Review of Ewing & Laury (2024): (Non)referentiality in Conversation

References

1. Ariel, Mira
   2001 “Accessibility Theory: An Overview.” InText Representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects, ed. byTed J. M. Sanders, Joost Schilperoord, and Wilbert Spooren, 29–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.8.04ari
   https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.8.04ari [Google Scholar]
2. Du Bois, John W. and Sandra A. Thompson
   1991 Dimensions of a theory of information flow. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Santa Barbara.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Fillmore, Charles J.
   1977 “The case for case reopened.” InGrammatical Relations, 59–81. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004368866_005
   https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368866_005 [Google Scholar]
4. Givón, Thomas
   1983 Topic Continuity in Discourse: A quantitative cross-language study (vol.31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.3
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.3 [Google Scholar]
5. Goffman, Erving
   1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg, and Ron Zacharski
   1993 “Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse.” Language691: 274–307. 10.2307/416535
   https://doi.org/10.2307/416535 [Google Scholar]
7. Ochs, Elimor, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson
   (eds) 1996 Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620874
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874 [Google Scholar]
8. Trueswell, John C., Irina Sekerina, Nicole M. Hill, and Marian L. Logrip
   1999 “The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children.” Cognition73(2): 89–134. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(99)00032‑3
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00032-3 [Google Scholar]