1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Language and Dialogue
  4. Volume 7, Issue 3
  5. Article
Volume 7, Issue 3
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper discusses about twenty approaches to the study of dialogue or interaction. The literature shows different foci in and understandings of these phenomena. There is a basic distinction between dialogue – in the sense of of sequentialised utterances or contributions by two or more participants who are co-present in particular situated encounters – and , which is taken to be a more that enables individuals or constellations of individuals in and through interactions with others, artefacts and environments. There are also “ approaches that appear to broaden the scope to encompass more of non-linguistic and often material aspects of human sense-making.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ld.7.3.01lin
2017-11-27
2024-12-09

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ld.7.3.01lin
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anward, Jan
    2015 Doing Language. Linköping: Department of Culture and Communication.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Arendt, Hannah
    1971 [1978] The Life of the Mind. Book One: Thinking. San Diego: Harcourt, Inc.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Auer, Peter
    2005 “Projection in interaction and projection in grammar.” Text25: 7–36. doi: 10.1515/text.2005.25.1.7
     https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2005.25.1.7 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2009 “On-line syntax: Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language.” Language Sciences31: 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2007.10.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2007.10.004 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bakhtin, Michail M.
    1968 Rabelais and His World. Translated by H. Iswolsky . Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. 1981 The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Transl. by Carol Emerson and Michael Holquist , edited by Michael Holquist . Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
    1986 Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. A selection of essays from the Russian original “Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva” [1979] Translated by V. McGee , edited by Carol Emerson and Michael Holquist . Austin: University of Texas Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Barad, Karen
    2007 Meeting the Universe Halfway – Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press. doi: 10.1215/9780822388128
     https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388128 [Google Scholar]
  9. Barwise, John and Jon Perry
    1983 Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bertau, Marie-Cécile , Gonçalves Miguel , and Peter Raggatt
    (Eds.) 2012 Dialogic Formations: Investigations into the Origins and Development of the Dialogical Self. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Billig, Michael
    1987 Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. 2nd ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Brandist, Craig and Galin Tihanov
    (eds.) 2000 Materializing Bakhtin: The Bakhtin Circle and Social Theory. Basingstoke: Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230501461
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501461 [Google Scholar]
  13. Brannigan, Holly , Martin Pickering , Janet McLean , and Alexandra Cleland
    2007 “Syntactic alignment and participant role in dialogue.” Cognition104: 163–197. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.006 [Google Scholar]
  14. Broth, Mathias , Jakob Cromdal , and Lena Levin
    2017 “Starting out as a driver: Progression in instructed pedal work.” InMemory Practices and Learning: Interactional, Institutional and Sociocultural Perspectives, ed. by Mäkitalo, Åsa , Linell, Per and Säljö, Roger , 113–143. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Buber, Martin
    1954 Die Schriften über das Dialogische Prinzip: Ich und Du [1923], Zwiesprache [1932], Die Frage an den Einzelnen, Elemente des Zwischenmenschlichen [1954] Heidelberg: Schneider.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Carbaugh, Donal
    2013 “On Dialogue Studies.” Journal of Dialogue Studies1: 9–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Cicourel, Aaron
    1968 The Social Organization of Juvenile Evidence. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. 1981 “Notes on the integration of micro- and macro-levels of analysis.” InAdvances in Social Theory and Methodology: Towards an Integration of Micro- and Macro-sociologies, ed. by Knorr-Cetina, Karin and Cicourel, Aaron , 51–80. London: Routledge and Kegan.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Clark, Herbert
    1996 Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539 [Google Scholar]
  20. Cooper, Robin
    2005 Type Theory with Records. University of Gothenburg. Ms.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Cowley, Stephen
    (ed.) 2011 Distributed Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/bct.34
     https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.34 [Google Scholar]
  22. Cowley, Stephen , João Major , Sune V. Steffensen , and Alfredo Dinis
    (Eds.) 2010 Signifying Bodies: Biosemiosis, Interaction and Health. Braga: The Faculty of Philosophy of Braga.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. De Boer, Bart
    2011 “Self-organization and language evolution.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution (e-book), ed. by Talleman, Maggie and Gibson, Kathleen . Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541119.013.0063
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541119.013.0063 [Google Scholar]
  24. Dewey, John and Arthur Bentley
