1887
Volume 40, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0378-4169
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9927
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

We investigate the effect of French clitic construction on verb learning. In French, object pronouns precede the verb, and the canonical direct object position remains empty. We test whether children treat such contexts as input for transitivity (since a direct object is morphologically identified) or optional transitivity (due to the empty direct object position). Forty-eight monolingual French preschoolers heard verb input with clitics and noun phrases as direct objects, in two input conditions: obligatory transitivity, and mixed optional transitivity. Results show that children are sensitive to the input, but produce more sentences with null implicit objects in the clitic conditions. This provides evidence that specific properties of a language (e.g. clitic constructions), affect the acquisition of verbal classes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/li.40.1.06per
2017-12-08
2019-10-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abbot-Smith, K. , Lieven, E. , & Tomasello, M.
    (2004) Training 2;6-year-olds to produce the transitive construction: The role of frequency, semantic similarity and shared syntactic distribution. Developmental Science, 7(1), 48–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑7687.2004.00322.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00322.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Bencini, G. M. L. , & Valian, V. V.
    (2008) Abstract sentence representations in 3-year-olds: Evidence from language production and comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(1), 97–113. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.007 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bock, J. K. , & Griffin, Z. M.
    (2000) The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(2), 177–192. doi: 10.1037/0096‑3445.129.2.177
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.129.2.177 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bourmayan, A.
    (2013) Les objets implicites en français : une approche pragmatique. Doctoral dissertation. École des hautes études en sciences sociales.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cardinaletti, A. , & Starke, M.
    (1999) The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In H. Van Riemsdijk (Ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe (pp.145–233). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Childers, J. , & Tomasello, M.
    (2001) The role of pronouns in young children’s acquisition of the English transitive construction. Developmental Psychology, 37, 739–748. doi: 10.1037/0012‑1649.37.6.739
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.37.6.739 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cohen, J.
    (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (second ed.). Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cummins, S. , & Roberge, Y.
    (2005) A modular account of null objects in French. Syntax, 8, 44–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9612.2005.00074.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2005.00074.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Déchaine, R. , & Wiltschko, M.
    (2002) Decomposing pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 33, 409–442. doi: 10.1162/002438902760168554
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438902760168554 [Google Scholar]
  10. Gleitman, L. R.
    (1990) The structural sources of verb meanings. Language Acquisition, 1, 3–55. doi: 10.1207/s15327817la0101_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la0101_2 [Google Scholar]
  11. Göksun, T. , Küntay, A. & Naigles, L.
    (2008) Turkish children use morphosyntax in extending verb meaning. Journal of Child Language, 35, 291–323. doi: 10.1017/S0305000907008471
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000907008471 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hamann, C. , Rizzi, L. & Frauenfelder, U.
    (1996) The acquisition of subject and object clitics in French. In H. Clahsen (Ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition (pp.309–334). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lald.14.13ham
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.14.13ham [Google Scholar]
  13. Ingham, R.
    (1993/1994) Input and learnability: direct object omissibility in English. Language Acquisition, 3, 95–120. doi: 10.1207/s15327817la0302_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la0302_1 [Google Scholar]
  14. Jakubowicz, C. , Müller, N. , Kang, O. -K. , Riemer, B. & Rigaut, C.
    (1996) On the acquisition of the pronominal system in French and German. In A. Springfellow , D. Cahana-Amitay , E. Hughes & A. Zukowski (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Boston University Conference in Language Development (pp.374–385). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kayne, R. S.
    (1975) French syntax: The transformational cycle. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kline, M. & Demuth, K.
    (2014) Syntactic generalizations with novel intransitive verbs. Journal of Child Language, 41(3), 543–74. doi: 10.1017/S0305000913000068
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000913000068 [Google Scholar]
  17. Lambrecht, K. & Lemoine, K.
    (1996) Vers une grammaire des compléments zéro en français parlé, in J. Chuquet & M. Frid (Eds.), Absence de marques et représentation de l’absence (pp.279–309). Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (2005) Definite null objects in (spoken) French. A construction-grammar account, in M. Fried & H. Boas (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Construction-Grammar Conference (pp.13–55). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Larjavaara, M.
    (2000) Présence ou absence de l’objet. Limites du possible en français contemporain. Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennica.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee, J. & Naigles, L. R.
    (2005) Input to verb learning in Mandarin Chinese: A role for syntactic bootstrapping. Developmental Psychology, 41, 529–540. doi: 10.1037/0012‑1649.41.3.529
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.3.529 [Google Scholar]
  21. Matsuo, A. , Kita, S. , Shinya, Y. , Wood, G. C. & Naigles, L.
    (2012) Japanese two-year-olds use morphosyntax to learn novel verb meanings. Journal of Child Language, 39(3), 637–663. doi: 10.1017/S0305000911000213
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000911000213 [Google Scholar]
  22. Merlo, P. & Stevenson, S.
    (2001) Automatic verb classification based on statistical distributions of argument structure. Computational Linguistics, 27, 373–408. doi: 10.1162/089120101317066122
    https://doi.org/10.1162/089120101317066122 [Google Scholar]
  23. Naigles, L. , Gleitman, H. , & Gleitman, L.
    (1993) Children acquire word meaning components from syntactic evidence. In E. Dromi (Ed.), Language and development (pp.104–140). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Naigles, L. , & Hoff-Ginsberg, E.
