1887
Volume 13, Issue 3
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper looks at cross-cultural variation in corporate communication over the pandemic, focusing on the language adopted by rail companies in the UK and Italy to enhance trust in safety and highlighting how they engage in communicative action with potential passengers and other online users. The analysis shows that UK companies generally prefer personal forms of self-mention and avoid technicisms, while Italian companies adopt more formal language and more impersonal forms of self-representation. Common elements seem to be related to repeated communicative functions, and the semantic elements they involve, thus highlighting the close link between pragmatic units and lexico-grammatical patterns (with their semantics), as well as the interplay between meaning, dialogic action and context in communication.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00154.bon
2023-09-18
2024-06-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abbas, Ali Haif
    2022 “Politicizing COVID-19 vaccines in the press: A critical discourse analysis”. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique35(3): 1167–1185. 10.1007/s11196‑021‑09857‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-021-09857-3 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aiezza, Maria Cristina
    2015 “We May Face the Risks”… “Risks that Could Adversely Affect Our Face”. A Corpus-assisted Discourse Analysis of Modality Markers in CSR Reports”. Studies in Communication Sciences15 (1): 68–76. 10.1016/j.scoms.2015.03.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scoms.2015.03.005 [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-Mwzaiji, Khaled N. A.
    2021 “The Political Spin of Conviction: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Origin of Covid-19”. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies21(1): 239–242. 10.17576/gema‑2021‑2101‑14
    https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2021-2101-14 [Google Scholar]
  4. Anthony, Laurence
    2020AntConc (Version 3.5.9) [Computer Software]. Waseda University, Tokyo. https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Berrocal, Martina, Michael Kranert, Paola Attolino, Júlio Antonio Bonatti Santos, Sara Garcia Santamaria, Nancy Henaku, Aimée Danielle Lezou Koffi, Camilla Marziani, Viktorija Mažeikienė, Dasniel Olivera Pérez, Kumaran Rajandran, and Aleksandra Salamurović
    2021 “Constructing collective identities and solidarity in premiers’ early speeches on COVID-19: a global perspective”. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications8 (1): 1–12
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bhatia, Aditi
    2012 “The Corporate Social Responsibility Report: The Hybridization of a “Confused” Genre (2007–2011)”. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication55 (3): 221–238. 10.1109/TPC.2012.2205732
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2012.2205732 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bondi, Marina
    2016a “The Future in Reports: Prediction, Commitment and Legitimization in CSR.” Pragmatics and Society7 (1): 57–81. 10.1075/ps.7.1.03bon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.7.1.03bon [Google Scholar]
  8. 2016b “CSR Reports in English and Italian: Focus on Generic Structure and Importance Markers”. InLanguage for Specific Purposes. Research and Translation across Cultures and Media, ed. byGiuliana Garzone, Dermot Heaney, and Giorgia Riboni, 168–199. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bondi, Marina and Danni Yu
    2018 “The Generic Structure of CSR Reports: Dynamicity, Multimodality, Complexity and Recursivity”. InDiscourse Communication and the Enterprise: When Business Meets Language, ed. byWalter Giordano and Giuliana Garzone, 176–205. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Breeze, Ruth
    2012 “Legitimation in Corporate Discourse: Oil Corporations after Deepwater Horizon”. Discourse and Society23 (1): 3–18. 10.1177/0957926511431511
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511431511 [Google Scholar]
  11. Casañ Pitarch, Ricardo
    2015 “The Genre ‘about Us’: A Case Study of Banks’ Corporate Webpages.” International Journal of Language Studies91: 69–96.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Catenaccio, Paola
