1887
image of ‘Nani?’ strategic moves in Japanese mobile phone openings
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

In this study, using descriptive sketches as a prompt, 95 female Japanese university students engaged in Discourse Completion Tasks (DCTs) to produce projected opening sequences for mobile phone conversations with family members and close friends. The DCT data suggest that the on-screen mutual recognition features afforded by mobile phones prior to the receiver answering reduces the relevance of conventional greetings and identification. As a result, callers tend to introduce the topic immediately following the summons–answer sequence, while answerers often use leading inquiries (e.g., nani? “what?” or dooshita no? “what’s up?”) to prompt topic initiation. The DCT projections indicate that mutual awareness shifts the interactional work of opening a call away from formal identification procedures toward displays of relational familiarity.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00223.fre
2026-05-05
2026-05-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arminen, Ilkka and Minna Leinonen
    2006 “Mobile phone call openings: Tailoring answers to personalized summonses.” Discourse Studies: –. 10.1177/1461445606061791
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606061791 [Google Scholar]
  2. Arminen, Ilkka and Alexandra Weilenmann
    2009 “Mobile presence and intimacy — Reshaping social actions in mobile contextual configuration.” Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.016 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baruah, Anganabha
    2025 “The impact of computer-mediated communication on relationships and social interactions.” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction: –. 10.1080/10447318.2024.2442755
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2442755 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bordeaux, Marcy and Mary Willbrand
    1987 “Pragmatic development in children’s telephone discourse.” Discourse Processes: –. 10.1080/01638538709544675
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538709544675 [Google Scholar]
  5. Coates, Jennifer
    2016Women, Men and Language: A sociolinguistic account of gender differences in language. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Culpeper, Jonathan, Alison Mackey, and Naoko Taguchi
    2018Second Language Pragmatics from Theory to Research. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315692388
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315692388 [Google Scholar]
  7. Fortunati, Leopoldina and Naomi Baron
    2017 “Evolving patterns of mobile call openings and closings.” InBetween the Public and the Private, ed. byAna Tellería, –. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315399300‑4
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315399300-4 [Google Scholar]
  8. Freiermuth, Mark
    2011 “Debating in an online world: A comparative analysis of speaking, writing and online chat.” Text & Talk: –. 10.1515/text.2011.006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2011.006 [Google Scholar]
  9. Giles, Howard and Tania Ogay
    2007 “Communication accommodation theory.” InExplaining Communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars, ed. byBryan Whaley and Wendy Samter, –. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Grice, Paul H.
    1975 “Logic and conversation.” InSyntax and Semantics, speech acts, ed. byPeter Cole and Jerry Morgan, –. New York: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368811_003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hashiuchi, Takeshi
    1999Discourse: Danwa no orinasu sekai [Discourse: The world constructed by interaction]. Tokyo: Kuroshio Shuppan.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hayashi, Makoto and Kaoru Hayano
    2018 “A-prefaced responses to inquiry in Japanese.” InBetween Turn and Sequence: Turn-initial particles across languages, ed. byJohn Heritage and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.31.07hay
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.31.07hay [Google Scholar]
  13. Holmes, Janet and Nick Wilson
    2022An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780367821852
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367821852 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hopper, Robert
    1992Telephone Conversation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hutchby, Ian and Simone Barnett
    2005 “Aspects of the sequential organization of mobile phone conversation.” Discourse Studies: –. 10.1177/1461445605050364
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050364 [Google Scholar]
  16. Johnstone, Barbara
    2008Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jodłowiec, Maria and Agnieszka Piskorska
    2024 “Dynamism of context: A case of joke interpretation.” Intercultural Pragmatics: –. 10.1515/ip‑2024‑3006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2024-3006 [Google Scholar]
  18. Jucker, Andreas
    2021 “Methodological issues in digital conversation analysis.” Discourse, Context & Media: . 10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100520
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100520 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kaye, Linda, Anastasia Rousaki, Laura Joyner, Laura Barrett, and Lisa Orchard
    2022 “The online behaviour taxonomy: A conceptual framework to understand behaviour in computer-mediated communication.” Computers in Human Behavior: . 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107443
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107443 [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee, Seung-Hee