    1949 Knowing and the Known. Boston.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Drew, Paul and John Heritage
    (Eds.) 1992 Talk at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Du Bois, Jack
    2014 “Towards a Dialogic Syntax.” Cognitive Linguistics25: 359–410. doi: 10.1515/cog‑2014‑0024
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0024 [Google Scholar]
  27. Emerson, Carol
    1997 The First Hundred Years of Mikhail Bakhtin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Engeström, Yrjö
    2008 From Teams to Knots: Activity-theoretical Studies of Collaboration and Learning at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511619847
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619847 [Google Scholar]
  29. Foolen, Ad , Ulrike Lüdtke , Timothy Racine , and Jordan Zlatev
    (eds.) 2012 Moving Ourselves, Moving Others: Motion and Emotion in Intersubjectivity, Consciousness and Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ceb.6
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ceb.6 [Google Scholar]
  30. François, Frédéric
    1994 Morale et mise en mots. Paris: L’Harmattan.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Gallagher, Shaun
    2011 “Interpretations of embodied cognition.” InThe Implications of Embodiment: Cognition and Communication, ed. by Tschacher, T. and Bergomi, C. , 59–71. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Garfinkel, Harold
    1967 Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Prentice-Hall.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. 2002 Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working out Durkheim’s Aphorism. Edited and introduced by A. W. Rawls . Lanham, MA: Rowman and Littlefield.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Gibson, James
    1979 The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Gillespie, Alex and Flora Cornish
    2009 “Intersubjectivity: Towards a Dialogical Analysis.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour40: 19–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1468‑5914.2009.00419.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2009.00419.x [Google Scholar]
  36. Ginzburg, Jonathan
    2009 The Interactive Stance: Meaning for Conversation. London: King’s College.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Ginzburg, Jonathan and Massimo Poesio
    2016 “Grammar is a system that characterizes talk in interaction.” Frontiers in Psychology7: 1–22. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01938
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01938 [Google Scholar]
  38. Goodwin, Charles
    2011 “Contextures of Action.” InEmbodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World, ed. by Streeck, Jürgen , Goodwin, Charles and LeBaron, Curtis , 182–193. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. 2017 Co-Operative Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Grice 1975. doi: 10.1017/9781139016735
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139016735 [Google Scholar]
  40. Grossen, Michèle
    2010 “Interaction analysis and psychology. A dialogical perspective!” Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science44: 1–22. doi: 10.1007/s12124‑009‑9108‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-009-9108-9 [Google Scholar]
  41. Grice, Paul
    1975 “Logic and conversation.” InSyntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Cole, Peter and Morgan, Jerry , 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Günthner, Susanne , Wolfgang Imo , and Jörg Bücker
    (Eds.) 2014 Grammar and Dialogism: Sequential, Syntactic and Prosodic Patterns between Emergence and Sedimentation. Berlin: de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110358612
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110358612 [Google Scholar]
  43. Habermas, Jürgen
    1981 Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Hakulinen, Auli and Margret Selting
    (eds.) 2005 Syntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/sidag.17
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.17 [Google Scholar]
  45. Harris, Roy
    1997 “From an integrationist point of view.” InLinguistics Inside Out: Roy Harris and His Critics, ed. by Wolf, George and Nigel Love , 229–310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.148.16har
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.148.16har [Google Scholar]
  46. Heath, Christian
    2013 The Dynamics of Auction: Social Interaction and the Sale of Fine Art and Antiques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Heritage, John
    1984 Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Heritage, John and Steven Clayman
    2010 Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities and Institutions. New York: Wiley Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781444318135
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444318135 [Google Scholar]
  49. Heritage, John and Douglas Maynard
    (eds.) 2006 Communication in Medical Care: Interaction between Primare Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511607172
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607172 [Google Scholar]
  50. Hermans, Hubert and Harry Kempen
    1993 The Dialogical Self. London: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Hermans, Hubert and Agnieszka Hermans-Konopka
    2010 Dialogical Self Theory: Positioning and Counter-positioning in a Globalizing Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511712142
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712142 [Google Scholar]
  52. Hintikka, Jaakko and Jack Kalus
    1985 Anaphora and Definite Descriptions: Two Applications of Game-Theoretical Semantics. Dordrecht: Reidel. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑5410‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5410-6 [Google Scholar]
  53. Hodges, Bert , Sune V. Steffensen , and Jim Martin
