1887
Volume 40, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0378-4169
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9927
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Some long-standing questions surrounding anticausatives in languages like French include whether the morphological marking (presence/absence of ) correlates with interpretational differences and/or different syntax. We examine the three anticausatives classes (optional , obligatory , no ) in three aspectual contexts and formulate a generalization whereby a default morphological form (reflexive-/non-reflexive-marked) can be identified for each context, plus an interpretive anti-blocking effect: if the lexicon does not provide the default form then the other form (regardless of morphology) preserves the aspectual interpretation of its transitive source. French anticausative is tied to lexical aspect (rather than syntax), but the distribution is complex and non-transparent. We argue that the grammar allows bidirectional competition among forms and interpretations and the formalize analysis in Bidirectional OT (Superoptimality).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/li.40.1.02leg
2017-12-08
2019-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alexiadou, A. , Anagnostopoulou, E. , & Schäfer, F.
    (2015) External Arguments in Transitivity Alternations – A Layering Approach. Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Blutner, R.
    (2000) Some aspects of optimality in natural language interpretation. Journal of Semantics, 17(3), 189–216. doi: 10.1093/jos/17.3.189
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/17.3.189 [Google Scholar]
  3. Cennamo, M.
    (2012) Aspectual constraints on the (anti)causative alternation in Old Italian. Transactions of the Philological Society, 110(3), 394–421. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.2012.01322.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2012.01322.x [Google Scholar]
  4. Centineo, G.
    (1995) The distribution of si in Italian transitive/inchoative pairs. In M. Simmons , & T. Galloway (Eds.), Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory V (pp.54–71). NY: Cornell University.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chierchia, G.
    (2004) A semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences. In A. Alexiadou , E. Anagnostopoulou , & M. Everaert (Eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle: exploration at the syntax-lexicon interface (pp.22–59). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  6. Dowty, D. R.
    (1979) Word meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑9473‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9473-7 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dekker, P. , & von Rooy, R.
    (2000) Bi-directional Optimality Theory: An application of game theory. Journal of Semantics17(3), 217–42. doi: 10.1093/jos/17.3.217
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/17.3.217 [Google Scholar]
  8. Folli, R.
    (2002) Constructing Telicity in English and Italian. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Grimshaw, J.
    (1982) On the lexical representation of Romance reflexive clitics. In J. Bresnan (Ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations (pp.87–148). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hale, K. , & Keyser, S. J.
    (1987) A View from the Middle. Lexicon Project Working Papers 10. MIT.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Harley, H.
    (1995) Subjects, Events, and Licensing. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Heidinger, S.
    (2010) French Anticausatives: A Diachronic Perspective. Berlin: De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110251357
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110251357 [Google Scholar]
  13. Kempchinsky, P.
    (2004) Romance se as an aspectual element. In J. Auger et al. , (Eds.), Contemporary Approaches to Romance Linguistics (pp.239–56). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.258.13kem
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.258.13kem [Google Scholar]
  14. Koontz-Garboden, A.
    (2009) Anticausativization. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 27, 77–138. doi: 10.1007/s11049‑008‑9058‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-008-9058-9 [Google Scholar]
  15. Kratzer, A.
    (1996) Severing the external argument from its verb. In J. Rooryck & L. Zaring (Eds.), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon (pp.109–37). Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑015‑8617‑7_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5 [Google Scholar]
  16. Labelle, M.
    (1992) Change of state and valency. Journal of Linguistics, 28(2), 375–414. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700015267
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700015267 [Google Scholar]
  17. Labelle, M. , & Doron, E.
    (2010) Anticausative derivations (and other valency alternations) in French. Probus, 22(2), 303–16. doi: 10.1515/prbs.2010.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.2010.011 [Google Scholar]
  18. Legendre, G. , & Smolensky, P.
    (2010) French inchoatives and the Unaccusativity Hypothesis. In D. Gerdts , J. Moore , & M. Polinsky (Eds.), Hypothesis A/Hypothesis B: Linguistic Explorations in Honor of David M. Perlmutter (pp.229–46). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Legendre, G. , Grimshaw, J. , & Vikner, S.
    (Eds.) (2001) Optimality-Theoretic Syntax. MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Legendre, G. , Putnam, M. , de Swart, H. , & Zaroukian, E.
    (Eds.) (2016a) Optimality-Theoretic Syntax, Semantics, and Pragmatics – From Uni- to Bidirectional Optimization. Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198757115.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198757115.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  21. Legendre, G. , Smolensky, P. , & Culbertson, J.
    (2016b) Blocking effects at the lexicon/semantics interface and bi-directional optimization in French. In G. Legendre , M. Putnam , H. de Swart , & E. Zaroukian (Eds.), Optimality-theoretic syntax, semantics, and pragmatics: From uni- to bidirectional optimization (pp.276–99). Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198757115.003.0012
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198757115.003.0012 [Google Scholar]
  22. Levin, B. , & Rappaport-Hovav, M.
    (1995) Unaccusativity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Martin, F. , & Schäfer, F.
    (2014) Anticausatives compete but do not differ in meaning: A French case study. Proceedings of CMLF. SHS Web of Conferences 8. doi: 10.1051/shsconf/20140801245
    https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20140801245 [Google Scholar]
  24. Pesetsky, D.
    (1995) Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Pinón, C.
    (2001) A finer look at the causative-inchoative alternation. In R. Hastings , B. Jackson , & Z. Zvolenszky (Eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 11 (pp.346–64). Ithaca: CLC Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Prince, A. , & Smolensky, P.
    (1993/2004) Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Technical report, Rutgers University and University of Colorado at Boulder 1993, ROA 537 2002 Revised version published by Blackwell 2004.Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470759400
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470759400 [Google Scholar]
  27. Pylkkänen, L.
    (2008) Introducing Arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262162548.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262162548.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  28. Reinhart, T.
    (2002) The theta system – An overview. Theoretical Linguistics, 28, 229–90.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Rothemberg, M.
    (1974) Les verbes à la fois transitifs et intransitifs en français contemporain. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Smith, C.
    (1970) Jespersen’s ‘Move and Change’ Class and Causative Verbs in English. In M. A. Jazayery , E. C. Polomé , & W. Winter (Eds.), Linguistic and Literary Studies in Honor of Archibald A. Hill, Descriptive Linguistics, 2 (pp.101–109). The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Zribi-Hertz, A.
    (1987) La réflexivité ergative en français moderne. Le Français Moderne, 55(1–2), 23–54.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/li.40.1.02leg
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error