oa English TikTok videos: ‘short lessons’ or just waffle?

References

1. Ahmad, Mubarik, Kasiyah Junus, and Harry Budi Santoso
   2022 “Automatic Content Analysis of Asynchronous Discussion Forum Transcripts: A Systematic Literature Review.” Education and Information Technologies(): –. 10.1007/s10639‑022‑11065‑w
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11065-w [Google Scholar]
2. Alghameeti, Afrah
   2022 “Is TikTok an Effective Technology Tool in English Vocabulary Expansion?” English Language Teaching(): –. 10.5539/elt.v15n12p14
   https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v15n12p14 [Google Scholar]
3. Almodiel, Myra Collado
   2022 “Analyzing Online Learners’ Knowledge Construction in Asynchronous Discussion Forums Using Interaction Analysis Model.” International Journal in Information Technology in Governance, Education and Business(): –. 10.32664/ijitgeb.v4i1.93
   https://doi.org/10.32664/ijitgeb.v4i1.93 [Google Scholar]
4. Ambalegin and Tomi Arianto
   2019 “A Phonology-Based Study: English Pronunciation Inconsistency.” InProceedings of the 2nd Annual International Conference on Language and Literature (AICLL 2019), July 3–4, Medan, Indonesia.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Arbaugh, J. B. and Raquel Benbunan-Fich
   2007 “The Importance of Participant Interaction in Online Environments.” Decision Support Systems(): –.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bannon, Liam
   1986 “Computer-Mediated Communication.” InUser Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction, ed. byDonald A. Norman and S. W. Draper, –. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 10.1201/b15703‑21
   https://doi.org/10.1201/b15703-21 [Google Scholar]
7. Bassetti, Bene, Paola Escudero, and Rachel Hayes-Harb
   2015 “Second Language Phonology at the Interface between Acoustic and Orthographic Input.” Applied Psycholinguistics(): –. 10.1017/S0142716414000393
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716414000393 [Google Scholar]
8. Bohlke, Olaf
   2003 “A Comparison of Students Participation Levels by Group Size and Language Stages during Chatroom and Face-to-Face Discussions in German.” CALICO Journal(): –. 10.1558/cj.v21i1.67‑97
   https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v21i1.67-97 [Google Scholar]
9. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
   1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
10. Caldeiro-Pedreira, Mari-Carmen and Carmen Yot-Domínguez
    2023 “Usos de TikTok en educación: Revisión sistemática de la aplicabilidad didáctica de TikTok.” Anàlisi: Quaderns de Comunicació i Cultura: –. 10.5565/rev/analisi.3630
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/analisi.3630 [Google Scholar]
11. Chik, Alice
    2020 “Humorous Interaction, Language Learning, and Social Media.” World Englishes(): –. 10.1111/weng.12443
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12443 [Google Scholar]
12. Creel, Sarah C.
    2022 “Preschoolers Have Difficulty Discriminating Novel Minimal-Pair Words.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research(): –. 10.1044/2022_JSLHR‑22‑00029
    https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00029 [Google Scholar]
13. De Wever, Bram, Tammy Schellens, Martin Valcke, and Hilde Keer
    2006 “Content Analysis Schemes to Analyze Transcripts of Online Asynchronous Discussion Groups: A Review.” Computers & Education(): –. 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.005 [Google Scholar]
14. Derkach, Svitlana, Irma Vitovska-Vantsa, Myroslava Melnyk, Alexander Matuzko, Alisa Kolpashchykova, Kateryna Iudova-Romanova
    2022 “The Trend of Tik-Tock Video as a New Tool for Motivating the Educational Activities of Students of Kyiv University of Culture: Analytical and Prognostic Aspect.” Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Derwing, Tracey M. and Murray J. Munro
    2005 “Second Language Accent and Pronunciation Teaching: A Research-Based Approach.” TESOL Quarterly(): –. 10.2307/3588486
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588486 [Google Scholar]
16. Dover, Yaniv and Guy Kelman
    2018 “Emergence of Online Communities: Empirical Evidence and Theory.” PLoS One(): e0205167. 10.1371/journal.pone.0205167
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205167 [Google Scholar]
17. Du, Helen S. and Christian Wagner
    2007 “Learning with Weblogs: Enhancing Cognitive and Social Knowledge Construction.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication(): –. 10.1109/TPC.2006.890848
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2006.890848 [Google Scholar]
18. Duffy, Thomas M. and Donald J. Cunningham
    1996 “Constructivism: Implications for the Design and Delivery of Instruction.” InHandbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, ed. byDavid H. Jonassen, –. New York: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Erlin, B., Norazah Yusof, and Azizah Abdul Rahman