    2010 “Representations of Corporate Philanthropy. A Linguistic Approach.” InDiscourse, Identities and Genres in Corporate Communication, ed. byPaola Evangelisti Allori and Giuliana Elena Garzone, 121–142. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 2011 “Green Advertising and Corporate CSR Communication: Hybrid Discourses, Mutant Genres”. InGenre(s) on the Move. Hybridization and Discourse Change in Specialized Communication, ed. bySrikant Sarangi, Vanda Polese, and Giuditta Caliendo, 353–372. Napoli: ESI.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2012Understanding CSR Discourse. Insights from Linguistics and Discourse Analysis. Milano: Arcipelago.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Conte, Francesca, Agostino Vollero, Claudia Covucci, and Alfonso Siano
    2020 “Corporate Social Responsibility Penetration, Explicitness, and Symbolic Communication Practices in Asia: A National Business System Exploration of Leading Firms in Sustainability”. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management27 (3): 1425–1435. 10.1002/csr.1895
    https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1895 [Google Scholar]
  16. Djonov, Emilia
    2007 “Website Hierarchy and the Interaction between Content Organization, Webpage and Navigation Design: A Systemic Functional Hypermedia Discourse Analysis Perspective.” Information Design Journal15(2): 144–162. 10.1075/idj.15.2.07djo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.15.2.07djo [Google Scholar]
  17. Einwiller, Sabine, Christopher Ruppel, and Alexandra Schnauber
    2016 “Harmonization and Differences in CSR Reporting of US and German Companies.” Corporate Communications: An International Journal21 (2): 230–245. 10.1108/CCIJ‑09‑2014‑0062
    https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-09-2014-0062 [Google Scholar]
  18. Fuoli, Matteo
    2012 “Assessing Social Responsibility: A Quantitative Analysis of Appraisal in BP’s and IKEA’s Social Reports.” Discourse and Communication6 (1): 55–81. 10.1177/1750481311427788
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481311427788 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fuoli, Matteo and Carita Paradis
    2014 “A Model of Trust-Repair Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics741: 52–69. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.09.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Habib, Muhammad Ahsanul and Md Asif Hasan Anik
    2021 “Impacts of COVID-19 on Transport Modes and Mobility Behavior: Analysis of Public Discourse in Twitter.” Transportation Research Record2677(4): 65–78. 10.1177/03611981211029926
    https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211029926 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hafner, Christoph A.
    2021 “Communicating Expertise in the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Genre Analytical Perspective.” Viral Discourse, 13–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Halliday, M. A. K. and Christian Matthiessen
    2004An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Herring, Susan, Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen
    2013Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110214468
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214468 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hunston, Susan
    2002Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524773
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524773 [Google Scholar]
  25. Jamali, Dima and Ben Neville
    2011 “Convergence versus Divergence of CSR in Developing Countries: An Embedded Multi-layered Institutional Lens.” Journal of Business Ethics1021: 599–621. 10.1007/s10551‑011‑0830‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0830-0 [Google Scholar]
  26. Jaworska, Sylvia
    2021 “Competence and collectivity: The discourse of Angela Merkel’s media communications during the first wave of the pandemic.” Discourse, Context and Media421, article 100506. 10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100506
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100506 [Google Scholar]
  27. Jiang, Feng (Kevin) and Ken Hyland
    2020 “Prescription and Reality in Advanced Academic Writing.” Ibérica391: 14–42. 10.17398/2340‑2784.39.14
    https://doi.org/10.17398/2340-2784.39.14 [Google Scholar]
