Instant messaging, digital writing and spelling production quality in French

References

1. Anderson, H., & Elsner, R. J.
   2014 Exposure to “textisms” does not lower spelling scores for elementary school aged children. Current Research in Psychology, 5(2), 89–95. doi:  10.3844/crpsp.2014.89.95
   https://doi.org/10.3844/crpsp.2014.89.95 [Google Scholar]
2. Anis, J.
   2003 Communication électronique scripturale et formes langagières. Paper presented at theActes des Quatrièmes Rencontres Réseaux humains / Réseaux technologiques. RetrievedDecember 11th, 2010, fromrhrt.edel.univ-poitiers.fr/document.php?id=547
   [Google Scholar]
3. Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G.
   1974 Working memory. InG. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, 8, 47–89. New York: Academic Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Baddeley, A.
   2000 The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory?Trends in cognitive sciences, 4 (11), 417–423. doi:  10.1016/S1364‑6613(00)01538‑2
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2 [Google Scholar]
5. Bernicot, J., Goumi, A. & Bert-Erboul, A., Volckaert-Legrier, O.
   2014 How do skilled and less-skilled spellers write text messages? A longitudinal study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. doi:  10.1111/jcal.12064
   https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12064 [Google Scholar]
6. Blanche-Benveniste, C., & Chervel, A.
   1969 L’orthographe. Paris: Maspero.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bonetti, L., Campbell, M. A., & Gilmore, L.
   2010 The relationship of loneliness and social anxiety with children’s and adolescents’ online communication. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 13(3), 279–285. doi:  10.1089/cyber.2009.0215
   https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0215 [Google Scholar]
8. Bouillaud, C., Chanquoy, L., & Gombert, J.-E.
   2007 Cyberlangage et orthographe: quels effets sur le niveau orthographique des élèves de CM2, 5ème et 3ème?Bulletin de Psychologie, 60(6), 553–565. doi:  10.3917/bupsy.492.0553
   https://doi.org/10.3917/bupsy.492.0553 [Google Scholar]
9. Bryant, J. A., Sanders Jackson, A., & Smallwood, A. M.
   2006 IMing, text messaging, and adolescent social networks. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 11(2), 577–592. doi:  10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2006.00028.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00028.x [Google Scholar]
10. Caramazza, A.
    1991 The role of the graphemic buffer in spelling: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Neuropsychology and Cognition, 3, 269–295. doi:  10.1007/978‑94‑011‑3740‑9_8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3740-9_8 [Google Scholar]
11. Catach, N.
    1980 L’orthographe française : traité théorique et pratique avec des travaux d’application et leurs corrigés. Paris: Nathan.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Caverni, J.-P.
    1998 Un code de conduite des chercheurs dans les sciences du comportement. L’année psychologique, 98(1), 83–100. doi:  10.3406/psy.1998.28612
    https://doi.org/10.3406/psy.1998.28612 [Google Scholar]
13. Cellier, M.
    2003 Orthographe. InM. Prouilhac (Ed.), Savoirs et culture, 193–247. Toulouse: CNED.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Coltheart, V., Patterson, K., & Leahy, J.
    1994 When a ROWS is a ROSE: Phonological effects in written word comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (A: Human Experimental Psychology), 47, 917–955. doi:  10.1080/14640749408401102
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749408401102 [Google Scholar]
15. Cousin, M. P., Thibault, M. P., Largy, P., & Fayol, M.
    2006 Apprentissage de la morphologie flexionnelle du nombre nominal: étude de la récupération d’instances chez des enfants tout-venant et des enfants présentant un trouble de l’apprentissage de l’écrit. Rééducation orthophonique, 44(225), 93–109.
