Writing-in-interaction

References

1. Alamargot, Denis , Sylvie Plane , Eric Lambert , and David Chesnet
   2010 “Using Eye and Pen Movements to Trace the Development of Writing Expertise: Case Studies of a 7th, 9th and 12th Grader, Graduate student, and Professional Writer.” Reading and Writing23: 853–888 doi: 10.1007/s11145‑009‑9191‑9
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9191-9 [Google Scholar]
2. Asmuss, Birte , and Sae Oshima
   2012 “Negotiation of Entitlement in Proposal Sequences.” Discourse Studies14: 67–86. doi: 10.1177/1461445611427215
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611427215 [Google Scholar]
3. Basso, Keith
   1974 “The Ethnography of Writing.” InExplorations in the Ethnography of Speaking, ed. by Richard Bauman , and Joel Sherzer . 423–432. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bazerman, Charles
   (ed) 2007 Handbook of Research on Writing: History, Society, School, Individual, Text. New York: Taylor & Francis.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bazerman, Charles
   1988 Shaping written knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bellemin-Noël, Jean , and Oscar Vladislas de Lubicz Milosz
   1972 Le Texte et l’avant-texte: Les brouillons d’un poème de Milosz. [The text and the avant-texte: The drafts of a poem by Milosz] Paris: Larousse.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bereiter, Carl , and Marlene Scardamalia
   1987 The Psychology of Written Composition. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Biber, Douglas
   1988 Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
9. Blommaert, Jan
   2008 Grassroots Literacy: Writing, Identity and Voice in Central Africa. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bouchard, Robert , and Lorenza Mondada
    (eds) 2005 Les processus de la rédaction collaborative, [The process of collaborative writing]. Paris: L’Harmattan.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Chafe, Wallace , and Jane Danielewicz
    1990 “Properties of Spoken and Written Language”. InComprehending Oral and Written Language. ed. by Rosalind Horowitz and S. Jay Samuels , 83–113. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Cibulka, Paul
    2013 “The Writing Hand: Some Interactional Workings of Writing Gestures in Japanese Conversation.” Gesture13: 166–192. doi: 10.1075/gest.13.2.03cib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.13.2.03cib [Google Scholar]
13. De Stefani, Elwys , Paul Sambre and Dorien Van De Mieroop
    . This issue.
14. Deppermann, Arnulf , Reinhold Schmitt , and Lorenza Mondada
    2010 “Agenda and Emergence: Contingent and Planned Activities in a Meeting.” Journal of Pragmatics42: 1700–1718. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.10.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.10.006 [Google Scholar]
15. Deppman, Jed , Daniel Ferrer , and Michael Groden
    (eds) 2004 Genetic Criticism: Texts and Avant-Textes. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Drew, Paul
    2006 “When Documents ‘Speak’: Documents, Language and Interaction.” InTalk and Interaction in Social Research Methods, ed. by Paul Drew , Geoffrey Raymond , and Darin Weinberg , 63–80. London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781849209991.n5
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209991.n5 [Google Scholar]
17. Everett, Yayoi Uno
    2007 “Calligraphy and musical gestures in the late works of Chou Wen-chung”. Contemporary Music Review, 26: 569–584. doi: 10.1080/07494460701652988
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07494460701652988 [Google Scholar]
18. Fayol, Michel
    1999 “From On-Line Management Problems to Strategies in Written Production.” InThe Cognitive Demands of Writing: Processing Capacity and Working Memory Effects in Text Production, ed. by Mark Torrance and Gaynor Jeffery , 13–23. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Fenoglio, Irène
    2010 “Conceptualisation linguistique: Du manuscrit au texte: Contribution à l’étude des spécificités de l’écriture scientifique.” [Linguistic conceptualization: From manuscript to tet: Contributions to the study of the specificities of scientific writing]. Item. www.item.ens.fr/index.php?id=577246.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Flower, Linda , and John R. Hayes
    1981 “A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing.” College Composition and Communication32: 365–387. doi: 10.2307/356600
    https://doi.org/10.2307/356600 [Google Scholar]
21. Garfinkel, Harold
    1967 Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Gaulmyn, Marie-Madeleine de , Robert Bouchard , and Alain Rabatel
    (eds) 2001 Le processus rédactionnel: Écrire à plusieurs voix., [The writing process: Writing together] Paris: L’Harmattan.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Gee, James
