Street-level bureaucracy revisited

References

1. Ames, Natalie
   1999 “Social Work Recording: A New Look at an Old Issue.”Journal of Social Work Education35 (2): 227–237.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Drew, Paul
   2006 “When Documents “Speak””. InTalk and interaction in social research methods, ed. by Paul Drew , Geofrey Raymond and Darin Weinberg . 98–122. London: Sage.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Farvaque-Vitkovic, Catherine , Lucien Godin , Hugues Leroux , Florence Verdet and Roberto Chavez
   2005 Street Addressing and the Management of Cities. Washington, DC: The World Bank. doi: 10.1596/0‑8213‑5815‑4
   https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-5815-4 [Google Scholar]
4. Garfinkel, Harold. and Harvey Sacks
   1986 “On Formal Structures of Practical Actions”. InEthnomethodological Studies of Work, ed. by Harold Garfinkel , 157–189. London: Routledge. (Originally published in John C. McKinney and E.A. Tiryakian, eds. Theoretical sociology: perspectives and developments, 338-66. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1970).
   [Google Scholar]
5. Hagel, Jill Doner and Sandra Kopels
   2008 Social Work Records. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke
   2000 Interaction and the Standardized Survey Interview: The Living Questionnaire. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511489457
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489457 [Google Scholar]
7. Kameo, Nahoko and Jack Whalen
   2015 ‘”Organizing Documents: Standard Forms, Person Production and Organizational Action”. Qualitative Sociology38(2): 205–229. doi: 10.1007/s11133‑015‑9302‑7
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-015-9302-7 [Google Scholar]
8. Liberman, Kenneth
   2013 “Following Sketched Maps”. In Kenneth Liberman , More Studies in Ethnomethodology, 45–82. New York: SUNY Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Lipsky, Michael
   1980 Street-Level Bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Lynch, Michael
    2002 “The Living Text: Written Instructions and Situated Actions in Telephone Surveys”. InStandardization and Tacit Knowledge. Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview, ed. by Douglas W. Maynard , Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra , Nora Cate Schaeffer and Johannes van der Zouwen , 125–150. New York: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Mondada, Lorenza
    2010 “Reassembling Fragmented Geographies”. InMobile Methods, ed. by Buscher, Monika , John Urry and Katian Witchger , 138–163. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Mondada, Lorenza
    2012 “Video Analysis and the Temporality of Inscriptions: the Case of Architects at Work”. Qualitative Research12(3): 304–333. doi: 10.1177/1468794112438149
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112438149 [Google Scholar]
13. Mondada, Lorenza and Kimmo Svinhufvud
    . This issue.
14. Moore, Robert J. , Jack Whalen and E. Cabell Hankinson Gathman
    2009 “The Work of the Work Order: Document Practice in Face-to-Face Service Encounters”. InOrganization, Interaction and Practice. Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, ed. by Nick Llwellyn and Jon Hindmarsh , 172–197. New York: Cambridge University Press,
    [Google Scholar]
15. Psathas, George
    1979 “Organizational Features of Direction Maps”. InEveryday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas , 203–226. New York: Irvington.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Schegloff, Emanuel A
    1972 “Notes on a Conversational Practice: Formulating Place”. InStudies in Social Interaction, ed. by David Sudnow , 75–119. New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Stivers, Tanya and Jack Sidnell
    (eds.) 2013 The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Svinhufvud, Kimmo and Sanna Vehviläinen
    2013 “Papers, Documents, and the Opening of an Academic Supervision Encounter”. Text & Talk33(1): 139–166.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Whalen, Jack and Eric Vinkhuyzen
    2000 “Expert Systems in (Inter)action: Diagnosing Document Machine Problems over the Telephone”. InWorkplace studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design, ed. by Paul Luff , Jon Hindmarsh and Christian Heath , 92–140. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511628122.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628122.006 [Google Scholar]
20. Whalen, Marilyn R. and Don H. Zimmerman
    1990 “Describing Trouble: Practical Epistemology in Citizen Calls to the Police”. Language in Society19: 465–492. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500014779
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500014779 [Google Scholar]