References

1. Barsalou, Lawrence W
   2005 “Continuity of the conceptual system across species”, Trends in Cognitive Sciences9: 309–311. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.003
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.003 [Google Scholar]
2. Black, Michael
   1992 A Short History of Cambridge University Press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Chomsky, Noam
   1959 Review of B. F. Skinner, Verbal Behavior, Language35: 26–58. Reprinted in Jakobovits and Miron (1967).
   [Google Scholar]
4. Evans, Vyvyan
   2014 The Language Myth: Why Language is Not an Instinct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107358300
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107358300 [Google Scholar]
5. Fodor, Jerry A
   1975 The Language of Thought. New York: Thomas Crowell.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Katz, Jerrold J. and Jerry A. Fodor
   1963 “The structure of a semantic theory”, Language39. 170–210. Reprinted in The Structure of Language, ed. by Fodor and Katz, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1964, and in Jakobovits and Miron (1967). doi: 10.2307/411200
   https://doi.org/10.2307/411200 [Google Scholar]
7. Sampson, Geoffrey
   2005 The “Language Instinct” Debate (revised edition). London and New York: Continuum.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Sampson, Geoffrey
   2016 “Rigid strings and flaky snowflakes”. To be inLanguage and Cognition. Online atwww.grsampson.net/ARsy.pdf.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Toolan, Michael
   2015 Review of Evans (2014). Language and Dialogue5: 471–84. doi: 10.1075/ld.5.3.06too
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.5.3.06too [Google Scholar]