    2009 “Analyzing Online Asynchronous Discussion Using Content and Social Network Analysis.” In2009 Ninth International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, –. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society. 10.1109/ISDA.2009.40
    https://doi.org/10.1109/ISDA.2009.40 [Google Scholar]
20. Espejel, Olivia, Pilar Concheiro, and Joan-Tomàs Pujolà
    2022 “TikTok En La Enseñanza de Español LE/L2: Telecolaboración y Competencia Digital.” Journal of Spanish Language Teaching(): –. 10.1080/23247797.2022.2091843
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23247797.2022.2091843 [Google Scholar]
21. Fetzer, Anita
    2008 “And I Think That Is a Very Straightforward Way of Dealing with It”: The Communicative Function of Cognitive Verbs in Political Discourse.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology(): –. 10.1177/0261927X08322481
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X08322481 [Google Scholar]
22. Foote, Jennifer A., Amy K. Holtby, and Tracey M. Derwing
    2011 “Survey of the Teaching of Pronunciation in Adult ESL Programs in Canada.” TESL Canada Journal/Revue TESL du Canada(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Garrison, Randy D.
    1991 “Critical Thinking and Adult Education: A Conceptual Model for Developing Critical Thinking in Adult Learners.” International Journal of Lifelong Education(): –. 10.1080/0260137910100403
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0260137910100403 [Google Scholar]
24. Garrison, D. Randy, Terry Anderson, and Walter Archer
    1999 “Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education.” The Internet and Higher Education (): –. 10.1016/S1096‑7516(00)00016‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6 [Google Scholar]
25. González-Lloret, Marta
    2009 “CA for Computer-Mediated Interaction in the Spanish L2 Classroom.” InTalk-in-Interaction: Multilingual Perspectives, ed. byGabriel Kasper and Hanh Nguyen, –. Honolulu: NFLRC.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Gunawardena, Charlotte, Nick Flor, David Gomez, and Damien Sanchez
    2016 “Analyzing Social Construction of Knowledge Online by Employing Interaction Analysis, Learning Analytics, and Social Network Analysis.” The Quarterly Review of Distance Education(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Gunawardena, Charlotte N., Constance A. Lowe, and Terry Anderson
    1997 “Analysis of a Global Online Debate and the Development of an Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social Construction of Knowledge in Computer Conferencing.” Journal of Educational Computing Research(): –. 10.2190/7MQV‑X9UJ‑C7Q3‑NRAG
    https://doi.org/10.2190/7MQV-X9UJ-C7Q3-NRAG [Google Scholar]
28. Hayes, Clare, Katherine Stott, Katie J. Lamb, and Glenn A. Hurst
    2020 “Making Every Second Count: Utilizing TikTok and Systems Thinking to Facilitate Scientific Public Engagement and Contextualization of Chemistry at Home.” Journal of Chemical Education(): –. 10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00511
    https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00511 [Google Scholar]
29. Henri, France
    1992 “Computer Conferencing and Content Analysis.” InCollaborative Learning through Computer Conferencing, ed. byAnthony R. Kaye, –. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑77684‑7_8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77684-7_8 [Google Scholar]
30. Heritage, John
    1984 “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement.” InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. byEmanuel A. Schegloff, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Herring, Susan
    1999 “Interactional Coherence in CMC.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication(). 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.1999.tb00106.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1999.tb00106.x [Google Scholar]
32. Hou, Huei-Tse, Yao-Ting Sung, and Kuo-En Chang
    2009 “Exploring the Behavioral Patterns of an Online Knowledge-Sharing Discussion Activity among Teachers with Problem-Solving Strategy.” Teaching and Teacher Education(): –. 10.1016/j.tate.2008.07.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.07.006 [Google Scholar]
33. Hurst, Beth, Randall Wallace, and Sarah B. Nixon
    2013 “The Impact of Social Interaction on Student Learning.” Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Jézégou, Annie
    2010 “Community of Inquiry En E-Learning: À Propos Du Modèle de Garrison et d’Anderson.” Journal of Distance Education / Revue de l’Éducation à Distance(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Jones, Rodney H. and Christoph A. Hafner
    2021 Understanding Digital Literacies: A Practical Introduction, 2nd edition. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003177647
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003177647 [Google Scholar]
