1887
Volume 14, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127

Abstract

Abstract

Politicians often mention their personality traits when communicating with the public that aligns with the concept of impression management (Benoit and McHale 2003). This suggests that politicians can use their personalities to create a favorable image during election campaigns (Van Santen and Van Zoonen 2010). However, previous research has not adequately incorporated personality theories into the study of impression management (Clifford 2018). Addressing this gap, our study examines how presidential candidates presented themselves during the 2016 and 2020 US elections, and explores the personality traits emphasized in campaign communication. Our research combines qualitative and quantitative methods and diverse data sources, including political commercials and speeches. This study contributes to the field by incorporating personality theories into the study of political impression management.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00163.die
2024-01-19
2024-10-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ld.00163.die.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00163.die&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Adam, Silke and Michaela Maier
    2010 “Personalization of Politics: A Critical Review and Agenda for Research.” Communication Yearbook341: 213–257.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Allport, Gordon W.
    1961Pattern and growth in personality. Oxford: Holt, Reinhart, and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Alonso-Muñoz, Laura, Silvia Marcos-García, and Andreu Casero-Ripollés
    2016 “Political leaders in (inter)action. Twitter as a strategic communication tool in electoral campaigns.” Tripodos. Blanquerna School of Communication and International Relations391: 71–90.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ariely, Gal
    2017 “Why does patriotism prevail? Contextual explanations of patriotism across countries.” Identities – Global Studies in Culture and Power24(3): 351–377. 10.1080/1070289X.2016.1149069
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2016.1149069 [Google Scholar]
  5. Ashton, Michael C., Kibeom Lee, and Reinout E. De Vries
    2014 “The HEXACO Honesty-Humility, Agreeableness, and Emotionality Factors: A Review of Research and Theory.” Personality and Social Psychology Review18(2): 139–152. 10.1177/1088868314523838
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314523838 [Google Scholar]
  6. Balgiu, Beatrice Adriana
    2013 “Perception of women as managers. The difference of attitudes between employees and non-employees.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences781: 330–334. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.305
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.305 [Google Scholar]
  7. Balmas, Michael, Gideon Rahat, Tamir Sheafer, and Shaul R. Shenhav
    2012 “Two routes to personalized politics: Centralized and decentralized personalization.” Party Politics20(1): 37–51. 10.1177/1354068811436037
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811436037 [Google Scholar]
  8. Barr, Robert R.
    2009 “Populists, outsiders and anti-establishment politics.” Larty politics15(1): 29–48. 10.1177/1354068808097890
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068808097890 [Google Scholar]
  9. Benoit, William L.
    1999Seeing Spots: A functional analysis of presidential television advertisements, 1952–1996. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Benoit, William L. and J. P. McHale
    2003 “‘Presidential candidates’ television spots and personal qualities.” Southern Journal of Communication68(4): 319–334. 10.1080/10417940309373270
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10417940309373270 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bhattacharya, Soumya, Cheng Yang, Preethi Srinivasan, and Brian Boynton
    2016 “Perceptions of presidential candidates’ personalities in twitter.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology67(2): 249–267. 10.1002/asi.23377
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23377 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bimber, Bruce
    2014 “Digital Media in the Obama Campaigns of 2008 and 2012: Adaptation to the Personalized Political Communication Environment.” Journal of Information Technology and Politics11(2): 130–150. 10.1080/19331681.2014.895691
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.895691 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bowes, Scott M., Thomas H. Costello, Charles Lee, Stephanie McElroy-Heltzelf, David E. Davis and Scott O. Lilienfeld
