1887
Volume 48 Number 2
  • ISSN 0378-4169
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9927
Preview this article:

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/li.00127.kis
2026-02-19
2026-03-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/li.00127.kis.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/li.00127.kis&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Arutjunova, N. D.
    (1990) Toždestvo i podobie: sravnenie i identifikacija [Identity and similarity: comparison and identification]. Moscow.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bužarovska, E.
    (2005) Equality versus similarity constructions in English. Journal of Language and Linguistics, 4(1), 74–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cooke, T., Jäkel, F., Wallraven, Ch. & Bülthoff, H. H.
    (2007) Multimodal similarity and categorization of novel, three-dimensional objects. Neuropsychologia, 45(3), 484–495. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.02.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.02.009 [Google Scholar]
  4. Creissels, D.
    (2017) Similarity, suitability, and non-epistemic modalities (volitionality, ability, and obligation). InY. Treis & M. Vanhove (Eds), Similative and Equative Constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective, 79–90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.117.04cre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.117.04cre [Google Scholar]
  5. Fortescue, M.
    (2010) Similitude: A conceptual category. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 42(2), 117–142. 10.1080/03740463.2010.521442
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2010.521442 [Google Scholar]
  6. Giomi, R.
    (2022) Similatives are Manners, comparatives are Quantities (except when they aren’t). Open Linguistics, 8(1), 650–674. 10.1515/opli‑2022‑0211
    https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2022-0211 [Google Scholar]
  7. Gipper, S.
    (2018) From similarity to evidentiality. Uncertain visual/perceptual evidentiality in Yurakaré and other languages. InA. Foolen, H. de Hoop and G. Mulder (Eds), Evidence for Evidentiality, 257–280. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.61.11gip
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.61.11gip [Google Scholar]
  8. Goddard, C. & Wierzbicka, A.
    (2014) Words and Meanings: Lexical Semantics Across Domains, Languages, and Cultures. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Goldstone, R. L.
    (1994) The role of similarity in categorization: providing a groundwork. Cognition, 52(2), 125–157. 10.1016/0010‑0277(94)90065‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90065-5 [Google Scholar]
  10. Hahn, U. & M. Ramscar
    (Eds) (2001) Similarity and categorization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198506287.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198506287.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hampton, J. A.
    (2015) Categories, prototypes and exemplars. InN. Riemer (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of semantics, 125–141. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Haspelmath, M.
    (2017) Equative constructions in world-wide perspective: A cross-linguistic perspective. InY. Treis & M. Vanhove (Eds), Similative and Equative Constructions, 9–32. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Haspelmath, M. & Buchholz, O.
    (1998) Equative and similative constructions in the languages of Europe. InJ. van der Auwera (Ed.), Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, 277–334. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110802610.277
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110802610.277 [Google Scholar]
  14. Irsara, M.
    (2021) Expressing equality and similarity in English, Italian, and Ladin: Interlingual contrastive features and micro-variation. Linguistic Typology at the Crossroads, 1(1), 47–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Janebová, M., Martinková, M. & Gast, V.
    (2023) Czech type nouns: Evidence from corpora. InW. Mihatsch, I. Hennecke, A. Kisiel, A. Kolyaseva, K. Davidse & L. Brems (Eds), Type Noun Constructions in Slavic, Germanic and Romance Languages, 571–617. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110701104‑015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110701104-015 [Google Scholar]
  16. Letuchiy, A.
    (2008) Сравнительные конструкции, ирреалис и эвиденциальность [Comparative constructions, irrealis and evidentiality]. In. B. Wiemer (Ed.), Lexikalische Evidenzialitäts-Markerin slavischen, 217–238. München: Wien.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Mihatsch, W.
    (2023) Type Noun Constructions in Slavic, Germanic and Romance Languages. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110701104
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110701104 [Google Scholar]
  18. Rosch, E.
    (1975) Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104(3), 192–233. 10.1037/0096‑3445.104.3.192
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.192 [Google Scholar]
  19. Sovran, T.
    (1992) Between similarity and sameness. Journal of Pragmatics, 18(4), 329–344. 10.1016/0378‑2166(92)90093‑Q
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(92)90093-Q [Google Scholar]
  20. Treis, Y. & Vanhove, M.
    (Eds) (2017) Similative and Equative Constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.117
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.117 [Google Scholar]
  21. Umbach, C. & Gust, H.
    (2021) Grading similarity. InLöbner, S., Gamerschlag, T., Kalenscher, T., Schrenk, M., Zeevat, H. (Eds), Concepts, Frames and Cascades in Semantics, Cognition and Ontology, 365–386. Springer Open. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑50200‑3_17
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50200-3_17 [Google Scholar]
  22. Vassiliadou, H. & Lammert, M.
    (Eds) (2022) A Crosslinguistic Perspective on Clear and Approximate categorization. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Wiemer, B.
    (2024) Polish jakoby: an exotic similative-reportive doughnut? Tracing the pathway and conditions of its rise. Linguistics, 62(3), 729–767. 10.1515/ling‑2021‑0199
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2021-0199 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/li.00127.kis
Loading
  • Article Type: Introduction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error