Emergent professional practices

References

1. Ansio, Heli, Pia Houni, and Mikko Piispa
   2018 “Ei ole keksitty sitä ammattinimikettä, mikä olisin. Sosiaalisesti sitoutuneen taiteen tekijät ja hybridinen työ.” [There’s no job title for what I do — socially engaged artists and hybrid work]. Yhteiskuntapolitiikka: –.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Antaki, Charles
   2012 “Affiliative and Disaffiliative Candidate Understandings.” Discourse Studies(): –.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Antaki, Charles, Rebecca Barnes, and Ivan Leudar
   2005 “Diagnostic Formulations in Psychotherapy.” Discourse Studies(): –.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Arminen, Ilkka
   2005 Institutional Interaction: Studies of Talk at Work. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Berthoin Antal, Ariale, Jill Woodilla, and Ulla Johansson Sköldberg
   2016 “Artistic Interventions in Organisations: Introduction.” InArtistic Interventions in Organizations: Research, Theory, Practice, ed. byUlla Johansson Sköldberg, Jill Woodilla, and Ariale Berthoin Antal, –. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Boyd, Elizabeth and John Heritage
   2006 “Taking the History: Questioning during the Comprehensive History-taking.” InCommunication in Medical Care: Interaction Between Primary Care Physicians and Patients, ed. byJohn Heritage and Douglas Maynard, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Clark, Herbert H.
   1996 Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Clifton, Jonathan, Geert Jacobs, Julia Valeiras-Jurado, and Astrid Vandendaele
   2022 “Governmentality-in-action: The Pursuit of Happiness and Identity-work in Graduate Career Coaching Interaction.” Language and Dialogue(): –.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cooren, Francois, Fiona Thompson, Donna Canestraro, and Tamás Bodor
   2006 “From Agency to Structure: Analysis of an Episode in a Facilitation Process.” Human Relations(): –.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Deppermann, Arnulf, Reinhold Schmitt, and Lorenza Mondada
    2010 “Agenda and Emergence: Contingent and Planned Activities in a Meeting.” Journal of Pragmatics(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Drew, Paul
    1987 “Po-faced Receipts of Teases.” Linguistics: –.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Drew, Paul
    1991 “Asymmetries of Knowledge in Conversational Interactions.” InAsymmetries in Dialogue, ed. byIvana Markova and Klaus Foppa, –. Oxford: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Drew, Paul and John Heritage
    (eds) 1992 Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Etelämäki, Marja, Markku Haakana, and Mia Halonen
    2013 “Keskustelukumppanin kehuminen suomalaisessa keskustelussa” [Compliments in everyday Finnish conversation]. Virittäjä: –.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Franco, L. Alberto and Mie Femø Nielsen
    2018 “Examining Group Facilitation in Situ: The Use of Formulations in Facilitation Practice.” Group Decision and Negotiation(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
16. George, Alan and Donna Ladkin
    2008 “The Aesthetics of Leadership Development.” InLeadership Learning: Knowledge into Action, ed. byKim Turnbull James and James Collins, –. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Glenn, Philip
    2003 Laughter in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Graf, Eva-Maria
    2011 “ʻYes Then I Will Tell You Maybe a Little Bit about the Procedure’ — Constructing Professional Identity Where There Is Not Yet a Profession: The Case of Executive Coaching.” InConstructing Identities at Work, ed. byJo Angouri and Meredith Marra, –. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Graf, Eva-Maria
    2019 The Pragmatics of Executive Coaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.303
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.303 [Google Scholar]
20. Graf, Eva-Maria, Frédérick Dionne, and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy
    2020 “How to Investigate the Local and Global Change Potential of Questioning Sequences in Executive Coaching? A Call for Interdisciplinary Research.” Scandinavian Studies in Language(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Graf, Eva-Maria and Joanna Pawelczyk
    2014 “The Interactional Accomplishment of Feelings-talk in Psychotherapy and Executive Coaching.” InDiscourses of Helping Professions, ed. byEva-Maria Graf, Marlene Sator, and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.252.04gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.252.04gra [Google Scholar]
22. Goodwin, Charles
    2018 “Why multimodality? Why co-operative action?” Social Interaction: Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality(). 10.7146/si.v1i2.110039
    https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v1i2.110039 [Google Scholar]
23. Goodwin, Charles and Marjorie Harness Goodwin
    1992 “Assessments and the Construction of Context.” InRethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. byAlessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, –. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Gunnarsson, Britt-Louise
    2009 Professional Discourse. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Heritage, John
    1997 “Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk: Analyzing Data.” InQualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, ed. byDavid Silverman, –. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Heritage, John
    2012 “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Heritage, John and Geoffrey Raymond
    2005 “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Heritage, John C. and D. Rodney Watson
    1979 “Formulations as Conversational Objects.” InEveryday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. byGeorge Psathas, –. New York: Irvington Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Karvonen, Ulla and Riikka Nissi
    2024 “Enabling Participation in Joint Drumming within Organizational Workshops.” Multimodal Communication(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Koivisto, Aino
    2009 “Kiitoksen paikka: Kiittäminen kioskiasiointia jäsentämässä.” [The position of the thanking in interactions in kiosks]. InKieli kioskilla: Tutkimuksia kioskiasioinnin rutiineista, ed. byHanna Lappalainen and Liisa Raevaara, –. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Koivisto, Aino
    2017 “Uutta tietoa vai oivallus? Eräiden dialogipartikkeleiden tehtävistä.” [New information or sudden realisation? On the functions of some response particles in Finnish]. Virittäjä: –.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Kong, Kenneth
    2014 Professional Discourse. Cambridge: University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Koole, Tom
    2012 “Teacher Evaluations: Assessing ‘Knowing’, ‘Understanding’, and ‘Doing’.” InEvaluating Cognitive Competences in Interaction, ed. byGitte Rasmussen, Catherine E. Brouwer, and Dennis Day, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.225.03koo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.225.03koo [Google Scholar]
34. Kääntä, Leila
    2010 Teacher Turn-Allocation and Repair Practices in Classroom Interaction: A Multisemiotic Perspective. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Lee, Yo-An
    2007 “Third Turn Position in Teacher Talk: Contingency and the Work of Teaching. Journal of Pragmatics: –.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Lehikoinen, Kai
    2018 “Setting the Context: Expanding Professionalism in the Arts — A Paradigm Shift?” InCareers in the Arts: Visions for the Future, ed. byBarbara Revelli, –. Amsterdam: ELIA.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Lehikoinen, Kai, Anne Pässilä, and Allan Owens
    2021 “Conflicting Professional Identities for Artists in Transprofessional Contexts: Insights from a Pilot Programme Initiating Artistic Interventions in Organisations.” InExpanding Professionalism in Music and Higher Music Education — A Changing Game, ed. byHeidi Westerlund and Helena Gaunt, –. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Levinson, Stephen C.
