Style variation in the second formant

References

1. Ansaldo, Umberto; Lisa Lim; and Salikoko S. Mufwene
   2007 The sociolinguistic history of the Peranakans: What it tells us about “creolization.” Deconstructing Creole. Typological Studies in Language. 73, ed. byUmberto Ansaldo, Stephen Matthews, and Lisa Lim, 203–226. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.73.11ans
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.73.11ans [Google Scholar]
2. Bell, Allan
   1984 Language style as audience design. Language in Society13.145–204. 10.1017/S004740450001037X
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001037X [Google Scholar]
3. Boersma, Paul; and David Weenink
   2013 Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.3.59, retrieved20 November 2013fromwww.praat.org/
   [Google Scholar]
4. Calder, Jeremy
   2019 The fierceness of fronted /s/: Linguistic rhematization through visual transformation. Language in Society48.31–64. 10.1017/S004740451800115X
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740451800115X [Google Scholar]
5. D’Onofrio, Annette
   2014 Phonetic Detail and Dimensionality in Sound-shape Correspondences: Refining the Bouba-Kiki Paradigm. Language and Speech57. SAGE Publications Ltd.367–393. doi:  10.1177/0023830913507694
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830913507694 [Google Scholar]
6. Drager, Katie
   2013 Experimental Methods in Sociolinguistics. Research Methods in Sociolinguistics: A practical guide, ed. byJanet Holmes and Kirk Hazen, 58–73. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Eckert, Penelope
   2019 The limits of meaning: Social indexicality, variation, and the cline of interiority 95.27. 10.1353/lan.0.0239
   https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0239 [Google Scholar]
8. Geertz, Clifford
   1976 The religion of Java. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Gonda, J.
   1949 The functions of word duplication in Indonesian languages. Lingua2.170–197. doi:  10.1016/0024‑3841(49)90022‑4
   https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(49)90022-4 [Google Scholar]
10. Gordon, Matthew; and Jeffrey Heath
    1998 Sex, Sound Symbolism, and Sociolinguistics. Current Anthropology39.421–449. doi:  10.1086/204758
    https://doi.org/10.1086/204758 [Google Scholar]
11. Gwee, William Thian Hock
    2006 A Baba Malay Dictionary: The First Comprehensive Compendium of Straits Chinese Terms and Expressions. Singapore: Tuttle Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Kasstan, Jonathan R.
    2019 Emergent sociolinguistic variation in severe language endangerment. Language in Society48.685–720. 10.1017/S0047404519000472
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404519000472 [Google Scholar]
13. Hildebrandt, Kristine A.; Carmen Jany; and Wilson Silva
    2017 Introduction: Documenting Variation in Endangered Languages. Language Documentation & Conservation13.1–5.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Kendall, Maurice George
    1955 Rank Correlation Methods. New York: Hafner Publishing Co.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Ladefoged, Peter; and Keith Johnson
    2011 A Course in Phonetics, Sixth Edition. International Edition. Canada: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Lambert, Wallace E.; Richard Hodgson; Robert C. Gardner; and Samuel Fillenbaum
    1960 Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology60.44–51. 10.1037/h0044430
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044430 [Google Scholar]
17. Lee, Nala H.
    2014 A grammar of Baba Malay with sociophonetic considerations. Manoa: University of Hawai’i PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Lee, Nala H.
    2019 Peranakans in Singapore: Responses to language endangerment and documentation. (Ed.) Mário Pinharanda-Nunes and Cardoso, Hugo C.Language Documentation & Conservation. Special issue on Documentation and conservation of contact languages in Southeast Asia and East Asia: Current issues and ongoing initiatives19.123–140.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Lee, Nala H.