    1996 Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourse. New York: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Goldberg, Stephen J
    2004 “The Primacy of Gesture: Phenomenology and the Art of Chinese Calligraphy.” Analecta HusserlianaLXXXI: 175–186.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Goodwin, Charles
    2000 “Practices of Seeing: Visual Analysis: An Ethnomethodological Approach.” InHandbook of Visual Analysis, ed. by Theo van Leeuwen , and Carey Jewitt , 157–182. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Goody, Jack , and Ian Watt
    1963 “The Consequences of Literacy.” Comparative Studies in Society and History5: 304–345 doi: 10.1017/S0010417500001730
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500001730 [Google Scholar]
27. Greatbatch, David , Christian Heath , Paul Luff , and Paul Campion
    1995 “Conversation Analysis: Human–Computer Interaction and the General Practice Consultation.” InPerspectives on HCI: Diverse approaches, ed. by Andrew Monk , and G. Nigel Gilbert , 199–222. London: Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Greiffenhagen, Christian
    2014 “The Materiality of Mathematics: Presenting Mathematics at the Blackboard.” The British Journal of Sociology65: 502–528. doi: 10.1111/1468‑4446.12037
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12037 [Google Scholar]
29. Grésillon, Almuth
    2001 “La critique génétique, aujourd’hui et demain.” [Genetic critique, today and tomorrow]. L’Esprit Créateur41: 9–15. doi: 10.1353/esp.2010.0141
    https://doi.org/10.1353/esp.2010.0141 [Google Scholar]
30. Haddington, Pentti , Keisanen, Tiina , Mondada, Lorenza , Nevile, Maurice
    (eds.) 2014 Multiactivity in Social Interaction: Beyond Multitasking. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.187
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.187 [Google Scholar]
31. Harris, Roy
    1986 The Origin of Writing. London: Duckworth.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Hasenfeld, Yeheskel
    1972 “People Processing Organizations: An Exchange Approach.” American Sociological Review: 256–263. doi: 10.2307/2093466
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2093466 [Google Scholar]
33. Hay, Louis
    1979 “La critique génétique: origine et perspectives.” [“Genetic critique: origins and perspectives”]. InEssais de critique génétique, [Essays in genetic critique], ed. by Louis Hay . Paris: Flammarion.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Hazel, Spencer , and Kristian Mortensen
    2014 “Embodying the Institution: Object Manipulation in Developing Interaction in Study Counselling Meetings.” Journal of Pragmatics65: 10–29. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.016 [Google Scholar]
35. Heath, Christian
    1982 “Preserving the Consultation: Medical Record Cards and Professional Conduct.” Sociology of Health and Illness4: 56–74. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9566.ep11345612
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11345612 [Google Scholar]
36. Heath, Christian
    1986 Body Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511628221
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628221 [Google Scholar]
37. Heath, Christian , and Paul Luff
    1996 “Documents and Professional Practice: ‘Bad’ Organisational Reasons for ‘Good’ Clinical Records.” Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work , 354–363. New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/240080.240342
    https://doi.org/10.1145/240080.240342 [Google Scholar]
38. Heath, Christian , and Gillian Nicholls
    1997 “Animated Texts: Selective Renditions of News Stories.” InDiscourse, tools, and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition, ed. by Lauren B. Resnick , Clotilde Pontecorvo , and Roger Säljö , 63–86. Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑662‑03362‑3_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03362-3_4 [Google Scholar]
39. Herring, Susan C
    2015 “New Frontiers in Interactive Multimodal Communication.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, ed. by Alexandra Georgapoulou and Tereza Spilloti , 398–402. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke
    2000 Interaction and the Standardized Survey Interview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511489457
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489457 [Google Scholar]
41. Ivanič, Roz
    2004 “Discourses of Writing and Learning to Write.” Language and Education18: 220–245. doi: 10.1080/09500780408666877
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780408666877 [Google Scholar]
42. Jakobs, Eva-Maria , and Daniel Perrin
    (eds) 2014 Handbook of Writing and Text Production. Berlin: De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110220674
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110220674 [Google Scholar]
43. Jakonen, Teppo
    . This issue.
