Competence-in-performance in China’s ESL teaching

References

1. Chang, Yunyue
   2006 “Globalization and English in Chinese Higher Education.” World Englishes25(3/4): 513–525. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.2006.00484.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2006.00484.x [Google Scholar]
2. Chen, Zan and Christine Chuen Meng Goh
   2011 “Teaching oral English in higher education: Challenges to EFL teachers.” Teaching in Higher Education16(3): 333–345. 10.1080/13562517.2010.546527
   https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2010.546527 [Google Scholar]
3. Cunningsworth, Alan
   1995 Choosing Your Coursebook. Oxford: Heinemann.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Ge, Xiaoyu
   . “Oriental Wisdom for Interpersonal Life: Confucian Ideal Personality Traits (Junzi Personality) Predict Positive Interpersonal Relationships.” Journal of Research in Personality89(1): 104034. 10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104034
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104034 [Google Scholar]
5. Gilmore, Alex
   2007 “Authentic Materials and Authenticity in Foreign Language Learning.” Language Teaching40(2): 97–118. 10.1017/S0261444807004144
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004144 [Google Scholar]
6. Grein, Marion
   2007 “The Speech Act of Refusals within the Minimal Action Game: A Comparative Study of German and Japanese.” InDialogue Studies, ed. byMarion Grein and Edda Weigand, 95–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Hellermann, John
   2003 “The Interactive Work of Prosody in the IRF Exchange: Teacher Repetition in Feedback Moves.” Language in Society32(1): 79–104. 10.1017/S0047404503321049
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404503321049 [Google Scholar]
8. The INCA Project: Intercultural Competence Assessment
   “The INCA Project: Intercultural Competence Assessment.” European Website on Integration, August 31, 2009. https://ec.europa.eu/migrant-integration/library-document/inca-project-intercultural-competence-assessment_en
9. Koike, Dale A.
   2017 “Theory and Practice.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. byEdda Weigand, 251–263. New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Li, Jiao and Xuehai Cui
    2020 “Evaluating College English Textbooks for Chinese Students’ English Academic Writing: Voices of Students and Teachers’.” Asia-Pacific Education Researcher30(1): 47–58. 10.1007/s40299‑020‑00513‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-020-00513-1 [Google Scholar]
11. Miao, Pei and Audrey L. Heining-Boynton
    2011 “Initiation/Response/Follow-up, and Response to Intervention: Combining Two Models to Improve Teacher and Student Performance.” Foreign Language Annals44(1): 65–79. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2010.01116.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2010.01116.x [Google Scholar]
12. Ministry of Education
    Ministry of Education 2020 “Daxue yingyu jiaoxue zhinan” [Guidelines on College English Teaching]. Available athttps://wy.baiyunu.edu.cn/upfile/2023/10/11/20231011090223872.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
13. Savignon, Sandra J.
    1987 “Communicative Language Teaching.” Theory into Practice26(4): 235–242. 10.1080/00405848709543281
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00405848709543281 [Google Scholar]
14. Si, Peng
    2019 “A Study of the Differences between EFL and ESL for English Classroom Teaching in China.” IRA International Journal of Education and Multidisciplinary Studies15(1): 32–35. 10.21013/jems.v15.n1.p4
    https://doi.org/10.21013/jems.v15.n1.p4 [Google Scholar]
15. Smaoui, Anouar
    2021 “The Development of a Language-and-Culture Course Incorporating Intercultural Teaching Materials in the Tunisian Higher Education EFL Context: Challenges and Opportunities.” Open Journal of Modern Linguistics11(1): 1–23. 10.4236/ojml.2021.111001
    https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2021.111001 [Google Scholar]
16. Smith, Megan and Shawn Loewen
    2018 “Situational Language Teaching.” InThe TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, ed. byJohn I. Liontas, 1–6. Hoboken: John Wiley. 10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0174
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0174 [Google Scholar]
17. Wang, Wenyu
    2022 “批评话语分析视角下中美新闻报道中的文化差异对比研究 [Cultural Differences in Chinese and American News Reports from the Perspective of Critical Discourse Analysis: A Case Study of China Daily and The New York Times Reports on TikTok].” MA thesis, Tianjin University of Commerce.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Weigand, Edda
    2004 “Possibilities and Limitations of Corpus Linguistics.” InDialogue Analysis VIII: Understanding and Misunderstanding in Dialogue, ed. byKarin Aijmer, 301–315. Berlin, New York: Max Niemeyer Verlag. 10.1515/9783110933239.301
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110933239.301 [Google Scholar]
19. Weigand, Edda
    2007 “The Sociobiology of Language.” InDialogue and Culture, ed. byMarion Grein and Edda Weigand, 27–49. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.1.04wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.1.04wei [Google Scholar]
20. Weigand, Edda
    2009 “Teaching a Foreign Language: A Tentative Enterprise.” Language Teaching011: 128–147.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Weigand, Edda
    2010a “Language as Dialogue.” Intercultural Pragmatics7(3): 505–515. 10.1515/iprg.2010.022
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2010.022 [Google Scholar]
22. Weigand, Edda
    2010b Dialogue. The Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]
23. Weigand, Edda
    2015 “Dialogue in the Stream of Life.” Language and Dialogue5(2): 197–223. 10.1075/ld.5.2.01wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.5.2.01wei [Google Scholar]
24. Weigand, Edda
    2017 “The Mixed Game Model – A Holistic Theory.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. byEdda Weigand, 174–194. New York: Taylor and Francis. 10.4324/9781315750583‑12
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315750583-12 [Google Scholar]
25. Xu, Jinfen and Yumei Fan
    2016 “The Evolution of the College English Curriculum in China (1985–2015): Changes, Trends and Conflicts.” Language Policy16(3): 267–89. 10.1007/s10993‑016‑9407‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-016-9407-1 [Google Scholar]
26. Zhang, Xuezhu
    2020 “Evaluation of Suitability of a Listening Textbook for English Majors in Universities of China.” Advances in Language and Literary Studies11(4): 87–94. 10.7575/aiac.alls.v.11n.4p.87
    https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.11n.4p.87 [Google Scholar]