oa Review of Nasi (2024): Children’s Peer Cultures in Dialogue. Participation, hierarchy, and social identity in diverse schools

References

1. Antaki, Charles and Sue Widdicombe
   1998 “Identity as achievement and as a tool.” InIdentities in talk, ed. byCharles Antaki and Sue Widdicombe, 1–14. London: Sage.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bauman, Richard and Charles Briggs
   1990 “Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life.” Annual Review of Anthropology191: 59–88. 10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000423
   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000423 [Google Scholar]
3. Bakhtin, Mikhail
   1981 [1935] The Dialogic Imagination: Four essaysbyMikhail M. Bakhtin, ed. byMichael Holquist. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bakhtin, Mikhail
   1986 [1953] Speech genres and other late essays, ed. byCaryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Baraldi, Claudio
   2009 “Empowering dialogue in intercultural settings.” InDialogue in Intercultural Communities. From an educational point of view, ed. byClaudio Baraldi, 3–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.4.01bar
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.4.01bar [Google Scholar]
6. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Deborah Huck-Taglicht, and Hanna Avni
   2004 “The Social and Discursive Spectrum of Peer Talk.” Discourse Studies6(3): 307–28. 10.1177/1461445604044291
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445604044291 [Google Scholar]
7. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana and Naomi Gorbatt
   2014 “‘Say princess’: The challenges and affordances of young Hebrew L2 novices’ interaction with their peers.” InChildren’s peer talk: Learning from each other, ed. byAsta Cekaite, Shoshana Blum-Kulka, Vibeke Grøver and Eva Teubal, 169–193. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139084536.013
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084536.013 [Google Scholar]
8. Caronia, Letizia and Nicola Nasi
   2022 “The communicative constitution of epistemic and deontic authority: epistemological implications of a second order construct.” InThe Routledge Handbook of the Communicative Constitution of Organization, ed. byJoëlle Basque, Nicolas Bencherki, and Timothy Kuhn, 148–164. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003224914‑11
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003224914-11 [Google Scholar]
9. Cekaite, Asta
   2007 “A child’s development of interactional competence in a Swedish L2 classroom.” The Modern Language Journal91(1): 45–62. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2007.00509.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00509.x [Google Scholar]
10. Cekaite, Asta
    2012 “Tattling and Dispute Resolution: moral order, emotions and embodiment in the teacher-mediated disputes of young second language learners.” InDisputes in everyday life: Social and moral orders of children and young people, ed. bySusan Danby and Maryanne Theobald, 165–192. Bingley, UK: Emerald. 10.1108/S1537‑4661(2012)0000015011
    https://doi.org/10.1108/S1537-4661(2012)0000015011 [Google Scholar]
11. Cekaite, Asta, Shoshana Blum-Kulka, Vibeke Grøver, and Eva Teubal
    2014 “Children’s peer talk and learning: Uniting discursive, social, and cultural facets of peer interactions: Editor’s introduction.” InChildren’s peer talk: Learning from each other, ed. byAsta Cekaite, Shoshana Blum-Kulka, Vibeke Grøver, and Eva Teubal, 3–23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139084536.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084536.003 [Google Scholar]
12. Church, Amelia
    2009 Preference Organization and Peer Disputes. How young children resolve conflict. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Cobb-Moore, Charlotte, Susan Danby, and Ann Farrell
    2009 “Young children as rule makers.” Journal of Pragmatics411: 1477–1492. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.04.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.04.013 [Google Scholar]
14. Cook-Gumperz, Jenny, William Corsaro, and Jürgen Streeck
    (eds) 1986 Children’s Worlds and Children’s Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110864212
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110864212 [Google Scholar]
15. Corsaro, William
    1985 Friendship and Peer Culture in the Early Years. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Corsaro, William
    1992 “Interpretive Reproduction in Children’s Peer Cultures.” Social Psychology Quarterly55(2): 160–177. 10.2307/2786944
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2786944 [Google Scholar]
17. Danby, Susan and Carolyn Baker
    1998 “‘What’s the problem?’ Restoring social order in the preschool classroom.” InChildren and Social Competence: Arenas of Action, ed. byIan Hutchby and Jo Moran-Ellis, 159–185. London: Falmer Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Ehrlich, Sara and Shoshana Blum-Kulka
    2010 “Peer talk as a ‘double opportunity space’: The case of argumentative discourse.” Discourse and Society21(2): 211–233. 10.1177/0957926509353847
