1887
Volume 7, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
GBP
Buy:£15.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Focusing on the Aubry – Hollande debate that took place in the context of the 2011 French socialist party primaries, we observe a possible reversal of gender stereotypes and examine word choices as well as more subtle cues such as interruptions, hedges, etc. If the debate could be described as a stereotypical gender role-reversal, we suggest that these cues point to a more complex picture than a gender reversal, and that the pragmatics structuring the dialogue might be interpreted as a pattern of challenger/champion. Moreover contrasting press articles and comment in online forums on the same debate we invoke a ‘peri-performativity concept’ to explain the differences in interpretations of the politicians’ performances, and conclude that perlocutionary dimensions can be reinterpreted by dominant discourses, (de)/(re)-constructing the performativity of speech acts.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ld.7.2.03bai
2017-10-16
2018-11-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Achin, Catherine and Marion Paloetti
    2002 “Le “salto” du stigmate. Genre et construction des listes aux municipales de 2001.” Politix: La parité en pratiques15(60): 33–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Achin, Catherine , Lucie Bargel , Delphine Dulong , Eric Fassin
    2007Sexes genre et politique. Paris: Economica.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Achin, Catherine
    2012 “Au-delà de la parité.” Mouvements69(1): 49–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Achin, Catherine and Elsa Dorlin
    2008 “Nicolas Sarkozy ou la masculinité mascarade du Président.” Raisons politiques3(31): 19–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Achin, Catherine and Sandrine Levêque
    2012 “Femmes et hommes en politique : comprendre la différence…” Available athttps://blogs.mediapart.fr/edition/sociologie-politique-deselections/article/100312/femmes-et-hommes-en-politique-compren (accessed27.01.15).
  6. Allan, Claire and Céline Mas
    2007Femmes et politique. Paris: Ellipses.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Anthias, Floya
    2012 “Hierarchies of social location, class and intersectionality: Towards a translocational frame.” International Sociology28(1): 121–138.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Baider, Fabienne
    2010 “Ségolène Royal dans la presse française: Deuxième sexe, ou second choix?” Modern and Contemporary France Journal18(4): 475–48.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 2014 “Hybrid Strategic Identities as Gendered Resources in French Politics (Martine Aubry and Marine Le Pen).” Communication Papers3(5): 91–102.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 2015 “Evaluation de la présidentiabilité.” Mots. Les langages du politique108: 103–128.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Béchet, Marion , Marion Sandré , Fabrice Hirsch , Arnaud Richard , Fabrice Marsac and Rudolph Sock
    2013 “De l’utilisation de la pause silencieuse dans le débat politique télévisé. Le cas de François Hollande.” Mots. Les Langages du politique103: 23–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bertini, Marie-Joseph
    2002Femmes, le Pouvoir impossible. Paris: Pauvert.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Briton, Nancy J. and Judith A. Hall
    1995 “Beliefs about female and male nonverbal communication.” Sex Roles32: 79–90.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Butler, Judith
    1995Gender Trouble. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Carroll, Susan J.
    1994Women as Candidates in American Politics. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Clifton, Jonathan
    2012 “A discursive approach to leadership.” Journal of Business Communication49(2): 148–168.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Coulomb-Gully, Marlène
    2009 “Le corps présidentiel. Représentation politique et incarnation dans la campagne présidentielle française de 2007.” Mots. Le langage du politique1(89): 25–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 2012Présidente: le grand défi. Femmes, politique et médias. Paris: Payot.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Crenshaw, Kimberlé
    1994 “Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color.” InThe Public Nature of Private Violence, ed. by M. Fineman and R. Mykitiuk , 93–118. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Eagly, Alice H. and Steven J. Karau
    2002 “Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.” Psychological Review109: 573–598.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Eagly, Alice H.
    2005 “Achieving relational authenticity in leadership: Does gender matter?” The Leadership Quarterly16: 459–474.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ekman, Paul and Wallace V. Friesen
    1969 “The repertoire, or non-verbal behavior: categories, origins, usage and coding.” Semiotica1: 49–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 1982 “Felt, false, and miserable smiles.” Journal of non-verbal behavior6 (4): 238–252.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Fairclough, Norman
    1995Critical Discourse Analysis. Boston: Addison Wesley.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Fairhurst, Gail and Stacey L. Connaughton
    2014 “Leadership: A communicative perspective.” Leadership10: 7–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Freedman, Jane
    1997Femmes politiques: mythes et symboles. Paris: L’Harmattan.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Garcin-Marrou, Isabelle
    2009 “Ségolène Royal ou le difficile accès au panthéon politique.” Mots. Les langages du politique2(90): 13–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Gardiner, Rita
    2015Gender, Authenticity and Leadership: Thinking with Arendt. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Gee, James Paul
    2011An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Gidengil, Elizabeth and Joanna Everitt
    2003 “Conventional coverage/ unconventional politicians: gender and media coverage of Canadian leaders’ debates, 1993, 1997, 2000.” Canadian Journal of Political Science/ Revue canadienne de science politique36(3): 559–577.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Gingras, Anne-Marie
    2015Genre et Politique dans la presse en France et au Canada. Québec: Presse Universitaire Québec.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Goffman, Erving
    1977 “The arrangement between the sexes.” Theory and Society4(3): 301–331.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Hall, Judith A. and Amy Gene Halberstadt
    1986 “Smiling and gazing.” InThe Psychology of Gender: Advances through Meta-analysis, ed. by J. S. Hyde and M. C. Inn , 136–185. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Heilman, Madeline E.
