Conflict resolution in online mental health support groups

References

1. Aakhus, Mark and Esther Rumsey
   2010 “Crafting supportive Communication Online: A Communication Design Analysis of Conflict in an Online Support Group.” Journal of Applied Communication Research38(1): 65–84. 10.1080/00909880903483581
   https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880903483581 [Google Scholar]
2. Angouri, Jo and Theodora Tseliga
   2010 “’You Have No Idea What You Are Talking About!’ From E-Disagreement to E-Impoliteness in Two Online Fora”. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture6(1): 57–82. 10.1515/jplr.2010.004
   https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.004 [Google Scholar]
3. Antaki, Charles, Elisenda Ardévol, Francesc Núnez, and Agnès Vayreda
   2005 “’For She Who Knows Who She Is’: Managing Accountability in Online Forum Messages.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication11(1): Article 6. 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2006.tb00306.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.tb00306.x [Google Scholar]
4. Bergman, Stina
   2019 “Different Roads to Empathy: Stage Actors and Judges As Polar Cases.” Emotions and Society1(2): 163–180. 10.1332/263168919X15653390808962
   https://doi.org/10.1332/263168919X15653390808962 [Google Scholar]
5. Bou, Patricia and Pilar Garcés-Conejos
   2014 “Conflict Management in Massive Polylogues: A Case Study from YouTube”. Journal of Pragmatics731: 19–36. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.001
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.001 [Google Scholar]
6. Broome, Benjamin J.
   1993 “Managing Differences in Conflict Resolution: The Role of Relational Empathy.” InConflict Resolution Theory and Practice: Integration and Application, ed. byDennis J. D. Sandole and Hugo van der Merwe, 97–111. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Brummans, Boris, Lise Higham, and François Cooren
   2022 “The Work of Conflict Mediation: Actors, Vectors, and Communicative Relationality.” Human Relations75(4): 764–791. 10.1177/0018726721994180
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726721994180 [Google Scholar]
8. Burleson, Brant R.
   2003 “Emotional Support Skills.” InHandbook of Communication and Social Interaction Skills, ed. byJohn O. Greene and Brant R. Burleson, 551–594. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Burleson, Brant R. and Daena J. Goldsmith
   1998 “How the Comforting Process Works: Alleviating Emotional Distress Through Conversationally Induced Reappraisals.” InHandbook of Communication and Emotion: Research, Theory, Applications, and Contexts, ed. byPeter A. Andersen and Laura K. Guerrero, 245–280. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Burleson, Brant R. and Erina L. MacGeorge
    2002 “Supportive Communication.” InHandbook of Interpersonal Communication (3rd ed.), ed. byMark L. Knapp and John A. Daly, 374–424. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bury, Michael
    1982 “Chronic Illness as Biographical Disruption.” Sociology of Health & Illness41: 167–182. 10.1111/1467‑9566.ep11339939
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11339939 [Google Scholar]
12. Cahn, Dudley D.
    1992 Conflict in Intimate Relationships. New York: Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Charmaz, Kathy
    1991 Good Days, Bad Days: The Self in Chronic Illness and Time. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Cobb, Sara and Janet Rifkin
    1991 “Practice and Paradox: Deconstructing Neutrality in Mediation.” Law & Social Inquiry161: 35–62. 10.1111/j.1747‑4469.1991.tb00283.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1991.tb00283.x [Google Scholar]
15. Colditz, Jason B., Lily H. Hsiao, Brandon G. Bergman, David W. Best, Eric G. Hulsey, Jaime E. Sidani, Bruce L. Rollman, and Kevin L. Kraemer
    2024 “Characteristics and Engagement Among English-Language Online Forums for Addiction Recovery Available in the US.” Internet Interventions351. 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100708
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2024.100708 [Google Scholar]
16. Costello, Leesa, Marie-Louise McDermott, and Ruth Wallace
    2017 “Netnography: Range of Practices, Misperceptions, and Missed Opportunities.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods161: 1–12. 10.1177/1609406917700647
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917700647 [Google Scholar]
17. Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
    2012 “Exploring Affiliation in the Reception of Conversational Complaint Stories.” InEmotion in Interaction, ed. byAnssi Perakyla and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 113–146. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730735.003.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730735.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
18. Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield, and Anne Wichmann
    2003 “Impoliteness Revisited: With Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics35(10/11): 1545–1579. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00118‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00118-2 [Google Scholar]
19. Decety, Jean and Phillip L. Jackson
    2006 “A Social-Neuroscience Perspective on Empathy.” Current Directions in Psychological Science15(2): 54–58. 10.1111/j.0963‑7214.2006.00406.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00406.x [Google Scholar]
