1887
Volume 7, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This essay examines the importance of semioethics in relationship to the work of Levinas. The interplay of semioethics and Levinas’s commitment to “ethics as first philosophy” announces the communicative height and weight of a semiotic signification that demands responsive human action. Semioethics is a communicative act that wades through the plethora of signs in the global communication production system with the objective of discerning signs of ill health that curtail care of life. Semioethics necessitates attentiveness and responsiveness to Otherness and difference. Semioethics functions as resistance, the unwillingness to accept and abide within an unreflective communication production system composed of taken-for-granted sameness of process and procedure.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ld.7.1.06arn
2017-06-17
2019-10-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arnett, Ronald C.
    2004 “A Dialogic Ethic ‘Between’ Buber and Levinas: A Responsive Ethical ‘I,’” InDialogue: Theorizing Difference in Communication Studies, ed. by Rob Anderson , Leslie A. Baxter , and Kenneth N. Cissna , 75–90. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781483328683.n5
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483328683.n5 [Google Scholar]
  2. 2015 “Awakening Communicative Justice: Attending to the Precariat.” Social Transformations1: 1–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 2017Levinas’s Rhetorical Demand: The Unending Obligation of Communication Ethics. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bahktin, Mikhail
    1984Rabelais and His World. Bloomingdale, IN: Indiana University Press. First published 1965.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bernard, Jeff
    1991 “Ferruccio Rossi-Landi and a Short History of the Rossi-Landi Network.” Paper presented atthe Institute for Socio-Economic Studies, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved fromwww.ferrucciorossilandi.com/files/BernardIntroIFRN.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bourdieu, Pierre
    2000Pascalian Meditations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Caputo, John D.
    1993Against Ethics: Contributions to a Politics of Obligation with Constant Reference to Deconstruction. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Darwin, Charles
    1909On the Origin of Species. New York, NY: P. F. Collier and Son Company. First published 1859.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Deely, John
    2008 “From semiosis to semioethics: The full vista of the action of signs.” Sign Systems Studies36: 437–490.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 2009Augustine and Poinsot: The Protosemiotic Development. Scranton, PA: University of Scranton Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 2013 “Lady Welby and Lady Petrilli.” Semiotica196: 13–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Eco, Umberto
    1976A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑15849‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15849-2 [Google Scholar]
  13. 1990The Limits of Interpretation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ellul, Jacques
    2012Violence: Reflections from a Christian Perspective. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers. First published in 1969 by Seabury Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Neubauer, Deana
    2013 “Lady Welby: Significs and the interpretive mind.” Semiotica196: 243–260.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Levinas, Emmanuel
    1985Ethics and Infinity. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Peirce, Charles S.
    1960Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 2014Illustrations of the Logic of Science. Chicago, IL: Open Court Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Petrilli, Susan
    2004 “Semioethics, subjectivity, and communication: For the humanism of otherness.” Semiotica148: 69–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 2009 “Semiotics as semioethics in the era of global communication.” Semiotica173: 343–367.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 2011Signifying and Understanding: Reading the Works of Victoria Welby and the Signific Movement. Berlin: de Gruyter GmbH & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2013a “Semioethics and translation as communication in and across genres.” Semiotica195: 97–118.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 2013b “Presentation: Two texts at the beginning of a research itinerary. From significs to semioethics.” Semiotica196: 513–519.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 2014Sign Studies and Semioethics: Communication, Translation and Values. Berlin: de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9781614515227
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614515227 [Google Scholar]
  25. 2015a “Language, communication, and speech: Human signs in global semiosis Supplemented by an interview with Thomas A Sebeok.” Semiotica204: 173–237.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 2015bVictoria Welby and the Science of Signs. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Petrilli, Susan and Augusto Ponzio
    2011 “Transcendence and alterity: On life, communication, and subjectivity.” Semiotica184: 229–250.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ponzio, Augusto
    1988 “Rossi-Landi and the Philosophy of Language.” Adriatica.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 1990Man as a Sign. Germany: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110874426
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110874426 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2013 “Theory of meaning and theory of knowledge: Vailati and Welby” Semiotica196: 521–532.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Sebeok, Thomas A. and Danesi, Marcel
    2000The Forms of Meaning: Modeling Systems Theory and Semiotic Analysis. Berlin: de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110816143
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110816143 [Google Scholar]
  32. Sebeok, Thomas A.
    2001Global Semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Sebeok, Thomas A. , Susan Petrilli and Augusto Ponzio
    2001Semiotica dell’io. Rome: Meltemi editore srl.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Shaw, Bernard
    1949Back to Methuselah. New York, NY: Penguin Books, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Song, Wen
    2013 “In search of the other: Reading Victoria Welby’s significs.” Semiotica196: 443–455.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Standing, Guy
    2011The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. New York, NY: Bloomsburg Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Welby, Victoria
    1985Significs and Language: with an introduction by H. W. Schmitz. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ld.7.1.06arn
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): abduction , biosemiotics , hypertextuality , mother-sense , semioethics and semiosis
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error