    2021 “Stepping Outside the Echo Chamber: Is Intellectual Humility Associated With Less Political Myside Bias?” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin11: 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Boyer, Ming M., Loes Aaldering, and Sophie Lecheler
    2020 “Motivated Reasoning in Identity Politics: Group Status as a Moderator of Political Motivations.” Political Studies1–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Brandt, Tiina, and Maarit Laiho
    2013 “Gender and personality in transformational leadership context.” Leadership and Organization Development Journal34(1): 44–66. 10.1108/01437731311289965
    https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731311289965 [Google Scholar]
  16. Brunnerová, Olga
    2019 “It’s Getting Personal: Personalisation of political campaigns in four Prague districts during the 2018 Czech Senate elections.” Politics in Central Europe15(2): 279–308. 10.2478/pce‑2019‑0018
    https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2019-0018 [Google Scholar]
  17. Caprara, Gian Vittorio, and Jo Silvester
    2018 The personality attributes of political elites. InThe Palgrave Handbook of Political Elites, ed. byH. Best and J. Higley, 467–488. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑51904‑7_30
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51904-7_30 [Google Scholar]
  18. Carney, Dana R., John T. Jost, Samuel D. Gosling, and Jeff Potter
    2008 “The Secret Lives of Liberals and Conservatives: Personality Profiles, Interaction Styles, and the Things They Leave Behind.” Political Psychology29(6): 807–840. 10.1111/j.1467‑9221.2008.00668.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00668.x [Google Scholar]
  19. Clifford, Scott
    2018 “Reassessing the structure of presidential character.” Electoral Studies541: 240–247. 10.1016/j.electstud.2018.04.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2018.04.006 [Google Scholar]
  20. 2019 “Compassionate Democrats and Tough Republicans: How Ideology Shapes Partisan Stereotypes.” Political Behavior.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Costa, Patrício and Frederico Ferreira da Silva
    2015 “The impact of voter evaluations of leaders” traits on voting behaviour: Evidence from seven European Countries.” West European Politics38(6): 1226–1250. 10.1080/01402382.2015.1004231
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2015.1004231 [Google Scholar]
  22. Devroe, Robin
    2020 “Voters’ evaluation of (contra-) prototypical political candidates. An experimental test of the interaction of candidate gender and policy positions cues in Flanders (Belgium).” Electoral Studies681: 102240. 10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102240
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102240 [Google Scholar]
  23. Landtsheer, Christ’L. De, Philippe De Vries, and Dieter Vertessen
    2008 “Political Impression Management: How Metaphors, Sound Bites, Appearance Effectiveness, and Personality Traits Can Win Elections.” Journal of Political Marketing7(3–4): 217–238. 10.1080/15377850802005083
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15377850802005083 [Google Scholar]
  24. Deluga, Ronald J.
    2001 “American presidential Machiavellianism: Implications for charismatic leadership and rated performance.” The Leadership Quarterly12(3): 339–363. 10.1016/S1048‑9843(01)00082‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(01)00082-0 [Google Scholar]
  25. Enli, Gunn
    2017 “Twitter as arena for the authentic outsider: exploring the social media campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election.” European Journal of Communication32(1): 50–61. 10.1177/0267323116682802
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323116682802 [Google Scholar]
  26. Enli, Gunn and Eli Skogerbø
    2015 “Personalised Campaigns in Party-Centered Politics: Twitter and Facebook as Arenas for Political Communication.” Information Communication and Society16(5): 757–774. 10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330 [Google Scholar]
  27. Fridkin, Kim L. and Patrick J. Kenney
    2011 “The Role of Candidate Traits in Campaigns.” The Journal of Politics73(1): 61–73. 10.1017/S0022381610000861
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381610000861 [Google Scholar]
  28. Garzia, Diego, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, and Andrea De Angelis
    2021 “The personalisation of politics: why political leaders now lie at the heart of European democracy.” LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) Blog.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Gilmore, Jason, and Charlwes M. Rowling
    2019 “Partisan Patriotism in the American Presidency: American Exceptionalism, Issue Ownership, and the Age of Trump.” Mass Communication and Society22(3): 389–416. 10.1080/15205436.2018.1559334
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2018.1559334 [Google Scholar]
