Transparent communication in public transit

References

1. Albu, Oana B., and Stefan Wehmeier
   2014 “Organizational transparency and sense-making: The case of Northern Rock.” Journal of Public Relations Research26(2): 117–133. 10.1080/1062726X.2013.795869
   https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2013.795869 [Google Scholar]
2. Bakhtin, Mikhail
   1981 The dialogical imagination (ed. byMichael Holquist.). University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Ball, Carolyn
   2009 What is transparency?Public Integrity11(4): 293–308. 10.2753/PIN1099‑9922110400
   https://doi.org/10.2753/PIN1099-9922110400 [Google Scholar]
4. Ball, Ian
   2012 “New development: Transparency in the public sector.” Public Money and Management32(1): 35–40. 10.1080/09540962.2012.643054
   https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2012.643054 [Google Scholar]
5. Banister, David
   2005 Unsustainable transport: City transport in the new century, New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203003886
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203003886 [Google Scholar]
6. Bednarek, Monika, and Carly Bray
   2023 “Trialling corpus search techniques for identifying person-first and identity-first language.” Applied Corpus Linguistics3(1): 100046. 10.1016/j.acorp.2023.100046
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acorp.2023.100046 [Google Scholar]
7. Bertot, John C., Paul. T. Jaeger, and Justin M. Grimes
   2010 “Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies.” Government Information Quarterly27(3), 264–271. 10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001 [Google Scholar]
8. Bondi, Marina
   1997 “Reported argument in economics textbooks: A meta-pragmatics of argumentative dialogue.” InProceedings of the 16th ICL (Paper 41), ed. byBernard Caron. Elsevier.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bondi, Marina
   2018a “Dialogicity in written language use: Variation across expert action games.” InFrom pragmatics to dialogue, ed. byEdda Weigand and Istvan Kovecses, (pp.137–170). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.31.08bon
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.31.08bon [Google Scholar]
10. Bondi, Marina
    2018b “Try to prove me wrong: Dialogicity and audience involvement in economics blogs.” Discourse, Context and Media241: 33–42. 10.1016/j.dcm.2018.04.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.04.011 [Google Scholar]
11. Bondi, Marina
    2022 “Dialogicity in individual and institutional scientific blogs.” Publications10(1): 9. 10.3390/publications10010009
    https://doi.org/10.3390/publications10010009 [Google Scholar]
12. Criado, J. Ignacio, Rodrigo Sandoval-Almazan, and J. Ramon Gil-Garcia
    2013 “Government innovation through social media.” Government information quarterly30(4): 319–326. 10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.003 [Google Scholar]
13. Currie, Graham
    2011 New perspectives and methods in transport and social exclusion research. Emerald. 10.1108/9781780522012
    https://doi.org/10.1108/9781780522012 [Google Scholar]
14. del Mar Gálvez-Rodríguez, Maria, Alejandro Sáez-Martín, Manuela García-Tabuyo, and Carmen Caba-Pérez
    2018 “Exploring dialogic strategies in social media for fostering citizens’ interactions with Latin American local governments.” Public relations review44(2): 265–276. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.03.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.03.003 [Google Scholar]
15. Fairbanks, Jenille, Kenneth D. Plowman, and Brad L. Rawlins
    2007 “Transparency in government communication.” Journal of Public Affairs: An International Journal7(1): 23–37. 10.1002/pa.245
    https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.245 [Google Scholar]
16. Falcone, Mariasophia, and Ilaria Iori
    . (in press). “Conveying transparency on social media: A cross-cultural comparison of exemplification strategies in public transport Instagram posts.” ESP Across Cultures.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Fløttum, Kjersti
    2005 “The self and the others: Polyphonic visibility in research articles.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics15(1): 29–44. 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.2005.00079.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2005.00079.x [Google Scholar]
18. Gunawong, Panom
    2015 “Open government and social media: A focus on transparency.” Social Science Computer Review33(5): 587–598. 10.1177/0894439314560685
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314560685 [Google Scholar]
19. Hyland, Ken
    2000 Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hyland, Ken
    2002 “What do they mean? Questions in academic writing.” Text22(4): 529–557.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hyland, Ken
    2005 “Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse.” Discourse studies7(2): 173–192. 10.1177/1461445605050365
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365 [Google Scholar]
22. Kent, Michael L., and Maureen Taylor
    1998 “Building dialogic relationships through the World Wide Web.” Public relations review24(3): 321–334. 10.1016/S0363‑8111(99)80143‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80143-X [Google Scholar]
23. Kent, Michael L., and Maureen Taylor
    2002 “Toward a dialogic theory of public relations.” Public relations review28(1): 21–37. 10.1016/S0363‑8111(02)00108‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(02)00108-X [Google Scholar]
24. Kent, Michael L., and Petra Theunissen
    2016 “Discussion, dialogue, discourse elegy for mediated dialogue: Shiva the destroyer and reclaiming our first principles.” International Journal of Communication101: 4040–4054.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kent, Michael L., Maureen Taylor, and William White, J.
