1887
Volume 4, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2452-1949
  • E-ISSN: 2452-2147
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

One of the core assumptions of the sociolinguistic interview methodology is that read speech tasks may be used to elicit more standard variants from a speaker. This link between reading and standardness, however, is a socially constructed relationship that may differ across cultures. Standard language ideologies in Israel differ from those in well-studied English speaking communities, and exhibit a complex tension between the notions of standardness and correctness. Drawing on a corpus of sociolinguistic interviews of 21 Hebrew speakers, this paper analyzes the variation in two Hebrew morpho-phonological variables. The results show a pattern of use that differs from the cline typically observed, which suggests that Hebrew speakers have a specialized reading register that recruits distinctive stylistic resources. These findings highlight the nature of reading as a stylistic performance that may manifest differently according to local language ideologies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/le.00008.gaf
2021-07-27
2021-10-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Coffin, Edna A. and Shmuel Bolozky
    2005A Reference Grammar of Modern Hebrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511811081
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811081 [Google Scholar]
  2. Coupland, Nikolas
    2007Style. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511755064
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755064 [Google Scholar]
  3. Dunn, Cynthia Dickel
    2013 Speaking politely, kindly, and beautifully: Ideologies of politeness in Japanese business etiquette training. Multilingua32(2): 225–245. 10.1515/multi‑2013‑0011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2013-0011 [Google Scholar]
  4. Eckert, Penelope
    1989 The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation. Language Variation and Change1: 245–67. 10.1017/S095439450000017X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S095439450000017X [Google Scholar]
  5. 2008 Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics12: 453–476. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2008.00374.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x [Google Scholar]
  6. 2012 Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology41: 871–100. 10.1146/annurev‑anthro‑092611‑145828
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145828 [Google Scholar]
  7. Gafter, Roey J.
    2016a What’s a stigmatized variant doing in the word list? Authenticity in reading styles and the Hebrew pharyngeals. Journal of Sociolinguistics20: 31–58. 10.1111/josl.12169
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12169 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2016b Pharyngeal beauty and depharyngealized geek: Performing ethnicity on Israeli reality TV. InH. Samy Alim, John. R. Rickford and Arnetha F. Ball, eds.Raciolinguistics: How language shapes our ideas about race. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 185–201. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190625696.003.0011
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190625696.003.0011 [Google Scholar]
  9. Gafter, Roey. J.
    2019 Modern Hebrew sociophonetics. Brill’s Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics11: 226–242. 10.1163/18776930‑01101014
    https://doi.org/10.1163/18776930-01101014 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2020 Using pharyngeals out of context: Linguistic stereotypes in parodic performances of Mizrahi Hebrew speakers. InRenée Blake and Isabelle Buchstaller, eds.The Routledge Companion to the Work of John R. Rickford. New York, NY: Routledge. 232–241.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gonen, Einat
    2013 Normativism. InGeoffrey Khan, ed.Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics, vol 2. Leiden: Brill. 847–852.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Labov, William
    1966The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 1972Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Marco, Aryeh
    2009 Radio, speak to me. Panim46: 46–58. [In Hebrew]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Milroy, Lesley
    1987Observing and Analysing Natural Language. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Mor, Uri
    2020 Prescriptive activity in Modern Hebrew. InRuth Berman, ed.Usage-based studies in Modern Hebrew: Background, Morpho-lexicon, and Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 97–129. 10.1075/slcs.210.06mor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.210.06mor [Google Scholar]
  17. Morag, Shelomo
    1990 Modern Hebrew: Some sociolinguistic aspects. Cathedra56: 70–92. [in Hebrew]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Myhil, John
    2004 A parameterized view of the concept of ‘correctness’. Multilingua23: 389–416. 10.1515/mult.2004.23.4.389
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.2004.23.4.389 [Google Scholar]
  19. Nir, Raphael
    2011 On the meaning of “linguistic norm” in contemporary Hebrew. InGila Shilo and Luba Charlap, eds.Language Anthology for Colleges of Education: A Selection of Essays on Modern Hebrew and Language Teaching. Tel Aviv: The Mofet Institute. 61–70. [In Hebrew]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ravid, Dorit D.
    1995Language Change in Child and Adult Hebrew: A Psycholinguistic Perspective. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Rosén, Haim B.
    1966A textbook of Israeli Hebrew: Second corrected edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Schilling, Natalie
    2014 Surveys and interviews. InRobert J. Podesva and Devyani Sharma, eds.Research Methods in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 96–115. 10.1017/CBO9781139013734.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013734.007 [Google Scholar]
  23. Stanford, James N.
    2016 A call for more diverse sources of data: Variationist approaches in non-English contexts. Journal of Sociolinguistics20: 525–541. 10.1111/josl.12190
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12190 [Google Scholar]
  24. Stuart-Smith, Jane, Gwilym Price, Claire Timmins & Barrie Gunter
    2013 Television can also be a factor in language change: Evidence from an urban dialect. Language89: 501–536. 10.1353/lan.2013.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2013.0041 [Google Scholar]
  25. Trudeau, Danielle
    1992Les Inventeurs du Bon Usage (1529–1647). Paris: Minuit.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Walden, Tsvia
    1993 Vocalization in Hebrew: Myths and reality. InUzi Ornan, Rina Ben-Shahar and Gide’on Turi, eds.Hebrew: A Living Language: Studies on the Language in Social and Cultural Contexts, vol. 1. Haifa: Haifa University Press. 23–33. [In Hebrew].
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Yaeger-Dror, Malcah
    1988 The influence of changing group vitality on convergence toward a dominant norm: An Israeli example. Language & Communication8: 285–305. 10.1016/0271‑5309(88)90023‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(88)90023-7 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/le.00008.gaf
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/le.00008.gaf
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): language ideologies; Modern Hebrew; reading tasks; standardness; stylistic variation
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error