Volume 6, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


The paper focuses on arguing and reasoning processes occurring at dinnertime family conversations. Our goal is to highlight the interplay between two sides of argumentative practices: the justification as social need to provide evidences for an assertion; the dialogic function of argumentation that refers to the goals arguers want to achieve during discussions. Through the analysis of a case study we discuss a sequence in which a child resists his father’s directive by an elaborated argumentative strategy in order to achieve his goal. Results show how participants engage in opposing the other’s standpoint and are socialized to argumentative dialogues.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Antaki, Charles
    1994Explaining and Arguing. The Social Organization of Accounts. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Arcidiacono, Francesco and Antonio Bova
    2015 “Activity-bound and activity-unbound arguments in response to parental eat-directives during mealtime conversations: Differences and similarities in children of 3-5 and 6-9 years old.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction6: 40–55. doi: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  3. Arcidiacono, Francesco and Clotilde Pontecorvo
    2009 “Cultural practices in Italian family conversations: Verbal conflict between parents and preadolescents.” European Journal of Psychology of Education24 (1): 97–117. doi: 10.1007/BF03173477
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173477 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2010 “The discursive construction of the fathers’ positioning within family participation frameworks.” European Journal of Psychology of Education25 (4): 449–472. doi: 10.1007/s10212‑010‑0024‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-010-0024-7 [Google Scholar]
  5. Arcidiacono, Francesco , Clotilde Pontecorvo and Sara Greco Morasso
    2009 “Family conversations: The relevance of context in evaluating argumentation.” Studies in Communication Sciences9 (2): 79–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Aronsson, Karin and Asta Cekaite
    2011 “Activity contracts and directives in everyday family politics.” Discourse in Society22 (2): 1–18. doi: 10.1177/0957926510392124
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926510392124 [Google Scholar]
  7. Aronsson, Karin and Lucas Gottzén
    2011 “Generational positions at a family dinner: Food morality and social order.” Language in Society40 (4): 405–426. doi: 10.1017/S0047404511000455
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404511000455 [Google Scholar]
  8. Atkinson, J. Maxwell and John Heritage
    (Eds.) 1984Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversational Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bazerman, Charles
    1997 “Discursively structured activities.” Mind, Culture, and Activity4 (4): 296–308. doi: 10.1207/s15327884mca0404_6
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0404_6 [Google Scholar]
  10. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
    1997Dinner Talk: Cultural Patterns of Sociability and Socialization in Family Discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bova, Antonio and Francesco Arcidiacono
    2013 “Invoking the authority of feelings as a strategic maneuver in family mealtime conversations.” Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology23 (3): 206–224. doi: 10.1002/casp.2113
    https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2113 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2014 “You must eat the salad because it is nutritious”. Argumentative strategies adopted by parents and children in food-related discussions at mealtimes.” Appetite73 (1): 81–94. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.10.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2013.10.019 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2015 “Beyond conflicts. Origin and types of issues leading to argumentative discussions during family mealtimes.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict3 (2): 263–288. doi: 10.1075/jlac.3.2.02bov
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.3.2.02bov [Google Scholar]
  14. Bower, Thomas G.R
    1977A Primer of Infant Development. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Brassac, Christian , Pierre Fixmer , Lorenza Mondada , and Dominique Vinck
    2008 “Interweaving objects, gestures, and talk in context.” Mind, Culture, and Activity15 (3): 208–233. doi: 10.1080/10749030802186686
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10749030802186686 [Google Scholar]
  16. Brumark, Åsa
    2008 “Eat your hamburger!” – “No, I don’t want to!” Argumentation and argumentative development in the context of dinner conversation in twenty Swedish families.” Argumentation22 (2): 251–271. doi: 10.1007/s10503‑007‑9061‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9061-z [Google Scholar]
  17. Busch, Gillian
    2012 “Will, you’ve got to share: Disputes during family mealtime.” InDisputes in Everyday Life: Social and Moral Orders of Children and Young People. Sociological Studies of Children and Youth, vol. 15, ed. by Susan Danby and Maryanne Theobald , 27–56. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing. doi: 10.1108/S1537‑4661(2012)0000015006
    https://doi.org/10.1108/S1537-4661(2012)0000015006 [Google Scholar]
  18. Button, Graham and John Lee
    (Eds.) 1987Talk and Social Organization. Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Cole, Michael
    1990 “Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline?” InNebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1989: Cross-Cultural Perspectives, ed. by John J. Berman , 37. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Edwards, Derek
