1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Language Ecology
  4. Volume 3, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 3, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2452-1949
  • E-ISSN: 2452-2147
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper reviews a number of specific features typical of analytic languages, in an attempt to investigate whether Creole languages can indeed be grouped, at least structurally, with other languages of the analytic (or isolating) type. Based on Sybesma et al. (forthcoming), a study of the nature of analyticity, we select eight features which constitute rather obvious structural parallels between two unrelated groups, namely Sinitic and Kwa. In terms of Creole languages, these eight features can be also clearly located within the APiCS (Michaelis et al. 2013). Contrary to works like Bakker et al. (2011) which argue for the existence of a “Creole Prototype”, our results show that Creole languages do not cluster with each other against other non-Creole languages. Instead, various Creoles clearly owe their grammatical profile to the languages that dominate the typological environment in which they are formed.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/le.17003.sze
2019-06-12
2023-09-24

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/le.17003.sze
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aboh, Enoch O.
    2010 The morphosyntax of the noun phrase. InEnoch O. Aboh and James Essegbey, eds.Topics in Kwa Syntax. Dordrecht: Springer. 11–37. 10.1007/978‑90‑481‑3189‑1_2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3189-1_2 [Google Scholar]
  2. 2016 Creole distinctiveness: A dead end. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages31(2): 400–418. 10.1075/jpcl.31.2.07abo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.31.2.07abo [Google Scholar]
  3. Aboh, Enoch O. and Michel DeGraff
    2014 Some notes on bare nouns in Haitian creole and in Gungbe: A transatlantic Sprachbund perspective. InTor A. Åfalí and Brit Mæhlum, eds.The Sociolinguistics of Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 203–236. 10.1075/slcs.154.11abo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.154.11abo [Google Scholar]
  4. 2016 A null theory of Creole formation based on Universal Grammar. InIan Roberts, ed.The Oxford Handbook of Universal Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 401–458.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Aboh, Enoch O. and James Essegbey
    2010 General properties of the clause. InEnoch O. Aboh and James Essegbey, eds.Topics in Kwa Syntax. Dordrecht: Springer. 39–64. 10.1007/978‑90‑481‑3189‑1_3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3189-1_3 [Google Scholar]
  6. Aboh, Enoch O. and Norval Smith
    2012 The morphosyntax of non-iconic reduplications: A case study in Eastern Gbe and the Surinam creoles. InEnoch O. Aboh, Norval Smith and Anne Zribi-Herz, eds.The Morphosyntax of Reiteration in Creole and Non-Creole Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 27–76. 10.1075/cll.43.02abo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.43.02abo [Google Scholar]
  7. Aboh, Enoch O., Norval Smith and Anne Zribi-Hertz
    2012 Reduplication beyond the word level: A cross-linguistic view. InEnoch O. Aboh, Norval Smith and Anne Zribi-Herz, eds.The Morphosyntax of Reiteration in Creole and Non-Creole Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1–26. 10.1075/cll.43.01abo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.43.01abo [Google Scholar]
  8. Ameka, Felix K.
    2008 Aspect and modality in Ewe: A survey. InFelix K. Ameka and Mary Esther Kropp Dakubu, eds.Aspect and Modality in Kwa Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 135–194. 10.1075/slcs.100.07ame
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.100.07ame [Google Scholar]
  9. Ameka, Felix K. and Mary Esther Kropp Dakubu
    2008 Imperfective constructions: Progressive and prospective in Ewe and Dangme. InFelix K. Ameka and Mary Esther Kropp Dakubu, eds.Aspect and Modality in Kwa Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 215–289. 10.1075/slcs.100.09ame
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.100.09ame [Google Scholar]
  10. Ansaldo, Umberto
    2009 Contact Languages: Ecology and Evolution in Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511642203
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511642203 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2010 Contact and Asian varieties of English. InRaymond Hickey, ed.The Handbook of Language Contact. New York: Wiley-Blackwell. 498–517. 10.1002/9781444318159.ch24
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444318159.ch24 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2011 Sri Lanka Malay and its Lankan abstrates. InClaire Lefebvre, ed.Creoles, Their Substrates, and Language Typology. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 367–382. 10.1075/tsl.95.21ans
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.95.21ans [Google Scholar]
  13. Bakker, Peter, Aymeric Daval-Markussen, Mikael Parkvall and Ingo Plag
    2011 Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages26(1): 5–42. 10.1075/jpcl.26.1.02bak
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.26.1.02bak [Google Scholar]
  14. Baptista, Marlyse and Jacqueline Guéron
    eds. 2007 Noun Phrases in Creole Languages: A Multi-Faceted Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cll.31
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.31 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bickerton, Derek
    1984 The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences7(2): 173–188. 10.1017/S0140525X00044149
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044149 [Google Scholar]
  16. Blasi, Damián E., Susanne Maria Michaelis and Martin Haspelmath
    2017 Grammars are robustly transmitted even during the emergence of creole languages. Nature Human Behaviour1: 723–729. 10.1038/s41562‑017‑0192‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0192-4 [Google Scholar]
  17. Brousseau, Anne-Marie
    1988 Triptyque sur les composés: les noms composés en français, fongbe et haïtien en regard des notions de tête et de percolation. Travaux de recherche sur le créole haïtien2: 1–109.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Bryant, David and Vincent Moulton
    2004 Neighbor-Net: An agglomerative method for the construction of phylogenetic networks. Molecular Biology and Evolution21(2): 255–265. 10.1093/molbev/msh018
     https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msh018 [Google Scholar]
  19. Chappell, Hilary
    2008 Variation in the grammaticalization of complementizers from verba dicendi in Sinitic languages. Linguistic Typology12(1): 45–98. 10.1515/LITY.2008.032
     https://doi.org/10.1515/LITY.2008.032 [Google Scholar]