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926509353847 [Google Scholar]
19. Enfield, Nick and Stephen Levinson
    2006 “Introduction: Human Sociality as a New Interdisciplinary Field.” InRoots of Human Sociality. Culture, Cognition, and Interaction, ed. byNick Enfield and Stephen Levinson, 1–38. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Ervin-Tripp, Susan and Claudia Mitchell-Kernan
    1977 Child Discourse. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Giddens, Anthony
    1984 The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Goodwin, Charles
    2018 Co-Operative Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Goodwin, Marjorie and Amy Kyratzis
    2012 “Peer language socialization.” InThe Handbook of Language Socialization, ed. byAlessandro Duranti, Elinor Ochs, and Bambi Schieffelin, 365–390. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Gumperz, John and Eleanor Herasimchuk
    1972 “The conversational analysis of social meaning: a study of classroom interaction.” InSociolinguistics: current trends and prospects, ed. byRoger Shuy, 99–134. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Heritage, John
    2012 “Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction451: 1–29. 10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684 [Google Scholar]
26. Hutchby, Ian and Jo Moran-Ellis
    (eds) 1998 Children and Social Competence. Arenas of Action. London: The Falmer Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Karlsson, Magnus and Nicola Nasi
    2023 “‘This friend was nice’: Young children’s negotiation of their social relationships in and through interactions with (play) objects.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction421: 100734. 10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100734
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100734 [Google Scholar]
28. LeMaster, Barbara
    2010 “Authority and preschool disputes: Learning to behave in the classroom.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology20(1): 166–178. 10.1111/j.1548‑1395.2010.01055.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1395.2010.01055.x [Google Scholar]
29. Linell, Per
    2009 Rethinkig language, mind and world dialogically. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Luhmann, Niklas
    1996 [1984] Social systems. Redwood, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Maynard, Douglas
    1985 “On the functions of social conflict among children.” American Sociological Review50(2): 207–223. 10.2307/2095410
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2095410 [Google Scholar]
32. Moore, Ekaterina and Matthew Burdelski
    2020 “Peer conflict and language socialization in preschool: Introduction to special issue.” Linguistics and Education591: 100758. 10.1016/j.linged.2019.100758
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.100758 [Google Scholar]
33. Ochs, Elinor and Bambi Schieffelin
    2017 “Language Socialization: A Historical Overview.” InLanguage socialization, ed. byPatricia Duff and Stephen May, 3–17. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑02255‑0_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02255-0_1 [Google Scholar]
34. Pallotti, Gabriele
    2001 “External appropriations as a strategy for participating in multi-party intercultural conversations.” InCulture in Communication, ed. byAldo Di Luzio, Susanne Guenthner, and Franca Orletti, 295–334. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.81.16pal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.81.16pal [Google Scholar]
35. Schegloff, Emanuel
    2006 “Interaction: the infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language and the arena in which culture is enacted.” InThe Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, ed. byNick Enfield and Stephen Levinson, 70–96. New York: Berg.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Stokoe, Elizabeth
    2012 “Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis.” Discourse Studies14(3): 277–303. 10.1177/1461445612441534
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612441534 [Google Scholar]
37. Stevanovic, Melisa and Anssi Peräkylä
    2014 “Three Orders in the Organization of Human Action: on the Interface between Knowledge, Power, and Emotion in Interaction and Social Relations.” Language in Society43(2): 185–207. 10.1017/S0047404514000037
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404514000037 [Google Scholar]
38. Tholander, Michael and Karin Aronsson
    2003 “Doing Subteaching in School Group Work: Positionings, Resistance and Participation Frameworks.” Language and Education171: 208–234. 10.1080/09500780308666849
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780308666849 [Google Scholar]
39. Vygotsky, Lev
    1978 Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Weigand, Edda
    2010 Dialogue. The Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]
41. Weigand, Edda
    2017 “The mixed game model: a holistic theory.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. byEdda Weigand, 174–194. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]