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction.” In: Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. byGene H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
24. Kääntä, Leila
    2012 “Teachers’ embodied allocations in instructional interaction.” Classroom Discourse3(2): 166–186. 10.1080/19463014.2012.716624
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2012.716624 [Google Scholar]
25. Kaukomaa, Timo, Anssi Peräkylä, and Johanna Ruusuvuori
    2014 “Foreshadowing a problem: Turn-opening frowns in conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics711(2014): 132–147. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.08.002 [Google Scholar]
26. Kendon, Adam
    2004 Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
27. Lerner, Gene H. and Geoffrey Raymond
    2021 “Body trouble: Some sources of difficulty in the progressive realization of manual action.” Research on Language and Social Interaction54(3): 277–298. 10.1080/08351813.2021.1936994
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2021.1936994 [Google Scholar]
28. Licoppe, Christian
    2017a “Skype appearances, multiple greetings and ‘coucou’: The sequential organization of video-mediated conversation openings.” Pragmatics27(3): 351–386.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Licoppe, Christian
    2017b “Showing objects in Skype video-mediated conversations: From showing gestures to showing sequences.” Journal of Pragmatics1101(2017): 63–82. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.007 [Google Scholar]
30. Licoppe, Christian
    2021 “The politics of visuality and talk in French courtroom proceedings with video links and remote participants.” Journal of Pragmatics1781(2021): 363–377. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.03.023
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.03.023 [Google Scholar]
31. Licoppe, Christian and Julien Morel
    2012 “Video-in-interaction: ‘Talking heads’ and the multimodal organization of mobile and Skype video calls.” Research on Language & Social Interaction45(4): 399–429. 10.1080/08351813.2012.724996
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.724996 [Google Scholar]
32. Lopez-Ozieblo, Renia
    2018 “Disagreeing without a ‘no’: How teachers indicate disagreement in a Hong Kong classroom.” Journal of Pragmatics1371(2018): 1–18. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.016 [Google Scholar]
33. Luff, Paul
    2016 “Embedded reference: Translocating gestures in video-mediated interaction.” Research on Language & Social Interaction49(4): 342–361. 10.1080/08351813.2016.1199088
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1199088 [Google Scholar]
34. Luff, Paul and Christian Heath
    2012 “Some ‘technical challenges’ of video analysis: Social actions, objects, material realities and the problems of perspective.” Qualitative Research12(3): 255–79. 10.1177/1468794112436655
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112436655 [Google Scholar]
35. Luff, Paul, Menisha Patel, Hideaki Kuzuoka, and Christian Heath
    2014 “Assembling collaboration: Informing the design of interaction spaces.” Research on Language & Social Interaction47(3): 317–329. 10.1080/08351813.2014.925680
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2014.925680 [Google Scholar]
36. Markaki, Vassiliki and Lorenza Mondada
    2012 “Embodied orientations towards co-participants in multinational meetings.” Discourse Studies14(1): 31–52. 10.1177/1461445611427210
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611427210 [Google Scholar]
37. Mondada, Lorenza
    2007 “Multimodal resources for turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers.” Discourse Studies9(2): 194–225. 10.1177/1461445607075346
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607075346 [Google Scholar]
38. Mondada, Lorenza
    2009 “Video recording practices and the reflexive constitution of the interactional order: Some systematic uses of the split-screen technique.” Human Studies32(1): 67–99. 10.1007/s10746‑009‑9110‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-009-9110-8 [Google Scholar]
39. Mondada, Lorenza
    2013 “Embodied and spatial resources for turn-taking in institutional multi-party interactions: Participatory democracy debates.” Journal of Pragmatics461(2013): 39–68. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.010 [Google Scholar]
40. Mondada, Lorenza
    2018 “Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality.” Research on Language and Social Interaction51(1): 85–106. 10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878 [Google Scholar]
41. Mortensen, Kristian
    2016 “The body as a resource for other-initiation of repair: Cupping the hand behind the ear.” Research on Language and Social Interaction49(1): 34–57. 10.1080/08351813.2016.1126450
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1126450 [Google Scholar]
42. Olbertz-Siitonen, Margarethe, and Arja Piirainen-Marsh
    2021 “Coordinating action in technology-supported shared tasks: Virtual pointing as a situated practice for mobilizing a response.” Language & Communication791: 1–21. 10.1016/j.langcom.2021.03.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2021.03.005 [Google Scholar]
43. Pomerantz, Anita
    1984 “Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred-dispreferred turn shapes.” In: Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. byJ. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Rossi, Giovanni
    2018 “Composite social actions: The case of factual declaratives in everyday interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction51(4): 379–397. 10.1080/08351813.2018.1524562
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1524562 [Google Scholar]
45. Sacks, Harold
    1972 “An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology.” In: Studies in Social Interaction, ed. byDavid Sudnow, 31–74. New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Sacks, Harvey
    1992 Lectures on Conversation. Oxford, UK and Cambridge, USA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Sacks, Harvey, and Emanuel A. Schegloff
    2002 “Home position.” Gesture2(2): 133–146. 10.1075/gest.2.2.02sac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.2.2.02sac [Google Scholar]
48. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.” Language50(4): 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
49. Sahlström, Fritjof J.
    2002 “The interactional organization of hand raising in classroom interaction.” Journal of Classroom Interaction37(2): 47–57.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Satar, Müge H.
    2016 “Meaning-making in online language learner interactions via desktop videoconferencing.” ReCALL28(3): 305–325. 10.1017/S0958344016000100
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344016000100 [Google Scholar]
51. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1984 “On some gestures’ relation to talk.” In: Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. byJ. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 266–296. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2000 “Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation.” Language in Society29(1): 1–63. 10.1017/S0047404500001019
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500001019 [Google Scholar]
53. Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Harvey Sacks
    1973 “Opening up closings.” Semiotica8(4): 289–327. 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
54. Stukenbrock, Anja
    2009 “Herausforderungen der multimodalen Transkription: Methodische und theoretische Überlegungen aus der wissenschaftlichen Praxis.” [“Challenges of multimodal transcription. Methodical and theoretical considerations from scientific practice.”] In: Die Arbeit mit Transkripten in Fortbildung, Lehre und Forschung, ed. byKarin Birkner and Anja Stukenbrock, 144–169. Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Streeck, Jürgen
    2009a “Forward-gesturing.” Discourse Processes46(2–3): 161–179. 10.1080/01638530902728793
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530902728793 [Google Scholar]
56. Streeck, Jürgen
    2009b Gesturecraft: The Manu-facture of Meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/gs.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.2 [Google Scholar]
57. Tuncer, Sylvaine, Oskar Lindwall, and Barry Brown
    2021 “Making time: Pausing to coordinate video instructions and practical tasks.” Symbolic Interaction44(3): 603–631. 10.1002/symb.516
    https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.516 [Google Scholar]
58. Weigand, Edda
    2010 Dialogue. The Mixed Game. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]
59. Weigand, Edda
    2021 “Language and dialogue in philosophy and science.” Intercultural Pragmatics18(4): 533–561. 10.1515/ip‑2021‑4005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2021-4005 [Google Scholar]
60. Weigand, Edda
    2023 “Principles of New Science Dialogue between science and philosophy.” Language and Dialogue13(1): 26–50. 10.1075/ld.00142.wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00142.wei [Google Scholar]
61. Zouinar, Moustafa and Julia Velkovska
    2017 “Talking about things: Image-based topical talk and intimacy in video-mediated family communication.” Pragmatics27(3): 387–418.
    [Google Scholar]