oa The syntax of similative clauses

References

1. Alexeyenko, S.
   (2015) The syntax and semantics of Manner modification: Adjectives and adverbs. PhD thesis, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.
2. Alexeyenko, S.
   (2025) On the categorial status of adverbs. Languages, 10(7), 149. 10.3390/languages10070149
   https://doi.org/10.3390/languages10070149 [Google Scholar]
3. Alrenga, P.
   (2010) Comparisons of similarity and difference. InP. Cabredo Hofher & O. Matushansky (Eds), Adjectives: Formal analyses in syntax and semantics, 155–186. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.153.05alr
   https://doi.org/10.1075/la.153.05alr [Google Scholar]
4. Bianchi, V.
   (1999) Consequences of antisymmetry: Headed relative clauses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110803372
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110803372 [Google Scholar]
5. Brandner, E. & Bräuning, I.
   (2013) Relative wo in Alemannic: Only a complementizer?Linguistische Berichte, 2341, 131–169. 10.46771/2366077500234_1
   https://doi.org/10.46771/2366077500234_1 [Google Scholar]
6. Bresnan, J. W.
   (1972) Theory of complementation in English syntax. PhD thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
7. Bresnan, J. W.
   (1975) Comparative deletion and constraints on transformations. Linguistic Analysis, 11, 25–74.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bužarovska, E.
   (2005) Equality versus similarity constructions in English. Journal of Language and Linguistics, 4(1), 74–99.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bücking, S.
   (2015) Zur Syntax hypothetischer Vergleichssätze im Deutschen [On the syntax of hypothetical comparison constructions in German]. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik, 43(2), 261–305. 10.1515/zgl‑2015‑0012
   https://doi.org/10.1515/zgl-2015-0012 [Google Scholar]
10. Camp, E. & Hawthorne, J.
    (2008) Sarcastic like: A case study in the interface of syntax and semantics. Philosophical Perspectives, 221, 1–21. 10.1111/j.1520‑8583.2008.00140.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2008.00140.x [Google Scholar]
11. Chamoreau, C. & Treis, Y.
    (Eds) (2019) Comparaison d’égalité et de similitude [Equative and similative constructions]. Faits de Langue, 50(1). 10.1163/19589514‑05001004
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19589514-05001004 [Google Scholar]
12. Chomsky, N.
    (1977) On wh-movement. InP. Culicover, T. Wasow & A. Akmajian (Eds), Formal syntax, 71–132. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Cinque, G.
    (2020) The syntax of relative clauses: A unified analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108856195
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108856195 [Google Scholar]
14. Citko, B.
    (2004) On headed, headless, and light-headed relatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 22(1), 95–126. 10.1023/B:NALA.0000005564.33961.e0
    https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NALA.0000005564.33961.e0 [Google Scholar]
15. Corver, N.
    (2006) Comparative deletion and subdeletion. InM. Everaert & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds), The Blackwell companion to syntax, 582–637. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. 10.1002/9780470996591.ch15
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996591.ch15 [Google Scholar]
16. D’Arcy, A.
    (2005) Like: Syntax and development. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Toronto.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Eggs, F.
    (2006) Die Grammatik von als und wie [The grammar of als and wie]. Tübingen: G. Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Emonds, J.
    (1985) A unified theory of syntactic categories. Dordrecht: Foris. 10.1515/9783110808513
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110808513 [Google Scholar]
19. Faarlund, J. T.
    (2004) The syntax of Old Norse: With a survey of the inflectional morphology and a complete bibliography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Faarlund, J. T., Lie, S. & Vannebo, K. I.
    (2006) Norsk referansegrammatikk [Norwegian reference grammar]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Franco, I. & Boef, E.
    (2015) On “som” in Scandinavian long-distance A-bar dependencies. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa, 371, 55–80.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Giusti, G.
    (1997) The categorial status of determiners. InL. Haegeman (Ed.), The new comparative syntax, 95–124. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Götz, K., Hock, W. & Widmer, P.
    (Eds) (2021) Comparison and gradation in Indo-European. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Gust, H. & Umbach, C.
    (2021) A qualitative similarity framework for the interpretation of natural language similarity expressions. InL. Bechberger, K.-U. Kühnberger & M. Liu (Eds), Concepts in Action: Representation, Learning, and Application, 63–92. Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑69823‑2_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69823-2_4 [Google Scholar]
25. Haspelmath, M. & Buchholz, I.
    (1998) Equative and similative constructions in the languages of Europe. InJ. van der Auwera & D. Ó Baoill (Eds), Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe, 277–334. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110802610.277
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110802610.277 [Google Scholar]
26. Hoekstra, J.
    (1995) Preposition stranding and resumptivity in West Germanic. InH. Haider, S. Olsen & S. Vikner (Eds), Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, 95–118. Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑8416‑6_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8416-6_4 [Google Scholar]
27. Hohaus, V. & Zimmermann, M.
    (2021) Comparisons of equality with German so… wie, and the relationship between degrees and properties. Journal of Semantics, 38(1), 95–143. 10.1093/jos/ffaa011
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffaa011 [Google Scholar]
28. Jäger, A.
    (2018) Vergleichskonstruktionen im Deutschen: Diachroner Wandel und Synchrone Variation [Comparison constructions in German: Diachronic change and synchronic variation]. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110561234
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110561234 [Google Scholar]
29. Jäger, A.
    (2019) The syntax of comparison constructions in diachronic and dialectal perspective. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 4(1), 1–51.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Jäger, A. & Walkden, G.
