To communicate is to make communicate

References

1. Baillargeon, Dany
   2018 “Connecting strategic practices, regionality and institution: A ventriloquism perspective on creativity in agencies.” M@n@gement(): –. 10.3917/mana.212.0913
   https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.212.0913 [Google Scholar]
2. Barad, Karen
   2003 “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society(): –. 10.1086/345321
   https://doi.org/10.1086/345321 [Google Scholar]
3. Barad, Karen
   2007 Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv12101zq
   https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv12101zq [Google Scholar]
4. Baron, Jaimie, Jennifer Fleeger, and Shannon Wong Lerner
   (eds) 2021 Media ventriloquism: How audiovisual technologies transform the voice-body relationship. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780197563625.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197563625.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
5. Bartesaghi, Mariaelena
   2014 “Ventriloquism as a matter for discourse analysis.” Language under Discussion(): –.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Beach, Wayne A.
   2012 “Conversation analysis and communication.” InThe handbook of conversation analysis, ed. byJack Sidnell and Tania Stivers, –. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118325001.ch33
   https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch33 [Google Scholar]
7. Berlo, David K.
   1960 The process of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Brummans, Boris H. J. M., Lise Higham, and François Cooren
   2022 “The Work of Conflict Mediation: Actors, Vectors, and Communicative Relationality.” Human Relations(): –. 10.1177/0018726721994180
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726721994180 [Google Scholar]
9. Bubel, Claudia
   2006 “’How are you?’ ‘I’m hot” An interactive analysis of small talk sequences.” InBeyond misunderstanding: Linguistic analyses of intercultural communication, ed. byKristin Bührig and Jan D. ten Thije, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.144.11bub
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.144.11bub [Google Scholar]
10. Castor, Theresa
    2020 “On streams and lakes: Metaventriloquism and the technologies of a water controversy.” Language and Dialogue(): –. 10.1075/ld.00058.cas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00058.cas [Google Scholar]
11. Cherny, Lynn
    1999 Conversation and community: Chat in a virtual world. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Christensen, Lars T. and Emma Christensen
    2022 “Preparing the Show: Organizational ventriloquism as autocommunication.” Organization Theory(). 10.1177/26317877221098767
    https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877221098767 [Google Scholar]
13. Clifton, Jonathan
    2017 “Leaders as ventriloquists. Leader identity and influencing the communicative construction of the organization.” Leadership(): –. 10.1177/1742715015584695
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715015584695 [Google Scholar]
14. Cooren, François and Gail T. Fairhurst
    2004 “Speech Timing and Spacing: The Phenomenon of Organizational Closure.” Organization(): –. 10.1177/1350508404047252
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508404047252 [Google Scholar]
15. Cooren, François and Gail T. Fairhurst
    2009 “Dislocation and stabilization.” Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication, ed. byLinda Putnam and Anne M. Nicotera, –. New York: Routeledge.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Cooren, François and Sergeiy Sandler
    2014 “Polyphony, ventriloquism, and constitution: In dialogue with Bakhtin.” Communication Theory(): –. 10.1111/comt.12041
    https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12041 [Google Scholar]
17. Cooren, François, John D. Peters, Ben Peters, and Nicolas Bencherki
    2020 “Dialogue, dissémination et matérialisation: une entrevue avec John Durham Peters.” [Dialogue, dissemination and materialization : an interview with John Durham Peters]. Médiations et médiatisations: –. 10.52358/mm.vi4.142
    https://doi.org/10.52358/mm.vi4.142 [Google Scholar]
18. Cooren, François, Simon Mallette, Matthieu Balay, Boris H. J. M. Brummans, and Olivier Germain
    2024 “Entrepreneuring as communicative practice: Analyzing vectors, tracing trajectories, unfolding relational fields.” Scandinavian Journal of Management. 10.1016/j.scaman.2024.101341
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2024.101341 [Google Scholar]
19. Cooren, François
    2004 “Textual agency: How texts do things in organizational settings.” Organization(): –. 10.1177/1350508404041998
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508404041998 [Google Scholar]
20. Cooren, François
    2008 “Between semiotics and pragmatics: Opening language studies to textual agency.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.018 [Google Scholar]
21. Cooren, François
    2009 “The Haunting Question of Textual Agency: Derrida and Garfinkel on Iterability and Eventfulness.” Research on Language and Social Interaction(): –. 10.1080/08351810802671735
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810802671735 [Google Scholar]
22. Cooren, François
    2010 Action and agency in dialogue: Passion, incarnation, and ventriloquism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.6 [Google Scholar]
23. Cooren, François
    2012 “Communication theory at the center: Ventriloquism and the communicative constitution of reality.” Journal of Communication(): –. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2011.01622.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01622.x [Google Scholar]
24. Cooren, François
    2020 “Reconciling dialogue and propagation: A ventriloquial inquiry.” Language and Dialogue(): –. 10.1075/ld.00057.coo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00057.coo [Google Scholar]