  20. Collins, Chris
    1994 The factive construction in Kwa. Ms. Cornell University.
  21. 1997 Argument sharing in serial verb constructions. Linguistic Inquiry28: 461–497.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Daval-Markussen, Aymeric
    2013 First steps towards a typological profile of creoles. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia45(2): 274–295. 10.1080/03740463.2014.880606
     https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2014.880606 [Google Scholar]
  23. Dede, Keith
    2007 The deep end of the feature pool: Syntactic hybridization in Chinese dialects. Journal of Chinese Linguistics35(1): 58–80.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. DeGraff, Michel
    2007 Kreyòl or Haitian Creole. InJohn Holm and Peter L. Patrick, eds.Comparative Creole Syntax: Parallel Outlines of 18 Creole Grammars. London: Battlebridge. 101–126.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Essegbey, James
    1999 Inherent Complement Verbs Revisited: Towards an Understanding of Argument Structure in Ewe. PhD thesis, Leiden University.
  26. 2008 The potential morpheme in Ewe. InFelix K. Ameka and Mary Esther Kropp Dakubu, eds.Aspect and Modality in Kwa Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 195–214. 10.1075/slcs.100.08ess
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.100.08ess [Google Scholar]
  27. Fattier, Dominique
    2013 Haitian Creole. InSusanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath and Magnus Huber, eds.The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages (Vol.II). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 195–204.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Fon Sing, Guillaume
    2017 Creoles are not typologically distinct from non-Creoles. Language Ecology1(1): 44–74. 10.1075/le.1.1.04fon
     https://doi.org/10.1075/le.1.1.04fon [Google Scholar]
  29. Gil, David
    2009 How Much grammar does it take to sail a boat?InGeoffrey Sampson, David Gil and Peter Trudgill, eds.Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 19–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Givón, Talmy
    1979 On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Glaude, Herby and Anne Zribi-Hertz
    2012 Verb focus in Haitian: From lexical reiteration to Predicate Cleft. InEnoch O. Aboh, Norval Smith and Anne Zribi-Herz, eds.The Morphosyntax of Reiteration in Creole and Non-Creole Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 77–134. 10.1075/cll.43.03gla
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.43.03gla [Google Scholar]
  32. Guillemin, Diana
    2011 The Syntax and Semantics of a Determiner System: A Case Study of Mauritian Creole. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cll.38
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.38 [Google Scholar]
  33. Holm, John
    2007 Creole typology and substrate typology. Presentation at theSymposium on Language Contact and the Dynamics of Language: Theory and Implications: Max Planck Institute, Germany, May 10–13.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Holm, John and Peter L. Patrick
    eds. 2007 Comparative Creole Syntax: Parallel Outlines of 18 Creole Grammars. London: Battlebridge.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Huang, C.-T. James, Y.-H. Audrey Li and Yafei Li
    2009 The Syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166935
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166935 [Google Scholar]
  36. Huson, Daniel H. and David Bryant
    2006 Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution23(2): 254–267. 10.1093/molbev/msj030
     https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msj030 [Google Scholar]
  37. Larson, Martha
    2010 The Empty Subject construction: Verb serialization in Baule. InEnoch O. Aboh and James Essegbey, eds.Topics in Kwa Syntax. Dordrecht: Springer. 195–232. 10.1007/978‑90‑481‑3189‑1_9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3189-1_9 [Google Scholar]
  38. Lefebvre, Claire
    1998 Creole Genesis and the Acquisition of Grammar: The Case of Haitian Creole. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. 2010 On the relevance of Pidgins and Creoles in the debate on the origins of language. Presentation at theSummer Institute on The Origins of Language: Université du Québec à Montréal, Canada, June 21–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Lefebvre, Claire and Anne-Marie Brousseau
    2002 A Grammar of Fongbe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110880182
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110880182 [Google Scholar]
  41. Li, Charles N. and Sandra A. Thompson
    1981 Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Lim, Lisa
    2007 Mergers and acquisitions: On the ages and origins of Singapore English particles. World Englishes27(4): 446–473. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.2007.00522.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2007.00522.x [Google Scholar]
  43. Lim, Lisa and Umberto Ansaldo
    2006 Keeping Kirinda vital: The endangerment-empowerment dilemma in the documentation of Sri Lanka Malay. InEnoch O. Aboh and Miriam van Staden, eds.ACLC (Amsterdam Centre for Language & Communication) Working Papers1: 51–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Lord, Carol
    1974 Causative constructions in Yoruba. Studies in African Linguistics, Supplement5: 195–204.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Luke, Kang-kwong
    1990 Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.9
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.9 [Google Scholar]
  46. Lyons, Christopher
    1999 Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511605789
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605789 [Google Scholar]
  47. Manfredi, Victor
    1991 Agbo and Ehugbo: Igbo Linguistic Consciousness, its Origins and Limits. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
  48. Matras, Yaron
    2010 Romani in Britain: The Afterlife of a Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748639045.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748639045.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  49. Maurer, Philippe and the APiCS Consortium
    2013a Tense-aspect systems. InSusanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath and Magnus Huber, eds.The Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 192–195.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. 2013b Tone. InSusanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath and Magnus Huber, eds.The Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 480–483.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. McWhorter, John H.