    (2021) West Germanic. InK. Götz, W. Hock & P. Widmer (Eds), Comparison and gradation in Indo-European, 281–348. Berlin, Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110641325‑012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110641325-012 [Google Scholar]
31. Johnsen, O.
    (1913) On some uses of the indefinite relatives in Old English and on the origin of the definite relatives. Jahresband, 371, 281–302. 10.1515/angl.1913.1913.37.281
    https://doi.org/10.1515/angl.1913.1913.37.281 [Google Scholar]
32. Jónsson, J. G.
    (2017) Why “sem” is (still) a complementizer and not a relative pronoun. InN. LaCara, K. Moulton & A.-M. Tessier (Eds), A Schrift to fest Kyle Johnson, 169–176. University of Massachusetts.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Kayne, R. S.
    (1994) The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Kayne, R. S.
    (2005) Movement and silence. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179163.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179163.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
35. König, E. & Umbach, C.
    (2018) Demonstratives of manner, of quality and of degree. InM. Coniglio, A. Murphy, E. Schlachter & T. Veenstra (Eds), Atypical demonstratives: Syntax, semantics and pragmatics, 285–328. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110560299‑010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110560299-010 [Google Scholar]
36. Leu, T.
    (2015) The architecture of determiners. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. López-Couso, M. J. & Méndez-Naya, B.
    (2012) On the use of as if, as though, and like in present-day English complementation structures. Journal of English Linguistics, 40(2), 172–195. 10.1177/0075424211418976
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424211418976 [Google Scholar]
38. Maling, J.
    (1983) Transitive adjectives: A case of categorial reanalysis. InF. W. Heny & B. Richards (Eds), Linguistic categories: Auxiliaries and related puzzles, 253–289. Dordrecht: Reidel. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑6989‑6_8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6989-6_8 [Google Scholar]
39. Moltmann, F.
    (1992) Coordination and comparatives. PhD thesis. MIT Cambridge: Mass.
40. Neijmann, D. L.
    (2022) Icelandic: An essential grammar. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Poletto, C. & Sanfelici, E.
    (2021) Against complementizers. InS. Wolfe & C. Meklenborg Salvesen (Eds), Continuity and variation in Germanic and Romance, 370–403. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198841166.003.0015
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198841166.003.0015 [Google Scholar]
42. Rett, J.
    (2013) Similatives and the argument structure of verbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 31(4), 1101–1137. 10.1007/s11049‑013‑9201‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-013-9201-0 [Google Scholar]
43. Rett, J.
    (2020) Separate but equal: a typology of equative constructions. InP. Hallman (Ed.), Interactions of Degree and Quantification, 163–204. Brill. 10.1163/9789004431515_006
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004431515_006 [Google Scholar]
44. van Riemsdijk, H.
    (2006) Free relatives. InM. Everaert & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, 338–382. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. 10.1002/9780470996591.ch27
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996591.ch27 [Google Scholar]
45. Rizzi, L.
    (2019) Notes on the map of the left periphery in Danish. InK. Ramshøj Christensen, H. Jørgensen & J. L. Wood (Eds), The sign of the V: Papers in honour of Sten Vikner, 489–502. Aarhus University: AU-TRYK. 10.7146/aul.348.112
    https://doi.org/10.7146/aul.348.112 [Google Scholar]
46. Ross, J.
    (1986) Infinite syntax!Norwood, NJ: ABLEX Publishing Corporation.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Smits, R. J. C.
    (1988) The relative and cleft constructions of the Germanic and Romance languages. Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Stroh-Wollin, U.
    (2002) Som-satser med och utan som [Som-sentences with and without som]. Skrifter utgivna av institutionen för nordiska språk vid Uppsala Universiteit, 58 [Publications edited by the institution for Nordic languages within Uppsala University]. Uppsala: Institutionen för nordiska språk vid Uppsala Universiteit.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Taraldsen, K. T.
    (1986) Som and the binding theory. InL. Hellan & K. Koch Christensen (Eds), Topics in Scandinavian syntax, 149–184. Dordrecht: Reidel. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑4572‑2_8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4572-2_8 [Google Scholar]
50. Terenghi, S.
    (2023) Missing person: Structure and change in Romance demonstratives. PhD thesis. Utrecht: LOT Publications.
51. Thurmair, M.
    (2001) Vergleiche und Vergleichen: Eine Studie zu Form und Funktion der Vergleichsstrukturen im Deutschen [Comparisons and comparing: A study on the form and function of comparison constructions in German]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Treis, Y. & Vanhove, M.
    (Eds) (2017) Similative and equative constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.117
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.117 [Google Scholar]
53. Umbach, C. & Gust, H.
    (2014) Similarity demonstratives. Lingua, 1491, 74–93. 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.05.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.05.003 [Google Scholar]
54. de Vries, M.
    (2002) The Syntax of relativization. PhD thesis. Utrecht: LOT Publications.
55. Westergaard, M., Vangsnes, Ø. A. & Lohndal, T.
    (2012) Norwegian “som”: The complementizer that climbed to the matrix Left Periphery and caused Verb Second violations. InV. Bianchi & C. Chesi (Eds), Enjoy linguistics! Papers offered to Luigi Rizzi on the occasion of his 60th birthday, 329–343. Siena: CISCL Press.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Westergaard, M., Vangsnes, Ø. A. & Lohndal, T.
    (2017) Variation and change in Norwegian wh-questions: The role of the complementizer “som”. Linguistic Variation, 17(1), 8–43. 10.1075/lv.17.1.02wes
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.17.1.02wes [Google Scholar]