1887
image of Linguistic creativity on digital platforms
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Social media platforms function as key environments for the creation, modification, and eventual standardisation of neologisms. This study seeks to investigate the communicative objectives of internet users when employing linguistic forms that have not yet been incorporated into conventional language. The real-time, interactive nature of social media accelerates the diffusion and transformation of novel linguistic expressions, making it an optimal setting for examining language adaptation in response to users’ needs and technological limitations. By analysing neologisms across three prominent platforms, namely TikTok, X and Instagram, the research aims to identify the motivations driving linguistic innovation. This study contributes to the understanding of neologism production and linguistic creativity in digital contexts, offering an updated framework for their analysis and demonstrating that social media acts as an active catalyst in linguistic evolution, rather than a passive repository of language change.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00218.szy
2025-09-30
2025-11-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Androutsopoulos, Jannis
    2011 “Language Change and Digital Media: A Review of Conceptions and Evidence.” Standard Languages and Language Standards in a Changing Europe: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2013Online Data Collection in Sociolinguistics: Opportunities, Challenges, and Innovations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 2014 “Digital Social Media and the Reshaping of Public Discourse.” InThe Social Turn in Communication Studies, ed. byHelen Kress and Jan Van Leeuwen, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, Paul
    2002Polari: The Lost Language of Gay Men. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Barnlund, Dean C.
    1988 “Communication in a Global Village.” InIntercultural Communication: A Reader, 5th ed., ed. byLarry A. Samovar and Richard E. Porter, –. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bauer, Laurie
    2012Beginning Linguistics. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑0‑230‑39031‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-39031-7 [Google Scholar]
  7. Baym, Nancy K.
    2015Personal Connections in the Digital Age, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Blommaert, Jan and Varis Piia
    2017 “Conviviality and Collectives on Social Media: Virality, Memes, and New Social Structures.” Multilingual Margins: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Caleffi, Paolo
    2015 “The ‘Hashtag’: A New Word or a New Rule?” Skase Journal of Theoretical Linguistics(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cook, Guy
    2001The Discourse of Advertising. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203978153
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203978153 [Google Scholar]
  11. Crystal, David
    2006Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511487002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487002 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2008Txtng: The Gr8 Db8. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 2011Internet linguistics: a student guide. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203830901
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203830901 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cunha, Evandro, Gabriel Magno, Giovanni Comarela, Virgilio Almeida, Marcos André Gonçalves, and Fabrício Benvenuto
    2011 “Analyzing the Dynamic Evolution of Hashtags on Twitter: A Language-Based Approach.” InProceedings of the Workshop on Language in Social Media (LSM 2011), ed. byMeenakshi Nagarajan and Michael Gamon, –. Portland, Oregon.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Čilić, Ivona Šetka and Jelena Ilic Plauc
    2021 “Today’s Usage of Neologisms in Social Media Communication.” Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences: –. 10.51558/2490‑3647.2021.6.1.115
    https://doi.org/10.51558/2490-3647.2021.6.1.115 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gerrig, Richard J. and Raymond W. Gibbs
    1988 “The Psychology of Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics and Generative Grammar.” Journal of Memory and Language(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gillespie, Tarleton
    2018Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ilbury, Christian
    2019 “Sassy Queens: Stylistic Orthographic Variation in Twitter and the Enregisterment of AAVE.” Journal of Sociolinguistics(): –. 10.1111/josl.12366
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12366 [Google Scholar]
  19. Jespersen, Otto
    1922Language: Its Nature, Development, and Origin. London: George Allen and Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Jurgens, David, Sergey Dimitrov, and Derek Ruths
