The origin of the valency metaphor in linguistics

References

1. Ágel, V.
   (2000) Valenztheorie. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Ágel, V. , Eichinger, L. , Eroms, H. -W. , Hellwig, P. , Heringer, H. -J. , & Lobin, H.
   (Eds.) (2003) Dependenz und Valenz: Ein Internationales Handbuch Der Zeitgenösischen Forschung. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110141900.1
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110141900.1 [Google Scholar]
3. Ajdukiewicz, K.
   (1935) Die syntaktische Konnexität. Studia Philosophica, 1, 1–27.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Askedal, J. O.
   (1991) Charles S. Peirce’s work on relatives and modern valency grammar. Cruzeiro Semiotico, 15, 69–82.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Baum, R.
   (1976) Dependenzgrammatik: Tesnières Modell der Sprachbeschreibung in wissenschaftsgeschichtlicher und kritischer Sicht. Tübingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783111328263
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111328263 [Google Scholar]
6. Bradford, R.
   (1994) Roman Jakobson: Life, Language, Art. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bühler, K.
   (1934) Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Verlag von Gustav Fischer.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Crystal, D.
   (2008) A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. Oxford: Blackwell, 6th edition.10.1002/9781444302776
   https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444302776 [Google Scholar]
9. de Groot, A. W.
   (1949) Structurele Syntaxis. Den Haag: Servire.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Engel, U.
    (2003) Das valenzkonzept in der Grammatikographie: ein Überblick. In V. Ágel et al. (2003), pp.1309–1330.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Fischer, K.
    (1997) German-English Verb Valency: A Contrastive Analysis. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
12. Hellan, L. , Malchukov, A. , & Cennamo, M.
    (2017) Issues in contrastive valency studies. In L. Hellan , A. Malchukov , & M. Cennamo (Eds.), Contrastive Studies in Verbal Valency. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.237.01hel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.237.01hel [Google Scholar]
13. Hockett, C. F.
    (1958) A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Jakobson, R. O.
    (1949) The phonemic and grammatical aspects of language and their interaction. InActes du Sixième Congrès International des Linguistes, (pp.5–18). Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Jakobson, R. O.
    (1965) Quest for the essence of language. Diogenes, 13(51), 21–37.10.1177/039219216501305103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/039219216501305103 [Google Scholar]
16. Jakobson, R. O.
    (1971) Results of a joint conference of anthropologists and linguists. InSelected Writings II, (pp.554–567). The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Jakobson, R. O.
    (1977) A few remarks on Peirce, pathfinder in the science of language. MLN, 92(5), 1026–1032.10.2307/2906890
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2906890 [Google Scholar]
18. Jakobson, R. O.
    (1980) The Framework of Language. Michigan Studies in Humanities.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Jespersen, O.
    (1937) Analytic Syntax. Copenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Kacnel’son, S. D.
    (1948) O grammatičeskoj kategorii. Vestnik Leningradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, 2, 114–134.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kacnel’son, S. D.
    (1987) K ponjatiju tipov valentnosti. Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 3, 20–32.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kahane, S. , & Osborne, T.
    (2015) Translators’ introduction. In L. Tesnière (2015), pp.xxix–lxxiii.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Liszka, J. J. , Battistella, E. , & Haley, M.
    (2006) Linguistics and semiotics II: C. S. Peirce’s influence on 20th-century linguistics. In S. Auroux , E. F. K. Koerner , H. -J. Niederehe , & K. Versteegh (Eds.), History of the Language Sciences: An International Handbook on the Evolution of the Study of Language from the Beginnings to the Present, (pp.2589–2599). Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Luraghi, S. , & Parodi, C.
    (2008) Key Terms in Syntax and Syntactic Theory. Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Nübler, N.
    (2003) Kontrastive Fallstudie: Deutsch – Russisch. In V. Ágel et al. (2003), pp.1207–1214.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Peirce, C. S.
    (1897) The logic of relatives. The MonistVII(2), 161–217.10.5840/monist18977231
    https://doi.org/10.5840/monist18977231 [Google Scholar]
27. Pongó, S.
    (2003) Die Wertigkeitsmetapher. In V. Ágel et al. (2003), pp.7–14.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Preucel, R. W.
    (2006) Archaeological Semiotics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470754962
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754962 [Google Scholar]
29. Schubert, K.
    (2003) Metataxe: ein Dependenzmodell für die computerlinguistische Praxis. In V. Ágel et al. (2003), pp.636–660.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Tesnière, L.
    (1953) Esquisse d’une Syntaxe Structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Tesnière, L.
    (1959) Éléments de Syntaxe Structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Tesnière, L.
    (2015) Elements of Structural Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.185
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.185 [Google Scholar]
33. Xrakovskij, V. S.
    (2003) Valenz und Sprachtypologie. In V. Ágel et al. (2003), pp.444–457.
    [Google Scholar]