Volume 3, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2452-1949
  • E-ISSN: 2452-2147
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Creolists and variationists often conceptualize variation in multilectal speech communities as a continuum of linearly ordered linguistic features. Using the variationist comparative method, we analyze variation in past tense marking in a creole speech community (Bequia, St Vincent and the Grenadines), comparing across groups of speakers (communities and age-groups) in terms of frequencies of past-marking, language-internal constraints on past-marking and the ranking of factors within those constraints. Based on these multiple lines of evidence, the analysis shows that placing groups on a continuum is not straightforward, in line with local language ideologies. We argue that linear models of variation may reify relationships between varieties in terms of differences that are not sustained across different levels of analysis. We also show that the relationships between lects even in quite small communities are subject to change across generations.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Aboh, Enoch O.
    2016 Creole distinctiveness: A dead end. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages31: 400–418. 10.1075/jpcl.31.2.07abo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.31.2.07abo [Google Scholar]
  2. Aceto, Michael and Jeffrey P. Williams
    eds. 2003Contact Englishes of the Eastern Caribbean. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/veaw.g30
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g30 [Google Scholar]
  3. Allsopp, Richard
    ed. 2003Dictionary of Caribbean English Usage. Mona: University of the West Indies Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Baayen, R. Harald, Doug J. Davidson, and Douglas M. Bates
    2008 Mixed-effects modelling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language59: 390–412. 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005 [Google Scholar]
  5. Baker, Gordon
    2007No Island is an Island: The Impact of Globalization on the Commonwealth Caribbean. London: Chatham House.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bakker, Peter
    2016 You got Gunbe, but we got the numbers: Feature pools show that creoles are still typologically distinct. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages31: 419–435. 10.1075/jpcl.31.2.08bak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.31.2.08bak [Google Scholar]
  7. Bickerton, Derek
    1975Dynamics of a Creole System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 1980 Creolization, linguistic universals, natural semantax and the brain. InRichard R. Dayed.Issues in English Creoles. Papers from the 1975 Hawaii Conference. Heidelberg: Groos. 1–18. 10.1075/veaw.g2.03bic
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g2.03bic [Google Scholar]
  9. Bloomfield, Leonard
    1984Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Blondeau, Helene and Naomi Nagy
    2008 Subordinate clause marking in Montreal Anglophone French and English. InMiriam Meyerhoff and Naomi Nagy, eds.Social Lives in Language – Sociolinguistics and Multilingual Speech Communities. John Benjamins: Amsterdam. 273–314. 10.1075/impact.24.18blo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.24.18blo [Google Scholar]
  11. Brown, Keith
    ed. 2006The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd ed.Oxford: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Buchstaller, Isabelle and Alexandra D’Arcy
    2009 Localized globalization: A multi-local, multivariate investigation of quotative be like. Journal of Sociolinguistics13: 291–331. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2009.00412.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2009.00412.x [Google Scholar]
  13. Chambers, Jack K. and Peter Trudgill
    1998Dialectology, 2nd ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511805103
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805103 [Google Scholar]
  14. Chomsky, Noam
    2001 Derivation by phase. InMichael J. Kenstowicz, ed.Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge: MIT Press. 1–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Clachar, Arlene
    2015 Processing subject relative clauses in English: Evidence from child speakers of English-lexified creoles. Applied Linguistics36: 635–640.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Comrie, Bernard
    1976Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Curtis, Debra
    2009Pleasures and Perils: Girls’ Sexuality in a Caribbean Consumer Culture. London: Rutgers University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Daleszynska, Agata
    2010 What’s gender got to do with it? Investigating the effect of gender and place on /t, d/ deletion in Bequia. Proceedings of the Summer School of Sociolinguistics, The University of Edinburgh.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2011 Variation in Past Tense Marking in Bequia Creole: Apparent Time Change and Dialect Levelling. PhD dissertation. University of Edinburgh.