    [Google Scholar]
16. De Jonge, S. & Kemp, K.
    2012 Text message abbreviations and language skills in high school and university students. Journal of Research in Reading, 35(1), 49–68. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9817.2010.01466.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01466.x [Google Scholar]
17. Drouin, M. A.
    2011 College students’ text messaging, use of textese and literacy skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(1), 67–75. doi:  10.1111/j.1365‑2729.2010.00399.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00399.x [Google Scholar]
18. Drouin, M. A. & Davis, C.
    2009 R u txting? Is the Use of Text Speak Hurting Your Literacy?Journal of Literacy Research, 41(1), 46–67. doi:  10.1080/10862960802695131
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10862960802695131 [Google Scholar]
19. Febvrel, A., & Hureau, C.
    2008 “Msn c tro bi1?”: Influence de la communication médiée par ordinateur sur les pratiques orthographiques: étude auprès d’une population de CM2. Unpublished master’s thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Fernandez, J. & Yuldashev, A.
    2011 Variation in the Use of General Extenders and Stuff in Instant Messaging Interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(10), 2610–2626. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.012 [Google Scholar]
21. Goumi, A. & Bernicot, J.
    2012 Le langage SMS chez les adolescents, faut-il s’en inquiéter ?L’école numérique, 12, 34–35.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Haggan, M.
    2007 Text messaging in Kuwait. Is the medium the message?Multilingua, 26(1), 427–449. 10.1515/MULTI.2007.020
    https://doi.org/10.1515/MULTI.2007.020 [Google Scholar]
23. Hayes, J. R.
    1996 A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. InC. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing, 1–27. Mahwah (NJ): Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S.
    1980 Identifying the organization of writing processes. InL. W. Gregg, & E. R. Steinberg(Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing, 3–30. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kerswell, L., Siakaluk, P. D., Pexman, P. M., Sears, C. R., & Owen, W. J.
    2007 Homophone Effects in Visual Word Recognition Depend on Homophone Type and Task Demands. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(4), 322–327. doi:  10.1037/cjep2007032
    https://doi.org/10.1037/cjep2007032 [Google Scholar]
26. Khiari, W., Bouhafs, A., & Roche, M.
    2016 Comment prendre en compte les spécificités de “l’écriture SMS” pour l’analyse de sentiments?InProceedings JADT (Journées internationales d’Analyse statistique des Données Textuelles), Nice, France 2016
    [Google Scholar]
27. Lanchantin, T., Simoës-Perlant, A., & Largy, P.
    2015 De la relation de l’écrit numérique et la qualité de l’orthographe. Glossa, 118, 40–57.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Lanchantin, T., Simoës-Perlant, A., & Largy, P.
    2012a DWIM typology (Digital Writing in Instant Messaging) based on the spelling level of French 7th grade students. Paper presented at theInternational Psychological Applications Conference and Trends 2012, Lisbon.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Lanchantin, T., Simoës-Perlant, A., & Largy, P.
    2012b The case of Digital Writing in Instant Messaging: when cyber written productions are closer to the oral code than the written code. PsychNology, 10(3), 187–214.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Lanchantin, T., Simoës-Perlant, A., & Largy, P.
    2014 Good spellers write more textism than bad spellers in instant messaging: The case of French. PsychNology, 12(1–2), 45–63. Retrieved fromwww.psychnology.org
    [Google Scholar]
31. Largy, P., Cousin, M. P., Bryant, P., & Fayol, M.
    2007 When memorized instances compete with rules: the case of number-noun agreement in written French. Journal of Child Language, 34, 425–437. doi:  10.1017/S0305000906007914
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000906007914 [Google Scholar]
32. Lété, B.
    2006 L’apprentissage implicite des régularités statistiques de la langue et l’acquisation des unités morphosynthaxiques. Langue française, 151(3), 41–58. doi: 210.3406/lfr.2006.6773
    https://doi.org/210.3406/lfr.2006.6773 [Google Scholar]
33. Maskens, L., Cougnon, L. A., Roekhaut, S., & Fairon, C.
    2015 Nouveaux médias et orthographe. Incompétence ou pluricompétence? Discours [En ligne], mis en ligne le09 septembre 2015, consulté le30 septembre 2016. URL : discours.revues.org/9020. doi:  10.4000/discours.9020
    https://doi.org/10.4000/discours.9020
34. Petitjean, C. & Morel, E.
    2017 “Hahaha”: Laughter as a Resource to Manage WhatsApp Conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 110, 1–19. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.001 [Google Scholar]
35. Pétillon, S.
    2006 Le discours SMiste, un nouveau corpus? [Electronic Version]. Dossier “Orthographe", 440.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Plester, B., & Wood, C.