    (1995) Input to verb learning: Evidence for the plausibility of syntactic bootstrapping. Developmental Psychology, 31, 827–837. doi: 10.1037/0012‑1649.31.5.827
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.31.5.827 [Google Scholar]
  25. Naigles, L. , & Lehrer, A.
    (2002) Language-general and language-specific influences on children’s acquisition of argument structure: A comparison of French and English. Journal of Child Language, 29, 545–566. doi: 10.1017/S0305000902005159
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000902005159 [Google Scholar]
  26. O’Grady, W. , Yamashita, Y. , & Cho, S.
    (2008) Object drop in Japanese and Korean. Language Acquisition, 15, 58–68. doi: 10.1080/10489220701774278
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10489220701774278 [Google Scholar]
  27. Olguin, R. , & Tomasello, M.
    (1993) Twenty-five-month-old children do not have a grammatical category of verb. Cognitive Development, 8, 245–272. doi: 10.1016/S0885‑2014(93)80001‑A
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(93)80001-A [Google Scholar]
  28. Oshima-Takane, Y. , Ariyama, J. , Kobayashi, T. , Katerelos, M. , & Poulin-Dubois, D.
    (2011) Early verb learning in 20-month-old Japanese-speaking children. Journal of Child Language, 38, 455–484. doi: 10.1017/S0305000910000127
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000910000127 [Google Scholar]
  29. Pérez-Leroux, A. , Pirvulescu, M. , & Roberge, Y.
    (2008) Null objects in child language: Syntax and the lexicon. Lingua, 118, 370–398. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  30. Pérez-Leroux, A. T. , Pirvulescu, M. , Roberge, Y. , Tieu, L. , & Thomas, D.
    (2006) Variable input and object drop in child language. In C. Gurski & M. Radisic . Proceedings of the 2006 Canadian Linguistics Association Annual Conference. Retrieved fromwesternlinguistics.ca/Publications/CLA2006/CLA-ACL2006.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Pirvulescu, M.
    (2006) Theoretical implications of clitic omission in early French: Spontaneous vs. clicited production. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 5, 221–236.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Prévost, P.
    (2009) The acquisition of French: The development of inflectional morphology and syntax in L1 acquisition, bilingualism, and L2 acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lald.51
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.51 [Google Scholar]
  33. Pye, C.
    (1994) A cross-linguistic approach to the causative alternation. In Y. Levy (Ed.), Other children, other languages (pp.243–264). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Rissman, L. , Legendre, G. & Landau, B.
    (2013) Abstract morphosyntax in two- and three-year-old children: Evidence from priming. Language Learning and Development, 9, 278–292. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2012.755902
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2012.755902 [Google Scholar]
  35. Roberge, Y.
    (1990) The syntactic recoverability of null arguments. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Roberts, I.
    (2010) Agreement and head movement. Cambridge: MIT Press. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262014304.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014304.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  37. Rowland, C. , Chang, F. , Ambridge, B. , Pine, J. , & Lieven, E. V. M.
    (2012) The development of abstract syntax: Evidence from structural priming and the lexical boost. Cognition, 125, 49–63. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.008 [Google Scholar]
  38. Sigurðsson, H. A.
    (2011) Conditions on argument drop. Linguistic Inquiry, 42(2), 267–304. doi: 10.1162/LING_a_00042
    https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00042 [Google Scholar]
  39. Smith, J.
    (2011) Everyday talk informs toddlers’ novel verb generalizations. First Language, 31(4), 404–424. doi: 10.1177/0142723711399369
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723711399369 [Google Scholar]
  40. Sportiche, D.
    (1995) Clitic constructions. In J. Rooryck & L. Zaring (Eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon (pp.213–276). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Theakston, A. , Lieven, E. , Pine, J. , & Rowland, C.
    (2001) The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb-argument structures: An alternative account. Journal of Child Language, 28, 127–152. doi: 10.1017/S0305000900004608
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900004608 [Google Scholar]
  42. Tomasello, M.
    (2000) Do young children have adult syntactic competence?Cognition, 74, 209–253. doi: 10.1016/S0010‑0277(99)00069‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00069-4 [Google Scholar]
  43. Zesiger, P. , Chillier-Zesiger, L. , Arabatzi, M. , Baranzini, L. , Cronel-Ohayon, S. , Franck, J. , Frauenfelder, U. , Hamann, C. , & Rizzi, L.
    (2010) The acquisition of pronouns by French children: A parallel study of production and comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 571–603. doi: 10.1017/S0142716410000147
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716410000147 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/li.40.1.06per
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/li.40.1.06per
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error