1887
image of ‘The benefits of the vaccine outweigh the risks… they say’
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study aims to analyse Italian Internet users’ comments on two posts that appeared on the Facebook page of the Italian newspaper during a particularly critical phase of the COVID-19 pandemic (specifically, March 2021). At that time, the AstraZeneca vaccine had been temporarily suspended in some European countries due to confirmed reports of blood clots but subsequently declared “safe and effective” by the European Medicines Agency. Two datasets of comments were collected and analysed by combining automatic and manual, as well as quantitative and qualitative, methods. The main findings shed light on the orientation (agreement vs disagreement), construction of consensus and dissent, and epistemic positioning of Facebook users when they are confronted and engaged in dialogue with uncertain news about public health issues.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00173.ric
2024-06-13
2024-07-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andersson, Marta
    2022 “‘So Many ‘Virologists’ in this Thread!’ Impoliteness in Facebook Discussions of the Management of the Pandemic of Covid-19 in Sweden–the Tension between Conformity and Distinction.” Pragmatics(): –. 10.1075/prag.21014.and
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21014.and [Google Scholar]
  2. Anthony, Laurence
    2022AntConc (Version 4.2.0) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Aquino, Francesco, Gabriele Donzelli, Emanuela De Franco, Gaetano Privitera, Pier Luigi Lopalco, and Annalaura Carducci
    2017 “The Web and Public Confidence in MMR Vaccination in Italy.” Vaccine: –. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.07.029
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.07.029 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bertolazzi, Alessia, Ramona, Bongelli, and Ilaria Riccioni
    2023 “Health Risk Communication during Covid-19 Emergency in Italy: the Impact of Medical Experts’ Debate on Twitter.” Health Communication–. 10.1080/10410236.2023.2227436
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2023.2227436 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bongelli, Ramona, Ilaria Riccioni, Laura Vincze, and Andrzej Zuczkowski
    2018 “Questions and Epistemic Stance: Some Examples from Italian Conversations.” Ampersand: –. 10.1016/j.amper.2018.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2018.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bongelli, Ramona, Ilaria Riccioni, Alessandra Fermani, and Gill Philip
    2020 “Hypothetical Questions in Italian Everyday Conversations.” Lingua: . 10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102951
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102951 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bongelli, Ramona, Carla Canestrari, Alessandra Fermani, Morena Muzi, Ilaria Riccioni, Alessia Bertolazzi, and Roberto Burro
    2021 “Associations between Personality Traits, Intolerance of Uncertainty, Coping Strategies, and Stress in Italian Frontline and Non-frontline HCWS during the Covid-19 Pandemic – a Multi-group Path-analysis.” Healthcare (): . 10.3390/healthcare9081086
    https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9081086 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bongelli, Ramona, Andrzej Zuczkowski, and Ilaria Riccioni
    2023 “The Italian Epistemic Disclaimer Non so [I Donʼt Know] in a Corpus of Gynaecological Interactions.” Languages(): . 10.3390/languages8040226
    https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8040226 [Google Scholar]
  9. Carrieri, Vincenzo, Leonardo Madio, and Francesco Principe
    2019 “Vaccine Hesitancy and (Fake) News: Quasi-experimental Evidence from Italy.” Health Economics–. 10.1002/hec.3937
    https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3937 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chang, Chia-Hsuan, Michael Monselise, and Christopher C. Yang
    2021 “What Are People Concerned about during the Pandemic? Detecting Evolving Topics about COVID-19 from Twitter.” Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research: –. 10.1007/s41666‑020‑00083‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s41666-020-00083-3 [Google Scholar]