36. Kaplan, Andreas M.
    2015 “Social Media, the Digital Revolution, and the Business of Media.” International Journal on Media Management(): –. 10.1080/14241277.2015.1120014
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2015.1120014 [Google Scholar]
37. Kaye, David Bondy Valdovinos, Xu Chen, and Jing Zeng
    2020 “The Co-Evolution of Two Chinese Mobile Short Video Apps: Parallel Platformization of Douyin and TikTok.” Mobile Media & Communication(): –. 10.1177/2050157920952120
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920952120 [Google Scholar]
38. Kern, Richard
    2021 “Twenty-Five Years of Digital Literacies in CALL.” Language Learning & Technology(): –. 10.64152/10125/73453
    https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73453 [Google Scholar]
39. Kiesler, Sara, Jane Siegel, and Timothy W. McGuire
    1984 “Social Psychological Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication.” American Psychologist(): –. 10.1037/0003‑066X.39.10.1123
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.10.1123 [Google Scholar]
40. Kim, Hye Yeong
    2014 “Learning Opportunities in Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication and Face-to-Face Interaction.” Computer Assisted Language Learning(): –. 10.1080/09588221.2012.692386
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.692386 [Google Scholar]
41. Kimmerle, Joachim, Johannes Moskaliuk, Aileen Oeberst, and Ulrike Cress
    2015 “Learning and Collective Knowledge Construction with Social Media: A Process-Oriented Perspective.” Educational Psychologist(): –. 10.1080/00461520.2015.1036273
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1036273 [Google Scholar]
42. Kitade, Keiko
    2000 “L2 Learners’ Discourse and SLA Theories in CMC: Collaborative Interaction in Internet Chat.” Computer Assisted Language Learning(): –. 10.1076/0958‑8221(200004)13:2;1‑D;FT143
    https://doi.org/10.1076/0958-8221(200004)13:2;1-D;FT143 [Google Scholar]
43. Larson, James R. and Caryn Christensen
    1993 “Groups as Problem-Solving Units: Toward a New Meaning of Social Cognition.” British Journal of Social Psychology(): –. 10.1111/j.2044‑8309.1993.tb00983.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1993.tb00983.x [Google Scholar]
44. Lazonder, Ard W., Pascal Wilhelm, and Susanne A. W. Ootes
    2003 “Using Sentence Openers to Foster Student Interaction in Computer-Mediated Learning Environments.” Computers & Education(): –. 10.1016/S0360‑1315(03)00050‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(03)00050-2 [Google Scholar]
45. Lee, Yeong-Ju
    2023 “Language Learning Affordances of Instagram and TikTok.” Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching(): –. 10.1080/17501229.2022.2051517
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2022.2051517 [Google Scholar]
46. Liu, Min, Matthew K. Evans, Elaine Horwitz, Sunjung Lee, Monica McCrory, Jeong-Bin Park, and Claire Meadows Parrish
    2013 “A Study of the Use of Social Network Sites for Language Learning by University ESL Students.” InSocial Networking for Language Education, ed. byMarie-Noëlle Lamy and Katerina Zourou, –. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137023384_8
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137023384_8 [Google Scholar]
47. Lomicka, Lara, and Gillian Lord
    2016 “Social Networking and Language Learning.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language Learning and Technology, ed. byFiona Farr and Liam Murray. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Lucas, Margarida, Charlotte Gunawardena, and António Moreira
    2014 “Assessing Social Construction of Knowledge Online: A Critique of the Interaction Analysis Model.” Computers in Human Behavior: –. 10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.050
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.050 [Google Scholar]
49. Lucas, Margarida and Antonio Moreira
    2011 “Using Social Web Tools for Knowledge Construction.” International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning(): . 10.1504/IJTEL.2011.039399
    https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2011.039399 [Google Scholar]
50. McKenna, Katelyn Y. A. and John A. Bargh
    2000 “Plan 9 from Cyberspace: The Implications of the Internet for Personality and Social Psychology.” Personality and Social Psychology Review(): –. 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0401_6
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0401_6 [Google Scholar]
51. McLoughlin, Catherine and Joe Luca
    2002 “Experiential learning online: The role of asynchronous communication tools.” InProceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2002, ed. byPhilip Barker and Samuel Rebelsky, –. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworks/3923