44. Jönsson, Linda , and Per Linell
    1991 Story Generations: From Dialogical Interviews to Written Reports in Police Interrogations. Text11: 419–440.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Kameo, Nahoko , and Jack Whalen
    2015 “Organizing Documents: Standard Forms, Person Production and Organizational Action.” Qualitative Sociology38: 205–229. doi: 10.1007/s11133‑015‑9302‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-015-9302-7 [Google Scholar]
46. Karhu, Hanna
    2012 Säkeiden synty. Geneettinen tutkimus Otto Mannisen runokäsikirjoituksista. [The Genesis of Verses: A Genetic Analysis of Manuscripts of Otto Manninen]. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Kellogg, Ronald T
    1996 “A model of Working Memory in Writing.” InThe Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences and Applications, ed. by C. Michale Levy , and Sarah Ransdell , 57–72. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Knorr-Cetina, Karin
    1981 The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Komter, Martha
    2001 “La construction de la preuve dans un interrogatoire de police. [The construction of evidence in a police interrogation.]” Droit et société48: 367–393.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Komter, Martha
    2006 “From Talk to Text: The Interactional Construction of a Police Record.” Research on Language and Social Interaction39: 201–228. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3903_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3903_2 [Google Scholar]
51. Komter, Martha
    2012 “The Career of a Suspect’s Statement: Talk, Text, Context.” Discourse Studies14: 731–752. doi: 10.1177/1461445612457486
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612457486 [Google Scholar]
52. Koshik, Irene
    2002 “A Conversation Analytic Study of Yes/No Questions Which Convey Reversed Polarity Assertions.” Journal of Pragmatics34: 1851–1877. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00057‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00057-7 [Google Scholar]
53. Koshik, Irene
    2003 “Wh-Questions Used as Challenges.” Discourse Studies5: 51–77. doi: 10.1177/14614456030050010301
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456030050010301 [Google Scholar]
54. Kress, Gunther , and Theo Van Leeuwen
    2001 Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Kress, Gunther
    2003 Literacy in the New Media Age. New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203164754
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203164754 [Google Scholar]
56. Kunitz, Silvia
    2015 “Scriptlines as Emergent Artifacts in Collaborative Group Planning.” Journal of Pragmatics76: 135–149. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.10.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.10.012 [Google Scholar]
57. Latour, Bruno
    1990 “Visualisation and Cognition: ‘Drawing Things Together’”. InRepresentation in Scientific Practice. ed. by Michael Lynch and Steve Woolgar , 19–68. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Linell, Per
    2004 The written language bias in linguistics. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Luff, Paul , et al.
    2007. “Augmented Paper: Developing Relationships Between Digital Content and Paper.”InThe Disappearing Computer, Interaction Design, System Infrastructures and Applications for Smart Environments, ed. by Norbert Streitz , Achilles Kameas , and Irene Mavrommati , 275–297. Berlin: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Luff, Paul , Christian Heath , Moira Norrie , Beat Signer , and Peter Herdman
    2004 “Only Touching the Surface: Creating Affinities between Digital Content and Paper.” In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work , 523–532. New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/1031607.1031695
    https://doi.org/10.1145/1031607.1031695 [Google Scholar]
61. Luff, Paul , Karola Pitsch , Christian Heath , Peter Herdman , and Julian Wood
    2010 “Swiping Paper: The Second Hand, Mundane Artifacts, Gesture and Collaboration.” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing14: 287–299. doi: 10.1007/s00779‑009‑0253‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-009-0253-4 [Google Scholar]
62. Lynch, Michael
    1988 “The Externalized Retina: Selection and Mathematization in the Visual Documentation of Objects in the Life Sciences.” Human Studies11: 201–234.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Lynch, Michael
    2009 “Ethnomethodology and History: Documents and the Production of History.” Ethnographic Studies11: 87–106.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Lynch, Michael , and David Bogen
    1996 The Spectacle of History: Speech, Text, and Memory at the Iran-Contra Hearings. Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