  11. Colston, Herbert L.
    2017 “Irony and Sarcasm.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor, ed. bySalvatore Attardo, –. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315731162‑17
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315731162-17 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dubé, Eve, Maryline Vivion, and Noni E. MacDonald
    2015 “Vaccine Hesitancy, Vaccine Refusal and the Anti-vaccine Movement: Influence, Impact and Implications.” Expert Review of Vaccines(): –. 10.1586/14760584.2015.964212
    https://doi.org/10.1586/14760584.2015.964212 [Google Scholar]
  13. Franzke, Aline S., Anja Bechmann, Michael Zimmer, and Charles M. Ess
    2020Internet Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Giles, Howard, Nikolas Coupland, and Justine Coupland
    1991 “Accommodation Theory: Communication, Context and Consequences.” InContexts of Accommodation. Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics, ed. byHoward Giles, Justine Coupland, and Nikolas Coupland, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511663673.001
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663673.001 [Google Scholar]
  15. Griffith, Janessa, Husayn Marani, and Helen Monkman
    2021 “COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Canada: Content Analysis of Tweets Using the Theoretical Domains Framework.” Journal of Medical Internet Research(): . 10.2196/26874
    https://doi.org/10.2196/26874 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gruzd, Anatoliy, Deena Abul-Fottouh, Melodie Y. Song, and Alyssa Saiphoo
    2023 “From Facebook to YouTube: The Potential Exposure to COVID-19 Anti-Vaccine Videos on Social Media.” Social Media + Society(): 20563051221150403. 10.1177/20563051221150403
    https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221150403 [Google Scholar]
  17. Interian, Ruben, Ruslán G. Marzo, Isela Mendoza, and Celso C. Ribeiro
    2022 “Network Polarization, Filter Bubbles, and Echo Chambers: an Annotated Review of Measures and Reduction Methods.” International Transactions in Operational Research(): –. 10.1111/itor.13224
    https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.13224 [Google Scholar]
  18. Jang, Hyeju, Emily Rempel, David Roth, Giuseppe Carenini, and Naveed Z. Janjua
    2021 “Tracking COVID-19 Discourse on Twitter in North America: Infodemiology Study Using Topic Modeling and Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis.” Journal of Medical Internet Research(): . 10.2196/25431
    https://doi.org/10.2196/25431 [Google Scholar]
  19. Johnson, Neil F., Nicolas Velásquez, Nicolas J. Restrepo, and Yonatan Lupu
    2020 “The Online Competition between Pro- and Anti-vaccination Views.” Nature(): –. 10.1038/s41586‑020‑2281‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2281-1 [Google Scholar]
  20. Jolley, Daniel and Karen M. Douglas
    2014 “The Effects of Anti-vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination Intentions.” PloS one(): . 10.1371/journal.pone.0089177
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089177 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kalichman, Seth C., Lisa A. Eaton, Valerie A. Earnshaw, and Natalie Brousseau
    2022 “Faster than Warp Speed: Early Attention to COVD-19 by Anti-vaccine Groups on Facebook.” Journal of Public Health(): –. 10.1093/pubmed/fdab093
    https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdab093 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kelp, Nicole C., Jessica K. Witt, and Gayathri Sivakumar
    2022 “To Vaccinate or Not? The Role Played by Uncertainty Communication on Public Understanding and Behavior Regarding COVID-19.” Science Communication(): –. 10.1177/10755470211063628
    https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470211063628 [Google Scholar]
  23. Koshik, Irene
    2003 “Wh-questions Used as Challenges.” Discourse Studies(): –. 10.1177/14614456030050010301
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456030050010301 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2005 “Beyond Rhetorical Questions: Assertive Questions in Everyday Interaction.” Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.16
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.16 [Google Scholar]
  25. 2017 “Responses to Wh-question Challenges”. InEnabling Human Conduct, ed. byGeoffrey Raymond, Gene H. Lerner, and John Heritage, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.273.05kos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.273.05kos [Google Scholar]
  26. Lovari, Alessandro and Nicola Righetti
    2020 “La Comunicazione Pubblica della Salute tra Infodemia e Fake News: il Ruolo della Pagina Facebook del Ministero della Salute nella Sfida Social al Covid-19 [Public Health Communication between Infodemics and Fake News: the Role of the Ministry of Health Facebook Page in the Social Challenge to Covid-19].” Mediascapes Journal: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Lovari, Alessandro, Gea Ducci, and Nicola Righetti
    2021 “Responding to Fake News: The Use of Facebook for Public Health Communication During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy.” InCommunicating COVID-19: Interdisciplinary perspectives, ed. byMonique Lewis, Eliza Govender, and Kate Holland, –. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑79735‑5_13
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79735-5_13 [Google Scholar]
  28. Marcec, Robert and Robert Likic
    2022 “Using Twitter for Sentiment Analysis towards AstraZeneca/Oxford, Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 Vaccines.” Postgraduate Medical Journal(): –. 10.1136/postgradmedj‑2021‑140685
    https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-140685 [Google Scholar]