  30. Glaser, Barney G.
    1965 “The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis.” Social Problems12(4): 436–445.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Goffman, Erving
    1959The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life: Anchor Books edition. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Graham, Jesse, Jonathan Haidt, and Brian A. Nosek
    2009 “Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology96(5): 1029. 10.1037/a0015141
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141 [Google Scholar]
  33. Graham, Todd, Daniel Jackson, and Marcel Broersma
    2018 “The personal in the political on Twitter.” InManaging Democracy in the Digital Age, ed. bySchwanholz, J., Graham, T., Stoll, P. T., 137–157. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑61708‑4_8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61708-4_8 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hayes, Danny
    2005 “Candidate Qualities through a Partisan Lens: A Theory of Trait Ownership.” American Journal of Political Science49(4): 908–923. 10.1111/j.1540‑5907.2005.00163.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00163.x [Google Scholar]
  35. Hayes, Andrew F. and Klaus Krippendorff
    2007 “Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data.” Communication Methods and Measures1(1): 77–89. 10.1080/19312450709336664
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19312450709336664 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hayes, Danny
    2011 “When gender and party collide: Stereotyping in candidate trait attribution.” Politics and Gender7(2): 133. 10.1017/S1743923X11000055
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X11000055 [Google Scholar]
  37. Hill, Ronald Paul
    1989 “An Exploration of Voter Responses to Political Advertisements.” Journal of Advertising18(4):14–22. 10.1080/00913367.1989.10673163
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1989.10673163 [Google Scholar]
  38. Hodson, Gordon, Sarah M. Hogg, and Cara C. MacInnis
    2009 “The role of “dark personalities” (narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy).” Journal of Research in Personality43(4): 686–690. 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.005 [Google Scholar]
  39. Huddy, Leonie, David O. Sears, and Jack S. Levy
    2013The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199760107.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199760107.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  40. Huddy, Leonie and Nayda Terkildsen
    1993 “Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates.” American Journal of Political Science38(1): 119–147. 10.2307/2111526
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2111526 [Google Scholar]
  41. Immelman, Aubrey
    1998 “The political personalities of 1996 US presidential candidates Bill Clinton and Bob Dole.” The Leadership Quarterly9(3): 335–366. 10.1016/S1048‑9843(98)90035‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(98)90035-2 [Google Scholar]
  42. 2005 “Political Psychology and Personality.” InHandbook of Personology and Psychopathology, edited byS. Strack, 198–225. Haboken: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Joly, Jeroen K., Stuart Soroka, and Peter Loewen
    2019 “Nice guys finish last: personality and political.” Acta Politica54(1): 667–683. 10.1057/s41269‑018‑0095‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-018-0095-z [Google Scholar]
  44. Judge, Timothy A. and Joyce E. Bono
    2000 “Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership.” Journal of Applied Psychology85(5): 751–765. 10.1037/0021‑9010.85.5.751
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.751 [Google Scholar]
  45. Jung, Younbo, Ashley Tay, Terence Hong, Judith Ho, and Yan Hui Goh
    2017 “Politician’s strategic impression management on Instagram.” Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.. 10.24251/HICSS.2017.265
    https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2017.265 [Google Scholar]
  46. Katz, Nathan
    2016 “Impression Management, Super PACs and the 2012 Republican Primary.” Symbolic Interaction11: 39. 10.1002/symb.232
    https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.232 [Google Scholar]
  47. Kriesi, Hanspeter
    2011 “Personalization of national election campaigns.” Party Politics18(6): 825–844. 10.1177/1354068810389643
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068810389643 [Google Scholar]
  48. Krishnamurthy, Meena
    2013 “Political Solidarity, Justice and Public Health.” Public Health Ethics6(2): 129–141. 10.1093/phe/pht017
    https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/pht017 [Google Scholar]
  49. Kumar, Kamalesh and Michael Beyerlein
    1991 “Construction and validation of an instrument for measuring ingratiatory behaviors in organizational settings.” Journal of Applied Psychology76(5): 619. 10.1037/0021‑9010.76.5.619
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.5.619 [Google Scholar]
  50. Lalancette, Mireille and Vincent Raynauld
    2019 “The Power of Political Image: Justin Trudeau, Instagram, and Celebrity Politics.” American Behavioral Scientist63(7): 888–924. 10.1177/0002764217744838
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764217744838 [Google Scholar]
  51. Lee, Kibeom and Michael C. Ashton
    2004 “Psychometric Properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory.” Multivariate Behavioral Research39(2): 329–358. 10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8 [Google Scholar]
  52. 2005 “Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and Narcissism in the Five-Factor Model and the HEXACO Model of Personality Structure.” Personality and Individual Differences381: 1571–1582. 10.1016/j.paid.2004.09.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.09.016 [Google Scholar]
  53. Lilienfeld, Scott O., Christopher J. Patrick, Stephen D. Benning, Joanna Berg, Martin Sellbom and John F. Edens
    2012 “The role of fearless dominance in psychopathy: Confusions, controversies, and clarifications.” Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment3(3): 327–340. 10.1037/a0026987
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026987 [Google Scholar]
  54. Lombard, Matthew, Jennifer Snyder‐Duch, and Cheryl Campanella Bracken
    2002 “Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability.” Human Communication Research28(4): 587–604. 10.1111/j.1468‑2958.2002.tb00826.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x [Google Scholar]
  55. López-Meri, Amparo, Silvia Marcos-García, and Andreu Casero-Ripollés
    2017 “What do politicians do on Twitter? Functions and communication strategies in the Spanish electoral campaign of 2016.” El profesional de la información26(5): 795–804. 10.3145/epi.2017.sep.02
    https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.sep.02 [Google Scholar]