    2012 “Caring, conversing, and realizing values: new directions in language studies.” Language Sciences34: 499–506. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2012.03.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.03.006 [Google Scholar]
  54. Hoffmeyer, Jesper
    2010 “A biosemiotic approach to health.” InSignifying Bodies: Biosemiosis, Interaction and Health, ed. by Cowley, Stephen , Major, João , Steffensen, Sune V. and Dinis, Alfredo , 21–41. Braga: The Faculty of Philosophy of Braga.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Holquist, Michael
    1986 “Introduction.” In Bakhtin, Mikhail M. (1986) Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. A selection of essays from the Russian original “Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva” [1979] Translated by V. McGee , edited by C. Emerson and M. Holquist . Austin: University of Texas Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. 1990 Dialogism: Bakhtin and His World. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203330340
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203330340 [Google Scholar]
  57. Hundsnurscher, Franz
    1980 “Konversationsanalyse versus Dialoggrammatik.” InAkten des VI. Internationalen Germanisten-Kongress Basel 1980, ed. by Rupp, Heinz and Roloff, Hans-Gert , 89–95. Bern: Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Hutchins, Edwin
    2013 “The cultural ecosystem of human cognition.” Philosophical Psychology, 1–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Jovchelovitch, Sandra
    2007 Knowledge in Context: Representations, Community and Culture. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Keevallik, Leelo
    2010 “Bodily quoting in dance correction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43: 1–26. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2010.518065
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2010.518065 [Google Scholar]
  61. Kempson, Ruth , Wilfried Meyer-Viol , and Dov Gabbay
    2001 Dynamic Syntax: The Flow of Language Understanding. London: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Kendrick, Kobin
    2017 “Using Conversation Analysis in the Lab.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50: 1–11. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2017.1267911
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2017.1267911 [Google Scholar]
  63. Lave, Jean and Etienne Wenger
    1991 Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355 [Google Scholar]
  64. Leontiev, Aleksei N.
    1981 “The problem of activity in psychology.” InThe Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychologyed. by Wertsch, James , 37–71. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Levinas, Emmanuel
    1969 Totality and Infinity. Translated by A. Lingis . Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Ligorio, Beatrice and Margarida César
    (Eds.) 2013 Interplays between Dialogical Learning and Dialogical Self. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Lindblom, Björn , Peter MacNeilage , and Michael Studdert-Kennedy
    1984 “Self-organizing processes and the explanation of phonological universals.” InExplanation for Language Universals, ed. by Butterworth, Brian , Comrie, Bernard and Dahl, Östen , 181–203. Berlin: de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110868555.181
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110868555.181 [Google Scholar]
  68. Lindwall, Oskar and Anna Ekström
    2011 “Instruction‐in‐Interaction: The Teaching and Learning of a Manual Skill.” Human Studies35: 27–49. doi: 10.1007/s10746‑012‑9213‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-012-9213-5 [Google Scholar]
  69. Linell, Per
    1998 Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/impact.3
     https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.3 [Google Scholar]
  70. 2009 Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-making. Charlotte NC: Information Age Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. 2013 “The dynamics of incrementation in utterance-building: processes and resources.” InUnits of Talk – Units of Actions, ed. by Szczepek Reed, Beatrice and Raymond, Geoffrey , 57–89. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slsi.25.03lin
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.25.03lin [Google Scholar]
  72. 2015 “Dialogism and the Distributed Language Approach: A rejoinder to Steffensen.” Language Sciences50: 120–126. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2015.01.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2015.01.003 [Google Scholar]
  73. 2017 “Self-other interdependences in dialogue.” InSelf and Other in Dialogue, ed. by Gille, Johan and Norén, Coco , 7–29. Pieterlen, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Linell, Per , Lennart Gustavsson , and Päivi Juvonen
    1988 “Interactional dominance in dyadic communication: A presentation of initiative-response analysis.” Linguistics, 26: 415–442. doi: 10.1515/ling.1988.26.3.415
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1988.26.3.415 [Google Scholar]
  75. Linell, Per and Ivana Marková
    2014 Dialogical Approaches to Trust in Communication. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Luckmann, Thomas
    2012 “Alles Soziale besteht aus verschiedenen Niveaus der Objektivierung.” Ein Gespräch mit Thomas Luckmann. InSozialität in Slow Mootion: Theoretische und empirische Perspektiven, ed. by Ayass, Ruth and Meyer, Christian , 21–39. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Luff, Paul , Jon Hindmarsh , and Christian Heath
    (eds.) 2000 Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511628122
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628122 [Google Scholar]
  78. Mäkitalo, Åsa and Roger Säljö
    2002 Talk in institutional context and institutional context in talk: Categories as situated practices. Text22: 57–82. doi: 10.1515/text.2002.005