20. Della Noce, Dorothy J.
    1999 “Seeing Theory in Practice: An Analysis of Empathy in Mediation.” Negotiation Journal151: 229–244. 10.1111/j.1571‑9979.1999.tb00196.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.1999.tb00196.x [Google Scholar]
21. Fiehler, Reinhard
    2002 “How to Do Emotions with Words: Emotionality in Conversations.” InThe Verbal Communication of Emotions: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, ed. bySusan R. Fussell, 79–106. Mahwah, MJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Figueras, Carolina
    2017 “‘Pienso que tienes que salir del círculo vicioso de restricción’. Metáforas e interacción en un foro de recuperación de los trastornos de la conducta alimentaria.” Oralia201: 121–147. 10.25115/oralia.v20i1.6862
    https://doi.org/10.25115/oralia.v20i1.6862 [Google Scholar]
23. Figueras, Carolina
    2018 “Evidentiality in Illness Narratives: Structures with Spanish verb ‘ver’ in Autobiographical Narratives of Eating Disorders.” Pragmatics and Society9(3): 356–380. 10.1075/ps.16038.fig
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.16038.fig [Google Scholar]
24. Figueras, Carolina
    2020 “Cognitive and Affective Dimensions of Mitigation in Advice.” Corpus Pragmatics4(1): 31–57. 10.1007/s41701‑019‑00064‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-019-00064-x [Google Scholar]
25. Figueras, C.
    2021 “Mitigation in Discourse: Social, Cognitive and Affective Motivations When Exchanging Advice.” Journal of Pragmatics1731: 119–133. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.12.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.12.008 [Google Scholar]
26. Figueras, Carolina
    2023 “Empathy in Online Mental Health Communities.” InStance, Inter/Subjectivity and Identity in Discourse, ed. byMarín-Arrese, Juana, Laura Hidalgo-Downing, and Juan Rafael Zamorano-Mansilla, 353–377. Berlin: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Figueras, Carolina and Barbara De Cock
    2023 “Patrones de empatía en dos foros virtuales: el caso de la diabetes y los trastornos de la conducta alimentaria.” Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación951: 233–248. 10.5209/clac.90071
    https://doi.org/10.5209/clac.90071 [Google Scholar]
28. Frank, Arthur
    1995 The Wounded Storyteller: Body, Illness, and Ethics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226260037.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226260037.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
29. Franzke, Aline Shakti, Anja Bechmann, Michael Zimmer, Charles Ess, and the Association of Internet Researchers, and Association of Internet Research
    2002 “Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research; Recommendations from the AOIR Ethics Working Committee.” Available atwww.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf, accessed on21 January 2023.
30. Garcia, Angela Cora
    2000 “Negotiating Negotiation: The Collaborative Production of Resolution in Small Claims Mediation Hearings. Discourse & Society11(3): 315–343. 10.1177/0957926500011003003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926500011003003 [Google Scholar]
31. Garcia, Angela Cora
    2019 How Mediation Works. Resolving Conflict through Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781139162548
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139162548 [Google Scholar]
32. Giles, David
    2006 “Constructing Identities in Cyberspace: The Case of Eating Disorders.” British Journal of Social Psychology451: 463–477. 10.1348/014466605X53596
    https://doi.org/10.1348/014466605X53596 [Google Scholar]