65. MacArthur, Charles , Steve Graham and Jill Fitzgerald
    (eds) 2005 Handbook of Writing Research. New York: Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Meehan, Albert J
    1986 “Record-Keeping Practices in the Policing of Juveniles.” Urban Life15: 70–102.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Mikkola, Piia , and Esa Lehtinen
    2014 “Initiating Activity Shifts Through Use of Appraisal Forms as Material Objects During Performance Appraisal Interviews.” InInteracting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity, ed. by Maurice Nevile , Pentti Haddington , Trine Heinemann , and Mirka Rauniomaa , 57–78. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.186.03mik
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.186.03mik [Google Scholar]
68. Mondada, Lorenza
    2003 “Trajectoires d’objets de discours: Observer la science en train de se dire.” [Trajectories of discursive objects: observing science as emerging in talk]. Revue d’Etudes Romanes54: 31–68.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Mondada, Lorenza
    2005a “‘Il faut d’abord ramasser les arguments’: La coordination de la parole-en-interaction et de l’inscription dans l’élaboration collective des topics.” [‘You have first to put together the arguments’: coordination of talk-in-interaction and of inscription within the collective elaboration of topics] InLes processus de la rédaction collaborative, [The process of collaborative writing] ed. by Robert Bouchard , and Lorenza Mondada , 131–164. Paris: L’Harmattan.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Mondada, Lorenza
    2005b “Visions controversées de la carte: construire le visible par les gestes et la parole en interaction.” InEspaces, savoirs et incertitudes. [Space, Knowledge, and Uncertainty], ed. by Elisabeth Remy , Valérie November , Cristina D’Alessandro-Scapari , and Florian Charvolin , 15–31. Paris: Belin.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Mondada, Lorenza
    2006 “Participants’ Online Analysis and Multimodal Practices: Projecting the End of the Turn and the Closing of the Sequence. Discourse Studies8: 117–129. doi: 10.1177/1461445606059561
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059561 [Google Scholar]
72. Mondada, Lorenza
    2008 “Using Video for a Sequential and Multimodal Analysis of Social Interaction: Videotaping Institutional Telephone Calls.” Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research9.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Mondada, Lorenza
    2008b “Production du savoir et interactions multimodales: Une étude de la modélisation spatiale comme activité pratique située et incarnée.” [Knowledge production and multimodal interaction: A study of space modelling as a situated and embodied practice]. Revue d’Anthropologie des connaissances2: 219–266. doi: 10.3917/rac.004.0219
    https://doi.org/10.3917/rac.004.0219 [Google Scholar]
74. Mondada, Lorenza
    2008c “Documenter l’articulation des ressources multimodales dans le temps: La transcription d’enregistrements vidéos d’interactions.” [“Documenting the coordination of multimodal resources in time: Transcribing video recordings of interactions”]. InDonnees orales, les enjeux de la transcription, [Spoken data: transcription issues], ed. by Mireille Bilger , 127–155. Perpignan: Presses Universitaires de Perpignan.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Mondada, Lorenza
    2010 “Methods for Reassembling Fragmented and Mobile Geographies.” InMobile Methods, ed. by Monika Büscher , John Urry , and Katian Witchger , 138–163. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Mondada, Lorenza
    2011 “The Interactional Production of Multiple Spatialities within a Participatory Democracy Meeting.” Social Semiotics21: 289–316. doi: 10.1080/10350330.2011.548650
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2011.548650 [Google Scholar]
77. Mondada, Lorenza
    2012 “Video Analysis and the Temporality of Inscriptions within Social Interaction: The Case of Architects at Work.” Qualitative Research12: 304–333. doi: 10.1177/1468794112438149
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112438149 [Google Scholar]
78. Mondada, Lorenza
    2014 “The Local Constitution of Multimodal Resources for Social Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics65: 137–156. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004 [Google Scholar]
79. Mondada, Lorenza
    2016 “An Interactionist Perspective on the Ecology of Linguistic Practices: The Situated and Embodied Production of Talk.” InLinguistic Ecology and Language Contact, ed. by Ralph Ludwig , Steve Pagel , and Peter Mühlhäusler . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
80. Mondada, Lorenza
    . This issue.