     https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2002.005 [Google Scholar]
  79. Marková, Ivana
    2003 Dialogicality and Social Representations: The Dynamics of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. 2006 “On «the inner alter» in dialogue.” International Journal for Dialogical Science, 1: 125–147.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. 2014 “Complementarity as epistemology of life.” InCulture Psychology and Its Future: Complementarity in a New Key, ed. by Wagoner, Brady , Chaudhary, Nandita and Hviid, Pernille , 33–50. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. 2016 The Dialogical Mind: Common Sense and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511753602
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753602 [Google Scholar]
  83. Marková, Ivana and Klaus Foppa
    (eds.) 1990 The Dynamics of Dialogue. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. (eds.) 1991 Asymmetries of Dialogue. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Marková, Ivana and Alex Gillespie
    (eds.) 2008 Trust and Distrust: Sociocultural perspectives. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. (eds.) 2012 Trust and Conflict: Representation, culture and dialogue. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Marková, Ivana , Carl F. Graumann , and Klaus Foppa
    (eds.) 1995 Mutualities in Dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Marková, Ivana , Per Linell , Michèle Grossen , and Anne Salazar Orvig
    2007 Dialogue in Focus Groups: Exploring socially shared knowledge. London: Equinox.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Martin, Cathrin
    2004  From other to self. Learning as Interactional Change. Uppsala University.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Märtsin, Mariann , Brady Wagoner , Emma-Louise Aveling , Irini Kadianaki , and Lisa Whittaker
    (eds.) 2012 Dialogicality in Focus: Challenges to Theory, Method and Application. New York: Nova Science.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Maturana, Humberto and Francisco Varela
    1980 Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Dordrecht: Reidel. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑8947‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8947-4 [Google Scholar]
  92. Matusov, Eugene
    2001 Journey into Dialogic Pedagogy. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Mercer, Neil
    1995 The Guided Construction of Knowledge: Talk amongst Teachers and Learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice
    1964 “The philosopher and his shadow.” InSigns, ed. by Merleau-Ponty, Maurice , 159–81. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Meyer, Christian , Jürgen Streeck , and Scott Jordan
    (eds.) 2017 Intercorporeality: Emerging Socialities in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210465.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210465.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  96. Mondada, Lorenza
    2013 “Interactional space and the study of embodied talk-in-interaction.” InSpace in Language and Linguistics: Geographical, Interactional, and Cognitive Perspectives. (linguae and litterae, 24), ed. by Auer, Peter , Hilpert, Martin , Stukenbrock, Anja and Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt , 247–275. Berlin: de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110312027.247Rommetveit 1974
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110312027.247 [Google Scholar]
  97. Morson, Gary and Carol Emerson
    1990 Mikhail Bakhtin. Creation of a Prosaics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Moscovici, Serge
    2000 Social Representations: Explorations in Social Psychology, ed. by Gerald Duveen . Cambridge: Polity Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  99. 2008 Psychoanalysis: Its Image and its Public. Translated by David Macey . Cambridge: Polity Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Noë, Alva
    2004 Action in Perception. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Ochs, Elinor , Emanuel Schegloff , and Sandra Thompson
    1996 Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620874
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874 [Google Scholar]
  102. Pedersen, Sarah Bro
    2015 The Cognitive Ecology of Human Errors in Emergency Medicine: An Interactivity-Based Approach. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Southern Denmark.
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Pickering, Martin and Simon Garrod
    2004 “Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences27: 169–226. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X04000056
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X04000056 [Google Scholar]
  104. 2013 “How tightly are production and comprehension interwoven?” Frontiers in Psychology4: Article 238 (April 2013). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00238
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00238 [Google Scholar]
  105. Poesio, Massimo and Hannes Rieser
    2010 “Competions, coordination, and alignment in dialogue.” Dialogue and Discourse1: 1–89. doi: 10.5087/dad.2010.001
     https://doi.org/10.5087/dad.2010.001 [Google Scholar]
  106. Potter, Jonathan
    1996 Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781446222119
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446222119 [Google Scholar]
  107. Prior, Paul
    1998 Writing/disciplinarity: A Sociohistoric Account of Literate Activity in the Academy. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Prior, Paul and Jody Shipka
    2003 “Chronotopic lamination: Tracing the contours of literateactivity.” InWriting Selves/ Writing Societies: Research from Activity Perspectives, ed. by Bazerman, Charles and Russell, David , 180–238. Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse.