  28. Jones, Rodney H.
    (ed.) 2021Viral Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108986465
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108986465 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kim, Changsu, Jungkeun Kim, Roger Marshall, and Hajir Afzali
    2018 “Stakeholder Influence, Institutional Duality, and CSR Involvement of MNC Subsidiaries.” Journal of Business Research911: 40–47. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.044
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.044 [Google Scholar]
  30. Luzón, María José
    2021 “Digital Genres and Teaching English for Academic Purposes”. InResearch Questions in Language Education and Applied Linguistics, ed. byHassan Mohebbi and Christine Coombe, 627–632. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑79143‑8_109
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79143-8_109 [Google Scholar]
  31. Mahlberg, Michaela and Gavin Brookes
    2021 “Introduction.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics26 (4): 441–443. 10.1075/ijcl.00043.mah
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.00043.mah [Google Scholar]
  32. Malavasi, Donatella
    2012 “The Necessary Balance between Sustainability and Economic Success: An Analysis of Fiat’s and Toyota’s Corporate Social Responsibility Reports.” InThe Language Factor in International Business. New Perspectives on Research, Teaching and Practice, ed. byPriscilla Heynderickx, Sylvain Dieltjens, Jacobs Geert, Paul Gillaerts, and Elizabeth de Groot, 247–264. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Martin, James R. and Peter R. R. White
    2005The Language of Evaluation. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  34. Medina, Alicia Bolaños, María Jesús Rodríguez Medina, Lydia Bolaños, and Luis Losada García
    2005 “Analysing Digital Genres: Function and Functionality in Corporate Websites of Computer Hardware.” Ibérica91: 123–147.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Mheidly, Nour and Jawad Fares
    2020 “Leveraging media and health communication strategies to overcome the COVID-19 infodemic.” Public Health Policy41(4): 410–420. 10.1057/s41271‑020‑00247‑w
    https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-020-00247-w [Google Scholar]
  36. Mohammed, Shan, Elizabeth Peter, Tieghan Killackey, and Jane Maciver
    2021 “The “nurse as hero” discourse in the COVID-19 pandemic: A poststructural discourse analysis.” International Journal of Nursing Studies1171: 103887. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103887
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103887 [Google Scholar]
  37. Musolff, Andreas, Ruth Breeze, Kayo Kondo, and Sara Vilar-Lluch
    2022Pandemic and Crisis Discourse. Communicating COVID-19 and Public Health Strategy. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350232730
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350232730 [Google Scholar]
  38. Piller, Ingrid, Jie Zhang, and Jia Li
    2020 “Linguistic diversity in a time of crisis: Language challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic.” Multilingua39 (5): 503–515. 10.1515/multi‑2020‑0136
    https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2020-0136 [Google Scholar]
  39. Sinclair, John
    1991Corpus Concordance and Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Stubbs, Michael
    2001Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. New Jersey: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Sultan, Sultan and Muhammad Rapi
    2020 “Positive Discourse Analysis of the Indonesian Government Spokesperson’s Discursive Strategies during the COVID-19 Pandemic.” GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies20 (4): 251–272. 10.17576/gema‑2020‑2004‑14
    https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2020-2004-14 [Google Scholar]
  42. Sun, Zhikuan and Yan Zhang
    2022 “Strategic crisis response of shipping industry in the post COVID-19 era: a case of the top 10 shipping Lines.” Journal of Marine Science and Engineering10(5): 635. 10.3390/jmse10050635
    https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10050635 [Google Scholar]
  43. Tenca, Emanuela
    2018 “Remediating Corporate Communication Through the Web: The Case of ‘About US’ Sections in Companies’ Global Websites.” ESP Today6 (1): 84–106. 10.18485/esptoday.2018.6.1.5
    https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2018.6.1.5 [Google Scholar]
  44. Williams, Cynthia A. and Ruth V. Aguilera
    2008 “Corporate Social Responsibility in a Comparative Perspective.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, ed. byAndrew Crane, Abagail McWilliams, Dirk Matten, Jeremy Moon, and Donald Siegel, 452–472. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199211593.003.0020
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199211593.003.0020 [Google Scholar]
  45. Yu, Danni and Marina Bondi
    2017 “The Generic Structure of CSR Reports in Italian, Chinese, and English: A Corpus-Based Analysis”. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication60 (3): 273–291. 10.1109/TPC.2017.2702040
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2017.2702040 [Google Scholar]
  46. 2019 “A genre-based analysis of forward-looking statements in corporate social responsibility reports”. Written Communication36(3): 379–409. 10.1177/0741088319841612
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088319841612 [Google Scholar]
  47. Yu, Hangyan, Huiling Lu, and Jie Hu
    2021 “A corpus-based critical discourse analysis of news reports on the COVID-19 pandemic in China and the UK”. International Journal of English Linguistics11(2): 36–45. 10.5539/ijel.v11n2p36
    https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v11n2p36 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00154.bon
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00154.bon
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error