References

1. Arnett, Ronald
   2014 “Civic Dialogue: Attending to Locality and Recovering Monologue.” Journal of Dialogue Studies2 (2): 71–92.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Austin, J. L.
   1962 How to Do Things with Words. The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. London etc.: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Arnett, Ronald
   . (forthc.). “Language as the Originative House of Dialogic Ethics.” InLanguage and Dialogue: A Handbook of Key Issues in the Field ed. by Edda Weigand . New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Carbaugh, Donal
   2013 “On Dialogue Studies.” Journal of Dialogue Studies1 (1): 9–28.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chomsky, Noam
   1959 “Review: B.F. Skinner: Verbal Behavior. New York 1957.” Language35: 26–58. doi: 10.2307/411334
   https://doi.org/10.2307/411334 [Google Scholar]
6. Cissna, Kenneth N. and Rob Anderson
   2008 “Dialogic Rhetoric, Coauthorship, and Moments of Meeting.” InDialogue and Rhetoric, ed. by Edda Weigand , 39–53. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ds.2.05cis
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.2.05cis [Google Scholar]
7. Clark, Herbert H.
   1996 Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539 [Google Scholar]
8. Cooren, François
   2010 Action and Agency in Dialogue. Passion, Incarnation and Ventriloquism. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ds.6
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.6 [Google Scholar]
9. Dawkins, R.
   1976 The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Fetzer, Anita
    2004 Recontextualizing Context. Grammaticality Meets Appropriateness. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.121
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.121 [Google Scholar]
11. Finkbeiner, Rita , Jörg Meibauer and Petra B. Schumacher
    (eds) 2012 What is a context? Linguistic Approaches and Challenges. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.196
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.196 [Google Scholar]
12. Frawley, William
    1987 “Review Article: van Dijk (ed.). Handbook of Discourse Analysis, I-IV.” Language63: 361–397. doi: 10.2307/415660
    https://doi.org/10.2307/415660 [Google Scholar]
13. Humboldt, Wilhelm von
    1827/1963 “Ueber den Dualis.” InW. von Humboldt. Schriften zur Sprachphilosophie. Vol. 3, ed. by Andreas Flitner and Klaus Giel , 113–143. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hundsnurscher, Franz
    1980 “Konversationsanalyse versus Dialoggrammatik.” InAkten des VI. Internationalen Germanisten-Kongresses. Basel. 1980. Part 2, ed. by Heinz Rupp and Hans-Gert Roloff , 89–95. Bern etc.: Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hundsnurscher, Franz
    1992 “Does a Dialogic View of Language Amount to a Paradigm Change in Linguistics: Language as Dialogue.” InMethodologie der Dialoganalyse, ed. by Sorin Stati and Edda Weigand , 1–14. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kretschmar, Jr., William A.
    2014 Language and Complex Systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Lumsden, Charles J. and Edward O. Wilson
    2005 Genes, Mind, and Culture: The Coevolutionary Process. New Jersey: World Scientific. doi: 10.1142/5786
    https://doi.org/10.1142/5786 [Google Scholar]
18. Searle, John R.
    1972 “Chomsky’s Revolution in Linguistics.” The New York Review of BooksXVII, June29: 16–24.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Searle, John R.
    1992 “Conversation.” In(On) Searle on Conversation, ed. by John R. Searle et al. , 7–30. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.21.02sea
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.21.02sea [Google Scholar]
20. Simon, Herbert A.
    1962 “The Architecture of Complexity: Hierarchic Systems.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society106: 467–482.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Stati, Sorin
    1982 Il dialogo. Considerazioni di linguistica pragmatica. Napoli: Liguori.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Toulmin, Stephen
    2001 Return to Reason. Cambridge, Mass./London: Cambrigde University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Weigand, Edda
    1989 Sprache als Dialog. Sprechakttaxonomie und kommunikative Grammatik. 2nd, rev. ed. 2003 Tübingen: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Weigand, Edda
    1991 “The Dialogic Principle Revisited: Speech Acts and Mental States.” InDialoganalyse III. Referate der 3. Arbeitstagung, Bologna 1990, ed. by Sorin Stati , Edda Weigand and Franz Hundsnurscher , vol.1, 75–104. Tübingen: Niemeyer. − Reprinted in Edda Weigand 2009 Language as Dialogue. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 21–44. – Reprinted inInterdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society, ed. by Alessandro Capone and Jacob L. Mey , 209–232. Cham etc.: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Weigand, Edda
    2004 “Empirical Data and Theoretical Models. Review Article on Eerdmans, Susan L. , Prevignano, Carlo L. , and Paul J. Thibault (eds), Language and Interaction. Discussions with John J. Gumperz .” Pragmatics & Cognition12: 375–388. doi: 10.1075/pc.12.2.10wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.12.2.10wei [Google Scholar]
26. Weigand, Edda
    2007 “The Sociobiology of Language.” InDialogue and Culture, ed. by Marion Grein and Edda Weigand , 27–49. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ds.1.04wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.1.04wei [Google Scholar]
27. Weigand, Edda
    2009 Language as Dialogue. From Rules to Principles of Probability, ed. by Sebastian Feller . Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ds.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.5 [Google Scholar]
28. Weigand, Edda
    2010 Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ds.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]
29. Weigand, Edda
    2014 “Rationality of Performance.” Philosophia Scientiæ18 (3): 247–268. doi: 10.4000/philosophiascientiae.1023
    https://doi.org/10.4000/philosophiascientiae.1023 [Google Scholar]
30. Weigand, Edda
    2016 “How to Verify a Theory of Dialogue.” Language and Dialogue6: 349–369. doi: 10.1075/ld.6.3.01wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.6.3.01wei [Google Scholar]
31. Weller, Paul
    2013 “Editorial Introduction.” Journal of Dialogue Studies1 (1): 5–7.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Wilson, Edward O.
    1999 Consilience. The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Vintage Books.
    [Google Scholar]