25. Daly, Helen L.
    2018 “On insults.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association(): –. 10.1017/apa.2018.29
    https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2018.29 [Google Scholar]
26. Day, Amber
    2018 “Throwing our voices: Ventriloquism as new media activism.” Media, Culture and Society(): –. 10.1177/0163443718756064
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718756064 [Google Scholar]
27. Derrida, Jacques
    1988 Limited, inc. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Due, Brian L.
    2023 “Situated socio-material assemblages: assemmethodology in the making.” Human Communication Research(): –. 10.1093/hcr/hqad031
    https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqad031 [Google Scholar]
29. Fan, Linlin and Ran Yongping
    2024 “By then You’d Say ‘Why Hadn’t I Hung on a Little Bit Longer?’: Ventriloquizing as Indirectness in Chinese Medical Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2024.09.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2024.09.002 [Google Scholar]
30. Fauré, Bertrand, François Cooren, and Frédérik Matte
    2019 “To speak or not to speak the language of numbers: Accounting as ventriloquism.” Accounting, Auditing and Accountability(): –. 10.1108/AAAJ‑07‑2017‑3013
    https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2017-3013 [Google Scholar]
31. Frost, Catherine
    2019 “The power of voice: bots, democracy and the problem of political ventriloquism.” Journal of Political Power(): –. 10.1080/2158379X.2019.1701831
    https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2019.1701831 [Google Scholar]
32. Gesselman, Amanda N., Vivian P. Ta, and Justin R. Garcia
    2019 “Worth a thousand interpersonal words: Emoji as affective signals for relationship-oriented digital communication.” PloS one(): e0221297. 10.1371/journal.pone.0221297
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221297 [Google Scholar]
33. Giannoulis, Elena and Lukas R. A. Wilde
    (eds) 2019 Emoticons, kaomoji, and emoji: The transformation of communication in the digital age. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429491757
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429491757 [Google Scholar]
34. Gibson, Will, Ping Huang, and Qianyun Yu
    2018 “Emoji and Communicative Action: The Semiotics, Sequence and Gestural Actions of ‘Face Covering Hand’.” Discourse, Context and Media: –. 10.1016/j.dcm.2018.05.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.05.005 [Google Scholar]
35. Goffman, Erving
    1955 “On Face-Work: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction.” Psychiatry(): –. 10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008 [Google Scholar]
36. Goldblatt, David
    2006 Art and Ventriloquism: Critical Voices in Art, Theory and Culture. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Kaminska, Alexandra, Dyna McLeod, and Alanna Thain
    2023 “Introduction: The sleeper’s unrest.” Intermédialités/Intermediality: –. 10.7202/1106547ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/1106547ar [Google Scholar]
38. Kessler, Sarah
    2021 “‘You’re the Puppet’: Presidential Ventriloquism, Vocal Technologies, and the Politics of Voice.” InMedia Ventriloquism: How Audiovisual Technologies Transform the Voice-Body Relationship, ed. byJonathan Baron, Julie Fleeger and Sarah W. Lerner, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780197563625.003.0012
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197563625.003.0012 [Google Scholar]
39. Kittler, Friedrich A.
    1986/1999 Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Stanford California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Kittler, Friedrich A.
