Review of Lewiński & Aakhus (2023): Argumentation in Complex Communication: Managing Disagreement in a Polylogue

References

1. Aakhus, Mark
   2007 “Communication as Design.” Communication Monographs741: 112-117. 10.1080/03637750701196383
   https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750701196383 [Google Scholar]
2. Clark, Herbert H.
   1992 Arenas of Language Use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Cooren, François
   2010 Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Incarnation and Ventriloquism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.6
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.6 [Google Scholar]
4. Eemeren, Frans H. van
   2010 Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.2
   https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.2 [Google Scholar]
5. Eemeren, Frans H. van and Peter Houtlosser
   2005 “Theoretical Construction and Argumentation Reality: An Analytic Model of Critical Discussion and Conventionalized Types of Argumentation Activity.” InThe Uses of Argument: Proceedings of a Conference at McMaster University, ed. byDavid Hitchcock, 75–84. Hamilton: McMaster University.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Goffman, Erving
   1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Jacobs, Scott and Sally Jackson
   1981 “Argument as a Natural Category: The Routine Grounds for Arguing in Conversation.” The Western Journal of Speech Communication451: 118–132. 10.1080/10570318109374035
   https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318109374035 [Google Scholar]
8. Jackson, Sally
   1992 “‘Virtual Standpoints’ and the Pragmatics of Conversational Argument.” InArgumentation Illuminated, ed. byFrans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair, and Charles A. Willard, 260–269. Amsterdam: SicSat.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Levinson, Stephen S.
   1988 “Putting Linguistics on a Proper Footing: Explorations in Goffman’s Concepts of Participation.” InErving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, ed. byPaul Drew and Anthony Wootton, 161–227. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Phillips, Louise
    2011 The Promise of Dialogue: The Dialogic Turn in the Production and Communication of Knowledge. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.12
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.12 [Google Scholar]
11. Sacks, Harvey
    1992 Lectures in Conversation. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Walton, Douglas
    1998 The New Dialectic: Conversational Context of Argument. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 10.3138/9781442681859
    https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442681859 [Google Scholar]
13. Walton, Douglas
    2000 “The Place of Dialogue Theory in Logic, Computer Science and Communication Studies.” Synthese1231: 327–346. 10.1023/A:1005237527730
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005237527730 [Google Scholar]
14. Weigand, Edda
    2006 “Argumentation: The Mixed Game.” Argumentation201: 59–87. 10.1007/s10503‑006‑9000‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-006-9000-4 [Google Scholar]
15. Weigand, Edda
    2010 Dialogue. The Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]