1887
image of Preschool teachers’ training processes about coding and
robotics
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The Action-Research involved 19 Italian preschools within a teachers’ training on coding and educational robotics as innovative tools for enhancing children’s learning processes. The initial program used BeeBot, Cubetto, and Lego Wedo 2.0 technologies, while a subsequent version introduced i-Code, a newly developed tool specifically designed for Programmable Digital Storytelling applications. The research framework incorporated two fundamental methodological approaches: training conceptualized as a dialogic process emphasizing collective reflection on authentic educational practices, and small group methodology implemented with both children and adult participants. Initial findings demonstrate that adopting a practice-based, dialogic perspective successfully transformed teachers’ initial “oppositional ideas” regarding the integration of coding and robotics with 3-to-6-year-old children, while simultaneously revealing significant transformative processes in teachers’ discursive positioning within collaborative small group contexts.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00216.mon
2025-10-09
2025-11-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amineh, Roya Jafari and Hanieh Davatgari Asl
    2015 “Review of constructivism and social constructivism”. Journal of Social Sciences, Literature, and Languages(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Asterhan, Crista S. C., Babichenko, Miriam
    2015 “The social dimension of learning through argumentation: Effects of human presence and discourse style”. Journal of Educational Psychology(): –. 10.1037/edu0000014
    https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000014 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baranauskas, M., Cecilia C. Posada, Julián Esteban Gutiérrez
    2017 “Tangible and shared storytelling: Searching for the social dimension of constructionism”. InProceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, –. 10.1145/3078072.3079743
    https://doi.org/10.1145/3078072.3079743 [Google Scholar]
  4. Behnamnia, Najmed, Kamsin, Amirrudin, Ismail, Maizatul Akmar Binti, Hayati, Siavash A.
    2020 “The effective components of creativity in digital game-based learning among young children: A case study”. Children and Youth Services Review: 105227. 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105227
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105227 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bers, Marina Umaschi
    2022Beyond coding: How children learn human values through programming. MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/13775.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13775.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bruner, Jerome Seymour
    1990Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 1996The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/9780674251083
    https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674251083 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cole, Michael
    1996Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dorouka, Pandora, Stamatis Papadakis, Michail Kalogiannakis
    2020 “Tablets and apps for promoting robotics, mathematics, STEM education, and literacy in early childhood education”. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation(): –. 10.1504/IJMLO.2020.106179
    https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2020.106179 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dunbar, Kevin
    1993 “Concept discovery in a scientific domain.” Cognitive Science: –. 10.1207/s15516709cog1703_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1703_3 [Google Scholar]
  11. Edwards, Derek, Mercer, Neil
    1987Common Knowledge: The Development of Understanding in the Classrooms. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fridberg, Marie, Susanne Thulin, and Andreas Redfors
    2018 “Preschool children’s collaborative science learning scaffolded by tablets”. Research in science education(): –. 10.1007/s11165‑016‑9596‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9596-9 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gardner, Howard
    1983Frames of mind. A Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 1999Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kranzberg, Melvin
    1986 Technology and History: “Kranzberg’s Laws.” Technology and Culture(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lave, Jane W., Etienne Wenger
    1991Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355 [Google Scholar]
  17. Little, Judith Warren
    2012 “Understanding Data Use Practice among Teachers: The Contribution of Micro-Process Studies.” American Journal of Education(): –. 10.1086/663271
