Metaphorical patterns in news discourse on COP27

References

1. A’Beckett, Ludmilla
   2012 “The Play of Voices in Metaphor Discourse: A Case Study of “NATIONS ARE BROTHERS.”” Metaphor and Symbol27(2): 171–94. 10.1080/10926488.2012.665797
   https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2012.665797 [Google Scholar]
2. Aragbuwa, Adetutu
   2020 “Dialogic Contractions in Online News Discourse on Violence against Women in Nigeria.” Journal of Gender Studies29(2): 130–45. 10.1080/09589236.2019.1584553
   https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2019.1584553 [Google Scholar]
3. Asplund, Therese
   2011 “Metaphors in Climate Discourse: An Analysis of Swedish Farm Magazines.” Journal of Science Communication10(04): A01. 10.22323/2.10040201
   https://doi.org/10.22323/2.10040201 [Google Scholar]
4. Atanasova, Dimitrinka
   2019 “Moving Society to a Sustainable Future: The Framing of Sustainability in a Constructive Media Outlet.” Environmental Communication13(5): 700–711. 10.1080/17524032.2019.1583262
   https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1583262 [Google Scholar]
5. Atanasova, Dimitrinka, and Nelya Koteyko
   2017 “Metaphors in Guardian Online and Mail Online Opinion-Page Content on Climate Change: War, Religion, and Politics.” Environmental Communication11(4): 452–69. 10.1080/17524032.2015.1024705
   https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2015.1024705 [Google Scholar]
6. Augé, Anaïs
   2023 Metaphor and Argumentation in Climate Crisis Discourse. 1st ed.New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003342908
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003342908 [Google Scholar]
7. Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, and Tony McEnery
   2013 Discourse Analysis and Media Attitudes: The Representation of Islam in the British Press. Cambridge: New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511920103
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511920103 [Google Scholar]
8. Bakhtin, Michail Michajlovič
   1981 The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Edited byMichael Holquist. Translated byCaryl Emerson. 18. paperback printing. University of Texas Press Slavic Series 1. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Ball, Carolyn
   2009 “What Is Transparency?” Public Integrity11(4): 293–308. 10.2753/PIN1099‑9922110400
   https://doi.org/10.2753/PIN1099-9922110400 [Google Scholar]
10. Bondi, Marina
    2018 “Dialogicity in Written Language Use: Variation across Expert Action Games.” InDialogue Studies, ed. byEdda Weigand and Istvan Kecskes, 311: 137–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/ds.31.08bon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.31.08bon [Google Scholar]
11. Boylan, Brandon M., Jerry McBeath, and Bo Wang
    2021 “US–China Relations: Nationalism, the Trade War, and COVID-19.” Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences14(1): 23–40. 10.1007/s40647‑020‑00302‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-020-00302-6 [Google Scholar]
12. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
    2004 Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230000612
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612 [Google Scholar]
13. Christoff, Peter
    2010 “Cold Climate in Copenhagen: China and the United States at COP15.” Environmental Politics19(4): 637–56. 10.1080/09644016.2010.489718
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2010.489718 [Google Scholar]
14. Deignan, Alice
    2017 “Metaphors in Texts about Climate Change.” Ibérica341: 45–66.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Deignan, Alice, Elena Semino, and Shirley-Anne Paul
    2019 “Metaphors of Climate Science in Three Genres: Research Articles, Educational Texts, and Secondary School Student Talk.” Applied Linguistics40(2): 379–403. 10.1093/applin/amx035
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx035 [Google Scholar]
16. Diani, Giuliana, and Ilaria Iori
    2024 “Environmental Communication and Metaphors: The Case of Italian Blogs”. InQuaderni Del CIRM, 29–50. Vol.41.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Entman, Robert M.
    1993 “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication43(4): 51–58. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1993.tb01304.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x [Google Scholar]
18. Fairclough, Norman
    1992 Critical Language Awareness. Oxford: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Ferrari, Federica
    2018 Metaphor and Persuasion in Strategic Communication: Sustainable Perspectives. 1st ed.New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315188461
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315188461 [Google Scholar]
20. Flusberg, Stephen J., Teenie Matlock, and Paul H. Thibodeau
    2017 “Metaphors for the War (or Race) against Climate Change.” Environmental Communication11(6): 769–83. 10.1080/17524032.2017.1289111
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1289111 [Google Scholar]
21. Gardiner, Stephen M.
    2011 “Climate Justice.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society, ed. byJohn S. Dryzek, Richard B. Norgaard, and David Schlosberg, 309–22. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Gupta, Joyeeta
    2010 “A History of International Climate Change Policy.” WIREs Climate Change1(5): 636–53. 10.1002/wcc.67
    https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.67 [Google Scholar]
23. Hidalgo-Downing, Laura, and Niamh A. O’Dowd
    2023 “Code Red for Humanity: Multimodal Metaphor and Metonymy in Noncommercial Advertisements on Environmental Awareness and Activism”. Metaphor and Symbol38(3): 231–53. 10.1080/10926488.2022.2153336
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2022.2153336 [Google Scholar]
24. Hodges, Adam
    2015 “Intertextuality in Discourse.” InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysis, edited byDeborah Tannen, Heidi Ehernberger Hamilton, and Deborah Schiffrin, Second edition, 42–60. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118584194.ch2
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch2 [Google Scholar]
25. Hunston, Susan, and Geoff Thompson
    eds. 2000 Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198238546.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198238546.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
26. Konishi, Masako
    2018 “The Impact of Global NGOs on Japanese Press Coverage of Climate Negotiations: An Analysis of the New “Background Media Strategy.”” Environmental Communication12(4): 558–73. 10.1080/17524032.2017.1308403
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1308403 [Google Scholar]
27. Kristeva, Julia
    1980 Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art, edited byLeon S. Roudiez, translated by. T. Gora, Alice Jardine, and Leon S. Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
    1980 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Lambrou, Marina
    2017 “Dialogism in Journalistic Discourse: An Analysis of Ian McEwan’s “Savagely Awoken.”” InDialogue Studies, ed. byJarmila Mildorf and Bronwen Thomas, 281:137–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/ds.28.08lam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.28.08lam [Google Scholar]
30. Majdzińska-Koczorowicz, Aleksandra
    2023 “Animals are the homeless: A portrayal of sea ice dependent animals losing their natural habitat. A cognitive linguistics-oriented analysis of chosen climate change awareness raising campaigns.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics19(1):105–124. 10.1515/lpp‑2023‑0006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2023-0006 [Google Scholar]