    2003 “The relationship between Web site design and organizational responsiveness to stakeholders.” Public relations review29(1): 63–77. 10.1016/S0363‑8111(02)00194‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(02)00194-7 [Google Scholar]
26. Kilgarriff, Adam, Vit Baisa, Jan Bušta, Miloš Jakubíček, Vojtěch Kovář, Jan Michelfeit, Pavel Rychlý, and Vit Suchomel
    2014 “The Sketch Engine: Ten years on.” Lexicography1(1): 7–36. 10.1007/s40607‑014‑0009‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9 [Google Scholar]
27. Koskela, Merja
    2018 “Disclosing principles of IR communication: Rhetorical moves for constructing transparency.” International Journal of Business Communication55(2): 164–193. 10.1177/2329488417735645
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488417735645 [Google Scholar]
28. Koskela, Merja, and Belinda Crawford Camiciottoli
    2020 “Different paths from transparency to trust? A comparative analysis of Finnish and Italian listed companies’ investor relations communication practices.” Studies in Communication Sciences20(1): 59–76. 10.24434/j.scoms.2020.01.006
    https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2020.01.006 [Google Scholar]
29. Lorés-Sanz, Rosa
    2008 “Genres in contrast: The exploration of writers’ visibility in research articles and research article abstracts.” InEnglish as an additional language in research publication and communication, ed. bySally Burgess and Pedro Martín-Martín, 105–122. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Lucas, Karen
    2012 “Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now?” Transport Policy201: 105–113. 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.013 [Google Scholar]
31. Martin, Jim, and Peter White
    2005 The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
32. Mattioli, Giulio
    2016 “Transport needs in a climate-constrained world. A novel framework to reconcile social and environmental sustainability in transport.” Energy Research and Social Science181: 118–128. 10.1016/j.erss.2016.03.025
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.03.025 [Google Scholar]
33. Metropolitan Transportation Authority
    Metropolitan Transportation Authority. (n.d.). About. https://new.mta.info/about
34. Miller, Patrick, Alexander de Barros, Lina G. Kattan, and S. C. Wirasinghe
    2016 “Public transportation and sustainability: A review.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering20(3): 1076–1083. 10.1007/s12205‑016‑0705‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0705-0 [Google Scholar]
35. Moavenzadeh, Fred, Keiksuke Hanaki, and Peter Baccini
    2002 Future cities: dynamics and sustainability (Vol.11). Dordrecht: Springer Science and Business Media. 10.1007/978‑94‑010‑0365‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0365-0 [Google Scholar]
36. Rybalko, Svetlana, and Trent Seltzer
    2010 “Dialogic communication in 140 characters or less: How Fortune 500 companies engage stakeholders using Twitter.” Public Relations Review36(4): 336–341. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.08.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.08.004 [Google Scholar]
37. Sáez Martín, Alejando, Arturo Haro de Rosario, and Maria D. C. Caba Pérez
    2015 “Using twitter for dialogic communication: Local government strategies in the European Union.” Local Government Studies41(3): 421–444. 10.1080/03003930.2014.991866
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2014.991866 [Google Scholar]
38. Schiller, Preston L., Eric C. Bruun, and Jeffrey Kenworthy, R.
    2010 An Introduction to Sustainable Transportation: Policy, planning, and implementation. Washington DC: Earthscan. 10.4324/9781849775021
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849775021 [Google Scholar]
39. Sinclair, John. M.
    1982 “Planes of discourse.” InThe two-fold voice: Essays in honour of Ramesh Mohan, ed. byS. N. A. Rizvi, 70–89. New Delhi: Pitambar Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Song, Changsoo, and Jooho Lee
    2016 “Citizens’ use of social media in government, perceived transparency, and trust in government.” Public Performance and Management Review39(2): 430–453. 10.1080/15309576.2015.1108798
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1108798 [Google Scholar]
41. Soon, Carol, and Yi Da Soh
    2014 “Engagement@ web 2.0 between the government and citizens in Singapore: dialogic communication on Facebook?” Asian Journal of Communication24(1): 42–59. 10.1080/01292986.2013.851722
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2013.851722 [Google Scholar]
42. Sundstrom, Beth, and Abbey B. Levenshus
    2017 “The art of engagement: dialogic strategies on Twitter.” Journal of Communication Management21(1): 17–33. 10.1108/JCOM‑07‑2015‑0057
    https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-07-2015-0057 [Google Scholar]
43. Taylor, Maureen, Michael. L. Kent, and William J. White
    2001 “How activist organizations are using the Internet to build relationships.” Public relations review27(3): 263–284. 10.1016/S0363‑8111(01)00086‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(01)00086-8 [Google Scholar]
44. Thompson, Geoffrey
    2001 “Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader.” Applied Linguistics22(1): 58–78. 10.1093/applin/22.1.58
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.58 [Google Scholar]
45. Titchkosky, Tanya
    2001 “Disability: A rose by any other name? “People-First” language in Canadian society.” Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie38(2): 125–140. 10.1111/j.1755‑618X.2001.tb00967.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-618X.2001.tb00967.x [Google Scholar]
46. Vanderheiden, Steve
    2008 Atmospheric justice: A political theory of climate change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195334609.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195334609.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
47. Vuchic, Vukan
    2017 Transportation for livable cities. Routledge. 10.4324/9781351318167
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351318167 [Google Scholar]
48. Wanek-Libman, Mischa
    2021, October20. “New NY state law to make more of MTA’s data public.” Mass Transit. RetrievedSeptember 9, 2024, fromhttps://www.masstransitmag.com/technology/article/21243117/new-ny-state-law-to-make-more-of-mtas-data-public
    [Google Scholar]
49. Wang, Yuan, and Yiyi Yang
    2020 “Dialogic communication on social media: How organizations use Twitter to build dialogic relationships with their publics.” Computers in human behavior1041: 106183. 10.1016/j.chb.2019.106183
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106183 [Google Scholar]
50. Watkins, Brandi A.
    2017 “Experimenting with dialogue on Twitter: An examination of the influence of the dialogic principles on engagement, interaction, and attitude.” Public relations review43(1): 163–171. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.07.002 [Google Scholar]
51. Weigand, Edda
    2010 “Language as Dialogue.” Intercultural Pragmatics7(3): 505–515. 10.1515/iprg.2010.022
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2010.022 [Google Scholar]