33. Girdner, Linda K.
    1985 “Adjudication and Mediation: A Comparison of Custody Decision/Making Processes Involving Third Parties.” Journal of Divorce81: 33–47. 10.1300/J279v08n03_05
    https://doi.org/10.1300/J279v08n03_05 [Google Scholar]
34. Graham, Sage Lambert
    2007 “Disagreeing to Agree: Conflict, (Im)Politeness and Identity in a Computer-Mediated Community.” Journal of Pragmatics391: 742–759. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.017 [Google Scholar]
35. Greco, Sara
    2011 Argumentation in Dispute Mediation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.3 [Google Scholar]
36. Greco, Sara and Chiara Jermini-Martinez Soria
    2021 “Mediators’ Reframing as a Constitutive Element of Reconciliatory Argumentative Style.” Journal of Argumentation in Context10(1): 73–96. 10.1075/jaic.20019.gre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.20019.gre [Google Scholar]
37. Grimshaw, Allen D.
    1990 “Research on Conflict Talk: Antecedents, Resources, Findings, Directions.” InResearch on Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations in Conversations, ed. byAllen D. Grimshaw, 280–324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Heritage, John
    2011 “Territories of Knowledge, Territories of Experience: Empathic Moments in Interaction.” InThe Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. byTania Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensing, 159–183. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511921674.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921674.008 [Google Scholar]
39. Herrmann, Margaret S., Nancy Hollett, and Jerry Gale
    2006 “Mediation from Beginning to End: A Testable Model.” InThe Blackwell Handbook of Mediation. Bridging Theory, Research, and Practice, ed. byMargaret S. Herrmann, 19–78. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Janier, Mathilde
    2017 Dialogical Dynamics and Argumentative Structures in Dispute Mediation Discourse. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. University of Dundee. Retrieved fromhttps://discovery.dundee.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/17847783/Thesis.pdf
41. Kendal, Sarah, Sue Kirk, Rebecca Elvey, Roger Catchpole, and Steven Pryjmachuk
    2017 “How a Moderate Online Discussion Forum Facilitates Support for Young People with Eating Disorders.” Health Expectations20(1): 98–111. 10.1111/hex.12439
    https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12439 [Google Scholar]
42. Kleinke, Sonja
    2008 “Emotional Commitment in Public Political Internet Message Boards.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology27(4): 409–421. 10.1177/0261927X08322483
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X08322483 [Google Scholar]
43. Kozinets, Robert
    2015 Netnography: Redefined. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Kozinets, Robert, Pierre Dolbec, and Amanda Earley
    2014 “Netnographic Analysis: Understanding Culture through Social Media Data.” InSAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, ed. byUwe Flick, 262–275. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446282243.n18
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243.n18 [Google Scholar]
45. Kummervold, Per E., Deede Gammon, Svein Bergvik, Jan-Are K. Johnsen, Toralf Hasvold, and Jan H. Rosenvinge
    2002 “Social Support in a Wired World: Use of online Mental Health Forums in Norway.” Nordic Journal of Psychiatry56(1): 59–65. 10.1080/08039480252803945
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08039480252803945 [Google Scholar]
46. Kupetz, Maxi
    2014 “Empathy Displays as Interactional Achievements: Multimodal and Sequential Aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics611: 4–34. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.006 [Google Scholar]
47. Luzón, María José
    2013 “’This is an Erroneous Argument’: Conflict in Academic Blog Discussions.” Discourse, Context and Media21: 111–119. 10.1016/j.dcm.2013.04.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2013.04.005 [Google Scholar]
48. MacKay, Ruth, Jean R. Hughes, and E. Joyce Carver
    1990 Empathy in the Helping Relationship. New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Martinovski, Bilyana
    2006 “Framework for the Analysis of Mitigation in Courts: Toward a Theory of Mitigation.” Journal of Pragmatics38(12): 2065–2086. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.08.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.08.006 [Google Scholar]
50. McCormack, Abby and Neil S. Coulson
    2009 “Individuals with Eating Disorders and the Use of Online Support Groups as a Form of Social Support.” Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace3(2), Article 5. Available athttps://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/4228
    [Google Scholar]