    2011 Linguistic Simplicity and Complexity: Why do Languages Undress?Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781934078402
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781934078402 [Google Scholar]
  52. Michaelis, Susanne Maria, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath and Magnus Huber
    eds. 2013 The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Parkvall, Mikael
    2008 The simplicity of creoles in a cross-linguistic perspective. InMatti Miestamo, Kaius Sinnemäki and Fred Karlsson, eds.Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 265–285. 10.1075/slcs.94.17par
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.94.17par [Google Scholar]
  54. Pfänder, Stefan
    2013 Guyanais. InSusanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath and Magnus Huber, eds.The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages (Vol.II). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 220–228.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Roberts, Sarah Julianne
    1998 The role of diffusion in the genesis of Hawaiian creole. Language74(1): 1–39. 10.1353/lan.1998.0051
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1998.0051 [Google Scholar]
  56. Schwegler, Armin
    1990 Analyticity and Syntheticity: A Diachronic Perspective with Special Reference to Romance Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110872927
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110872927 [Google Scholar]
  57. 2013 Palenquero. InSusanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath and Magnus Huber, eds.The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages (Vol.II). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 182–192.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Stewart, Osamuyimen
    2001 The Serial Verb Construction Parameter. New York: Garland.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Su, Lily I-wen
    2004 Subjectification and the use of the complementizer SHUO. Studies in Linguistics30(1): 19–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Sybesma, Rint, Enoch O. Aboh, Umberto Ansaldo and Lisa L. S. Cheng
    (forthcoming). Analyticity: A Comparison of Sinitic and Kwa. Unpublished draft.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Szeto, Pui Yiu, Umberto Ansaldo and Stephen Matthews
    2018 Typological variation across Mandarin dialects: An areal perspective with a quantitative approach. Linguistic Typology22(2): 233–275. 10.1515/lingty‑2018‑0009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2018-0009 [Google Scholar]
  62. Wang, Jian
    2015 Bare classifier phrases in Sinitic languages: A typological perspective. InHilary M. Chappell, ed.Diversity in Sinitic Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 110–133.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Xu, Dan
    2014 甘青一帶的賓格標記及其類型學上的意義Gānqīng yīdài de bīngé biājì jí qí lèixíngxué shàng de yìyì [Accusative case marking in the Gansu-Qinghai region and its significance on typological studies]. InChe Wah Ho and Shengli Feng, eds.承繼與拓新：漢語語言文字學研究Chéngjì yǔ tuòxīn: Hànyǔ yǔyán wénzìxué yánjiū [Inheritance and Innovations: Studies in Chinese Linguistics and Philology]. Hong Kong: The Commercial Press. 494–514.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Yakpo, Kofi
    2012 Reiteration in Pichi: Forms, functions and areal-typological perspectives. InEnoch O. Aboh, Norval Smith and Anne Zribi-Herz, eds.The Morphosyntax of Reiteration in Creole and Non-Creole Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 251–284. 10.1075/cll.43.08yak
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.43.08yak [Google Scholar]
  65. 2013 Pichi. InSusanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath and Magnus Huber, eds.The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 194–205.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/le.17003.sze
Loading
Creole typology is analytic typology
Language Ecology 3, 89 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1075/le.17003.sze
/content/journals/10.1075/le.17003.sze
/content/journals/10.1075/le.17003.sze
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): analytic language; Creole; Kwa; linguistic complexity; phylogenetic network; Sinitic

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error