    1996 “The History of Communication Media.” C-Theory. https://journals.uvic.ca/index.php/ctheory/article/view/14325/5101
    [Google Scholar]
41. Krämer, Sybille
    2015 Medium, Messenger, Transmission: An Approach to Media Philosophy. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. 10.1515/9789048524990
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048524990 [Google Scholar]
42. Latour, Bruno
    1996 Petite réflexion sur le culte moderne des dieux faitiches. Paris: Les Empêcheurs de penser en rond.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Levinson, Stephen C.
    1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813313
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313 [Google Scholar]
44. Licoppe, Christian and Julien Morel
    2012 “Video-in-Interaction: ‘Talking Heads’ and the Multimodal Organization of Mobile and Skype Video Calls.” Research on Language and Social Interaction(): –. 10.1080/08351813.2012.724996
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.724996 [Google Scholar]
45. Licoppe, Christian, Julien Morel
    2018 “Visuality, text and talk, and the systematic organization of interaction in Periscope live video streams.” Discourse Studies(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
46. McCulloch, Gretchen, Lauren Gawne, and Jennifer Daniel
    2019 “Face with Peeking Eye Proposal for Unicode 14.0”. Unicode Technical Committee Document Registry, .
    [Google Scholar]
47. McLuhan, Marshall
    1964 Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Meredith, Jo and Elizabeth Stokoe
    2014 “Repair: Comparing Facebook ‘Chat’ with Spoken Interaction.” Discourse and Communication(): –. 10.1177/1750481313510815
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481313510815 [Google Scholar]
49. Meredith, Jo
    2019 “Conversation Analysis and Online Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction(): –. 10.1080/08351813.2019.1631040
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1631040 [Google Scholar]
50. Meyrowitz, Joshua
    1994 “Medium Theory.” InCommunication Theory Today, ed. byDavid Crowley and David Mitchell, –. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Nathues, E., Mark van Vuuren, and François Cooren
    2021 “Speaking about vision, talking in the name of so much more: A methodological framework for ventriloquial analyses in organization studies.” Organization Studies(): –. 10.1177/0170840620934063
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840620934063 [Google Scholar]
52. Nathues, Ellen, François Cooren, and Mark van Vuuren
    2024 “Ventriloquial Analysis in Qualitative Organizational Communication Research.” InQualitative Research in Organizational Communication, ed. byBoris H. J. M. Brummans, Anu Sivunen, and Brian C. Taylor, –. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 10.4135/9781529674729.n25
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529674729.n25 [Google Scholar]
53. Paulus, Trena, Amie Warren, and Jessica N. Lester
    2016 “Applying Conversation Analysis Methods to Online Talk: A Literature Review.” Discourse, Context and Media: –. 10.1016/j.dcm.2016.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2016.04.001 [Google Scholar]
54. Peirce, Charles S.
    1868 “Questions Concerning Certain Faculties Claimed for Man.” Journal of Speculative Philosophy: –. Reprinted inCollected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, CP.–.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Peirce, Charles S.