81. Monteiro, David
    . This issue.
82. Moore, Robert J. , Jack Whalen , and E. Cabell Hankinson Gathman
    2010 “The Work of the Work Order: Document Practice in Face-to-Face Service Encounters.” InOrganisation, Interaction and Practice, ed. by Nick Llewellyn , and Jon Hindmarsh . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
83. Mortensen, Kristian
    2013 “Writing Aloud: Some Interactional Functions of the Public Display of Emergent Writing.” Participatory Innovation Conference 2013 Lahti, Finland , 119–125.
    [Google Scholar]
84. Murphy, Keith
    2005 “Collaborative Imagining: The Interactive Use of Gestures, Talk, and Graphic Representation in Architectural Practice.” Semiotica156: 113–145.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Myers, Greg
    1990 Writing Biology: Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
86. Nevile, Maurice
    2004 “Integrity in the Airline Cockpit: Embodying Claims about Progress for the Conduct of an Approach Briefing.” Research on Language and Social Interaction37: 447–480. doi: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3704_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3704_3 [Google Scholar]
87. Nielsen, Søren Beck
    2014 “I’ll Just See What You Had Before: Making Computer Use Relevant While Patients Present Their Problems” InInteracting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity, ed. by Maurice Nevile , Pentti Haddington , Trine Heinemann , and Mirka Rauniomaa , 79–97. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.186.04bec
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.186.04bec [Google Scholar]
88. Nissi, Riikka
    2015 “From Entry Proposals to a Joint Statement: Practices of Shared Text Production in Multiparty Meeting Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics79: 1–21. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.002 [Google Scholar]
89. Nystrand, Martin
    2005 “The Social and Historical Context of Writing Research. InHandbook of Writing Research, ed. by Charles MacArthur , Steve Graham , and Jill Fitzgerald , 11–27. New York: Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
90. Ong, Walter J
    1982 Literacy and Orality. New York: Methuen. doi: 10.4324/9780203328064
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203328064 [Google Scholar]
91. Pälli, Pekka , and Esa Lehtinen
    2014 “Making Objectives Common in Performance Appraisal Interviews.” Language & Communication39: 92–108. doi: 10.1016/j.langcom.2014.09.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2014.09.002 [Google Scholar]
92. Park, Innhwa
    2012 “Asking Different Types of Polar Questions: The Interplay Between Turn, Sequence, and Context in Writing Conferences.” Discourse Studies14: 613–633. doi: 10.1177/1461445612454077
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612454077 [Google Scholar]
93. Park, Innhwa
    2015 “Requests: Knowledge and Entitlement in Writing Tutoring.” Language & Communication43: 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.langcom.2015.03.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2015.03.003 [Google Scholar]
94. Perrin, Daniel
    2013 The Linguistics of Newswriting. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/aals.11
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.11 [Google Scholar]
95. Pitsch, Karola
    2006 Sprache, Körper, Intermediäre Objekte: Zur Multimodalität der Interaktion im bilingualen Geschichtsunterricht. [“Language, the Body, and intermediary Objects: Multimodality of interaction in bilingual history lectures]. Bielefeld: Bielefeld University.
    [Google Scholar]
96. Pitsch, Karola
    2007 “Unterrichtskommunikation Revisited: Tafelskizzen als interaktionale Ressource.” [“School communication revisited: Sketches on the blackboard as an interactional resource”] Bulletin VALS-ASLA85: 59–80.
    [Google Scholar]
97. Poe, Edgar Allan
    1846 “The Philosophy of Composition.” Graham’s Magazine28: 163–167.
    [Google Scholar]
98. Prior, Paul and Julie Hengst
    (eds) 2010 Exploring Semiotic Remediation as Discourse Practice. Houndsmill: Palgrave MacMillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230250628
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230250628 [Google Scholar]
99. Prior, Paul , and Steven L. Thorne
    2014 “Research Paradigms: Beyond Product, Process, and Social Activity.” InHandbook of Writing and Text Production, ed. by Jakobs, Eva-Maria , and Daniel Perrin , 31–54. Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
100. Rauschenberg, Robert
     1953 Erased De Kooning Drawing. San Francisco: San Francisco Museum of Modern Art.
     [Google Scholar]
101. Relieu Marc
     2006 “Remarques sur l’analyse conversationnelle et les technologies médiatisées.” [“Some remarks about conversation analysis and mediated technologies.”] Revue française de linguistique appliquée [French Journal of Applied Linguistics] 11: 17–32.