    2006 “Second summonings in Korean telephone conversation openings.” Language in Society: –. 10.1017/S0047404506060118
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060118 [Google Scholar]
  21. Leech, Geoffrey
    1983Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ling, Rich
    2008a “Mobile communication and teen emancipation.” InMobile Technologies: From telecommunications to media, ed. byGerard Goggin and Larissa Hjorth, –. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 2008bNew Tech, New Ties: How mobile communication is reshaping social cohesion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/7568.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7568.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2017 “The phases of mobile communication research.” InBetween the Public and the Private, ed. byAna Tellería, –. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315399300‑2
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315399300-2 [Google Scholar]
  25. Nakamura, Sayo
    2011 “Starting the telephone conversation: Comparison of landline telephone talk with cell phone talk.” InProceedings from LANCOMM2011: Embracing Challenges in Current Trends, –. Kuala Lumpur: Kuala Lumpur Infrastructure University College.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 2012A study of discourse features on Japanese cell phone opening sequences. Unpublished MA Thesis atGunma Prefectural Women’s University.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Nishizaka, Aug
    2004 Denwa no kaiwa bunseki: Nihongo no denwa no kaishi [Analysis of telephone conversations: The opening of telephone calls in Japanese]. InJissen ethnomethodology nyuumon [An introductory guide to ethnomethodology in practice], ed. byKeichi Yamazaki, –. Tokyo: Yuhikaku.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2006 Kankei no naka no denwa/ denwa no naka no kankei [Phone calls as embedded in relationships/relationships constructed within phone calls]. InMobile communication: Keitai denwa no kaiwa bunseki [Mobile communication: An analysis of mobile phone conversations], ed. byKeichi Yamazaki, –. Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Pillet-Shore, Danielle
    2008Coming Together: Creating and maintaining social relationships through the openings of face-to-face interactions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 2012 “Greeting: Displaying stance through prosodic recipient design.” Research on Language and Social Interaction: –. 10.1080/08351813.2012.724994
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.724994 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2018 “How to begin.” Research on Language and Social Interaction: –. 10.1080/08351813.2018.1485224
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1485224 [Google Scholar]
  32. Sacks, Harvey
    1992 “Lecture 1. Rules of conversational sequence.” InThe Discourse Studies Reader: Main currents in theory and analysis, ed. byJohannes Angermuller, Dominique Maingueneau, and Ruth Wodak, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.184.43sac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.184.43sac [Google Scholar]
  33. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.” Language: –. 10.2307/412243
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412243 [Google Scholar]
  34. Sidnell, Jack
    2015 “Conversation analysis.” InThe Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, ed. byBernd Heine and Heiko Narrog, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Stockwell, Glenn
    2008 “Investigating learner preparedness for and usage patterns of mobile learning.” ReCALL: –. 10.1017/S0958344008000232
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344008000232 [Google Scholar]
  36. Stockwell, Glenn and Yi Chun Liu
    2015 “Engaging in mobile phone-based activities for learning vocabulary: An investigation in Japan and Taiwan.” Calico: –. 10.1558/cj.v32i2.25000
    https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v32i2.25000 [Google Scholar]
  37. Tomita, Hidenori
    1994Koe no Odyssey — dial Q2 no sekai: Denwa bunka no shakaigaku [Odyssey of the voice: The world of ‘Dial Q2’ — A sociology of telephone culture]. Tokyo: Koseishakoseikaku.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 2002 Keetai communication no tokusei [Characteristics of mobile communication]. InKeetaigaku nyuumon [An introduction to mobile phone studies], ed. byT. Okada and M. Matsuda, –. Tokyo: Yuhikaku.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Tsuruta, S.
    2006 Nanori no nai nanori: Keitai denwa ni okeru kaiwa no hajimari [Self-identification without self-identification: Openings in mobile phone conversations]. InMobile communication: Keitai denwa no kaiwa bunseki [Mobile communication: An analysis of mobile phone conversations], ed. byKeichi Yamazaki, –. Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Weigand, Edda
    2010Dialogue: The mixed game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]
  41. Yoshimi, Shun’ya, Mikio Wakabayashi, and Shin Mizukoshi
    1992Media to shite no denwa [The telephone as a medium]. Tokyo: Koubundou.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Yates, Simeon
    1996 “Oral and written linguistic aspects of computer conferencing: A corpus-based study.” InComputer-mediated Communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives, ed. bySusan Herring, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.39.05yat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.39.05yat [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00223.fre
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ld.00223.fre
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error