51. McNamara, Niamh and Harriet Parsons
    2016 “Everyone Here Wants Everyone Else to Get Better”: The Role of Social Identity in Eating Disorder Recovery.” The British Journal of Social Psychology55(4): 662–680. 10.1111/bjso.12161
    https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12161 [Google Scholar]
52. Moor, Peter J., Ard Heuvelman, and Ria Verleur
    2010 “Flaming on YouTube.” Computers in Human Behavior26(6): 1536–1546. 10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.023
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.023 [Google Scholar]
53. Nambisan, Priya
    2011 “Information Seeking and Social Support in online Health Communities: Impact on Patients’ Perceived Empathy.” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association181: 298e–304. 10.1136/amiajnl‑2010‑000058
    https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000058 [Google Scholar]
54. Neurauter, Manuela
    2011 “Im/polite Reader Responses on British Online News Sites.” Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture7(2): 187–214.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Pendry, Louise F. and Jessica Salvatore
    2015 “Individual and Social Benefits of Online Discussion Forums.” Computers in Human Behavior501: 211–220. 10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.067
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.067 [Google Scholar]
56. Preece, Jennifer J., and Kambiz Ghozati
    2001 “Experiencing Empathy Online.” InThe Internet and Health Communication: Experience and Expectations, ed. byRonald R. Rice, and James E. Katz, 237–260. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 10.4135/9781452233277.n11
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452233277.n11 [Google Scholar]
57. Pudlinski, Chistopher
    2005 “Doing Empathy and Sympathy: Caring Responses to Troubles Tellings on a Peer Support Line.” Discourse Studies7(3): 267–288. 10.1177/1461445605052177
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605052177 [Google Scholar]
58. Rayland, A. and Jacob Andrews
    2023 “From Social Network to Peer Support Network: Opportunities to Explore Mechanisms of Online Peer Support for Mental Health.” JMIR Mental Health101: 1–9. 10.2196/41855
    https://doi.org/10.2196/41855 [Google Scholar]
59. Sanahuges, Carme and Hortènsia Curell
    2020 “Responding to Trouble: An interactional Approach to Empathy in Catalan and English.” Corpus Pragmatics41: 449–472. 10.1007/s41701‑020‑00090‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-020-00090-0 [Google Scholar]
60. Sandaunet, Anne-Grete
    2008 “A Space for Suffering: Communicating Breast Cancer in an Online Self-Help Context.” Qualitative Health Research18(12): 1631–1641. 10.1177/1049732308327076
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732308327076 [Google Scholar]
61. Soini, Aleksi and Kirsi Eräranta
    2023 “Collaborative Construction of the Closet (in and out): The affordance of Interactivity and Gay and Lesbian Employees’ Identity Work Online.” Organization30(1): 21–41. 10.1177/13505084221115833
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084221115833 [Google Scholar]
62. Sproull, Lee and Sara Kiesler
    1986 “Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication.” Management Science321: 1492–1512. 10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1492
    https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1492 [Google Scholar]
63. Stommel, Wyke
    2009 Entering and Online Support Group on Eating Disorders: A Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789042026612
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042026612 [Google Scholar]
64. Stommel, Wyke and Toom Koole
    2010 “The Online Support Group as a Community: A Micro-Analysis of the Interaction with a New Member.” Discourse Studies12(3): 357–378. 10.1177/1461445609358518
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609358518 [Google Scholar]
65. Vayreda, Agnès and Charles Antaki
    2009 “Social Support and Unsolicited Advice in a Bipolar Disorder Online Forum.” Qualitative Health Research19(7): 931–942. 10.1177/1049732309338952
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309338952 [Google Scholar]
66. Weber, H. L.
    2011 “Missed cues: How Disputes Can Socialize Virtual Newcomers.” Language@Internet81, Article 5.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Williams, Gareth
    1984 “The Genesis of Chronic Illness: Narrative Re-Construction.” Sociology of Health & Illness61: 175–200. 10.1111/1467‑9566.ep10778250
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep10778250 [Google Scholar]
68. Worley, Susan M. and Andrew I. Schwebel
    1985 “The Effect of Cooperation on Egocentrism in Divorce Mediation.” Journal of Divorce8(3–4): 151–165. 10.1300/J279v08n03_11
    https://doi.org/10.1300/J279v08n03_11 [Google Scholar]