    https://doi.org/10.1086/663271 [Google Scholar]
  18. Liverta Sempio, Olga
    1998Vygotskij, Piaget, Bruner. Concezioni dello sviluppo. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Macrides, Elena, Ourania Miliou, and Charoula Angeli
    2021 “Programming in early childhood education: A systematic review”. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction100396.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Mancini, Ilaria and Maria Beatrice Ligorio
    2007Progettare scuola con i blog. Riflessioni ed esperienze per una didattica innovativa nella scuola dell’obbligo. Milano: Franco Angeli.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Marsh, Jackie, Lidia Plowman, Dylan Yamada-Rice, Julia Bishop, Jamel Lahmar, and Fiona Scott
    2018 “Play and creativity in young children’s use of apps”. British Journal of Educational Technology(): –. 10.1111/bjet.12622
    https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12622 [Google Scholar]
  22. Mich, Ornella, Patrizia Ghislandi, Paolo Massa, Vlad Mardare, Tommaso Bisutti, and Daniela Giacomozzi
    2021 “A Framework for Educational Robotics in Kindergarten: A Systematic Literature Review and Analysis”. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence(): –. 10.4018/IJDLDC.287624
    https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDLDC.287624 [Google Scholar]
  23. Mich, Ornella, Alessandra Potrich, Camilla Monaco, and Tiziana Ceol
    2022La robotica educativa nelle scuole dell’infanzia. Un’esperienza di formazione online. Conferenza DIDAMATICA 2022, Milano, Atti del Convegno, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Monaco, Camilla
    2007 “Poi devi trovare anche la risposta logica.” Pensare storicamente in quarta elementare: un’esperienza di lavoro in piccolo gruppo. Rivista di psicolinguistica applicata (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2017 “Il lavoro in piccolo gruppo a scuola: premesse e attualità”. InCastelnuovo Antonella (a cura di). Il Cristianesimo ed i grandi educatori del ‘900. Le religioni come sistemi educativi. Salomone Belforte and C. Livorno: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Monaco, Camilla and Tiziana Ceol
    2022 “Co-constructing narratives through educational robotics in preschool small working groups”. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brașov. Series IV. Philology. Cultural Studies(): –. 10.31926/but.pcs.2022.64.15.1.7
    https://doi.org/10.31926/but.pcs.2022.64.15.1.7 [Google Scholar]
  27. Monaco, Camilla, Tiziana Ceol, and Ornella Mich
    2024 “Coding and robotics to support linguistic and non-verbal interactional practices in Italian preschools: the powerful effect of small group situations”. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brașov. Series IV. Philology. Cultural Studies(): –. 10.31926/but.pcs.2024.66.17.2.9
    https://doi.org/10.31926/but.pcs.2024.66.17.2.9 [Google Scholar]
  28. Monaco, Camilla, Tiziana Ceol, Ornella Mich, and Alessandra Potrich
    2023 Dalla ricerca Robobimbi alla progettazione di percorsi formativi sulla robotica educativa. Annali online della Didattica e della Formazione Docente: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Monaco, Camilla and Ilaria Mancini
    2020 “Siamo noi quelli che dobbiamo decidere un’idea che vale per tutti”. Piccoli gruppi guidati e piccoli gruppi autonomi tra dimensioni metodologiche e strategie educativo-didattiche. AltriSpazi: abitare l’educazione.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Monaco, Camilla, Ornella Mich, Tiziana Ceol, and Alessandra Potrich
    2020 “Robobimbi: una ricerca con le scuole dell’infanzia sulle rappresentazioni dei robot nei bambini”. Sistemi intelligenti(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Monaco, Camilla and Cristina Zucchermaglio
    2021Piccoli gruppi e apprendimento nella scuola dell’infanzia. Una sfida che inizia con la formazione degli insegnanti. Valore Italiano Publisher.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Mortari, Luigina
    2003Apprendere dall’esperienza. Il pensiero riflessivo nella formazione. Carocci: Roma.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Musatti, Tullia
    1986 “Representational and Communicative Abilities in Early Social Play.” Human Development: –. 10.1159/000272995
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000272995 [Google Scholar]
  34. Ochs, Elinor
    2002 “Becoming a speaker of culture.” InLanguage acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives, ed. byClair Kramsch, –. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Ochs, Elinor and Bambi B. Schieffelin
    1994 “Language socialization and its consequences for language development.” InHandbook of Child Language, ed. byPaul Fletcher and Brian MacWhinney, –. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Pascucci, Marina