  56. McGregor, Shannon C.
    2018 “Personalization, social media, and voting: Effects of candidate self-personalization on vote intention.” New Media and Society20(3): 1139–1160. 10.1177/1461444816686103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686103 [Google Scholar]
  57. Metz, Manon, Sanne Kruikemeier, and Sophie Lecheler
    2020 “Personalization of politics on Facebook: Examining the content and effects of professional, emotional and private self-personalization.” Information, Communication, and Society23(10): 1481–1498. 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1581244
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1581244 [Google Scholar]
  58. Millon, Theodore
    1992 “Millon clinical multiaxial inventory: I and II.” Journal of Counseling and Development70(3): 421–426. 10.1002/j.1556‑6676.1992.tb01627.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1992.tb01627.x [Google Scholar]
  59. 1994Millon Index of Personality Styles Manual. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Mortelmans, Dimitri
    2020Handboek kwalitatieve onderzoeksmethoden / Handbook of qualitative research methods. Leuven: Acco.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Patton, Michael Quinn
    1990Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Beverly Hills: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Paulhus, Delroy L., and Kevin M. Williams
    2002 “The Dark Triad of Personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and Psychopathy.” Journal of Research in Personality361: 556–563. 10.1016/S0092‑6566(02)00505‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6 [Google Scholar]
  63. Renstrom, Randall A. and Victor C. Ottati
    2020 ““I Feel Your Pain”: The Effect of Displaying Empathy on Political Candidate Evaluation.” Journal of Social and Political Psychology8(2): 767–787. 10.5964/jspp.v8i2.1292
    https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v8i2.1292 [Google Scholar]
  64. Rossini, Philip G., Joshua Hemsley, Siriporn Tanupabrungsun, Fei Zhang, Jeffrey Robinson, and Jennifer Stromer-Galley
    2017 “Social media, US presidential campaigns, and public opinion polls: Disentangling effects.” Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media and Society. 10.1145/3097286.3097342
    https://doi.org/10.1145/3097286.3097342 [Google Scholar]
  65. Rubenzer, Steven J., Thomas R. Faschingbauer, and Deniz S. Ones
    2000 “Assessing the U.S. Presidents Using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory.” Psychological Assessment7(4): 403–420. 10.1177/107319110000700408
    https://doi.org/10.1177/107319110000700408 [Google Scholar]
  66. Savigny, Heather
    2004 “The Media and the Personal Lives of Politicians in the United States.” Parliamentary Affairs57(1): 223–235. 10.1093/pa/gsh018
    https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsh018 [Google Scholar]