  20. 2013 The local, the global, and the authentic: Language change and authenticity in Bequia. Zeitschrift fur Anglistik und Amerikanistik: A Quarterly of Language, Literature and Culture60: 275–294.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. DeCamp, David
    1971 Towards a generative analysis of a post-creole speech continuum. InDell Hymes, ed.Pidginization and Creolization of Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 349–370.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Deuber, Dagmar
    2009 The English we speaking: Morphological and syntactic variation in educated Jamaican speech. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages24: 1–52. 10.1075/jpcl.24.1.02deu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.24.1.02deu [Google Scholar]
  23. 2014English in the Caribbean: Variation, Style and Standards in Jamaica and Trinidad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139226400
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139226400 [Google Scholar]
  24. Eckert, Penelope
    2000Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Erker, D. and Gregory R. Guy
    2012 The role of lexical frequency in syntactic variability: Variable subject personal pronoun expression in Spanish. Language88: 526–557. 10.1353/lan.2012.0050
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0050 [Google Scholar]
  26. Escure, Genevieve
    2006 Variation in pidgins and creoles. InKeith Brown, ed.The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd ed.Oxford: Elsevier. 380–387. 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/01488‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01488-7 [Google Scholar]
  27. Fon Sing, Guillaume
    2017 Creoles are not typologically distinct from non-Creoles. Language Ecology1(1): 44–74. 10.1075/le.1.1.04fon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/le.1.1.04fon [Google Scholar]
  28. Francis, Winthrop N.
    1983Dialectology: An Introduction. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. González-Vilbazo, Kay and Luis López
    2012 Little v and parametric variation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory30: 33–77. 10.1007/s11049‑011‑9141‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9141-5 [Google Scholar]
  30. Gumperz, John J.
    1968 The speech community. International Encyclopedia of Social Sciences9: 381–386. [Reprinted (1971) in Language in Social Groups. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 114–128.]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Gumperz, John
    1982Language and Social Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Guy, Gregory R.
    1980 Variation in the group and the individual: The case of final stop deletion. InWilliam Labov, ed.Locating Language in Time and Space. New York: Academic Press. 1–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 1991 Explanation in variable phonology: An exponential model of morphological constraints. Language Variation and Change3:1–22. 10.1017/S0954394500000429
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500000429 [Google Scholar]
  34. 2013 The cognitive coherence of sociolects: How do speakers handle multiple sociolinguistic variables?Journal of Pragmatics52: 63–71. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.019 [Google Scholar]
  35. Hackert, Stephanie
    2004Urban Bahamian Creole: System and Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/veaw.g32
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g32 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hinrichs, Lars
    2006Code-switching on the Web: English and Jamaican Creole in E-mail Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.147
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.147 [Google Scholar]
  37. Hymes, Dell
    1972 Models of the interaction of language and social life. InJohn Gumperz and Dell Hymes, eds.Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston. 35–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Irvine, Alison
    2004 A good command of the English language: Phonological variation in the Jamaican acrolect. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages19: 41–76. 10.1075/jpcl.19.1.03irv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.19.1.03irv [Google Scholar]
  39. Johnson, Daniel Ezra
    2009 Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistic Compass3: 359–383. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2008.00108.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00108.x [Google Scholar]
  40. Labov, William
    1969 Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language45: 715–762. 10.2307/412333
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412333 [Google Scholar]
  41. 1971 The notion of ‘system’ in creole languages. InDell Hymes, ed.Pidginization and Creolization of Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 447–472.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 1972Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 1989 The child as linguistic historian. Language Variation and Change1: 85–97. 10.1017/S0954394500000120
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500000120 [Google Scholar]
  44. 1998 Coexistent systems in African-American English. InSalikoko Mufwene, ed.African American English: Structure, History and Use. London: Routledge. 110–153.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Labov, William, Sharon Ash, and Charles Boberg
    2006The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology and Sound Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110167467
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110167467 [Google Scholar]
  46. Levin, Beth and Malka Rappaport Hovav
    1995 Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph26. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. McWhorter, John H.