    1991 “Categories are for talking: On the cognitive and discursive base of categorization.” Theory & Psychology1 (4): 515–542. doi: 10.1177/0959354391014007
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354391014007 [Google Scholar]
  21. 1997Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Edwards, Derek and Jonathan Potter
    1992Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Eemeren van, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst
    1984Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Dordrecht: Foris. doi: 10.1515/9783110846089
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110846089 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2004A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Fasulo, Alessandra and Teresa Antonelli
    1996 “Buon senso o non senso? Aspetti normativi e ludici nel discorso familiare sul cibo.” Età evolutiva55: 91–102.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Fasulo, Alessandra and Clotilde Pontecorvo
    1997 “Il bisogno di raccontare. Analisi di narrazioni nel contesto familiare.” InIl Sé narrativo, ed. by Andrea Smorti , 180–214. Florence: Giunti.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Fatigante, Marilena , Alessandra Fasulo , and Clotilde Pontecorvo
    1998 “Life with the alien: Role casting and face-saving techniques in family conversation with young children.” Issues in Applied Linguistics9 (2): 97–121.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Gewirtz, Jacob. L
    1969 “Mechanisms of social learning: Some roles of simulation and behaviour in early human development.” InHandbook of Socialization Theory and Research, ed. by David A. Goslin , 57–212. Chicago, IL: McNally.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Giddens, Anthony
    1979Central Problems in Social Theory. London: McMillan. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑16161‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16161-4 [Google Scholar]
  30. Goldman, Alvin I
    1997 “Argumentation and interpersonal justification.” Argumentation11: 155–164. doi: 10.1023/A:1007786207614
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007786207614 [Google Scholar]
  31. Goodman, Leo A
    1961 “Snowball sampling.” Annals of Mathematical Statistics32 (1): 148–170. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177705148
    https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177705148 [Google Scholar]
  32. Goodwin, Charles
    1981Conversational Organization Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York, NY: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 1994 “Professional vision.” American Anthropologist96 (3): 606–633. doi: 10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100 [Google Scholar]
  34. 1996 “Transparent vision.” InInteraction and Grammar, ed. by Elinor Ochs , Emanuel A. Schegloff and Sandra A. Thompson , 370–404. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.008 [Google Scholar]
  35. Goodwin, Charles and Marjorie H. Goodwin
    1987 “Children’s arguing.” InLanguage, Gender, and Sex in Comparative Perspective, ed. by Susan Philips , Susan Steele and Christine Tanz , 200–248. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621918.011
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621918.011 [Google Scholar]
  36. Goodwin, Marjorie H
    1990He-Said-She-Said: Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Heckathorn, Douglas D
    1997 “Respondent-driven sampling. A new approach to the study of hidden populations.” Social Problems44 (2): 174–199. doi: 10.2307/3096941
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3096941 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2002 “Respondent-driven sampling II. Deriving valid estimates from chain-referral samples of hidden populations.” Social Problems49 (1): 11–34. doi: 10.1525/sp.2002.49.1.11
    https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2002.49.1.11 [Google Scholar]
  39. Hedergaard, Marianne
    2012 “Analyzing children’s learning and development in everyday settings from a cultural-historical wholeness approach.” Mind, Culture, and Activity19 (2): 127–138. doi: 10.1080/10749039.2012.665560
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2012.665560 [Google Scholar]
  40. Hewitt, John P
    1997Self and Society: A Symbolic Interactionist Social Psychology. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Jefferson, Gail
    1985 “An exercise in the transcription and analysis of laughter.” InHandbook of Discourse Analysis. Vol. 3: Discourse and Dialogue, ed. by Teun van Dijk , 25–34. London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Linell, Per
    2014 “Interactivities, intersubjectivities and language. On dialogism and phenomenology.” Language and Dialogue4 (2): 165–193. doi: 10.1075/ld.4.2.01lin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.4.2.01lin [Google Scholar]
  43. MacWhinney, Brian
    2000The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. 3 rd Edition . Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Maynard, Douglas W
    1985 “How children start arguments.” Language in Society14 (1): 1–29. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500010915
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500010915 [Google Scholar]
  45. Ochs, Elinor
    1988Culture and Language Development. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 2000 “Linguistic resources for socializing humanity.” InRethinking Linguistic Relativity, ed. by John J. Gumperz and Stephen C. Levinson , 407–437. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 2006 “The cultural structuring of mealtime socialization.” New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development111: 35–49. doi: 10.1002/cd.154
    https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.154 [Google Scholar]
