Volume 40, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0378-4169
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9927
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


This study is a corpus-based investigation of Persian relative clauses (RCs) used in written mode. 535 instances of RCs occurring in 1634 sentences in 40 editorials of four newspapers published in Iran were spotted and analyzed to determine the frequency of each RC type and the occurrence of certain features including complementizer , object marker , different representations of the relativised element in the modifying clause, and the status of gap and resumptive pronoun in the RC. The results indicated that subject RCs are the most frequent types. The tendency to use object marker before the modifying RC ( Karimi, 2001 ) was confirmed. Besides, some tokens were witnessed contrasting Taghvaipour’s (2005) proposals on the ungrammaticality of resumption in Persian subject ordinary and object free RCs and the necessity of prefix ‘ever’ in all Persian free RCs.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Al-e Ahmad, J.
    (1983) Modir-e madreseh ‘The school principal’. Tehran: Ravagh Publication.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Comrie, B.
    (1989) Language universals and linguistic typology (2nd edition). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dabir-Moghaddam, M.
    (1992) On the (in)dependence of syntax and pragmatics: Evidence from the postposition-ra in Persian. Cooperating with written texts: The pragmatics and comprehension of written texts (pp.549–573). doi: 10.1515/9783110881196.549
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110881196.549 [Google Scholar]
  4. Darzi, A.
    (2008) On the vP analysis of Persian finite control constructions. Linguistic Inquiry, 39(1), 103–116. doi: 10.1162/ling.2008.39.1.103
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2008.39.1.103 [Google Scholar]
  5. Dehkhoda, A. A.
    (1994) Persian to Persian dictionary. Tehran: University of Tehran Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ghomeshi, J.
    (1997) Non-projecting nouns and the Ezafe construction in Persian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 15(4), 729–788. doi: 10.1023/A:1005886709040
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005886709040 [Google Scholar]
  7. Karimi, S.
    (2001) Persian complex DPs: how mysterious are they?Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 46, 63–96. doi: 10.1017/S0008413100017941
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008413100017941 [Google Scholar]
  8. Keenan, E. , & Comrie, B.
    (1977) Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Lazard, G.
    (1992) A grammar of contemporary Persian. California: Mazda.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Mahootian, Sh. , & Gebhardt, L.
    (1997) Persian (Descriptive grammars). London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203192887
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203192887 [Google Scholar]
  11. McKee, C. , & McDaniel, D.
    (2001) Resumptive pronouns in English relative clauses. Language Acquisition, 9(2), 113–156. doi: 10.1207/S15327817LA0902_01
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327817LA0902_01 [Google Scholar]
  12. Taghvaipour, M. A.
    (2005) Persian relative clauses in head-driven phrase structure grammar. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Essex, England.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Windfuhr, G.
    (1979) Persian grammar: history and state of its study. New York. Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110800425
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110800425 [Google Scholar]
  14. Windfuhr, G. , & Perry, J. R.
    (2010) Persian and Tajik. In G. Windfuhr (Ed.), The Iranian Languages (pp.416–544). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): free RCs; gaps; object marker râ; Persian RCs; resumptive pronouns
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error