    2003 Pidgins and creoles as models of language change: The state of the art. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics23: 202–212. 10.1017/S0267190503000278
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190503000278 [Google Scholar]
  48. Meyerhoff, Miriam
    2009a Replication, transfer and calquing: Using variation as a tool in the study of language contact. Language Variation and Change21: 1–21. 10.1017/S0954394509990196
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394509990196 [Google Scholar]
  49. 2009b Men argue but the women doz trace: Gender and language variation in Bequia (St Vincent and the Grenadines). Sargasso: 115–133.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. 2017 Writing a linguistic symphony: Analysing variation while doing language documentation. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique62: 525–549. 10.1017/cnj.2017.28
    https://doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2017.28 [Google Scholar]
  51. Meyerhoff, Miriam and Steffen Klaere
    2017 A case for clustering speakers and linguistic variables: Big issues with smaller samples in language variation. InIsabelle Buchstaller and Beat Siebenhaar, eds.Language Variation – European Perspectives VI: Selected Papers from the Eight International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 8). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 23–46. 10.1075/silv.19.02mey
    https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.19.02mey [Google Scholar]
  52. Meyerhoff, Miriam and James N. Stanford
    2015 “Tings change, all tings change”: The changing face of sociolinguistics with a global perspective. InDick Smakman and Patrick Heinrich, eds.Globalising Sociolinguistics. London: Routledge. 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Meyerhoff, Miriam and James A. Walker
    2007 The persistence of variation in individual grammars: Copula absence in ‘urban sojourners’ and their stay-at-home peers, Bequia (St Vincent and the Grenadines). Journal of Sociolinguistics11: 346–366. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2007.00327.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00327.x [Google Scholar]
  54. 2012 Grammatical variation in Bequia (St Vincent and the Grenadines). Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages27: 209–234. 10.1075/jpcl.27.2.01mey
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.27.2.01mey [Google Scholar]
  55. 2013aBequia Talk (St Vincent and the Grenadines). Westminster: Battlebridge Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. 2013b An existential problem: The sociolinguistic monitor and variation in existential constructions on Bequia (St Vincent and the Grenadines). Language and Society42: 407–428. 10.1017/S0047404513000456
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404513000456 [Google Scholar]
  57. Michaelis, Susanne, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath, and Magnus Huber
    eds. 2013The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Nagy, Naomi and Miriam Meyerhoff
    2008 The social lives of linguistics. InMiriam Meyerhoff and Naomi Nagy, eds.Social Lives in Language – Sociolinguistics and Multilingual Speech Communities. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 1–17. 10.1075/impact.24.02nag
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.24.02nag [Google Scholar]
  59. Patrick, Peter L.
    1999Urban Jamaican Creole: Variation in the Mesolect. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/veaw.g17
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g17 [Google Scholar]
  60. Poplack, Shana
    ed. 2000The English History of African American English. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Poplack, Shana and Sali A. Tagliamonte
    2001African American English in the Diaspora: Tense and Aspect. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Rickford, John R.
    1987Dimensions of a Creole Continuum: History, Texts and Linguistic Analysis of Guyanese Creole. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. 2002 Implicational scales. InJ. K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill and Natalie Schilling-Estes, eds.The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Oxford: Blackwell. 142–167.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Rickford, John R. and Faye McNair-Knox
    1994 Addressee- and topic- influenced style shift: A quantitative sociolinguistic study. InD. Biber and E. Finegan, eds.Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register. New York: Oxford University Press. 235–276.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Roy, Joseph and Stephen Levey
    2014 Mixed effects models and unbalanced sociolinguistic data: The need for caution. Poster presented atNWAV43, Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Sankoff, Gillian
    1993 Focus in Tok Pisin. InFrancis Byrne and Donald Winford, eds.Focus and Grammatical Relations in Creole Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 117–140. 10.1075/cll.12.10san
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.12.10san [Google Scholar]
  67. Sankoff, David, Sali A. Tagliamonte, and Eric Smith
    2005Goldvarb X: A variable rule application for Macintosh and Windows. Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Santa Ana, Otto
    1996 Sonority and syllable structure in Chicano English. Language Variation and Change8: 63–89. 10.1017/S0954394500001071
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500001071 [Google Scholar]
  69. Schleef, Erik and Meyerhoff, Miriam
    2010 Sociolinguistic methods for data collection and analysis. InMiriam Meyerhoff and Erik Schleef, eds.The Routledge Sociolinguistics Reader: Edited Readings and Teaching Materials. London: Routledge. 1–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Sebba, Mark
    1997Contact Languages: Pidgins and Creoles. London: Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑25587‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25587-0 [Google Scholar]
  71. Singler, John Victor
    1988 The homogeneity of the substrate as a factor in pidgin/creole genesis. Language64: 27–51. 10.2307/414784
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414784 [Google Scholar]
  72. St Vincent and the Grenadines tourism statistics
    St Vincent and the Grenadines tourism statistics 2013 St Vincent and the Grenadines Tourism Authority Report. exploresvg.com/index.php/en/about-svg/tourism-statistics (accessed15 February 2015).