     [Google Scholar]
102. Robinson, Jeffrey D. , and Tanya Stivers
     2001 “Achieving Activity Transitions in Physician-Patient Encounters.” Human Communication Research27: 253–298.
     [Google Scholar]
103. Rosenberg, Harold
     1952 “The American Action Painters.” Art News51: 22–23.
     [Google Scholar]
104. Ruusuvuori, Johanna
     2001 “Looking Means Listening: Coordinating Displays of Engagement in Doctor-Patient Interaction.” Social Science & Medicine52: 1093–1108. doi: 10.1016/S0277‑9536(00)00227‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00227-6 [Google Scholar]
105. Schegloff, Emanuel A
     1998 “Body Torque.” Social Research65: 535–586.
     [Google Scholar]
106. Schmitt, Reinhold
     2001 “Die Tafel als Arbeitsinstrument und Statusrequisite.” [The blackboard as tool of work and indicator of status]. InGesprächsforschung: Tendenzen und Perspektiven, [Discourse analysis: trends and perspectives], ed. by Zsuzsanna Iványi , and András Kertész , 221–242. Frankfurt: Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
107. Stevanovic, Melisa
     2013 “Constructing a Proposal as a Thought: A Way to Manage Problems in the Initiation of Joint Decision-Making in Finnish Workplace Interaction.” Pragmatics23: 519–544. doi: 10.1075/prag.23.3.07ste
     https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.23.3.07ste [Google Scholar]
108. Streeck, Jürgen , and Werner Kallmeyer
     2001 “Interaction by Inscription.” Journal of Pragmatics33: 465–490. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00126‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00126-5 [Google Scholar]
109. Streeck, Jürgen
     2011 “The changing meaning of things: Found objects and inscriptions in social interaction.” InEmbodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World, ed. by Jürgen Streeck , Charles Goodwin , and Curtis LeBaron , 67–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
110. Street, Brian
     1984 Literacy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
111. Street, Brian
     1995 Social Literacies: Critical Approaches to Literacy in Development, Ethnography and Education. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
112. Svensson, Hanna
     2016 “Surveiller et corriger: L’accomplissement interactionnel de révisions d’inscriptions publiques.” [“To surveil and to correct. The interactional achievement of revisions of public inscriptions.”] InParticipation et asymétries dans l’interaction institutionnelle [Participation and asymmetries in institutional interactions], ed. by Lorenza Mondada , and Sara Keel . Paris: L’Harmattan.
     [Google Scholar]
113. Svinhufvud, Kimmo
     2008 “Palaute ongelmanratkaisuna: Opponentin tekstipalaute graduseminaarissa. [The Feedback Sequence as Problem-Solving: The Opponent’s Text Feedback in the Master’s Thesis Seminar.]” Kasvatus39: 439–455.
     [Google Scholar]
114. Svinhufvud, Kimmo
     2011 “Varovasti edeten ja taas perääntyen: Opponentin palautevuoron rakentuminen [Gently Forward, Then Back Again: Constructing Opponent Feedback].” Virittäjä115.2 (2011).
     [Google Scholar]
115. Svinhufvud, Kimmo
     . This issue.
116. Svinhufvud, Kimmo , and Sanna Vehviläinen
     2013 “Papers, Documents, and the Opening of an Academic Supervision Encounter.” Text & Talk33: 139–166.
