A dialogic speech act approach to ridiculing references in the French presidential debate of 2022

References

1. Emmanuel Macron – Marine Le Pen, presidential debate
   Emmanuel Macron – Marine Le Pen, presidential debate, April20th 2022: franceinfo – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v6g0u6yrDGc
2. Bakhtin, Mikhail. M.
   1981 The Dialogic Imagination. Four essays. Michael Holquist (ed.). University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bakhtin, Mikhail. M.
   1986 Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Emerson, C. and Holquist, M. (Eds.). University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Barbe, Katharina
   1995 Irony in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.34
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.34 [Google Scholar]
5. Bergson, Henri
   1924 Le Rire. Paris: Librairie Felix Alcan.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Billig, Michael
   2005 Laughter and Ridicule. Towards a Social Critique of Humour. London: Sage Publications. 10.4135/9781446211779
   https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446211779 [Google Scholar]
7. Charaudeau, Patrick
   2006 “Des catégories pour l’humour?” Questions de communication101, 19–41. RetrievedOctober 16, 2022, fromwww.patrick-charaudeau.com/Des-categories-pour-l-humour,93.html. 10.4000/questionsdecommunication.7688
   https://doi.org/10.4000/questionsdecommunication.7688 [Google Scholar]
8. Charaudeau, Patrick
   2011 “Des catégories pour l’humour. Précisions, rectifications, complements.” InHumour et crises sociales. Regards croisés France-Espagne, ed. byM. D. Vicero Garcia, 9–43. Paris: L’Harmattan.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Charaudeau, Patrick
   2015 “Le débat presidential. Un combat de mots. Une victoire aux points.” Revue Langage et Société1(151): 109–129. 10.3917/ls.151.0109
   https://doi.org/10.3917/ls.151.0109 [Google Scholar]
10. Chilton, Paul
    2004 Analysing Political Discourse. Theory and Practice. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203561218
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218 [Google Scholar]
11. Clark, Herbert H. and Richard J. Gerrig
    1984 “On the Pretense Theory of Irony.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General113(1): 121–126. 10.1037/0096‑3445.113.1.121
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.121 [Google Scholar]
12. Du Bois, John. W., Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Susanna Cumming, and Danae Paolino
    1993 “Outline of Discourse Transcription.” InTalking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research, ed. byJane A. Edwards and Martin D. Lampert. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Goffman, Erving
    1955 On Face-Work. Psychiatry18(3): 213–231. 10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008 [Google Scholar]
14. Goffman, Erving
    1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Haverkate, Henk
    1990 “A Speech Act Analysis of Irony.” Journal of Pragmatics141: 77–109. 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90065‑L
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90065-L [Google Scholar]
16. Ilie, Cornelia
    2018 Pragmatics vs rhetoric: Political discourse at the pragmatics-rhetoric interface. InPragmatics and its Interfaces, ed. byCornelia Ilie and Neil Norrick, 85–119. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.294.05ili
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.294.05ili [Google Scholar]
17. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
    2013a “Humour et ironie dans le débat Hollande-Sarkozy de l’entre-deux-tour des éléctions présidentielles (2 mai 2012).” Langage et société1461: 49–69. 10.3917/ls.146.0049
    https://doi.org/10.3917/ls.146.0049 [Google Scholar]
18. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
    2013b “L’ironie: problèmes de frontière et étude de cas. Sarkozy face à Royal (2 mai 2007).” InFrontières de l’Humour, ed. byM. D. Vivero Garcia, 27–62. Paris: L’Harmattan.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
    2019 Le débat Le Pen / Macron du 3 mai 2017: Un débat «disruptif»?. Paris: L’Harmattan.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Linell, Per
    2017 “Dialogue, dialogicality and interactivity. A conceptually bewildering field?” Language and Dialogue7(3): 301–336. 10.1075/ld.7.3.01lin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.7.3.01lin [Google Scholar]
21. Midgley, Warren
    2011 Look Who’s Listening: Using the superaddressee for understanding connections in dialogue. Information Age Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Saussure, Ferdinand de
    1931 Cours de Linguistique Générale. Ed. byCharles Bally, Albert Sechehaye. 3e édition. Paris: Payot.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Weigand, Edda
    2010 Dialogue: The mixed game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]
24. Weigand, Edda
    2021 “Dialogue: The complex whole.” Language and Dialogue11(3): 457–486. 10.1075/ld.00106.wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00106.wei [Google Scholar]
25. Wilson, Deidre and Dan Sperber
    2012 Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139028370
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028370 [Google Scholar]