    [Google Scholar]
52. Möller, A. Marthe, Susan A. M. Vermeer, and Susanne E. Baumgartner
    2024 “Cutting Through the Comment Chaos: A Supervised Machine Learning Approach to Identifying Relevant YouTube Comments.” Social Science Computer Review(): –. 10.1177/08944393231173895
    https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393231173895 [Google Scholar]
53. Mompean, José Antonio and Jonás Fouz-González
    2016 “Twitter-Based EFL Pronunciation Instruction.” Language Learning & Technology(): –. 10.64152/10125/44451
    https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/44451 [Google Scholar]
54. Muñoz García, Margarita and Nathalie Panissal
    2010 “Quelle place accorder à la prosodie dans l’enseignement de l’espagnol pour des francophones.” Les Cahiers de l’APLIUT(): –. 10.4000/apliut.626
    https://doi.org/10.4000/apliut.626 [Google Scholar]
55. Negretti, Raffaella
    1999 “Web-Based Activities and SLA: A Conversation Analysis Research Approach.” Language Learning & Technology: –. 10.64152/10125/25057
    https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/25057 [Google Scholar]
56. Ng, Reuben and Nicole Indran
    2022 “Not Too Old for TikTok: How Older Adults Are Reframing Aging.” The Gerontologist(): –. 10.1093/geront/gnac055
    https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnac055 [Google Scholar]
57. Nguyen, Ha and Morgan Diederich
    2023 “Facilitating Knowledge Construction in Informal Learning: A Study of TikTok Scientific, Educational Videos.” Computers & Education: . 10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104896
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104896 [Google Scholar]
58. Nielsen, Matias
    2017 “Computer-Mediated Communication and Self-Awareness: A Selective Review.” Computers in Human Behavior: –. 10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.015 [Google Scholar]
59. Ouyang, Fan, Mian Wu, Liyin Zhang, Weiqi Xu, Luyi Zheng, and Mutlu Cukurova
    2023 “Making Strides toward AI-Supported Regulation of Learning in Collaborative Knowledge Construction.” Computers in Human Behavior: . 10.1016/j.chb.2023.107650
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107650 [Google Scholar]
60. Paulus, Trena M.
    2007 “CMC Modes for Learning Tasks at a Distance.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication(): –. 10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2007.00375.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00375.x [Google Scholar]
61. Pena-Shaff, Judith B. and Craig Nicholls
    2004 “Analyzing Student Interactions and Meaning Construction in Computer Bulletin Board Discussions.” Computers & Education(): –. 10.1016/j.compedu.2003.08.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2003.08.003 [Google Scholar]
62. Pennington, Martha C.
    1998 “The Teachability of Phonology in Adulthood: A Re-Examination.” InInternational Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, ed. byMairin Hennebry-Leung and Yuen Yi Lo, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/iral.1998.36.4.323
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1998.36.4.323 [Google Scholar]
63. Pennington, Martha C. and Pamela Rogerson-Revell
    2019 English Pronunciation Teaching and Research: Contemporary Perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑47677‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47677-7 [Google Scholar]
64. Pera, Arianna and Luca Maria Aiello
    2024 “Narratives of Collective Action in YouTube’s Discourse on Veganism.” Proceedings of the 18th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, ed. byYu-Ru Lin, Yelena Mejova, and Meeyoung Cha, –. Washington, DC: AAAI Press. 10.1609/icwsm.v18i1.31384
    https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v18i1.31384 [Google Scholar]
65. Putri, Syifa Mutiara Diko
    2022 “The Effectiveness of Using TikTok to Improve EFL Learners’ Speaking Ability.” Mimesis(): –. 10.12928/mms.v3i2.6096
    https://doi.org/10.12928/mms.v3i2.6096 [Google Scholar]
66. Rach, Markus and Marc Lounis
    2021 “The Focus on Students’ Attention! Does TikTok’s EduTok Initiative Propose an Alternative Perspective to the Design of Institutional Learning Environments?” InIntegrated Science in Digital Age 2020, ed. byTatiana Antipova, –. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑49264‑9_22
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49264-9_22 [Google Scholar]
67. Radin, Abigail G. B. and Caitlin J. Light
    2022 “TikTok: An Emergent Opportunity for Teaching and Learning Science Communication Online.” Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education(): e00236–21. 10.1128/jmbe.00236‑21
    https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00236-21 [Google Scholar]
