Dialogic framing in pharmaceutical corporate energy transition strategies

References

1. Annesi, Nora, Massimo Battaglia, and Marco Frey
   2021 “Stakeholder Engagement by an Italian Water Utility Company: Insight from Participant Observation of Dialogism.” Utilities Policy721: 101–270. 10.1016/j.jup.2021.101270
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2021.101270 [Google Scholar]
2. Austin, John L.
   1962 How to Do Things with Words. Clarendon, Oxford.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bakhtin, Mikhail
   1986 The Problem of Speech Genres. InSpeech Genres and Other Late Essays, 60–102. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bakhtin, Mikhail
   1981 The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bondi, Marina
   2018 “Try to Prove Me Wrong: Dialogicity and Audience Involvement in Economics Blogs.” Discourse, Context & Media241: 33–42. 10.1016/j.dcm.2018.04.011
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.04.011 [Google Scholar]
6. Bondi, Marina
   2016a “Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres.” English for Specific Purposes421: 117–119. 10.1016/j.esp.2015.10.002
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2015.10.002 [Google Scholar]
7. Bondi, Marina
   2016b “The Future in Reports: Prediction, Commitment and Legitimization in CSR.” Pragmatics and Society7(1): 57–81. 10.1075/ps.7.1.03bon
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.7.1.03bon [Google Scholar]
8. Bortree, Denise S., and Trent Seltzer
   2009 “Dialogic Strategies and Outcomes: An Analysis of Environmental Advocacy Groups’ Facebook Profiles.” Public Relations Review35(3): 317–319. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.05.002
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.05.002 [Google Scholar]
9. Cavanaugh, Jillian R.
   2015 Performativity. Oxford Bibliographies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/obo/9780199766567‑0114
   https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199766567-0114 [Google Scholar]
10. Christensen, Lars. T., Mette Morsing, and Ole Thyssen
    2013 “CSR as Aspirational Talk.” Organization20(3): 372–393. 10.1177/1350508413478310
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508413478310 [Google Scholar]
11. Druckman, James N.
    2001 “The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen Competence.” Political Behavior23(3): 225–256. 10.1023/A:1015006907312
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015006907312 [Google Scholar]
12. Entman, Robert M.
    1993 “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication43(4): 51–58. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1993.tb01304.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x [Google Scholar]
13. Ettinger, Joshua, and James Painter
    2023 “The Science of Climate Conversations.” Social Media and Society. 10.1177/20563051231177930
    https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231177930 [Google Scholar]
14. Fillmore, Charles
    1985 “Frames and the Semantics of Understanding.” Quaderni di Semantica61: 222–254.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hyland, Ken
    2004 “Patterns of Engagement: Dialogic Features and L2 Student Writing.” InAnalysing Academic Writing: Contextualized Frameworks, ed. byL. Ravelli and R. Ellis, 5–23. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hyland, Ken
    2005 “Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse.” Discourse Studies71: 173–192. 10.1177/1461445605050365
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365 [Google Scholar]
17. Hyland, Ken
    2014 “Dialogue, Persuasion and Community in Research Writing.” InDialogicity in Written Specialised Genres, ed. byM. Luz Gil-Salom & C. Soler-Monreal, 1–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.23.02hyl
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.23.02hyl [Google Scholar]
18. Kent, Michael, and Maureen Taylor
    2014 “Dialogic Engagement as a Foundational Concept in the Practice of Public Relations.” Journal of Public Relations Research261: 384–398. 10.1080/1062726X.2014.956106
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2014.956106 [Google Scholar]
19. Kilgarriff, Adam, Pavel Smrz, Pavel Rychlý, and David Tugwell
    2004 The Sketch Engine. Proc. Euralex, Lorient, France.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Linell, Per
    1998 Approaching Dialogue. Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/impact.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.3 [Google Scholar]
21. Martin, Jim. R., and Peter White
    2005 The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
22. Nisbet, Matthew C.
    2009 “Communicating Climate Change: Why Frames Matter for Public Engagement.” Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development51(2): 12–23. 10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12‑23
    https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23 [Google Scholar]
23. Rayson, Paul
    2003 Matrix: A Statistical Method and Software Tool for Linguistic Analysis through Corpus Comparison. Ph.D. thesis, Lancaster University.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Schultz, Friederike, Jan Kleinnijenhuis, Dirk Oegema, Sonja Utz, Wouter van Atteveldt
    2012 “Strategic Framing in the BP Crisis: A Semantic Network Analysis of Associative Frames.” Public Relations Review38(1): 97–107. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.08.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.08.003 [Google Scholar]
25. Si, Yutong, Dipa Desai, Diana Bozhilova, Sheila Puffer, and Jennie C. Stephens
    2023 “Fossil Fuel Companies’ Climate Communication Strategies: Industry Messaging on Renewables and Natural Gas.” Energy Research & Social Science981: 103028. 10.1016/j.erss.2023.103028
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103028 [Google Scholar]
26. Voloshinov, Valentin N.
    1995 Marixism and the Philosophy of Language. Translated byL. Matjka and I. R. Titunik. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Wirtz, John G., and Thais M. Zimbres
    2018 “A Systematic Analysis of Research Applying ‘Principles of Dialogic Communication’ to Organizational Websites, Blogs, and Social Media: Implications for Theory and Practice.” Journal of Public Relations Research30(1):1–30. 10.1080/1062726X.2018.1455146
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2018.1455146 [Google Scholar]