oa Negotiating the good and bad in CSR reports

References

1. Azar, Moshe
   1997 “Concession relations as argumentation.” Text(): –.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Barth, Dagmar
   2000 ‘That's true, although not really, but still: expressing concession in spoken English’. In Cause, Condition, Concession, and Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, ed. byElizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Bernd Kortmann, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bhatia, Aditi
   2012 “The Corporate Social Responsibility Report: The Hybridization of a “Confused” Genre (2007–2011).” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication(): –. 10.1109/TPC.2012.2205732
   https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2012.2205732 [Google Scholar]
4. Bondi, Marina and Danni Yu
   2018 “Textual Voices in Corporate Reporting: A Cross-cultural Analysis of Italian, Chinese and English CSR Reports.” International Journal of Business Communication(): –. 10.1177/2329488418784690
   https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488418784690 [Google Scholar]
5. Crevels, Mily
   2000 “Concessives on Different Semantic Levels: A Typological Perspective.” InCause, Condition, Concession, Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, ed. byElizabeth Couper-Kuhlenand, and Bernd Kortmann, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110219043.4.313
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219043.4.313 [Google Scholar]
6. Fuoli, Matteo
   2012 “Assessing Social Responsibility: A Quantitative Analysis of Appraisal in BP’s and IKEA’s Social Reports.” Discourse & Communication(): –. 10.1177/1750481311427788
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481311427788 [Google Scholar]
7. Fuoli, Matteo
   2018 “Building a Trustworthy Corporate Identity: A Corpus-based Analysis of Stance in Annual and Corporate Social Responsibility Reports.” Applied Linguistics(): –. 10.1093/applin/amw058
   https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw058 [Google Scholar]
8. Fuoli, Matteo and Carita Paradis
   2014 “A Model of Trust-repair Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.09.001
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.09.001 [Google Scholar]
9. Garzone, Giuliana
   2005 “Pragmatic and discoursal features of annual executive letters: observations on the rhetorical and evaluative function of concessive constructions.” InCross-cultural Encounters: Linguistic Perspectives, ed. byMarina Bondi, and Nick Maxwell, –. Roma: Officina Edizioni.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Garzone, Giuliana
    2012 “Dialogism in Arbitration Awards: Focus on Concessive Constructions.” InArbitration Awards, ed. byVijay Bhatia, Giuliana Garzone, and Chiara Degano, –. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Gast, Volker
    2019 “A Corpus-based Comparative Study of Concessive Connectives in English, German and Spanish: The Distribution of although, obwohl and aunque in the Europarl Corpus.” InEmpirical Studies on the Construction of Discourse, ed. byÓscar Loureda, Inés Recio Fernández, Laura Nadal, and Adriana Cruz, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.305.06gas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.305.06gas [Google Scholar]
12. Ho, Shuna Shu Ham, Chang Hoon Oh, and Daniel Shapiro
    2024 “Can Corporate Social Responsibility Lead to Social License? A Sentiment and Emotion Analysis.” Journal of Management Studies(): –. 10.1111/joms.12863
    https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12863 [Google Scholar]
13. Izutsu, Nitsuko Narita
    2008 “Contrast, Concessive and Corrective: Toward a Comprehensive Study of Opposition Relations.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.07.001 [Google Scholar]
14. König, Ekkehard and Peter Siemund
    2000 “Causal and Concessive Clauses: Formal and Semantic Relations.” InCause, Condition, Concession, Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, ed. byElizabeth Couper-Kuhlenand, and Bernd Kortmann, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110219043.4.341
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219043.4.341 [Google Scholar]
15. König, Ekkehard
    1986 “Conditionals, Concessive Conditionals and Concessives: Areas of Contrast, Overlap and Neutralization.” InOn Conditionals, ed. byElizabeth Closs Traugott, Alice ter Meulen, Judy Snitzer Reilly, and Charles A. Ferguson, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511753466.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753466.013 [Google Scholar]
16. König, Ekkehard
    2006 “Concessive Clauses.” InEncyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (Second edition), –. Elsevier Science. 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/00277‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00277-7 [Google Scholar]
17. König, Ekkehard
    2020 “Concessive Markers and Concessive Meaning: Taking Stock of What We Know and Do Not Know.” InPioniergeist, Ausdauer, Leidenschaft. Festschrift zur Ehren von Prof. Dr. Jürgen Handke, ed. bySabrina Zeaiter, and Peter Franke, –. Open publication server, Philipps-Universiteit
    [Google Scholar]
18. Lin, Yuting
    2021 “Legitimation Strategies in Corporate Discourse: A Comparison of UK and Chinese Corporate Social Responsibility Reports.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.02.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.02.009 [Google Scholar]
19. Martin, Jim R., and Peter R. R. White
    2005 The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan Basingstoke. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
20. Milosavljević, Aleksandra and Stefan Milosavljević
    2024 “Standard Concessives are Inherently Focused: Evidence from Serbian.” Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Mizuno, Yuko
    2007 “Although” Clauses in English Discourse: A Functional Analysis. PhD dissertation, Hokkaido University.
22. Noordman, Leo G.
    2001 ‘On the production of causal-contrastive although sentences in context.’ InText Representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects, ed. byTed Sanders, Joost Schilperoord, and Wilber Spooren, –. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Rutherford, Brian A.
    2005 “Genre Analysis of Corporate Annual Report Narratives: A Corpus Linguistics–based Approach.” The Journal of Business Communication (1973)(): –. 10.1177/0021943605279244
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943605279244 [Google Scholar]
24. Sinclair, John
    2004 Trust the Text: Language, Corpus, and Discourse. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Schnackenberg, Andrew K., and Edward C. Tomlinson
    2016 “Organisational Transparency: A New Perspective on Managing Trust in Organisation-Stakeholder Relationships.” Journal of Management (): –. 10.1177/0149206314525202
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314525202 [Google Scholar]
26. Sweetser, Eve E.
    1990 From Etymology to Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620904
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904 [Google Scholar]
27. Vergaro, Carla
    2008 “On the pragmatics of concessive constructions in Italian and English business letter discourse.” Multilingua(): –. 10.1515/MULTI.2008.013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/MULTI.2008.013 [Google Scholar]
28. Vergaro, Carla
    2014 “Struggle Though I May … ”: A Note on the Inverted Though Concessive Construction in English.” English Studies(): –. 10.1080/0013838X.2014.924281
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0013838X.2014.924281 [Google Scholar]
29. Weigand, Edda
    2018 “Dialogue: The Key to Pragmatics.” InFrom Pragmatics to Dialogue, ed.byEdda Weigand, and Istvan Kecskes, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.31.02wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.31.02wei [Google Scholar]
30. Wiechmann, Daniel, and Elma Kerz
    2013 “The Positioning of Concessive Adverbial Clauses in English: Assessing the Importance of Discourse-pragmatic and Processing-based Constraints.” English Language and Linguistics(): –. 10.1017/S1360674312000305
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674312000305 [Google Scholar]
31. Yu, Danni
    2023 “A Cross-Cultural Genre Analysis of Leadership Statements in Italian and American University Sustainability Reports.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication(): –. 10.1109/TPC.2022.3228024
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2022.3228024 [Google Scholar]
32. Yu, Danni, and Marina Bondi
    2017 “The Generic Structure of CSR Reports in Italian, Chinese, and English: A Corpus-based Analysis.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication(): –. 10.1109/TPC.2017.2702040
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2017.2702040 [Google Scholar]