1887
Volume 6, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

In this article, I discuss a particular (and little studied) action-reaction exchange in Spanish and Romanian, consisting of a dyadic exchange where an exploratory speech act (i.e., a question) is followed by a sequence-dependent reactive speech act, which repeats parts or all of the trigger’s structure in an interrogative form. Rather than being a canonical echo question, the reactive speech act under discussion represents what I call an Interrogative Echo Response (IER), by virtue of the fact that it provides an answer of opposite polarity to that of the initiative move put forward by the questioner (or Interrogative Echo Reply, when the response may or must be explicitly provided after the sequence-dependent interrogative utterance). In both languages, these IERs (and IERps) have a distinct syntactic structure, and the discourse function they fulfill is that of rhetorically challenging the validity of the initial move and providing (or implying) a response of opposite polarity with regard to the triggering question.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ld.6.2.01dum
2016-08-11
2019-09-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Academia Română
    2005Gramatica limbii române. II. Enunţul. Bucureşti: Editura Academiei Române.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alonso-Cortés, Ángel
    1999 “Las construcciones exclamativas. La interjección y las expresiones vocativas. InGramática descriptiva de la lengua española, ed. by. Ignacio Bosque and Violeta Demonte , 3993–4050. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Briz, Antonio and Grupo Val.Es.Co
    2002Corpus de conversaciones coloquiales. Madrid: Arcos Libros and ILSE.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dascălu-Jinga, Laurenţia and Liana Pop
    (coord) 2003Dialogul în româna vorbită. Bucureşti: Oscar Print.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dumitrescu, Domniţa
    1993 “Función pragma-discursiva de la interrogación ecoica usada como respuesta en español”. InAproximaciones pragmalingüísticas al español, ed. by Henk Haverkate , Kees Hengeveld and Gijs Mulder . Diálogos Hispánicos 12: 51–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 1996 “Rhetorical vs. nonrhetorical allo-repetition: The case of Romanian interrogatives”. Journal of Pragmatics26: 321–354. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00052‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00052-6 [Google Scholar]
  7. 1998 “Subordinación y recursividad en la conversación: las secuencia integradas por intercambios ecoicos”. InLa pragmática lingüística del español. Recientes desarrollos, ed. by Henk Haverkate , Gijs Mulder and Carolina Fraile Maldonado . Diálogos Hispánicos 22: 277–314.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 2016 “Oraciones interrogativas directas. Oraciones interrogativas indirectas y otras estructuras”. InEnciclopedia de lingüística hispánica, ed. by Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach , 750–772. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Escandell Vidal, María Victoria
    1999 “Los enunciados interrogativos: Aspectos semánticos y pragmáticos”. InGramática descriptiva de la lengua española, ed. by Ignacio Bosque and Violeta Demonte , 3929–3991.Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu, Liliana
    (coord) 2002Interacţiunea verbală în româna actuală. Corpus (selectiv). Schiţă de tipologie. Bucureşti: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Lope Blanch, Juan
    (ed) 1981El habla de la ciudad de México: Materiales para su estudio. México, D.F.: UNAM.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (ed) 1995El habla popular de la Repúbica Mexicana: Materiales para su estudio. México D.F.: UNAM and El Colegio de México.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Morales, Amparo and María Vaquero
    (eds)1992El habla culta de San Juan: Materiales para su estudio. San Juan: Universidad de Puerto Rico.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Moreno Fernández, Francisco , Ana Mª Cestero Mancera , Isabel Molina Martos and Florentino Paredes García
    (eds) 2004La lengua hablada en Alcalá de Henares: Corpus PRESEEA-ALCALÁ. II. Hablantes de instrucción media. Alcalá de Henares: Universidad de Alcalá (Servicio de Publicaciones).
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Real Academia Española and Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española
    2009Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa Libros.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Săftoiu, Răzvan
    2009Discursul fatic: Un ritual interacţional. Bucureşti: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Steel, Brian
    1985A Textbook of Colloquial Spanish. Madrid: S.G.E.L.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Trognon, Alain
    2013 “Pragmatics re-established on its feet: Weigand’s Mixed Game Model 2010.” Language and Dialogue3 (3): 457–475. doi: 10.1075/ld.3.3.07tro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.3.3.07tro [Google Scholar]
  19. Weigand, Edda
    2010Dialogue – The Mixed Game. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/ds.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ld.6.2.01dum
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error