  29. Masullo, Gina M.
    2022 “Facebook Reactions as Heuristics: Exploring Relationships between Reactions and Commenting Frequency on News about COVID-19.” First Monday(). 10.5210/fm.v27i8.12674
    https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v27i8.12674 [Google Scholar]
  30. Mondada, Lorenza
    2014 “Displaying, Contesting and Negotiating Epistemic Authority in Social Interaction: Descriptions and Questions in Guided Visits.” Discourse Studies(): –. 10.1177/1461445613501577
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613501577 [Google Scholar]
  31. Mori, Elisa, Barbara Barabaschi, Franca Cantoni, and Roberta Virtuani
    2020 “Local Governments’ Communication through Facebook. Evidences from COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy.” Journal of Public Affairs(): e2551. 10.1002/pa.2551
    https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2551 [Google Scholar]
  32. Palamenghi, Lorenzo, Serena Barello, Stefania Boccia, Guendalina Graffigna
    2020 “Mistrust in Biomedical Research and Vaccine Hesitancy: The Forefront Challenge in the Battle Against COVID-19 in Italy.” European Journal of Epidemiology: –. 10.1007/s10654‑020‑00675‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-020-00675-8 [Google Scholar]
  33. Puri, Neha, Eric A. Coomes, Hourmazd Haghbayan, and Keith Gunaratne
    2020 “Social Media and Vaccine Hesitancy: New Updates for the Era of COVID-19 and Globalized Infectious diseases.” Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics(): –. 10.1080/21645515.2020.1780846
    https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2020.1780846 [Google Scholar]
  34. Ranalli, Christopher and Malcom Finlay
    2023 “What’s So Bad about Echo Chambers?” Inquiry: –. 10.1080/0020174X.2023.2174590
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2023.2174590 [Google Scholar]
  35. Riccioni, Ilaria, Ramona Bongelli, Gill Philip, and Andrzej Zuczkowski
    2018 “Dubitative Questions and Epistemic Stance.” Lingua: –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2018.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2018.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  36. Riccioni, Ilaria, Andrzej Zuczkowski, Roberto Burro, and Ramona Bongelli
    2022 “The Italian Epistemic Marker Mi Sa [to Me it Knows] Compared to So [I Know], Non So [I Don’t Know], Non So Se [I Don’t Know Whether], Credo [I Believe], Penso [I Think].” PloS one(): e0274694. 10.1371/journal.pone.0274694
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274694 [Google Scholar]
  37. Savolainen, Reijo
    2014 “The Use of Rhetorical Strategies in Q&A Discussion.” Journal of Documentation(): –. 10.1108/JD‑11‑2012‑0152
    https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-11-2012-0152 [Google Scholar]
  38. Sesagiri Raamkumar, Aravind, Soon Guan Tan, and Hwee Lin Wee
    2020 “Measuring the Outreach Efforts of Public Health Authorities and the Public Response on Facebook during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Early 2020: Cross-country Comparison.” Journal of Medical Internet Research(): e19334. 10.2196/19334
    https://doi.org/10.2196/19334 [Google Scholar]
  39. Smith, Michael J. and Gary S. Marshall
    2010 “Navigating Parental Vaccine Hesitancy.” Pediatric Annals(): –. 10.3928/00904481‑20100726‑05
    https://doi.org/10.3928/00904481-20100726-05 [Google Scholar]
  40. Spilioti, Tereza and Caroline Tagg
    2017 “The Ethics of Online Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Challenges, Opportunities, and Directions in Ethical Decision-making.” Applied Linguistics Review(): –. 10.1515/applirev‑2016‑1033
    https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2016-1033 [Google Scholar]
  41. The jamovi project
    The jamovi project 2022jamovi. (Version 2.3) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Van Atteveldt, Wouter, Mariken A. Van der Velden, and Mark Boukes
    2021 “The Validity of Sentiment Analysis: Comparing Manual annotation, Crowd-coding, Dictionary approaches, and Machine Learning Algorithms.” Communication Methods and Measures(): –. 10.1080/19312458.2020.1869198
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1869198 [Google Scholar]
  43. Wawrzuta, Dominik, Mariusz Jaworski, Joanna Gotlib, and Mariusz Panczyk
    2021 “What Arguments Against COVID-19 Vaccines Run on Facebook in Poland: Content Analysis of Comments.” Vaccines(): . 10.3390/vaccines9050481
    https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9050481 [Google Scholar]
  44. Weigand, Edda
    2017 “The Mixed Game Model. A Holistic Theory.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. byEdda Weigand, –. New York/London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. 2023 “Principles of New Science: Dialogue between Science and Philosophy.” Language and Dialogue(): –. 10.1075/ld.00142.wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00142.wei [Google Scholar]
  46. World Health Organization
    World Health Organization 2019Top ten threats to global health in 2019. https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Yang, Kai-Cheng, Francesco Pierri, Pik-Mai Hui, David Axelrod, Christopher Torres-Lugo, John Bryden, and Filippo Menczer
    2021 “The COVID-19 Infodemic: Twitter versus Facebook.” Big Data & Society(): 20539517211013861. 10.1177/20539517211013861
    https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211013861 [Google Scholar]
  48. Zuczkowski, Andrzej, Ramona Bongelli, and Ilaria Riccioni
    2017Epistemic Stance in Dialogue. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.29
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.29 [Google Scholar]
  49. Zuczkowski, Andrzej, Ramona Bongelli, Ilaria Riccioni, and Gill Philip
    2021Questions and Epistemic Stance in Contemporary Spoken British English. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00173.ric
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00173.ric
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: uncertainty ; epistemic positioning ; KUB model ; AstraZeneca vaccine ; Facebook ; COVID-19
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error