  48. Ochs, Elinor , Clotilde Pontecorvo , and Alessandra Fasulo
    1996 “Socializing taste.” Ethnos61 (1-2): 7–46. doi: 10.1080/00141844.1996.9981526
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.1996.9981526 [Google Scholar]
  49. Ochs, Elinor and Bambi Schieffelin
    1986Language Socialization across Cultures. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Ochs, Elinor and Merav Shohet
    2006 “The cultural structuring of mealtime socialization.” InFamily Mealtime as a Context of Development and Socialization, ed. by Reed Larson , Angela Wiley and Kathryn Branscomb , 35–50. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Ochs, Elinor and Carolyn Taylor
    1992 “Science at dinner.” InText and Context: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Language Study, ed. by Claire Kramsch and Sally McConnel-Ginet , 29–45. Heath, DC: Lexington.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Paglieri, Fabio and Cristiano Castelfranchi
    2010 “Why argue? Towards a cost-benefit analysis of argumentation.” Argument & Computation1 (1): 71–91. doi: 10.1080/19462160903494584
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19462160903494584 [Google Scholar]
  53. Pontecorvo, Clotilde and Francesco Arcidiacono
    2007Famiglie all’italiana. Parlare a tavola. Milan: Cortina.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. 2010 “Development of reasoning through arguing in young children.” Культурно-Историческая Психология/ Cultural-Historical Psychology 4: 19–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. 2014 “Social interactions in families and schools as contexts for the development of spaces of thinking.” InActivity of Thinking in Social Spaces, ed. by Tania Zittoun and Antonio Iannaccone , 83–97. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Pontecorvo, Clotilde , and Alessandra Fasulo
    1999 “Planning a typical Italian meal: A family reflection on culture.” Culture & Psychology5 (3): 313–335. doi: 10.1177/1354067X9953004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X9953004 [Google Scholar]
  57. Pontecorvo, Clotilde , Alessandra Fasulo , and Laura Sterponi
    2001 “Mutual apprentices: The making of parenthood and childhood in family dinner conversations.” Human Development44: 340–361. doi: 10.1159/000046155
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000046155 [Google Scholar]
  58. Rigotti, Eddo , and Sara Greco Morasso
    2009 “Argumentation as an object of interest and as a social and cultural resource.” InArgumentation and Education: Theoretical Foundations and Practices, ed. by Nathalie Muller Mirza and Anne-Nelly Perret-Clermont , 9–66. New York, NY: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑98125‑3_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98125-3_2 [Google Scholar]
  59. Rogoff, Barbara
    2003The Cultural Nature of Human Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Rogoff, Barbara , and Jean Lave
    (Eds.) 1984Everyday Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Rorty, Richard
    1979Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Sacks, Harvey , Emanuel A. Schegloff , and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.” Language50: 696–735. doi: 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  63. Saxe, Geoffrey B
    1994 “Studying cognitive development in sociocultural context: The development of a practice-based approach.” Mind, Culture, and Activity1 (3): 135–157. doi: 10.1080/10749039409524666
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039409524666 [Google Scholar]
  64. Schiffrin, Deborah
    1994Approaches to Discourse. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Snow, Catherine E. and Diane E. Beals
    2006 “Mealtime talk that supports literacy development.” New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development111: 51–67. doi: 10.1002/cd.155
    https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.155 [Google Scholar]
  66. Sterponi, Laura and Clotilde Pontecorvo
    1996 “Discourse at family dinner: How children are socialized through arguing.” Interaction et Cognition1 (2-3): 329–366.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Stetsenko, Anna
    2005 “Activity as object-related: Resolving the dichotomy of individual and collective planes of activity.” Mind, Culture, and Activity12 (1): 70–88. doi: 10.1207/s15327884mca1201_6
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca1201_6 [Google Scholar]
  68. Suchman, Lucy
    1987Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human/Machine Communication. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Valsiner, Jaan
    1995 “Editorial: Discourse complexes and relations between social sciences and societies.” Culture & Psychology1: 411–422. doi: 10.1177/1354067X9514001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X9514001 [Google Scholar]
  70. Wartofsky, Max
    1979 “Perception, representation, and the forms of action: Towards an historical epistemology.” InModels: Representation and the Scientific Understanding, ed. by Robert S. Cohen , Donald Davidson , Gabriél Nuchelmans and Wesley. C. Salmon , 188–210. Dordrecht: Reidel.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Wells, Gordon
    2007 “The mediating role of discoursing in activity.” Mind, Culture, and Activity14 (3): 1–18. doi: 10.1080/10749030701316300
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10749030701316300 [Google Scholar]
  72. Wiggins, Sally
    2013 “The social life of ‘eugh’: Disgust as assessment in family mealtimes.” British Journal of Social Psychology52 (3): 489–509. doi: 10.1111/j.2044‑8309.2012.02106.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02106.x [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): argumentation; dinnertime conversations; family; reasoning; socialization
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error