Rhetoric, ethics, and the principle of charity

References

1. Bitzer, Lloyd
   1968 “The Rhetorical Situation.” Philosophy and Rhetoric1(1): 1–14.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Booth, Wayne
   1979 Critical Understanding: The Powers and Limits of Pluralism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Crick, Nathan
   2010 Democracy and Rhetoric: John Dewey on the Arts of Becoming. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Danisch, Robert
   2007 Pragmatism, Democracy, and the Necessity of Rhetoric. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Danisch, Robert
   2015 Building a Social Democracy: The Promise of Rhetorical Pragmatism. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Davidson, D.
   1984 “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.” Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Dewey, John
   1888/1969 “The Ethics of Democracy.” In Jo Ann Boydston (ed.), The Early Works of John Dewey, Vol. 4 (pp.227–252). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Dewey, John
   1925/1988 Experience and Nature. In Jo Ann Boydston (ed.), The Later Works of John Dewey, Vol.1. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Dewey, John
   1930/1984 “Three Independent Factors in Morals.” In Jo Ann Boydston (ed.), The Later Works of John Dewey, Vol.8 (pp.279–288). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dewey, John
    1932/1989 Ethics. In Jo Ann Boydston (ed.), The Later Works of John Dewey, Vol.7. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Ehrenhaus, Peter
    2001 “Why We Fought: Holocaust Memory in Spielberg’s Saving Private Ryan .” Critical Studies in Media Communication18: 321–337. doi: 10.1080/07393180128089
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07393180128089 [Google Scholar]
12. Fesmire, Steven
    2003 John Dewey and Moral Imagination: Pragmatism in Ethics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. James, William
    1899/1977 “On a Certain Blindness in Human Beings,” in J. J. McDermott , The Writings of William James. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Kunda, Ziva
    1990 “The Case for Motivated Reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin108 (3): 480–98. doi: 10.1037/0033‑2909.108.3.480
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 [Google Scholar]
15. Leff, Michael C.
    2001 “Lincoln at Cooper Union: Neo-Classical Criticism Revisited.” Western Journal of Communication65 (3): 232–248. doi: 10.1080/10570310109374704
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10570310109374704 [Google Scholar]
16. McGee, Michael Calvin
    1980 “The ‘Ideograph’: A Link Between Rhetoric and Ideology.” Quarterly Journal of Speech66 (1): 1–16. doi: 10.1080/00335638009383499
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638009383499 [Google Scholar]
17. McKerrow, Raymie E.
    1989 Critical Rhetoric: Theory and Praxis. Communication Monographs, 56: 91–111. doi: 10.1080/03637758909390253
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758909390253 [Google Scholar]
18. Miller, Carolyn R.
    1984 “Genre as Social Action.” Quarterly Journal of Speech70 (2): 151–167. doi: 10.1080/00335638409383686
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638409383686 [Google Scholar]
19. Pappas, Gregory F.
    2008 John Dewey’s Ethics: Democracy as Experience. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Perkins, David N. , Michael Farady , and Barbara Bushey
    1991 “Everyday Reasoning and the Roots of Intelligence.” InInformal Reasoning and Education, ed. James F. Voss , David N. Perkins , and Judith W. Segal , 83–105. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Quine, W. V. O.
    1960 Word and Object. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Rorty, Richard
    1989 Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511804397
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804397 [Google Scholar]
23. Stob, Paul
    2011 “Pragmatism, Experience, and William James’s Politics of Blindness.” Philosophy and Rhetoric44 (3): 227–49. doi: 10.5325/philrhet.44.3.0227
    https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.44.3.0227 [Google Scholar]
24. Stob, Paul
    2013 William James and the Art of Popular Statement. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Stroud, Natalie
    2011 Niche News: The Politics of News Choice. New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199755509.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199755509.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
26. Stroud, Scott R.
    2011 John Dewey and the Artful Life: Pragmatism, Aesthetics, and MoralityUniversity Park: Pennsylvania State Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Stroud, Scott R.
    2012 “William James and the Impetus of Stoic Rhetoric.” Philosophy and Rhetoric, 45 (3): 246–268. doi: 10.5325/philrhet.45.3.0246
    https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.45.3.0246 [Google Scholar]
28. Stroud, Scott R.
    2014 “Comprehensive Rhetorical Pluralism and the Demands of Democratic Discourse: Partisan Perfect Reasoning, Pragmatism, and the Freeing Solvent of Jaina Logic.” Philosophy and Rhetoric47 (3): 297–322. doi: 10.5325/philrhet.47.3.0297
    https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.47.3.0297 [Google Scholar]
29. Stroud, Scott R.
    2015 “The Challenge of Speaking with Others: A Pragmatist Account of Democratic Rhetoric,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 29 (1): 91–106. doi: 10.5325/jspecphil.29.1.0091
    https://doi.org/10.5325/jspecphil.29.1.0091 [Google Scholar]
30. Stroud, Scott R.
    2016 “Democracy, Partisanship, and the Meliorative Value of Sympathy in John Dewey’s Philosophy of Communication,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 30 (1): 75–93. doi: 10.5325/jspecphil.30.1.0075
    https://doi.org/10.5325/jspecphil.30.1.0075 [Google Scholar]
31. Vallone, Robert P. , Lee Ross , and Mark R. Lepper
    1985 “The Hostile Media Phenomenon: Biased Perception and Perceptions of Media Bias in Coverage of the Beirut Massacre.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology49 (3): 577–85. doi: 10.1037/0022‑3514.49.3.577
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.577 [Google Scholar]
32. Wason, Peter C.
    1960 “On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual Task.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology12: 129–40. doi: 10.1080/17470216008416717
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717 [Google Scholar]