  67. Schlenker, Barry R.
    2012 “Self-presentation.” InHandbook of Self and Identity, ed. byM. R. R. Leary and J. P. Tangney, 542–570. New York: The Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Schütz, Astrid
    1995 “Entertainers, experts, or public servants? Politicians” self-presentation on television talk shows.” Political Communication12(2): 211–221. 10.1080/10584609.1995.9963066
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1995.9963066 [Google Scholar]
  69. 1998 “Assertive, Offensive, Protective, and Defensive Styles of Self-Presentation: A Taxonomy.” The Journal of Psychology132(6): 611–628. 10.1080/00223989809599293
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00223989809599293 [Google Scholar]
  70. Serazio, Michael
    2016 “Encoding the paranoid style in American politics: “anti-establishment” discourse and power in contemporary spin.” Critical Studies in Media Communication33(2): 181–194. 10.1080/15295036.2016.1174338
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2016.1174338 [Google Scholar]
  71. Sheets, Penelope, David S. Domke, and Anthony G. Greenwald
    2011 “God and country: The partisan psychology of the presidency, religion, and nation.” Political Psychology32(3): 459–484. 10.1111/j.1467‑9221.2010.00820.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00820.x [Google Scholar]
  72. Sigelman, Lee
    2001 “The Presentation of Self in Presidential Life: Onstage and Backstage With Johnson and Nixon.” Political Communication18(1): 1–22. 10.1080/10584600150217631
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600150217631 [Google Scholar]
  73. Stier, Sebastian, Arnim Bleier, Haiko Lietz, and Markus Strohmaier
    2018 “Election campaigning on social media: Politicians, audiences, and the mediation of political communication on Facebook and Twitter.” Political Communication35(1): 50–74. 10.1080/10584609.2017.1334728
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1334728 [Google Scholar]
  74. Strömbäck, Jesper, Frank Esser, and Lundby Knut
    2009 “Shaping politics: Mediatization and media interventionism.” InMediatization: Concept, Changes, Consequences, ed. byKnut Lundby, 205–223. New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Van Aelst, Peter, Tamir Sheafer, and James Stanyer
    2011 “The personalization of mediated political communication: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings.” Journalism13(2): 203–220. 10.1177/1464884911427802
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911427802 [Google Scholar]
  76. Van Aelst, Peter, Tamir Sheafer, and James Stanyer
    2012 “The personalization of mediated political communication: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings.” Journalism13(2): 203–220. 10.1177/1464884911427802
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911427802 [Google Scholar]
  77. Van Santen, Rosa and Liesbet Van Zoonen
    2009 “Popularisering en personalisering in politieke communicatie.” Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschap37(2):155–176. 10.1347/tijd.37.2.155
    https://doi.org/10.1347/tijd.37.2.155 [Google Scholar]
  78. 2010 “The Personal in Political Television Biographies.” Politics and Popular Culture33(1): 46–67. 10.1353/bio.0.0157
    https://doi.org/10.1353/bio.0.0157 [Google Scholar]
  79. Van Zoonen, Liesbet and Christina Holtz-Bacha
    2002 “Personalisation in Dutch and German Politics: The Case of Talk Show.” Javnost – The Public7(2): 45–56. 10.1080/13183222.2000.11008743
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2000.11008743 [Google Scholar]
  80. Vernon, Philip A., Vincent C. Villani, Lisa C. Vickers, and Julie A. Harris
    2008 “A behavioral genetic investigation of the Dark Triad and the Big 5.” Personality and Individual Differences44(2): 445–452. 10.1016/j.paid.2007.09.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.09.007 [Google Scholar]
  81. Watts, Ashley L., Scott O. Lilienfeld, Sarah F. Smith, Joshua D. Miller, W. Keith Campbell, Irwin D. Waldman, and Thomas J. Faschingbauer
    2013 “The Double-Edged Sword of Grandiose Narcissism.” Psychology Science24(2): 2379–2389. 10.1177/0956797613491970
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613491970 [Google Scholar]
  82. Wells, Christopher, Dhavan V. Shah, John C. Pevehouse, JungHwan Yang, Amit Pelled, Franziska Boehm, and Julia L. Schmidt
    2016 “How Trump Drove Coverage to the Nomination: Hybrid Media Campaigning.” Political Communication33(4): 669–676. 10.1080/10584609.2016.1224416
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1224416 [Google Scholar]
  83. Winter, Nicholas J.
    2010 “Masculine republicans and feminine democrats: Gender and Americans’ explicit and implicit images of the political parties.” Political Behavior32(4): 587–618. 10.1007/s11109‑010‑9131‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9131-z [Google Scholar]
  84. Winter, David. G.
    2013 “Personality Profiles of Political Elites.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, 423–458. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Yi, Yan
    2016 “Information control and political impression management: A dramaturgical analysis of the Chinese premier’s press conference.” International Journal of Communication101: 21.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00163.die
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00163.die
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error