    2013 “Action formation and ascription.” InHandbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. byJack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, –. Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Martikainen, Suvi-Jonna, Anne Pässilä, and Allan Owens
    2021 “Convoking Radical Imagination: The Use of Arts-Based Methods for Inquiry in Organizational Contexts.” InBeyond Text — Learning Through Arts-Based Research, ed. byJeff Adams and Allan Owens, –. Bristol: Intellect.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Mehan, Hugh
    1979 Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Mondada, Lorenza
    2019 “Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics: –.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Nassaji, Hossein and Gordon Wells
    2000 “What’s the Use of ‘Triadic Dialogue’?: An Investigation of Teacher-student Interaction.” Applied Linguistics(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Nissi, Riikka, Mona Blåsjö, and Carla Jansson
    2023 “Workplace Communication in Flux: From Discrete Languages, Text Genres and Conversations to Complex Communicative Situations.” Applied Linguistics Review(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Nissi, Riikka and Heidi Hirsto
    2023 “Policing Language in the World of New Work: The Commodification of Workplace Communication in Organizational Consulting.” Applied Linguistics Review(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Nissi, Riikka and Esa Lehtinen
    2024 “Perceiving the Organisation through a Coding Scheme: The Construction of Managerial Expertise in Organisational Training.” Pragmatics(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Nissi, Riikka and Anne Pässilä
    2022 “The Moral Work of Becoming a Professional: The Interactional Practices of Storytelling in Professional Peer Mentoring Groups.” Narrative Inquiry(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Onnismaa, Jussi
    2018 “Outouden tuojat: Taide- ja hyvinvointityön yhdistäminen.” [Importers of strangeness: Combining art and health care work]. Työelämän tutkimus(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Peräkylä, Anssi
    2016 “Conversation Analysis.” Wiley Online Library. 10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosc133.pub2
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosc133.pub2 [Google Scholar]
49. Pomerantz, Anita M.
    1984 “Giving a Source or Basis: The Practice in Conversation of Telling ‘How I Know’.” Journal of Pragmatics: –.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Raymond, Geoffrey and John Heritage
    2006 “The Epistemics of Social Relations: Owning Grandchildren.” Language in Society: –.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Rettinger, Sabine
    2011 “Construction and Display of Competence and (Professional) Identity in Coaching Interactions.” Journal of Business Communication(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation.” Language: –.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Salomaa, Elina and Esa Lehtinen
    2023 “Graphicons as a Vehicle for Eliciting Negative Emotions in Multimedial Workplace Interaction.” InConversation Analytic Perspectives to Digital Interaction: Practices, Resources, and Affordances, ed. byAino Koivisto, Heidi Vepsäläinen, and Mikko T. Virtanen, –. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Schiuma, Giovanni
    2011 The Value of Arts for Business. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Sinclair, John McHardy and R. Malcolm Coulthard
    1975 Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Sorjonen, Marja-Leena
    2001 Responding in Conversation: A Study of Response Particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.70
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.70 [Google Scholar]
57. Stevanovic, Melisa and Anssi Peräkylä
    2012 “Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose and Decide.” Research on Language and Social Interaction(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Susskind, Richard and Daniel Susskind
    2015 The Future of the Professions: How Technology Will Transform the Work of Human Experts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Voutilainen, Liisa, Anssi Peräkylä, and Johanna Ruusuvuori
    2010 “Recognition and Interpretation: Responding to Emotional Experience in Psychotherapy.” Research on Language and Social Interaction(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Winkler, Oliver
    2022 “The Role of Semi-responsive Answers for Relationship Building in Coaching.” InRelationships in Organized Helping: Analyzing Interaction is Psychotherapy, Medical Encounters, Coaching and in Social Media, ed. byClaudio Scarvaglieri, Eva-Maria Graf, and Thoma Spranz-Fogasy, –. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.331.07win
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.331.07win [Google Scholar]