68. Rahman, Muhammad Saufi. S.
    2021 “Analysis Regression and Path Model: The Influence of Both Instagram and TikTok in Improving Students’ Vocabulary.” Sketch Journal(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Romiszowski, Alexander and Robin Mason
    2003 “Computer-Mediated Communication.” Journal of Educational Technology(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Rourke, Liam, Terry Anderson, D. Randy Garrison, and Walter Archer
    2001 “Methodological Issues in the Content Analysis of Computer Conference Transcripts.” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education: –.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Saritas, Tuncay
    2008 “The Construction of Knowledge through Social Interaction via Computer-Mediated Communication.” Quarterly Review of Distance Education(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Savic, Milovan
    2021 “Research Perspectives on TikTok & Its Legacy Apps. From Musical.Ly to TikTok: Social Construction of 2020’s Most Downloaded Short-Video App.” International Journal of Communication: .
    [Google Scholar]
73. Scardamalia, Marlene
    2002 “Collective Cognitive Responsibility for the Advancement of Knowledge.” InLiberal Education in a Knowledge Society, ed. byBarry Smith, –. Chicago: Open Court.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Singh, Shubham
    2025 “How Many People Use TikTok 2025 (Users Statistics).” Demand Sage. Available athttps://www.demandsage.com/tiktok-user-statistics/
    [Google Scholar]
75. Sullivan, Nancy and Ellen Pratt
    1996 “A Comparative Study of Two ESL Writing Environments: A Computer-Assisted Classroom and a Traditional Oral Classroom.” System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics(): –. 10.1016/S0346‑251X(96)00044‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(96)00044-9 [Google Scholar]
76. Tamayo, Maria Azela L., Carina Mogol, and Jahzeel Sarmiento
    2024 “TikTokracy: Utilizing TikTok as a New Literacy Practice among College Students during Covid-19 Pandemic.” The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Organizational Studies: –.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Tan, Kim Hua, Agila Rajendran, Nazri Muslim, Jamsari Alias, and Nor Afian Yusof
    2022 “The Potential of TikTok’s Key Features as a Pedagogical Strategy for ESL Classrooms.” Sustainability(): –. 10.3390/su142416876
    https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416876 [Google Scholar]
78. Umera-Okeke, Nneka
    2008 “Spelling and Phonetic Inconsistencies in English: A Problem for Learners of English as a Foreign/Second Language.” African Research Review(): –. 10.4314/afrrev.v2i1.41025
    https://doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v2i1.41025 [Google Scholar]
79. Vazquez-Calvo, Boris, Liudmila Shafirova, and Leticia-Tian Zhang
    2022 “Language Learning Hashtags on TikTok in Chinese, Italian, and Russian.” InIdentity, Multilingualism and CALL: Responding to New Global Realities, ed. byLiudmila Klimanova, –. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing Ltd. 10.1558/equinox.43411
    https://doi.org/10.1558/equinox.43411 [Google Scholar]
80. Walther, Joseph B. and Monica T. Whitty
    2022 “Language, Psychology, and New New Media: The Hyperpersonal Model of Mediated Communication at Twenty-Five Years.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Zhu, C.
    2012 “Student Satisfaction, Performance, and Knowledge Construction in Online Collaborative Learning.” Journal of Educational Technology & Society(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Zulkifli, Nurul Nadwa, Malathi Letchumanan, Shafinah Kamarudin, Noor Dayana Abd Halim, and Suhaizal Hashim
    2022 “A Review: The Effectiveness of Using TikTok in Teaching and Learning.” InProceedings of the 30th International Conference on Computers in Education, ed. bySridhar Iyer, Ju-Ling Shih, Weiqin Chen, Mas Nida Md Khambari. Taoyuan City: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
    [Google Scholar]