    2020 Utilizing the Matched-guise as a Method of Examining Perceptual Change in an Endangered Creole. Applied Linguistics. 10.1093/applin/amaa011
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaa011 [Google Scholar]
20. Levon, Erez
    2014 Categories, stereotypes, and the linguistic perception of sexuality. Language in Society43.539–566. 10.1017/S0047404514000554
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404514000554 [Google Scholar]
21. Lim, Lisa
    2016 The art of losing: Beyond java, patois and postvernacular vitality – Repositioning the periphery in global Asian ecologies. Endangered languages and languages in danger: Issues of documentation, policy, and language rights, ed. byLuna Filipović and Martin Pütz, 283–312. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/impact.42.12lim
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.42.12lim [Google Scholar]
22. Mansfield, John; and James Stanford
    2017 Documenting Sociolinguistic Variation in Lesser- studied Indigenous Communities: Challenges and Practical Solutions. Language Documentation & Conservation13.116–136.
    [Google Scholar]
23. McCune, Keith Michael
    1985 The internal structure of Indonesian roots. Jakarta: Badan Penyelenggara Seri Nusa, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya.
    [Google Scholar]
24. McLeod, A. Ian
    2014 Kendall. R package version 2.2CRAN.R-project.org/packge=kendall
25. Meyerhoff, Miriam
    2019 Unnatural bedfellows? The sociolinguistic analysis of variation and language documentation. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand49. Taylor & Francis. 229–241. doi:  10.1080/03036758.2019.1619599
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03036758.2019.1619599 [Google Scholar]
26. Ohala, John J.
    1994 The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice pitch. Sound symbolism, ed. ByLeanne Hinton, Johanna Nichols and John J. Ohala, 222–236. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Omar, Asmah Haji
    1986 Sociolinguistic varieties of Malay. The Fergusonian impact: In honor of Charles A. Ferguson on the occasion of his 65th birthday. Sociolinguistics and the Sociology of Language Vol. 2, ed. byJoshua A. Fishman, Andrée Tabouret-Keller, Michael Clyne, Bh. Krishnamurti, and Mohamed Abdulaziz, 191–206. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Plichta, Bartłomiej
    2013 Akustyk: Speech analysis and synthesis plug-in for Praat. Previously available at: github.com/akustyk
29. Poedjosoedarmo, Soepomo
    1968 Javanese speech levels. Indonesia6. 10.2307/3350711
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3350711 [Google Scholar]
30. Pratt, Teresa
    2020 Embodying “tech”: Articulatory setting, phonetic variation, and social meaning. Journal of Sociolinguistics24.328–349. doi:  10.1111/josl.12369
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12369 [Google Scholar]
31. Şahin, Hülya
    2015 Cross-linguistic influences: Dutch in contact with Papiamento and Turkish. LOT Dissertations Series, 405. Utrecht: Landelijke Onderzoekschool Taalwetenschap.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Sapir, Edward
    1929 A study in phonetic symbolism. Journal of Experimental Psychology12. US: Psychological Review Company. 225–239. doi:  10.1037/h0070931
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070931 [Google Scholar]
33. Silverstein, Michael
    1995 Relative motivation in denotational and indexical sound symbolism of Wasco-Wishram Chinookan. Sound Symbolism, ed. byJohanna Nichols, John J. Ohala, and Leanne Hinton, 40–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/sound-symbolism/relative-motivation-in-denotational-and-indexical-sound-symbolism-of-wascowishram-chinookan/6B073730B8FF6F5DC8F7FD0FAE10989A.   10.1017/CBO9780511751806.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511751806.004 [Google Scholar]
34. Stevens, Alan M.
    1965 Language levels in Madurese. Language41.294–302. 10.2307/411879
    https://doi.org/10.2307/411879 [Google Scholar]
35. Tan, Chee Beng
    1979 Baba and Nyonya: a study of the ethnic identity of the Chinese Peranakan in Malacca. New York: Cornell University.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Wessing, Robert
    1974 Language levels in Sundanese. Man9.5–22. 10.2307/2800032
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2800032 [Google Scholar]
37. Willemsen, Jeron; and Ehm Hjort Miltersen
    2020 The expression of vulgarity, force, severity and size: phonaesthemic alternations in Reta and in other languages. Studies in Language. In press. 10.1075/sl.19073.wil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.19073.wil [Google Scholar]