1887
image of Navigating digital dialogue
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study examines how Japanese students engage in digital dialogue during Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) synchronous interactions, focusing on action and reaction sequences and the creation of dialogic spaces. Using discourse analysis of recorded Zoom meetings, the study identifies both successful and failed interaction patterns, revealing key challenges in turn-taking and response timing. Findings suggest that mismatched conversational expectations between the Japanese and American students participating in the COIL exchanges contribute to communication breakdowns, while shared multilingual experiences facilitate deeper engagement. The research highlights the need for targeted pedagogical strategies to enhance digital interaction skills in COIL settings. These insights contribute to a broader understanding of how intercultural communication unfolds in virtual learning environments and inform best practices for fostering meaningful student engagement in COIL.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00219.cus
2025-11-20
2025-12-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alexander, Robin
    2017Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. York: Dialogos.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2020A dialogic teaching companion. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351040143
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351040143 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bouton, Edith, Adam Lefstein, Aliza Segal, and Julia Snell
    2024 “Blurring the boundaries: Opening and sustaining dialogic spaces.” Theory into Practice(): –. 10.1080/00405841.2024.2307837
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2024.2307837 [Google Scholar]
  4. Boyd, Maureen P. and Michael B. Sherry
    2024 “Dialogic space: An introduction.” Theory Into Practice(): –. 10.1080/00405841.2024.2325309
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2024.2325309 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cusen, Oana
    2025 “Key factors for success in designing and implementing COIL projects.” Annual Research Report of the Language Center: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Deardorff, Darla K.
    2006 “The identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization.” Journal of Studies in International Education(): –. 10.1177/1028315306287002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306287002 [Google Scholar]
  7. Finardi, Kyria and Asuman Aşık
    2024 “Possibilities of virtual exchange for internationalization at home: Insights from the Global South.” Journal of Virtual Exchange: –. 10.21827/jve.7.39593
    https://doi.org/10.21827/jve.7.39593 [Google Scholar]
  8. Fritz, Robinson and Małgorzata Marchewka
    2023 “Transformative learning: Investigating perspective changes towards developing global human resources in a virtual exchange project.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International, –. 10.1080/14703297.2022.2163277
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2022.2163277 [Google Scholar]
  9. Hackett, Simone, Mark Dawson, Jeroen Janssen, and Jan van Tartwijk
    2024 “Defining collaborative online international learning (COIL) and distinguishing it from virtual exchange.” TechTrends: –. 10.1007/s11528‑024‑01000‑w
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-01000-w [Google Scholar]
  10. Herring, Susan C. and Jannis Androutsopoulos
    2015 “Computer-Mediated Discourse 2.0.” InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysised. byDeborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton, and Deborah Schiffrin, –. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118584194.ch6
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch6 [Google Scholar]
  11. Jiang, Xuan
    2022 “Exploring U.S. students’ takeaways from a cross-Pacific COIL project.” Journal of Virtual Exchange: –. 10.21827/jve.5.36443
    https://doi.org/10.21827/jve.5.36443 [Google Scholar]