31. Moser, Susanne C.
    2010 “Communicating Climate Change: History, Challenges, Process and Future Directions.” WIREs Climate Change1(1): 31–53. 10.1002/wcc.11
    https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.11 [Google Scholar]
32. Musolff, Andreas
    2006 “Metaphor Scenarios in Public Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol21(1): 23–38. 10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2 [Google Scholar]
33. Musolff, Andreas
    2011 “Metaphor in Political Dialogue.” Language and Dialogue1(2): 191–206. 10.1075/ld.1.2.02mus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.1.2.02mus [Google Scholar]
34. Musolff, Andreas
    2022 ““World-Beating” Pandemic Responses: Ironical, Sarcastic, and Satirical Use of War and Competition Metaphors in the Context of COVID-19 Pandemic.” Metaphor and Symbol37(2): 76–87. 10.1080/10926488.2021.1932505
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2021.1932505 [Google Scholar]
35. Painter, James, Silje Kristiansen, and Mike S. Schäfer
    2018 “How “Digital-Born” Media Cover Climate Change in Comparison to Legacy Media: A Case Study of the COP 21 Summit in Paris.” Global Environmental Change481 (January):1–10. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.003 [Google Scholar]
36. Partington, Alan
    2006 “Metaphors, Motifs and Similes across Discourse Types: Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS) at Work.” InCorpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy, ed. byAnatol Stefanowitsch and Stefan Th. Gries, 267–304. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199895.267
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199895.267 [Google Scholar]
37. Ping, Yuan
    2024 “Whose Voice Is It? Evaluations of Journalistic Voices in News Translation about the 2014 Hong Kong Protests.” Text & Talk44(5): 671–91. 10.1515/text‑2021‑0192
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2021-0192 [Google Scholar]
38. Post, Senja, Katharina Kleinen-von Königslöw, and Mike S. Schäfer
    2019 “Between Guilt and Obligation: Debating the Responsibility for Climate Change and Climate Politics in the Media.” Environmental Communication13(6): 723–39. 10.1080/17524032.2018.1446037
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1446037 [Google Scholar]
39. Pragglejaz Group
    Pragglejaz Group 2007 “MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol22(1): 1–39. 10.1080/10926480709336752
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752 [Google Scholar]
40. Rasmussen, Soley
    2010 “News as a Service: Adoption of Web 2.0 by Online Newspapers.” InManagement of the Interconnected World, ed. byAlessandro D’Atri, Marco De Marco, Alessio Maria Braccini, and Francesca Cabiddu, 11–19. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag HD. 10.1007/978‑3‑7908‑2404‑9_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2404-9_2 [Google Scholar]
41. Rayson, Paul
    2008 “From Key Words to Key Semantic Domains.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics13(4): 519–49. 10.1075/ijcl.13.4.06ray
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.13.4.06ray [Google Scholar]
42. Semino, Elena
    2008 Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Semino, Elena, Zsófia Demjén, and Jane Demmen
    2018 “An Integrated Approach to Metaphor and Framing in Cognition, Discourse, and Practice, with an Application to Metaphors for Cancer.” Applied Linguistics39(5): 625–45.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Semino, Elena, Zsófia Demjén, Andrew Hardie, Sheila Payne, and Paul Rayson
    eds. 2018 Metaphor, Cancer and the End of Life: A Corpus-Based Study. Routledge Advances in Corpus Linguistics 19. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Shaw, Christopher, and Brigitte Nerlich
    2015 “Metaphor as a Mechanism of Global Climate Change Governance: A Study of International Policies, 1992–2012.” Ecological Economics1091 (January):34–40. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.001 [Google Scholar]
46. Steen, Gerard, Aletta G. Dorst, J. Berenike Herrmann, Anna A. Kaal, and Tina Krennmayr
    2010 A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 14. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar]
47. Tannen, Deborah
    2007 Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. 2nd ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618987
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618987 [Google Scholar]
48. Thibodeau, Paul H., and Lera Boroditsky
    2011 “Metaphors We Think With: The Role of Metaphor in Reasoning.” Ed. byJan Lauwereyns. PLoS ONE6(2): e16782. 10.1371/journal.pone.0016782
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016782 [Google Scholar]
49. Trnavac, Radoslava, and Nele Põldvere
    2024 “Investigating Appraisal and the Language of Evaluation in Fake News Corpora.” Corpus Pragmatics8(2): 107–30. 10.1007/s41701‑023‑00162‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-023-00162-x [Google Scholar]
50. World Resources Institute
    World Resources Institute 2022 “Climate Watch Historical GHG Emissions.” Available online at: climatewatchdata.org/ghg-emissions. Retrieved23 April 2023.