1887
Volume 44, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0378-4169
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9927
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

A formal linguistitic model is presented, which produces, for a given conceptual representation of an extralinguistic situation, a corresponding semantic representation [SemR] that, in its turn, underlies the deep-syntactic representations of four near-synonymous Russian sentences expressing the starting information. Two full-fledged lexical entries are given for the lexemes ‘disturbance’ and ‘clash’, appearing in these sentences. Some principles of lexicalization – that is, matching the formal lexicographic definitions to the starting semantic representation in order to produce the deep-syntactic structures of the corresponding sentences – are formulated and illustrated; the problem of approximate matching is dealt with in sufficient detail.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/li.00058.Ior
2021-09-20
2022-12-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Dobrovolʹskij, D. & Pöppel, L.
    2013 Lexical Synonymy within the Semantic Field POWER. In: Kor Chanine, I., (ed.), Current Studies in Slavic Linguistics, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 281–296. 10.1075/slcs.146.16dob
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.146.16dob [Google Scholar]
  2. Iordanskaja, L.
    1990 Ot semantičeskoj seti k glubinno-sintaksičeskomu derevu: pravila naxoždenija veršiny dereva [From a Semantic Network to a Deep-syntactic Tree: Rules for the Determination of the Tree Top Node]. InSaloni, Z. (ed.), Metody formalne w opisie języków słowiańskich [Festschrift Ju. Apresjan], Białystok: Filija Uniwersyteta Warszawskiego w Białymstoku, 33–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Iordanskaja, L. & Polguère, A.
    1988 Semantic Processing for Text Generation. InProceedings of International Computer Science Conference ’88, Hong Kong, 310–318.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Lareau, F., Lambrey, F., Dubinskaitė, I., Galarreta-Piquette, D. & Nejat, M.
    2018 GenDR: A Generic Deep Realizer with Complex Lexicalization. In: Proceedings of the 11th edition of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC), Miyazaki (Japan), European Language Resources Association, 3018–3025.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lareau, F. & Wanner, L.
    2007 Towards a Generic Multilingual Dependency Grammar for Text Generation. InHolloway King, T. & Bender, E. M. (eds), Proceedings of the Grammar Engineering Across Frameworks 2007 Workshop [CSLI Publications, csli-publications.stanford.edu], 203–223.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Mel’čuk, I.
    2001Communicative Organization in Natural Language. The Semantic-Communicative Structure of Sentences. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.57
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.57 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2012–2015Semantics. From Meaning to Text. Vols1–3. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.129
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.129 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2016Language: From Meaning to Text. Moskva/Boston: Academic Studies Press. 10.1515/9781618114570
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781618114570 [Google Scholar]
  9. Mel’čuk, I. & Polguère, A.
    2018 Theory and Practice of Lexicographic Definition. Journal of Cognitive Science, 19: 4, 417–470. 10.17791/jcs.2018.19.4.417
    https://doi.org/10.17791/jcs.2018.19.4.417 [Google Scholar]
  10. Milićević, J.
    2007aLa paraphrase. Modélisation de la paraphrase langagière. Berne: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 2007b Semantic Equivalence Rules in Meaning-Text Paraphrasing. In: Wanner, L., ed., Selected Lexical and Grammatical Issues in Meaning-Text Theory, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 267–297. 10.1075/slcs.84.09mil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.84.09mil [Google Scholar]
  12. 2021 Modélisation de la paraphrase sémantique approximative. In: Marengo, S., dir., La Théorie Sens-Texte. Concepts-clés et applications, coll. « Dixit Grammatica », Paris: L’Harmattan, 51–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Polguère, A.
    1990Structuration et mise en jeu procédurale d’un modèle linguistique décla-ratif dans un cadre de génération de texte. Montréal: Université de Montréal [thèse de doctorat].
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Sowa, J. F.
    1976 Conceptual Graphs for a Data Base Interface. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 20: 4, 336–357. 10.1147/rd.204.0336
    https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.204.0336 [Google Scholar]
  15. 1984Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/li.00058.Ior
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/li.00058.Ior
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error