  73. Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt
    2013Grammatical Variation in British English Dialects: A Study in Corpus-based Dialectometry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Tagliamonte, Sali A.
    2006Analysing Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511801624
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801624 [Google Scholar]
  75. 2011 Comparative sociolinguistics. InSali A. Tagliamonte, ed.Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, Observation, Interpretation. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. 162–177.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Van Herk, Gerard and Shana Poplack
    2003 Rewriting the past: Bare verbs in the ‘Ottawa Repository of Early African American Correspondence’. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages18: 231–266. 10.1075/jpcl.18.2.03her
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.18.2.03her [Google Scholar]
  77. Velupillai, Viveka
    2015Pidgins, Creoles and Mixed Languages: An Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cll.48
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.48 [Google Scholar]
  78. 2016 Partitioning the timeline: A cross-linguistic survey of tense. Studies in Language40: 93–136. 10.1075/sl.40.1.04vel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.40.1.04vel [Google Scholar]
  79. Walker, James A.
    2000 Presented Accounted for: Prosody and Aspect in Early African American English. PhD dissertation. University of Ottawa.
  80. 2005 The ain’t constraint: Not-contraction in Early African American English. Language Variation and Change17: 1–17. 10.1017/S0954394505050015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394505050015 [Google Scholar]
  81. 2010aVariation in Linguistic Systems. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. 2010b Affairs of state: Defining and coding stativity in English and English-based Creole. InJames A. Walker, ed.Aspect in Grammatical Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 95–109. 10.1075/silv.6.07wal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.6.07wal [Google Scholar]
  83. Walker, James A., Michael Dunn, Aymeric Daval-Markussen, and Miriam Meyerhoff
    2015 Modelling the speech community through multiple variables: Trees, networks and clades. Poster presented atNWAV44, Toronto.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Walker, James A. and Miriam Meyerhoff
    2006 Zero copula in the Caribbean: Evidence from Bequia. American Speech81: 146–163. 10.1215/00031283‑2006‑010
    https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2006-010 [Google Scholar]
  85. Walker, James A. and Jack Sidnell
    2011 Negation in Bequia. InLars Hinrichs and Joseph Farquharson, eds.Variation in the Caribbean. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 39–56. 10.1075/cll.37.04wal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.37.04wal [Google Scholar]
  86. Williams, Jeffrey P.
    2003 The establishment and perpetuation of Anglophone white enclave communities in the Eastern Caribbean. InMichael Aceto and Jeffrey P. Williams, eds.Contact Englishes of the Eastern Caribbean. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 95–119. 10.1075/veaw.g30.08wil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g30.08wil [Google Scholar]
  87. Winford, Donald
    1992 Back to the past: The BEV/creole connection revisited. Language Variation and Change4: 311–357. 10.1017/S0954394500000831
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500000831 [Google Scholar]
  88. 1993Predication in Caribbean English Creoles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cll.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.10 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Bequia; comparative variation; creole continuum; past tense; polylectal grammar
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error