    1991 “Imparare da soli, imparare insieme: rappresentazioni e comportamenti degli insegnanti.” InDiscutendo si impara. Interazione sociale e conoscenza a scuola, ed. byClotilde Pontecorvo, Anna Maria Ajello, and Cristina Zucchermaglio, –. Roma: Carocci.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 1996Bambini insegnanti curricoli. Appunti di pedagogia. Milano: LED Edizioni Universitarie.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Pascucci, Marina and Cristina Zucchermaglio
    1987 “La costruzione sociale della lingua scritta”. Scuola e Città: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Pontecorvo, Clotilde
    (ed.) 1993La condivisione della conoscenza. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. (ed.) 1989Un curricolo per la continuità educativa dai quattro agli otto anni. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. (ed.) 1999Manuale di psicologia dell’educazione. Bologna: Il Mulino.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Pontecorvo, Clotilde, Anna Maria Ajello, and Cristina Zucchermaglio
    (eds) 1991Discutendo si impara. Interazione sociale e conoscenza a scuola. Roma: Carocci.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Pontecorvo, Clotilde, Delia Castiglia, and Cristina Zucchermaglio
    1983 “Discorso e ragionamento scientifico nelle discussioni in classe”. Scuola e Città: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Pontecorvo, Clotilde, Pontecorvo, Maurizio
    1986Psicologia dell’educazione. Conoscere a scuola. Bologna: Il Mulino.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Prensky, Marc
    2010 “Homo Sapiens Digitale: dagli immigrati digitali e nativi digitali alla saggezza digitale.” TD-tecnologie didattiche: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Rahiem, Maila D. H.
    2021 “Storytelling in early childhood education: Time to go digital”. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy(): –. 10.1186/s40723‑021‑00081‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40723-021-00081-x [Google Scholar]
  47. Rogoff, Barbara
    1990Apprenticeship in thinking. Cognitive development in social context. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195059731.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195059731.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  48. Schon, Donald A.
    1983The reflexive practitioner. How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Smith, Leali, Dockrell, Julie, Tomlinson, Peter
    1997Piaget, Vygotsky and beyond: Future issues for developmental psychology and education. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Vygotskij, Lev Semenovic
    1934 [1990] Trad. it. Pensiero e linguaggio, a cura di Luciano Mecacci. Bari: L. Laterza.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Wacks, Leonard
    (1999) “Reflective practice in the design studio and teacher education”. Journal of Curriculum Studies(): –. 10.1080/002202799183142
    https://doi.org/10.1080/002202799183142 [Google Scholar]
  52. Weigand, Edda
    2006 “Argumentation: the Mixed Game”. Argumentation: –. 10.1007/s10503‑006‑9000‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-006-9000-4 [Google Scholar]
  53. 2010Dialogue. The Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]
  54. Wenger, Etienne
    2000 “Comunità di pratica e sistemi sociali di apprendimento.” Studi Organizzativi: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Wood, David, Bruner, Jerome Semyour, Ross, Gail
    1976 “The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving”. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry(): –. 10.1111/j.1469‑7610.1976.tb00381.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x [Google Scholar]
  56. Zucchermaglio, Cristina
    1999 “Le pratiche dell’insegnare e l’apprendimento degli insegnanti”. InManuale di Psicologia dell’Educazione, ed. byClotilde Pontecorvo, –. Bologna: Il Mulino.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. 2000 Gruppi di lavoro: tecnologie, pratiche sociali e negoziazione, in Mantovani, Giuseppe, Ergonomia. Lavoro, Sicurezza e nuove tecnologie, –. Bologna: Il Mulino.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Zucchermaglio, Cristina, Francesca Alby, Marilena Fatigante, and Marzia Saglietti
    2013Fare ricerca situata in psicologia sociale. Bologna: Il Mulino.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Zucchermaglio, Cristina and A. Zanotti
    1989 “Conversazioni e discussioni.” InUn curricolo per la continuità educativa dai quattro agli otto anni, ed. byClotilde Pontecorvo. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00216.mon
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00216.mon
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error