    2001 “Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder.” Journal of Social Issues57: 657–674.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Herrnson, Paul S. and Jennifer C. Lucas
    2006 “The Fairer Sex? Gender and Negative Campaigning in US Elections.” American Politics Research34 (1): 69–94.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Hosking, Dian Mary
    2006 “Not leaders not followers. A postmodern discourse of leadership Processes.” InFollower-centered Perspectives on Leadership: A Tribute to the Memory of James R. Meindl, ed. by B. Shamir , R. Pillai , M. Bligh and M. Uhl-Bien , 243–263. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Huffaker, David
    2010 “Dimensions of leadership and social influence in online communities.” Human Communication Research36(4): 593–617.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Juven, Philippe and Jean-Marc Coletta
    2002 “Peut-on parler de gestualité” LIDIL26: 177–188.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Kahn, Kim Fridkin
    1996The Political Consequences of Being a Woman. New York: Columbia.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Kerbrat-Orrechioni Catherine
    1900Les interactions verbales. Paris: A. Colin.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Kern, Montague and Edley P. Paige
    1994 “Women candidates going public: the 30 second-format.” Argumentation & Advocacy31 (2): 80–95.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. LaFrance, Marianne , Levy E. Paluck and Marvin A. Hecht
    2003 “The Contingent Smile: A Meta-Analysis of Sex Differences in Smiling.” Psychological Bulletin129 (2): 305–334.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. LaFrance, Marianne and Marvin A. Hecht
    1999 “Obliged to smile: The effect of power and gender on facial expression.” InThe Social Context of Nonverbal Behavior, ed. by P. Philippot , R. S. Feldman and E. J. Coats , 45–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Lakoff, Robin
    1977 “What you can do with words: Politeness, pragmatics and performatives.” InProceedings of the Texas Conference on Performatives, Presuppositions and Implicatures, ed. by R. Rogers , R. Wall and J. Murphy , 79–106. Arlington: Center for Applied Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Le Bart, Christian
    2009 “Les présidentiables de 2007 entre proximité et surplomb. Nicolas Sarkozy et Ségolène Royal vus pas Libération.” Mots. Les langages du politique89: 31–45.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Melville, Herman
    [1852] 1949Pierre: Or the Ambiguities. New York: Hendricks House.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Millar, Sharon
    2015 “Pronominal use and leadership in the discourse of Helle Thorning-Schmidt.” InDiscourse, Politics and Women as Global Leaders, ed. by John Wilson and Diana Boxer , 67–90. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Moore, Jo Ellen
    1997 “Content analysis in leadership research: Examples, procedures, and suggestions for future use.” The Leadership Quarterly8(1): 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Murray, Robin
    2014 “Quotas for Men: Reframing Gender Quotas as a Means of Improving Representation for All.” American Political Science Review108(3): 520–532.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Sandré, Marion
    2009 “Analyse d’un dysfonctionnement interactionnel – l’interruption – dans le débat de l’entre-deux-tours de l’élection présidentielle de 2007.” Mots89: 69–81
    [Google Scholar]
  51. 2011 “Mimiques et politique : analyse des rires et sourires dans le débat télévisé.” Mots96: 13–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky
    2003Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Durham/ London: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Sineau, Mariette
    2001Femmes et pouvoir sous la Ve République. De l’exclusion à l’entrée dans la course présidentielle. Paris: Les Presses de Sciences Po.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. 2007 “Effets de genre, effets de génération ? Le vote hommes/femmes à l’élection présidentielle 2007.” Revue française de science politique3(57): 353–369.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Smith-Lovin, Lynn and Dawn Robinson
    1992 “Gender and Conversational Dynamics.” InGender, Interaction and Inequality, ed. by Cecilia L. Ridgeway , 122–57. New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Trognon, Alain and Janine Larrue
    1994Pragmatique du discours politique. Paris: Armand Colin.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Verloo, Mieke
    2006 “Multiple inequalities, intersectionality and the European Union.” European Journal of Women’s Studies13(3): 211–228.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. West, Candace and Don H. Zimmerman
    1987 “Doing gender.” Gender and Society1(2): 125–151.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Winker, Gabriele and Nina Degele
    2011 “Intersectionality as multi-level analysis: Dealing with social inequality.” European Journal of Women’s Studies18(1): 51–66.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ld.7.2.03bai
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ld.7.2.03bai
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error