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Rommetveit, Ragnar
    1974 On Message Structure. London: Wiley.
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Roth, Wolff-Michael and Alfredo Jornet
    2014 “Toward a Theory of Experience.” Science Education98: 106–126. doi: 10.1002/sce.21085
     https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21085 [Google Scholar]
  111. Roulet, Eddy , Antoine Auchlin , Jacques Moeschler , M. Schelling , and Christian Rubattel
    1985 L’articulation du discours en français contemporain. Berne: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Sacks, Harvey
    1992 Lectures on Conversation. Vols.I-II. Edited by Gail Jefferson . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Sacks, Harvey , Emanuel A. Schegloff , and Gail Jefferson
    1974 “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.” Language50: 696–735. doi: 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  114. Salazar Orvig, Anne
    1999 Les mouvements du discourse. Paris: l’Harmattan.
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Sarangi, Srikant and Celia Roberts
    (Eds.) 1999 Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110208375
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208375 [Google Scholar]
  116. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1992 “Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided for place for the defence of intersubjectivity in conversation.” American Journal of Sociology95: 1295–1345. doi: 10.1086/229903
     https://doi.org/10.1086/229903 [Google Scholar]
  117. 1996 “Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction.” InInteraction and Grammar, ed. by Ochs, Elinor , Schegloff, Emanuel A. and Thompson, Sandra , 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002 [Google Scholar]
  118. 2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  119. Searle, John
    1969 Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
  120. Steffensen, Sune Vork
    2013 “Human interactivity: Problem-solving, solution-probing and verbal patterns in the wild.” InCognition Beyond the Brain: Computation, Interactivity and Human Artifice, ed. by Cowley, Stephen and Vallée-Tourangeau, Frédéric , 195–221. Dordrect: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4471‑5125‑8_11
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5125-8_11 [Google Scholar]
  121. Streeck, Jürgen , Charles Goodwin , and Curtis LeBaron
    (Eds.) 2011 Embodied Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Szczepek Reed, Beatrice and Raymond Geoffrey
    (eds.) 2013 Units of Talk – Units of Actions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slsi.25
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.25 [Google Scholar]
  123. Tallis, Raymond
    2011 Aping Mankind: Neuromania, Darwinitis and the Misrepresentation of Humanity. (Acumen) New printing (2014): London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Theunissen, Michael
    1964 Der Andere: Studien zur Sozialontologie der Gegenwart. (New edition, Berlin: de Gruyter 1965).
     [Google Scholar]
  125. Thompson, Sandra A. , Barbara Fox , and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
    2015 Grammar in Everyday Talk: Building Responsive Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139381154
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139381154 [Google Scholar]
  126. Trevarthen, Colwyn
    1979 “Communication and cooperation in early infancy: a description of primary intersubjectivity.” InBefore Speech: The Beginning of Interpersonal Communication, ed. by Bullowa, Margaret , 321–347. New York: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Valsiner, Jaan
    2014 An Invitation to Cultural Psychology. Los Angeles, etc: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781473905986
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473905986 [Google Scholar]
  128. Vice, Susan
    1997 Introducing Bakhtin. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  129. Vygotsky, Lev
    1987 Thinking and Speech. Edited and translated by N. Minick . Russian original [1934] New York and London: Plenum.
     [Google Scholar]
  130. Wegerif, Rupert
    2007 Dialogic, Education and Technology: Expanding the Space of Learning. New York and Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑71142‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71142-3 [Google Scholar]
  131. Weigand, Edda
    2009 Language as Dialogue: From Rules to Principles of Probability. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ds.5
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.5 [Google Scholar]
  132. 2010 Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ds.10
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]
  133. 2016 “How to verify a theory of dialogue.” Language and Dialogue6: 349–369. doi: 10.1075/ld.6.3.01wei
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.6.3.01wei [Google Scholar]
  134. 2017 “IADA history: The unity of dialogue and its multiple faces.” Language and Dialogue7: 63–79. doi: 10.1075/ld.7.1.05wei
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.7.1.05wei [Google Scholar]
  135. 2018 “Ethics in Dialogue: Ideals and reality.” InDialogic Ethics, ed. by Arnett, Ronald and Cooren, François . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  136. Wertsch, James
    1985 Culture, Communication, and Cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  137. 1998 Mind as Action. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  138. Wieder, Lawrence
    1974 Language and Social Reality: The Case of Telling the Convict Code. The Hague: Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783111410999
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111410999 [Google Scholar]
  139. Zlatev, Jordan
    2013 “The mimesis hierarchy of semiotic development: Five stages of intersubjectivity in children.” Public Journal of Semiotices4: 47–70.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ld.7.3.01lin
Loading
Dialogue, dialogicality and interactivity
Language and Dialogue 7, 301 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.7.3.01lin
/content/journals/10.1075/ld.7.3.01lin
/content/journals/10.1075/ld.7.3.01lin
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): dialogicality; dialogue; interactivity; semiotic resource; sense-making

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error