    1991 Peirce on Signs: Writings on Semiotic. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Peters, John Durham
    1999 Speaking into the Air: A History of the Idea of Communication. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226922638.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226922638.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
57. Peters, John Durham
    2015 The Marvelous Clouds: Toward a Philosophy of Elemental Media. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226253978.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226253978.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
58. Pinchevski, Amit
    2019 Transmitted Wounds: Media and the Mediation of Trauma. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190625580.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190625580.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
59. Pinchevski, Amit
    2022 “Mutually Assured Heteronomy: On the Ethics and Politics of Dialogue and Dissemination.” Media Theory(): –. 10.70064/mt.v5i2.919
    https://doi.org/10.70064/mt.v5i2.919 [Google Scholar]
60. Pinchevski, Amit
    2022b Echo. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/12829.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12829.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
61. Pomerantz, Anita and Barbara J. Fehr
    2011 “Conversation Analysis: An Approach to the Analysis of Social Interaction.” InDiscourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, 2nd edition, ed. byTeun van Dijk, –. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 10.4135/9781446289068.n9
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446289068.n9 [Google Scholar]
62. Pomerantz, Anita
    2021 Asking and Telling in Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190927431.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190927431.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
63. Reed, David and Michael Ashmore
    2000 “The Naturally-Occurring Chat Machine. M/C: A Journal of Media and Culture(). 10.5204/mcj.1860
    https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.1860 [Google Scholar]
64. Rintel, Sarah
    2013 “Video Calling in Long-Distance Relationships: The Opportunistic Use of Audio/Video Distortions as a Relational Resource.” The Electronic Journal of Communication/La Revue Electronic De Communication (EJC/REC) (). Available athttps://www.cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/023/1/023123.HTML
    [Google Scholar]
65. Rogers, Everett M. and Thomas W. Valente
    2017 “A History of Information Theory in Communication Research.” InBetween Communication and Information, ed. byJosé R. Schement and Brian D. Ruben, –. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351294720‑2
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351294720-2 [Google Scholar]
66. Sandel, Todd L. and Peimin Qiu
    2020 “Code Switching and Language Games in Contemporary China; or Convergence and Identity Construction on WeChat.” InCommunication Convergence in Contemporary China: International Perspectives on Politics, Platforms, and Participation, ed. byPatrick Shaou-Whea Dodge, –. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press. 10.14321/j.ctv15kxg6g.11
    https://doi.org/10.14321/j.ctv15kxg6g.11 [Google Scholar]
67. Shannon, Claude E. and Warren Weaver
    1949 The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Smith, David
    1972 “Communication Research and the Idea of Process.” Speech Monographs(): –. 10.1080/03637757209375755
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637757209375755 [Google Scholar]
69. Stark, Luke and Kate Crawford
    2015 “The Conservatism of Emoji: Work, Affect, and Communication.” Social Media + Society(). 10.1177/2056305115604853
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115604853 [Google Scholar]
70. Stommel, Wouter J. P. and Harold T. Molder
    2015 “When Technical Affordances Meet Interactional Norms: The Value of Pre-Screening in Online Chat Counseling.” PsychNology(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Tang, Yu and Kenneth F. Hew
    2019 “Emoticon, Emoji, and Sticker Use in Computer-Mediated Communication: A Review of Theories and Research Findings.” International Journal of Communication: –.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Tannen, Deborah
    2004 “Talking the Dog: Framing Pets as Interactional Resources in Family Discourse.” Research on Language and Social Interaction(): –. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3704_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3704_1 [Google Scholar]
73. Tannen, Deborah
    2010 “Abduction and Identity in Family Interaction: Ventriloquizing as Indirectness.” Journal of Pragmatics(): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.06.002 [Google Scholar]
74. Tolins, Joshua and Pär Samerit
    2016 “GIFs as Embodied Enactments in Text-Mediated Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction(): –. 10.1080/08351813.2016.1164391
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1164391 [Google Scholar]
75. Tudini, Vincenza and Anthony J. Liddicoat
    2017 “Computer-Mediated Communication and Conversation Analysis.” InLanguage and Technology. Encyclopedia of Language and Education, ed. bySteven Thorne and Stephen May, –. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑02237‑6_32
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02237-6_32 [Google Scholar]
76. Tudini, Vincenza
    2015 “Extending Prior Posts in Dyadic Online Text Chat.” Discourse Processes(): –. 10.1080/0163853X.2014.969138
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2014.969138 [Google Scholar]
77. Watzlawick, Paul, Janet H. Beavin, and Don D. Jackson
    1967 Pragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathology, and Paradoxes. New York: Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Wilhoit, Elizabeth D. and Laura G. Kisselburgh
    2019 “The Relational Ontology of Resistance: Hybridity, Ventriloquism, and Materiality in the Production of Bike Commuting as Resistance.” Organization(): –. 10.1177/1350508417723719
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508417723719 [Google Scholar]