Minimodel of semantic synthesis of Russian sentences

References

1. Dobrovolʹskij, D. & Pöppel, L.
   2013 Lexical Synonymy within the Semantic Field POWER. In: Kor Chanine, I., (ed.), Current Studies in Slavic Linguistics, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 281–296. 10.1075/slcs.146.16dob
   https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.146.16dob [Google Scholar]
2. Iordanskaja, L.
   1990 Ot semantičeskoj seti k glubinno-sintaksičeskomu derevu: pravila naxoždenija veršiny dereva [From a Semantic Network to a Deep-syntactic Tree: Rules for the Determination of the Tree Top Node]. InSaloni, Z. (ed.), Metody formalne w opisie języków słowiańskich [Festschrift Ju. Apresjan], Białystok: Filija Uniwersyteta Warszawskiego w Białymstoku, 33–46.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Iordanskaja, L. & Polguère, A.
   1988 Semantic Processing for Text Generation. InProceedings of International Computer Science Conference ’88, Hong Kong, 310–318.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Lareau, F., Lambrey, F., Dubinskaitė, I., Galarreta-Piquette, D. & Nejat, M.
   2018 GenDR: A Generic Deep Realizer with Complex Lexicalization. In: Proceedings of the 11th edition of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC), Miyazaki (Japan), European Language Resources Association, 3018–3025.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Lareau, F. & Wanner, L.
   2007 Towards a Generic Multilingual Dependency Grammar for Text Generation. InHolloway King, T. & Bender, E. M. (eds), Proceedings of the Grammar Engineering Across Frameworks 2007 Workshop [CSLI Publications, csli-publications.stanford.edu], 203–223.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Mel’čuk, I.
   2001 Communicative Organization in Natural Language. The Semantic-Communicative Structure of Sentences. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.57
   https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.57 [Google Scholar]
7. Mel’čuk, I.
   2012–2015 Semantics. From Meaning to Text. Vols1–3. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.129
   https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.129 [Google Scholar]
8. Mel’čuk, I.
   2016 Language: From Meaning to Text. Moskva/Boston: Academic Studies Press. 10.1515/9781618114570
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9781618114570 [Google Scholar]
9. Mel’čuk, I. & Polguère, A.
   2018 Theory and Practice of Lexicographic Definition. Journal of Cognitive Science, 19: 4, 417–470. 10.17791/jcs.2018.19.4.417
   https://doi.org/10.17791/jcs.2018.19.4.417 [Google Scholar]
10. Milićević, J.
    2007a La paraphrase. Modélisation de la paraphrase langagière. Berne: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Milićević, J.
    2007b Semantic Equivalence Rules in Meaning-Text Paraphrasing. In: Wanner, L., ed., Selected Lexical and Grammatical Issues in Meaning-Text Theory, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 267–297. 10.1075/slcs.84.09mil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.84.09mil [Google Scholar]
12. Milićević, J.
    2021 Modélisation de la paraphrase sémantique approximative. In: Marengo, S., dir., La Théorie Sens-Texte. Concepts-clés et applications, coll. « Dixit Grammatica », Paris: L’Harmattan, 51–74.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Polguère, A.
    1990 Structuration et mise en jeu procédurale d’un modèle linguistique décla-ratif dans un cadre de génération de texte. Montréal: Université de Montréal [thèse de doctorat].
    [Google Scholar]
14. Sowa, J. F.
    1976 Conceptual Graphs for a Data Base Interface. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 20: 4, 336–357. 10.1147/rd.204.0336
    https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.204.0336 [Google Scholar]
15. Sowa, J. F.
    1984 Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    [Google Scholar]