Volume 7, Issue 3
  • ISSN 2210-4119
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


This paper addresses the language and pragmatic strategies used by Akan herbal drug sellers to persuade would-be-buyers. It adopts the theoretical framework of Weigand’s Mixed Game Model (MGM) and defines as a variable of competence-in-performance, and language use as the basis of dialogic interaction. It investigates how sellers employ politeness, honorifics, humour, digression, personification, proverbs, metaphors and hyperbole in dialogic action games. The herbal drug sellers are grouped into three: (a) those normally plying on Ghana’s major roads and at bus stations, (b) those who are on radio and TV and (c) those who advertise on radio and TV. We will discuss excerpts of five recordings in the Akan language and translated into English.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Agyekum, Kofi
    2002 “Menstruation as a Verbal Taboo among the Akan.” Journal of Anthropological Research58: 367–387. doi: 10.1086/jar.58.3.3631182
    https://doi.org/10.1086/jar.58.3.3631182 [Google Scholar]
  2. 2003 “Honorifics and Status Indexing in Akan Communication.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development24(5): 369–385. doi: 10.1080/01434630308666506
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434630308666506 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2004 “Aspects of Persuasion in Akan Communication.” International Journal of Language and Communication RASK21: 63–96.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 2005 “The Pragmatics of Requests in Akan Communication.” Legon Journal of Humanities16: 1–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 2010Akan Verbal Taboos in the Context of the Ethnography of Communication. Accra: Ghana Universities Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 2013Introduction to Literature. 3rd edition. Accra: Adwinsa Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana and Elite Olshtain
    1984 “Requests and Apologies: A Cross-Cultural Study of Speech Act Realization Patterns (CCSARP)”. Applied Linguistics5(3): 196–123. doi: 10.1093/applin/5.3.196
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/5.3.196 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bolatito, Ojenike
    2012 “Linkage between Persuasion Principles and advertising.” New Media and Mass Communication8: 7–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bonvillain, Nancy
    1993Language, Culture and Communication: The Meanings of Messages. Englewoods Cliffs: Prentice Hall Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Braun-Latour, Kathryn. A. and Gerald Zaltman
    2006 “Memory Change: An Intimate Measure of Persuasion”. Journal of Advertising Research46(1): 57–72. doi: 10.2501/S0021849906060077
    https://doi.org/10.2501/S0021849906060077 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cruse, Alan D.
    2004Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. El-daly, Hosney M.
    2011 “Towards an Understanding of the Discourse of Advertising: Review of Research with Special Reference to the Egyptian Media.” African Nebula3: 25–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ghana Statistical Service
    Ghana Statistical Service 2000Population and Housing Census (PHC) of Ghana.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Grein, Marion
    2007 “The Speech Act of Refusal within the Minimal Action Game: A Comparative Study of German and Japanese.” InDialogue and Culture, ed. by Marion Grein and Edda Weigand , 1–19. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ds.1.08gre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.1.08gre [Google Scholar]
  15. Hanson, Ralph. E.
    2011Mass Communication: Living in a Media World. 3rd edition. Washington DC: CQ Press (SAGE).
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Jamieson, G. Harry
    1985Communication and Persuasion. London/Sydney: Croom Helm Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Levinson, Stephen. C.
    2006 “Deixis.” InThe Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Horn, Laurence R. and Gregory Ward , 97–121. Malden: Blackwell Publishers. doi: 10.1002/9780470756959.ch5
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756959.ch5 [Google Scholar]
  18. Mikolajczak-Degrauwe, Kalina and Malaika Brengman
    2014 “The Influence of Advertising on Compulsive Buying – The Role of Persuasion Knowledge”. Journal of Behavioural Addictions3(1): 65–73. doi: 10.1556/JBA.2.2013.018
    https://doi.org/10.1556/JBA.2.2013.018 [Google Scholar]
  19. Olátéjú, Adesola
    2009 “Jèdí Ò M’Akòwé (Haemorrhoid Respects Not Even the Educated Elite): A Sociolinguistic-Stylistic Analysis of the Language of Yorùbá Herbal Medicine Practitioners.” InSelected Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference on African Linguistics, ed. by Akinloye Ojo and Lioba Moshi , 156–165. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Pearson, Judy C. , Paul E. Nelson , Scott Titsworth and Lynn Harter
    2003Human Communication. New York: McGraw Hill Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Rapaille, Clotaire
    2007The Culture Code: An Ingenious Way to Understand why People Around the World Buy and Live as they do. New York: Broadway Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Russo, Edward J. and Anne-Sophie Chaxel
    2010 “How Persuasive Messages can Influence Behavior without Awareness.” Journal of Consumer Psychology20: 338–342. doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2010.06.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2010.06.005 [Google Scholar]
  23. Weigand, Edda
    2007 “The Sociobiology of Language.” InDialogue and Culture, ed. by Marion Grein and Edda Weigand , 27–49. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ds.1.04wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.1.04wei [Google Scholar]
  24. 2009Language as Dialogue: From Rules of Principles of Probability. Sebastian Feller (ed.). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ds.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.5 [Google Scholar]
  25. 2010a “Language as Dialogue.” Intercultural Pragmatics7(3): 505–515. doi: 10.1515/iprg.2010.022
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2010.022 [Google Scholar]
  26. 2010bDialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ds.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.10 [Google Scholar]
  27. 2012a “Professional Action Games: Theory and Practice.” InProfessional Communication across Languages and Cultures, ed. by Stanca Măda and Răzvan Săftoiu , 43–59. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ds.17.04wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.17.04wei [Google Scholar]
  28. 2012b “The Challenge of Complexity: Body, Mind and Language in Interaction.” InMoving Ourselves, Moving Others, Motion and Emotion in Intersubjectivity, Consciousness and Language, ed. by Ad Foolen , Ulrike M. Lüdtke , Timothy P. Racine and Jordan Zlatev , 383–406. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ceb.6.15wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ceb.6.15wei [Google Scholar]
  29. 2015 “Persuasion or the Integration of Grammar and Rhetoric.” InPersuasive Games in Political and Professional Dialogueed. by Răzvan Săftoiu , Maria-Ionela Neagu and Stanca Măda , 1–18. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ds.26.01wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.26.01wei [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): advertising; Akan; commissives; directives; mixed game model; persuasion; rhetorical strategies
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error