Lexical plurals in Telugu

References

1. Acquaviva, P
   (2008a) Lexical Plurals: A morphosemantic approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Acquaviva, P
   (2008b) Roots and lexicality in Distributed Morphology. ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/000654.
3. Alexiadou, A
   (2011) Plural mass nouns and the morpo-syntax of number. In M. B. Washburn , K. McKinney-Bock , E. Varis , A. Sawyer & B. Tomaszewicz (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp.33–41). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bale, A. C. & Barner, D
   (2009) The interpretation of functional heads: Using comparatives to explore the mass/count distinction. Journal of Semantics, 26(3), 217–252. doi: 10.1093/jos/ffp003
   https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffp003 [Google Scholar]
5. De Belder, M
   (2013) Collective mass affixes: When derivation restricts functional structure. Lingua, 126, 32–50. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.11.008
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.11.008 [Google Scholar]
6. Borer, H
   (2005) Structuring Sense vol 1: In Name Only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Chierchia, G
   (1998) Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of ‘semantic parameter’. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Events and grammar (pp.53–103). Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑3969‑4_4
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3969-4_4 [Google Scholar]
8. Ghianiabadi, S
   (2012) Plural marking beyond count nouns. In D. Massam (Ed.), Count and Mass across languages (pp.112–128). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654277.003.0007
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654277.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
9. Halle, M. & Marantz, A
   (1993) Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The View from Building 20 (pp.111–176). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Harley, H
    (2009) Compounding in distributed morphology. In R. Lieber & P. Stekauer (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compounding (pp.129–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Kiparsky, P
    (1973) "Elsewhere" in phonology. InA Festschrift for Morris Halle (pp.93–106). New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Kramer, R
    (2014) Gender in amharic: A morphosyntactic approach to natural and grammatical gender. Language Sciences, 43, 102–115. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2013.10.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.10.004 [Google Scholar]
13. Kramer, R
    (2015) The Morphosyntax of Gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679935.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679935.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
14. Krishnamurti, B. & Gwynn, J
    (1985) A Grammar of Modern Telugu. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Landau, I
    (2016) DP-internal semantic agreement: A configurational analysis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 34, 975–1020. doi: 10.1007/s11049‑015‑9319‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9319-3 [Google Scholar]
16. Landman, F
    (1989a) Groups, I. Linguistics and Philosophy, 12, 559–605. doi: 10.1007/BF00627774
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627774 [Google Scholar]
17. Landman, F
    (1989b) Groups, II. Linguistics and Philosophy, 12, 723–744. doi: 10.1007/BF00632603
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00632603 [Google Scholar]
18. Link, G
    (1983) The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice theoretical approach. In C. S. R. Bäuerle & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Meaning, use and interpretation of language (pp.127–144). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Mathieu, E
    (2012) Flavors of division. Linguistic Inquiry, 43(4), 650–679. doi: 10.1162/ling_a_00110
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00110 [Google Scholar]
20. Ojeda, A
    (2005) The paradox of mass plurals. In E. F. Salikoko Mufwene & R. Wheeler (Eds.), Polymorphous Linguistics: Jim McCawley’s Legacy (pp.389–410). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Ponamgi, R
    (2012) Quantification in Telugu. In E. Keenan & D. Paperno (Eds.), Handbook of Quantifiers in Natural Language (pp.781–843). Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑2681‑9_15
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2681-9_15 [Google Scholar]
22. Ritter, E
    (1991) Two functional categories in noun-phrases: Evidence from modern hebrew. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Perspectives on phrase structure, volume 26 of Syntax and semantics (pp.37–62). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Schwarzschild, R
    (2011) Stubborn distributivity, multiparticipant nouns and the count/mass distinction. In B. S. Suzi Lima & Kevin Mullin (Eds.), Proceedings of NELS39 (pp.661–678).
    [Google Scholar]
24. Smith, P. W
    (2015) Feature mismatches: Consequences for syntax, morphology and semantics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Solt, S
    (2009) The semantics of adjectives of quantity. Ph.D. thesis, City University of New York.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Tsoulas, G
    (2007) On the grammar of number and mass terms in greek. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 49, 239–266.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Wiltschko, M
    (2008) The syntax of non-inflectional plural marking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 26, 639–694. doi: 10.1007/s11049‑008‑9046‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-008-9046-0 [Google Scholar]
28. Zhang, N. N
    (2012) Countability and numeral classifiers in mandarin chinese. In D. Massam (Ed.), Count and Mass across languages (pp.220–237). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654277.003.0012
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654277.003.0012 [Google Scholar]