  12. Koike, Dale A.
    2017 “Theory and practice.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. byEdda Weigand, –. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Maine, Fiona
    2024 “The role of provisional language in dialogic space.” Theory into Practice(): –. 10.1080/00405841.2024.2307836
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2024.2307836 [Google Scholar]
  14. Mullen, Tony, Christine Appel, and Trevor Shanklin
    2009 “Skype-based tandem language learning and Web 2.0.” InHandbook of Research on Web 2.0 and Second Language Learninged. byMichael Thomas, –. Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI Global Scientific Publishing. 10.4018/978‑1‑60566‑190‑2.ch006
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-190-2.ch006 [Google Scholar]
  15. Naicker, Ashika, Evonne Singh, and Tonnie van Genugten
    2022 “Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL): Preparedness and experiences of South African students.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International(): –. 10.1080/14703297.2021.1895867
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1895867 [Google Scholar]
  16. Nishio, Tomoe
    2023 “Project redesigning for U.S.-Japan COIL.” Journal of Virtual Exchange:–. 10.21827/jve.6.38835
    https://doi.org/10.21827/jve.6.38835 [Google Scholar]
  17. Nowlan, Andrew
    2024 “Exploring COIL experiences and shifting attitudes toward study abroad in Japan.” Kobe JALT Journal():–.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. O’Dowd, Robert
    2018a “From telecollaboration to virtual exchange: state-of-the-art and the role of UNICollaboration in moving forward.” Journal of Virtual Exchange:–. 10.14705/rpnet.2018.jve.1
    https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.jve.1 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2018b “The role of virtual exchange in the development of intercultural competence.” Journal of Language and Intercultural Communication(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 2021 “Virtual exchange: moving forward into the next decade.” Computer Assisted Language Learning(): –. 10.1080/09588221.2021.1902201
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1902201 [Google Scholar]
  21. Pica, Teresa, Richard Young, and Catherine Doughty
    1987 “The impact of interaction on comprehension”. TESOL Quarterly(): –. 10.2307/3586992
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3586992 [Google Scholar]
  22. Pilleux, Mauricio
    1969 “The dialogue: A useful tool in language teaching.” TESOL Quarterly(): –. 10.2307/3585829
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3585829 [Google Scholar]
  23. Radjai, Leyla and Christopher D. Hammond
    2024 “Internationalizing the curricula through COIL in Japanese higher education: Towards inclusive, accessible, and pluralistic internationalization.” Journal of Virtual Exchange: –. 10.21827/jve.7.41033
    https://doi.org/10.21827/jve.7.41033 [Google Scholar]
  24. Rubin, Jon
    2017 “Embedding collaborative online international learning (COIL) at higher education institutions.” Internationalisation of Higher Education: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Rubin, Jon and Sarah Guth
    (eds) 2022The guide to COIL Virtual Exchange: Implementing, growing, and sustaining collaborative online international learning. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Rubin, Jon
    2022 “Preface to an evolving international education landscape.” InThe Guide to COIL Virtual Exchange: Implementing, Growing, and Sustaining Collaborative Online International Learning, ed. byJon Rubin and Sarah Guth, –. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Sandu, Roxana and Oana Cusen
    2025 “Japanese students’ patterns of emotional engagement in COIL projects.” InMoving JALT into the Future: Opportunity, Diversity, and Excellence, ed. byBethany Lacy, Malcolm Swanson, and Paul Lege, –. JALT. 10.37546/JALTPCP2024‑38
    https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTPCP2024-38 [Google Scholar]
  28. Săftoiu, Răzvan
    2023 “Exploring dialogue and culture.” Language and Dialogue(): –. 10.1075/ld.00161.saf
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00161.saf [Google Scholar]
  29. Stone, Paul and Asa Brinham
    2022 “Turn taking in student Zoom discussions.” Language, Culture, and Society: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Sybing, Roehl
    2023Dialogue in the Language Classroom: Theory and Practice from a Classroom Discourse Analysis. United Kingdom: Taylor and Francis. 10.4324/9781003316480
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003316480 [Google Scholar]
  31. Tannen, Deborah, Heidi E. Hamilton, and Deborah Schiffrin
    (eds) 2015The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118584194
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194 [Google Scholar]
  32. Thoms, Joshua J.
    2012 “Classroom discourse in foreign language classrooms: A review of the literature.” Foreign Language Annals(): –. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2012.01177.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2012.01177.x [Google Scholar]
  33. Vásquez, Camilla
    (ed.) 2022Research methods for digital discourse analysis. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Weigand, Edda
    2010Dialogue. The Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]
  35. Wegerif, Rupert
    2007Dialogic Education and Technology: Expanding the Space of Learning. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑71142‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71142-3 [Google Scholar]
  36. 2024 “Afterword: Dialogic space.” Theory into Practice(): –. 10.1080/00405841.2024.2309840
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2024.2309840 [Google Scholar]
  37. Wimpenny, Katherine, Kyria R. Finardi, Marina Orsini-Jones, and Lynette Jacobs
    2022 “Knowing, being, relating and expressing through third space Global South-North COIL: Digital inclusion and equity in international higher education.” Journal of Studies in International Education(): –. 10.1177/10283153221094085
    https://doi.org/10.1177/10283153221094085 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00219.cus
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00219.cus
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error