    2014 “Twitter Users #CodeSwitch Hashtags! #MoltoImportante #wow #헐.” InProceedings of the First Workshop on Computational Approaches to Code Switching, –. 10.3115/v1/W14‑3906
    https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/W14-3906 [Google Scholar]
  21. Labov, William
    1997 “Rules for Ritual Insults.” InSociolinguistics, ed. byNikolas Coupland and Adam Jaworski, –. London: Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑25582‑5_37
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25582-5_37 [Google Scholar]
  22. Martseva, Tatyana A., Aleksandr Y. Snisar, Yuriy V. Kobenko, and Kristina A. Girfanova
    2018 “Neologisms in American Electronic Mass Media.” InLinguistic and Cultural Studies: Traditions and Innovations: Proceedings of the XVIIth International Conference on Linguistic and Cultural Studies. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, ed. byAleksandr Filchenko and Zinaida Anikina, –. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑67843‑6_32
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67843-6_32 [Google Scholar]
  23. Metcalf, Allan
    2002Predicting New Words: The Secrets of Their Success. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Napieralski, Andrzej
    2014 “Les Néologismes Anglais Sur Les Réseaux Sociaux — Analyse Des Verbes Empruntés Dans Le Langage Polonais Courant.” E-Scripta Romanica: –. 10.18778/2392‑0718.01.03
    https://doi.org/10.18778/2392-0718.01.03 [Google Scholar]
  25. Plag, Ingo
    2003Word-Formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511841323
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841323 [Google Scholar]
  26. Sandyha, Liliia, Iryna Oliinyk, Mykola Petrovsky, Liudmyla Shevchenko, and Yulia Sviatiuk
    2022 “Selfie Neologisms in Social Networks”. Amazonia Investiga():–. 10.34069/AI/2022.49.01.14
    https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2022.49.01.14 [Google Scholar]
  27. Shifman, Limor
    2014Memes in Digital Culture. The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9429.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9429.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  28. Spitzer, Leo
    1956 “The Individual Factor in Linguistic Innovations.” InThe Routledge Language and Cultural Theory Reader, ed. byLesley Burke, Thomas Crowley, and Andrew Girvin, –. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Steen, Ella, Kathryn Yurechko, and Daniel Klug
    2023 “You Can (Not) Say What You Want: Using Algospeak to Contest and Evade Algorithmic Content Moderation on TikTok.” Social Media + Society(). 10.1177/20563051231194586
    https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231194586 [Google Scholar]
  30. Szymańska, Maria
    2020 “Performative Discourse of Drag Queens: A Sociolinguistic Study.” Research in Language(): –. 10.18778/1731‑7533.18.1.02
    https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-7533.18.1.02 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2022 “Gendered Neologisms beyond Social Media: The Current Use of ‘Mansplaining’.” Research in Language(): –. 10.18778/1731‑7533.20.3.03
    https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-7533.20.3.03 [Google Scholar]
  32. Tagliamonte, Sali A.
    2016 “So sick or so cool? The language of youth on the internet.” Language in Society(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Tolins, Jackson and Samermit Patrawat
    2016 “GIFs as Embodied Enactments in Text-Mediated Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction: –. 10.1080/08351813.2016.1164391
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1164391 [Google Scholar]
  34. Ward, Thomas, Steven M. Smith, and Jyotsna Vaid
    1997Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes. Washington: American Psychological Association. 10.1037/10227‑000
    https://doi.org/10.1037/10227-000 [Google Scholar]
  35. Würschinger, Quentin, M. Faruk Elahi, Dilyana Zhekova, and Hermann J. Schmid
    2016 “Using the Web and Social Media as Corpora for Monitoring the Spread of Neologisms: The Case of ‘Rapefugee,’ ‘Rapeugee,’ and ‘Rapugee’.” InProceedings of the 10th Web as Corpus Workshop, –. 10.18653/v1/W16‑2605
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W16-2605 [Google Scholar]
  36. Zappavigna, Michele
    2011 “Ambient Affiliation: A Linguistic Perspective on Twitter.” New Media and Society(): –. 10.1177/1461444810385097
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810385097 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2012Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. London: Continuum. 10.5040/9781472541642
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472541642 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2015 “Searchable Talk: The Linguistic Functions of Hashtags.” Social Semiotics(): –. 10.1080/10350330.2014.996948
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2014.996948 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00218.szy
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error