     [Google Scholar]
117. Szymanski, Margaret H
     1999 “Re-Engaging and Dis-Engaging Talk in Activity.” Language in Society28: 1–23. doi: 10.1017/S0047404599001013
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404599001013 [Google Scholar]
118. Szymanski, Margaret H
     2003 “Producing Text through Talk: Question-Answering Activity in Classroom Peer Groups.” Linguistics and Education13: 533–563. doi: 10.1016/S0898‑5898(03)00003‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(03)00003-2 [Google Scholar]
119. Thorne, Steven L
     2012 Gaming Writing: Supervernaculars, Stylization, and Semiotic Remediation. InTechnology Across Writing Contexts and Tasks, ed. by Greg Kessler , Ana Oskoz , and Idoia Elola , 297–316. San Marcos: Calico.
     [Google Scholar]
120. Van Charldorp, Tessa
     2011 “The Coordination of Talk and Typing in Police Interrogations.” Crossroads of Language, Interaction and Culture8: 61–92.
     [Google Scholar]
121. Van Charldorp, Tessa
     2013 “The Intertwining of Talk and Technology: How Talk and Typing Are Combined in the Various Phases of the Police Interrogation.” Discourse & Communication7: 221–240. doi: 10.1177/1750481313476776
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481313476776 [Google Scholar]
122. Van Galen, Gerard P
     1993 “Handwriting: A developmental Perspective.” InMotor Development in Early and Later Childhood: Longitudinal Approaches, ed. by Alex F. Kalverboer , Brian Hopkins , and Reint Geuze , 143–172. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
123. Vehviläinen, Sanna
     2009a “Problems in the Research Problem: Critical Feedback and Resistance in Academic Supervision.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research53: 185–201. doi: 10.1080/00313830902757592
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830902757592 [Google Scholar]
124. Vehviläinen, Sanna
     2009b “Student-Initiated Advice in Academic Supervision.” Research on Language and Social Interaction42: 163–190. doi: 10.1080/08351810902864560
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810902864560 [Google Scholar]
125. Vehviläinen, Sanna
     2012 “Question-Prefaced Advice in Feedback Sequences of Finnish Academic Supervisions.” InAdvice in Discourse, ed. by Holger Limberg , and Miriam A. Locher , 31–51. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.221.04veh
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.221.04veh [Google Scholar]
126. Waring, Hansun Zhang
     2005 “Peer Tutoring in a Graduate Writing Centre: Identity, Expertise, and Advice Resisting.” Applied Linguistics26: 141–168. doi: 10.1093/applin/amh041
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amh041 [Google Scholar]
127. Waring, Hansun Zhang
     2007 “Complex Advice Acceptance as a Resource for Managing Asymmetries.” Text & Talk27: 107–137. doi: 10.1515/TEXT.2007.005
     https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2007.005 [Google Scholar]
128. Watson, Rod
     2009 Analysing Practical and Professional Texts: A Naturalistic Approach. Farnham: Ashgate.
     [Google Scholar]
129. Weilenmann, Alexandra , and Gustav Lymer
     2014 “Incidental and Essential Objects in Interaction.” InInteracting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity, ed. by Maurice Nevile , Pentti Haddington , Trine Heinemann , and Mirka Rauniomaa , 319–337. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.186.14wei
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.186.14wei [Google Scholar]
130. Whalen, Jack
     1995a “Expert Systems Versus Systems for Experts.” InSocial and Interactional Dimensions of Human-Computer Interfaces, ed. by Peter J. Thomas , 161–183. Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
131. Whalen, Jack
     1995b “A Technology of Order Production: Computer-Aided Dispatch in Public Safety Communications.” InSituated Order: Studies in the Social Organization of Talk and Embodied Activities, ed. by Paul Ten Have , and George Psathas , 187–230. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
     [Google Scholar]
132. Whalen, Jack , and Erik Vinkhuyzen
     2000 “Expert Systems in (Inter)action: Diagnosing Document Machine Problems over the Telephone.” InWorkplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing Systems Design, ed. by Paul Luff , Jon Hindmarsh , and Christian Heath , 92–140. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511628122.006
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628122.006 [Google Scholar]
133. Whalen, Marilyn , and Jack Whalen
     2004 “Studying workscapes.” InDiscourse and technology: Multimodal Discourse Analysis, ed. by Philip LeVine and Ron Scollon , 208–229. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
134. Zimmerman. Don
     1992 “The interactional organization of calls for emergency assistance.” InTalk at Work: Social Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage , 418–469. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]