    2009 Exploring relationships between traditional and new media literacies: British preteen texters at school. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 1108–1129. doi:  10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2009.01483.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01483.x [Google Scholar]
37. Plester, B., Wood, C., & Bell, V.
    2008 Txt msg n school literacy: does texting and knowledge of text abbreviations adversely affect children’s literacy attainment?Literacy, 42 (3), 137–144. doi:  10.1111/j.1741‑4369.2008.00489.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4369.2008.00489.x [Google Scholar]
38. Plester, B., Wood, C., & Joshi, P.
    2009 Exploring the relationship between children’s knowledge of text message abbreviations and school literacy outcomes. The British Psychological Society, 27, 145–161. doi:  10.1348/026151008X320507
    https://doi.org/10.1348/026151008X320507 [Google Scholar]
39. Powell, D., & Dixon, M.
    2011 Does SMS text messaging help or harm adults’ knowledge of standard spelling?Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(1), 58–66. doi:  10.1111/j.1365‑2729.2010.00403.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00403.x [Google Scholar]
40. Rivière, C. A. & Licoppe, C.
    2005 From voice to text: Continuity and change in the use of mobile phones in France and Japan. InR. Harper (Ed.) The inside text, 103–126. Dordrecht Springer. 10.1007/1‑4020‑3060‑6_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3060-6_6 [Google Scholar]
41. Simoës-Perlant, A., Thibault, M.-P., Lanchantin, T., Combes, C., Volckaert-Legrier, O., & Largy, P.
    2012 How adolescents with dyslexia dysorthographia use texting. Written Language and Literacy, 15(1), 65–79. doi:  10.1075/wll.15.1.04sim
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.15.1.04sim [Google Scholar]
42. Sjöberg, U.
    2003 Making sense of screen-based media. The uses and readings of television, computer games, and Internet among swedish young people. InI. Rydin (Ed.) Media fascinations: Perspectives on young people’s meaning making, 147–164. Goteborg: Nordicom.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Valkenburg, P. & Soeters, K.
    2001 Children’s positive and negative experiences with the Internet: An exploratory survey. Communication Research, 28(5), 652–675. doi:  10.1177/009365001028005004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/009365001028005004 [Google Scholar]
44. Volckaert-Legrier, O., Bernicot, J. &, Bert-Erboul, A.
    2009 Electronic Mail, a new written-language register: a study with French-speaking adolescents. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 163–181. 10.1348/026151008X368884
    https://doi.org/10.1348/026151008X368884 [Google Scholar]
45. Wood, C., Jackson, E., Plester, B., & Wilde, L.
    2009 Children’s use of mobile phone text messaging and its impact on literacy development in primary school [Electronic Version]. RetrievedSeptember 18th, 2013fromresearch.becta.org.uk/index.php?section=rh&catcode=_re_rp_02&rid=16824
46. Wood, C., Kemp, N., Waldron, S., & Hart, L.
    2014 Grammatical understanding, literacy and text messaging in school children and undergraduate students: A concurrent analysis. Computers & Education, 70, 281–290. doi:  10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.003 [Google Scholar]
47. Zahid, Y. & Mehmood, A.
    2013 Effects of SMS on Writing Skills of the University Students in Pakistan (A Case Study of University of Gujrat). Asian Economic and Financial Review, 3(3), 389–397. www.aessweb.com/pdf-files/389-397.pdf
    [Google Scholar]